Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reporting Systems for Sustainability: What Are They Measuring?

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dominance of the neoliberal discourse in the sustainability debate has tended to privilege the economy over environment and social dimensions with implications for what is measured by sustainability monitoring systems. Moreover, systems to measure sustainability, including those influenced by neoliberal discourse, lack robust definitions and fail to address the interrelationship between social, economic and environmental contexts. If sustainability indicators are to help understand the interrelated forces driving change, by providing indications of sustainability, then the indicators should be derived from an epistemologically consistent conceptual framework which encapsulates clearly defined phenomena. The paper discusses whether sustainability indicators in the Australian context are derived from an epistemologically consistent framework. It is argued that the validity of current sustainability reporting systems is contestable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS. (2004). Measures of Australia’s progress. ABS catalogue no. 1370.0. Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia.

  • ABS. (2006). Measures of Australia’s progress. ABS catalogue no. 1370.0. Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia.

  • Beder, S. (1996). The nature of sustainable development (2nd ed.). Australia: Scribe Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method and application. Prepared for the Balaton group. http://www.iisd.org. Accessed 7 Feb 2006.

  • Clapp, J., & Dauvergne, P. (2005). Paths to a green world. London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Government of Australia. (1992). National strategy for ecologically sustainable development. Canberra: Environment Australia. http://www.environment.gov.au/esd/national/nsesd/strategy/intro.html. Accessed 1 Aug 2006.

  • Commonwealth Government of Australia. (2002). Are we sustaining Australia? Report against headline sustainability indicators. Canberra: Environment Australia. http://www.environment.gov.au/esd/national/indicators/index.html#hsi. Accessed 1 Aug 2006.

  • Davidson, K. (2009). Monitoring systems for sustainability: What are they measuring? PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide.

  • Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or survive. Australia: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, C. (2001). Sustainability appraisal for sustainable development: Integrating every thing from jobs to climate change. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(2), 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasson, J., Therival, R., & Chadwickm, A. (1999). Introduction to environmental impact assessment: principles and procedures, process, practice and prospects. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., & Milne, M. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Who’s kidding whom? Centre for social and environmental accounting research discussion and working paper, University of St Andrews. http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk. Accessed 1 Aug 2007.

  • Hacking, T., & Guthrie, P. (2006). Sustainable development objectives in impact assessment: why are they needed and where do they come from? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8(3), 341–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (2003). Growth fetish. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1991). The green economy: environment, sustainable development, and the politics of the future. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2005). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005. KPMG Global Sustainability Services: Amsterdam. Retrieved 20 Dec 2006 from http://www.kpmg.com.au.

  • Lele, S. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), 607–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, G. (2001). The Holy grail of sustainable development: Blueways in Viet Nam and Greenways in Indianapolis. Perspectives, May 2001. Retrieved 14 April 2010 from http://www.indiana.edu/~spea/pubs/perspectives/vol6/index.html.

  • Liodakis, G. (2001). The people-nature relation and the historical significance of the labour theory of value. Capital & Class, 73, 113–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckman, P. (2006). KiwiGrow—a new approach to sustainable development reporting. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 13, 261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh, A., & Wilkinson, D. (2006). Which direction? A review of monitoring & reporting in Australia. Prepared for The Australian Collaboration.

  • Marohasy, J. (2003). How useful are Australia’s official environmental statistics? Review, December 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, I. (2003). Is Australia progressing towards ecologically sustainable development? Environmental Health, 3(1), 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, P. (1996). Contested terrains: politics, stories and discourses of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 5(1), 48–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of ‘triple bottom line’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Environmental performance reviews: UK. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Origin Energy (2008). Sustainability report 2005. http://www.originenergy.com.au/800/Sustainability-reports. Accessed 6 June 2009.

  • Origin Energy. (n.d.) Frequently asked questions—solar electricity (online). http://www.originenergy.com.au/1074/Frequently-asked-questions. Accessed 27 July 2008.

  • Origin Energy. (n.d.). Sustainability—our approach (online). http://www.originenergy.com.au/1731/Our-approach. Accessed 27 July 2008.

  • Pinter, L., Hardi, P., & Bartelmus, P. (2005). Sustainable development indicators: Proposals of the way forward. Retrieved 4 Oct 2007 from http://www.iisd.org.

  • Rosewarne, S. (2007). Towards and ecological political economy. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 50, 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel, D., & Jordon, A. (2009). Joining up or pulling apart? The use of appraisal to coordinate policy making for sustainable development. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1201–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J., Pfahl, S., & Dellar, K. (2002). Towards indicators for institutional sustainability: lessons from an analysis of Agenda 21. Ecological Indicators, 2, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stilwell, F. (2000). Changing track: A new political economic direction for Australia. Sydney: Pluto Press Australia Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. (2004). Measuring sustainable development in the era of globalisation: can it be done and what way ahead? World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 1(2), 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D., Pinter, L., Bregha, F., Volkery, A., & Jacob, K. (2004). Sustainable development: Challenges, approaches and innovation in strategies and coordinated action. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, and Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit, Eschborn.

  • Voisey, H., & O’Riordan, T. (1997). Governing institutions for sustainable development: the United Kingdom’s national level approach. Environmental Politics, 6(1), 24–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment, Development. (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: design and methods. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. C. (2000). The United Kingdom: from political containment to integrated thinking. In W. M. Lafferty & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Implementing sustainable development strategies and initiatives in high consumption societies (pp. 245–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, W. (2005). Comparative case studies. International Negotiation, 10, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Kathryn M. Davidson

Authors
  1. Kathryn M. Davidson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn M. Davidson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davidson, K.M. Reporting Systems for Sustainability: What Are They Measuring?. Soc Indic Res 100, 351–365 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9634-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9634-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation