Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring Social Cohesion: An Experiment using the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social cohesion is a concept difficult to define and to measure. As there can be many definitions, so there can be many measurements. The main problem, either in defining or measuring the concept, is its multilevel and multidimensional nature. At one extreme, country is the most commonly used level to view social cohesion but measurement at this level is of little use for any interventions. At the other extreme, community is the most useful level but it is a social construct for which data are difficult to get, given the administrative boundaries used in social surveys. As an initial attempt to measure social cohesion at a subcountry level, this study focuses on census metropolitan areas for which data on several dimensions of social cohesion are available. We use the information gathered by the National Survey on Giving, Volunteering and Participating (NSGVP) on three dimensions of social cohesion: political (voting and volunteering), economic (occupation, income, labour force participation) and social (social interactions, informal volunteering). Using statistical techniques including factor analysis and standardization, we create an overall index of social cohesion for each CMA. We point out use of this measure for further analysis of social dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger-Schmidt R. (2000). Social Cohesion as an Aspect of the Quality of Societies: Concept and Measurement. European Union Reporting Working Paper No.14. Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA), Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard P. (1999). Social Cohesion: A Critique. Canadian Policy Research Network, Discussion Paper No.F-09, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeley, R.: 1997, Social Capital and Public Policy Development. New Zealand Minister. As summarized in the Social Capital Database at the World Bank web site

  • Bollen K. A. and Hoyle R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces 69: 479–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckner J.C. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighbourhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology 16: 771–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. and J. Shields: 1999, The Job-poor Recovery: Social Cohesion and the Canadian Labour Market. A Research Report of the Ryerson Social Reporting Network. Ryerson Polytechnic University. Available on the internet at http://www.research.ryerson.ca/~ors/research/job.html

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions: 2000, Indices of Deprivation 2000. Available on the internet at http://www.urban.odpm.gov.uk/research/summaries/03100/index.htm

  • (1998). The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models. Gordon and Bleach Publishers, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E. (1893 (1965)). The Division of Labor in Society. Trans. by George Simpson. The Free Press, New York, 64

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman L.C. (1992). The social concept of “Group”: An empirical test of two models. American Journal of Sociology 98: 152–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F.: 1995, Social capital: The problem of measurement. Available from the World Bank Group at http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/mdf/mdf1/socicap.htm

  • Hirschfield A. and Bowers K.J. (1997). The effects of social cohesion on levels of recorded crime in disadvantaged areas. Urban Studies 34: 1275–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen J. (1998). Mapping Social Cohesion: The State of Canadian Research. Canadian Policy Research Network, Study No.F-03, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns A. and Forrest R. (2000). Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Studies 37: 995–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. and P. Keefer: 1997, ‘Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 1997, 1251–1288

  • Lavis J. and Stoddart G. (1999). Social Cohesion and Health. Working Paper No. 99–09 of Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.: 1996, Social Dimensions of Economic Growth, Eric John Hanson Memorial Lecture Series, Vol. VIII, University of Alberta

  • McCracken M. (1998). Social Cohesion and Macroeconomic Performance. Paper presented at the CSLS Conference on the State of Living Standards and the Quality of Life in Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson J.M. and Smith-Lovin L. (1986). Sex aggregation in voluntary associations. American Sociological Review 51: 61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody J. and White D.R. (2003). Social cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical conception of social groups. American Journal of Sociology 68: 103–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myles, J., G. Picot and W. Pyper: 2000, Neighbourhood inequality in Canadian cities. Paper presented at the Canadian Economics Association Meetings and CERF Conference, June 2000, Vancouver. Paper available from Statistics Canada at http://www.statcan.ca

  • Mudrack P.E. (1989). Defining group cohesiveness: A legacy of confusion. Small Group Behaviour 20: 37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Social Sciences 24: 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell S.A. (1995). Changing Maps: Governing in a World of Rapid Change. Carleton University Press, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett R. (1998). The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. Norton & Co, New York, 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley D. (1997). The Economic Consequences of Social Cohesion. SRFA-302, Heritage Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, D.: 2003, What Do We Know About Social Cohesion: The Research Perspective of the Federal Government’s Social Cohesion Research Network

  • Thomas D. (1999). Indicators of Social Cohesion in Canada. Statistics Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, F.: 1998, Social cohesion and voluntary activities: making connections. Conference on the state of living standards and the quality of life in Canada, Ottawa, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, October 30–31

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Western Ontario, Sociology, Social Science Centre, N6A 5c2, London, Ontario, Canada

    Fernando Rajulton, Zenaida R. Ravanera & Roderic Beaujot

Authors
  1. Fernando Rajulton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zenaida R. Ravanera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roderic Beaujot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Rajulton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajulton, F., Ravanera, Z.R. & Beaujot, R. Measuring Social Cohesion: An Experiment using the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating. Soc Indic Res 80, 461–492 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-0011-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-0011-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation