Skip to main content
Log in

A Theory of Life Satisfaction Dynamics: Stability, Change and Volatility in 25-Year Life Trajectories in Germany

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An adequate theory of life satisfaction (LS) needs to take account of both factors that tend to stabilise LS and those that change it. The most widely accepted theory in the recent past—set-point theory—focussed solely on stability (Brickman and Campbell, in: Appley (ed) Adaptation level theory, Academic Press, New York, pp 287–302, 1971; Lykken and Tellegen in Psychol Sci 7:186–189, 1996). That theory is now regarded as inadequate by most researchers, given that national panel surveys in several Western countries show that substantial minorities of respondents have recorded large, long term changes in LS (Sheldon and Lucas in The stability of happiness, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014). In this paper we set out a preliminary revised theory, based mainly on analysis of the LS trajectories of the 2473 respondents in the German Socio-Economic Panel who reported their LS for 25 consecutive years in 1990–2014. The theory entails three sets of propositions in which we attempt to account for stability, change and also volatility. First, it is proposed that stability is primarily due to stable personality traits, and also to parental influence on LS. The second set of propositions indicates that medium and long term changes are due to differences and changes in personal values/life priorities and behavioural choices. Differences in the priority given to pro-social values, family values and materialistic values affect LS, as do behavioural choices relating to one’s partner, physical exercise, social participation and networks, church attendance, and the balance between work and leisure. Medium term change is reinforced by two-way causation—positive feedback loops—between values, behavioural choices and LS. The third set of propositions breaks new ground in seeking to explain inter-individual differences in the volatility/variability of LS over time; why some individuals display high volatility and others low, even though their mean level of LS may change little over 25 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Many of the findings reported here have been replicated in other large panel studies, notably the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS), the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics Survey Australia (HILDA), and the Victorian Quality of Life Panel Survey (Headey and Wearing 1992). Citations to these surveys are included where appropriate.

  2. Later in the paper we will refer to an individual’s mean LS rating for the entire 1990–2014 period as his/her Grand Mean of LS. An individual’s standard deviation for the entire period is his/her Grand Standard Deviation.

  3. We use the terms ‘pro-social’ and ‘altruistic’ to refer to values which favour behaving cooperatively and helping others. In evolutionary biology altruism is defined as behaviour which involves a loss/cost to the individual concerned, as well as gains to others; we do not imply that here.

  4. No event has been conclusively shown to bring a long term increase in LS. A possible candidate, amusingly, is cosmetic surgery (Frederick and Loewenstein 1999; Wengle 1986).

  5. It is of course accepted that different LS trajectories can have the same Grand Mean and Grand Standard Deviation.

  6. It would have made no sense to classify these individuals according to their Grand Standard Deviations as well as their Grand Means, because their Grand Standard Deviations were in all cases large, simply because of their large upward or downward shifts in the distribution over 25 years.

  7. Ties in 5-year LS scores were broken by adding a uniformly distributed variable with a mean of zero and a tiny deviation to each individual’s score.

  8. Each of these 5 pairs of coefficients are bound to be almost exactly the same because, in the overall analysis, variables for each year appear an approximately equal number of times as year t, t + 1, t-1 etc. There is just a small amount of asymmetry due to the beginning and end years of the 25-year period.

  9. The difference between these two figures is at least partly due to the fact that the mean of LS (and hence the Grand Mean) is a little lower than the median (6.96 versus 6.98 on the 0–10 scale). So, in any given year, a few percentage points more panel members are above their own Grand Mean than below it. Over the entire 25-year period, the same pattern is found. The typical individual recorded a LS rating above his/her own Grand Mean for 14 years, and was at or below it for 11 years.

  10. Mean LS ratings (0–10 scale) for different age groups are: under 20 years 7.54, 20–29 years 7.22, 30–39 years 6.98, 40–49 years 6.77, 50–59 years 6.67, 60–64 years 6.88, 65–69 years 7.04, 70–79 years 6.93, age 80 plus 7.00. The only gender difference is between age 50 and 59: men age 50–54 years 6.68, women age 50–54 years 6.68, men age 55–59 years 6.72, women age 55–59 years 6.64.

  11. \({\text{LS}}_{{{\text{t}} + 6}} = \mathop {4.45}\limits_{ (0.12)} - \mathop {0.30}\limits_{ (0.07)} \,{\text{Disabled}}_{\text{t}} + \mathop {0.42}\limits_{ (0.01)} \,{\text{LS}}_{{{\text{t}} - 4}} - \mathop {0.06}\limits_{ (0.02)} \,{\text{Female}} - \mathop {0.02}\limits_{ (0.00)} \,{\text{Age}} + \mathop {0.03}\limits_{ (0.00)} \,{\text{Age-squared}}.\)

  12. They all have high Grand Standard Deviations, not because of volatility, but because of large long term gains or declines in LS.

  13. The measure here is a simple count of the number of years out of 25 that a person was unemployed.

  14. The coefficient for being partnered is Beta = 0.05 (p < 0.001) in a parallel equation in which LS is the dependent variable and the explanatory variables are the same as in Table 4.

  15. The various age groups recorded the following Grand Standard Deviations: age under 20 1.26, age 20–29 1.14, age 30–39 1.16, age 40–49 1.17, age 50–59 1.19, age 60–69 1.19, age 70–79 1.22, age 80 and over 1.26.

  16. Neither of these groups of researchers regarded themselves as explicitly testing a theory of hedonism. But, in our view, they developed measures and collected data which provide tests.

  17. This particular formulation of positivist theory is due to Robert D. Putnam of Harvard University.

References

  • Aguche, A., & Trommsdorff, G. (2010). Transmission of well-being between mothers, fathers and adolescent children: the role of parenting and personality factors. In 9th international German Socio-Economic Panel Users Conference, June 30–July 1.

  • Alwin, D. F., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. R. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118, F222–F243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influences of extroversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1991). NEO PI-R. Odessa, FL: PAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. (2013). The Bonobo and the Atheist. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health and well-being around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeg, D., & van Zonneveld, R. (1989). Does happiness lengthen life?. In R. Veenhoven (Ed.), How harmful is happiness? (Chap. 5). Rotterdam: Erasmus University Press.

  • Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1253–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An inter-disciplinary perspective (pp. 119–139). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 25, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2005). Building a better theory of well-being. In L. Bruni & P. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 29–64). New York: OUP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, J. R., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2007). Enhancing the power of the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)—Evolution, scope and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127, 139–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. S., & Martin, L. R. (2011). The longevity project: Surprising discoveries health and long life from the landmark eight-decade study. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. S., Tucker, J. S., Schwartz, J. E., Martin, L. R., Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Winegard, D. L., et al. (1995). Childhood conscientiousness and longevity: Health behaviors and cause of death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 696–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification, American Economic Review, 94, 730–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set-point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaerling, T., & Gamble, A. (2012). Influences on current mood of eliciting life-satisfaction judgments. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Hidajat, M., Mayraz, G., Lindenberger, U., Schupp, J., et al. (2010). Late-life decline in well-being across adulthood in Germany, the UK and the US: Something is seriously wrong at the end of life. Psychology and Aging, 25, 477–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gremeaux, V., Gayda, M., Lepers, R., Sosner, P., Juneau, M., & Nigam, A. (2012). Exercise and longevity. Maturitas, 73, 312–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, R., & Cantor, N. (1996). Still participating after all these years: A study of life task participation in later life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1235–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W. (2006). Subjective well-being: Revisions to dynamic equilibrium theory using national panel data and panel regression methods. Social Indicators Research, 79, 369–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W. (2008). Life goals matter to happiness: A revision of set-point theory. Social Indicators Research, 86, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., Hoehne, G., & Wagner, G. G. (2014a). Does religion make you healthier and longer lived? Evidence for Germany. Social Indicators Research, 119, 1335–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., & Muffels, R. J. A. (2015). Towards a theory of medium term life satisfaction: Two-way causation partly explains persistent satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 124(2), 937–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1146-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., & Muffels, R. J. A. (2016). Towards a theory of medium term Life Satisfaction: Similar results for Australia, Britain and Germany. Social Indicators Research (forthcoming).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., Muffels, R. J. A., & Wagner, G. G. (2010a). Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(42), 17922–17926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., Muffels, R. J. A., & Wagner, G. G. (2013). Choices which change life satisfaction: Similar results for Australia, Britain and Germany. Social Indicators Research, 112, 725–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., Muffels, R. J. A., & Wagner, G. G. (2014b). Parents transmit happiness along with associated values and behaviors to their children: A lifelong happiness dividend? Social Indicators Research, 116, 909–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., Muffels, R. J. A., & Wooden, M. (2008). Money does not buy happiness—Or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption. Social Indicators Research, 87, 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., Schupp, J., Tucci, I., & Wagner, G. G. (2010b). Authentic happiness theory supported by impact of religion on life satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis with data for Germany. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., Veenhoven, R., & Wearing, A. J. (1991). Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24, 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., & Wearing, A. J. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Longman Cheshire: Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2016). The distribution of world happiness. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report, 2016 (Chapter 2). New York: United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

  • Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.), World happiness reports (2012–2017). New York: United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

  • Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom and rising happiness: A global perspective 1981–2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 264–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P. (1985). Time, goods and well-being. Ann Arbor: ISR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Riis, J. (2005). Living, and thinking about it: Two perspectives on life. In F. A. Huppert, N. Baylis, & B. Keverne (Eds.), The science of well-being (pp. 285–306). Oxford: O.U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C. E., Mallard, A. G., & Michalos, A. C. (1995). Tests of the causal directions of global-life facet satisfaction relationships. Social Indicators Research, 34, 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (2007). Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being: Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 717–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 171–194). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to change in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis of differences between cognitive and affective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 592–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathison, L., Andersen, M. H., Veenstra, M., Wahl, A. K., Hanestad, B. R., & Fosse, E. (2007). Quality of life can both influence and be an outcome of general health perceptions after heart surgery. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 27. 10.1186/1477-7525-5-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehnert, T., Kraus, H. H., Nadler, R., & Boyd, M. (1990). Correlates of life satisfaction in those with a disabling condition. Rehabilitation Psychology, 35, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Is volunteering rewarding in itself? IZA Discussion Paper No 1045 (March) IZA, Bonn.

  • Myers, D. G. (2013). Religious engagement and well-being. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. Conley Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 88–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagazato, N., Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2011). Effect of changes in living conditions on well-being: A prospective top-down bottom-up model. Social Indicators Research, 100, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, C., Schwarz, N., Diener, E., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Zeroing in on the dark side of the American dream: A closer look at the negative consequences of the goal for financial success. Psychological Science, 14, 531–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1966). Objective knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1969). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherpenzeel, A., & Saris, W. E. (1996). Causal direction in a model of life satisfaction: The top-down/bottom-up controversy. Social Indicators Research, 38, 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Environmental influences on well-being: A dyadic latent panel analysis of spousal similarity. Social Indicators Research, 98, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. B. (2002). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze, J., Andersen, H., & Silke, A. (2000). Self-rated health and changes in self-rated health as predictors of mortality—First evidence from the German panel data. DIW Discussion Paper No. 203, Berlin, DIW.

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Lucas, R. E. (Eds.). (2014). The stability of happiness. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawbridge, W. J., Cohen, R. D., Shema, S. J., & Kaplan, G. A. (1997). Frequent attendance at religious services and mortality over 28 years. American Journal of Public Health, 87(6), 957–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven R. (2009) World database of happiness. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Press. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/. Accessed 20 May 2016.

  • Wengle, H. (1986). The psychology of cosmetic surgery: A critical review of the literature, 1960–1982, Part 1. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 16, 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). Explaining away: A model of affective adaptation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 370–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, R. (2004). Subjective well-being and the family: Results from an ordered probit model with multiple random effects. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1016.

  • Wortman, C. B., & Silver, R. C. (1989). The myths of coping with loss. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Headey.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Age changes in LS

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Headey, B., Muffels, R. A Theory of Life Satisfaction Dynamics: Stability, Change and Volatility in 25-Year Life Trajectories in Germany. Soc Indic Res 140, 837–866 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1785-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1785-z

Keywords

Navigation