Abstract
Subjective well-being is one of the most frequently used indicators in comparative and social indicators research. Although there is a plethora of research examining the associations between levels of subjective well-being and individual factors such as age, gender, education, health, marital status and employment status, less is known about period effects. In this paper, we seek to examine whether levels of subjective well-being of various age cohorts vary across four time points in Australia and Switzerland. We draw on data collected by the Swiss Household Panel and the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia projects between 2001 and 2016 to compare trends within and between these two countries across time. These data allow us to examine the effects of different institutional settings and economic conditions on levels of subjective well-being. Our analysis shows, firstly, for both countries a similar age effect with a nonlinear U-shaped relationship between age and subjective well-being. Secondly, we find consistently lower levels of subjective well-being in Australia for the cohort born between 1961 and 1965 whereas no such period effect could be observed for Switzerland. Thirdly, while marital status, age and being unemployed have similar effects on levels of subjective well-being in both countries, patterns in the effects of other indicators differ. For example, after controlling for sex, age, household income, marital status, employment status and health, education is positively associated with subjective well-being in Switzerland but negatively associated with subjective well-being in Australia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Although the HILDA survey included a deprivation module in 2016, we use data derived from the financial hardship questions that were included in each year i.e. 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2016.
The Swiss Pension system is generally based on two compulsory pension pillars, but individuals have the possibility and are encouraged to save into a 3rd private pension pillar.
The items for Switzerland include items that would not necessarily be perceived as social necessities in Australia. All of the questions in the HILDA survey refer to an inability to pay essential bills.
Given that overall health status is a subjective measure and as such is highly correlated with subjective well-being, another subjective measure, we use a measure of physical impediment. Although this may be biased against older people, we control for age.
References
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). (1971–1977). The labour force. Cat. No. 6203.0. Canberra: Commonwealth Government. Retrieved from www.abs.gov.au.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). (2019). Labour force, Australia Cat. No. 6202.0. Canberra: Commonwealth Government. Retrieved from www.abs.gov.au.
Ambrey, C. L., & Fleming, C. M. (2014). Life satisfaction in Australia: Evidence from ten years of the HILDA survey. Social Indicators Research, 115, 691–714.
Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99, 183–203.
Bell, D. N., & Blanchflower, D. G. (2011). Young people and the great recession. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(2), 241–267.
Biddle, N. (2014). Measuring and analysing the wellbeing of Australia’s Indigenous population. Social Indicators Research, 116, 713–729.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2005). Happiness and the human development index: The paradox of Australia. Australian Economic Review, 38(3), 307–318.
Boreham, P., Povey, J., & Tomaszewski, W. (2013). An alternative measure of social wellbeing: Analysing the key conceptual and statistical components of quality of life. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 151–172.
Brulé, G., & Suter, C. (Eds.). (2019). Wealth(s) and Subjective Well-being. Cham: Springer.
Bühlmann, F., Schmid Botkine, C., Farago, P., Höpflinger, F., Joye, D., Levy, R., et al. (2013). Swiss Social Report 2012: Generations in Perspective. Zurich: Seismo.
Chesters, J. (2019). Does money buy Happiness? Associations between family wealth and levels of wellbeing of young Australians. In G. Brulé, C. Suter (Eds.), Wealth(s) and Subjective Well-being (pp. 183–198). Springer.
Clark, A., Knabe, A., & Ratzel, S. (2010). Boon or bane? Others’ unemployment, well-being and job security. Labour Economics, 17, 52–61.
Clark, A. E. (2019). Born to be mild? Cohort effects don’t (fully) explain why well-being is U-shaped in age. In M. Rojas (Ed.), The economics of happiness (pp. 387–408). Cham: Springer.
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation of the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144.
Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359–381.
D’Ambrosio, C., & Frick, J. R. (2004). Subjective well-being and relative deprivation: an Empirical link. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1351.
Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.
Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.
Fritjers, P., & Beatton, T. (2012). The mystery of the U-shaped relationship between happiness and age. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 82, 525–542.
Fukuda, K. (2013). A happiness study using age-period-cohort framework. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 135–153.
Green, F. (2011). Unpacking the misery multiplier: How employability modifies the impacts of unemployment and job insecurity on life satisfaction and mental health. Journal of Health Economics, 30, 265–276.
Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2013). Choices which change life satisfaction: Similar results for Australia, Britain and Germany. Social Indicators Research, 112, 725–748.
Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wooden, M. (2008). Money does not buy happiness: Or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption. Social Indicators Research, 87, 65–82.
Igleasias, K., Gazareth, P., & Suter, C. (2017). Explaining the decline in subjective well-being over time in panel data. In G. Brulé & F. Maggino (Eds.), Metrics of Subjective Well-Being: Limits and Improvements (pp. 85–105). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Iglesias K., Moussa, J., & Suter, C. (2015). Le bien-être subjectif en Suisse au début de 21e siècle: Evolution et déterminants. Working Paper 4-2015/F, Maison d’analyse des processus sociaux, Université de Neuchâtel. Neuchâtel.
Kahneman, D., & Kreuger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.
Laaksonen, S. (2018). A research note: Happiness by age is more complex than U-shaped. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 471–482.
Manning, M., Ambrey, C. L., & Fleming, C. M. (2016). A longitudinal study of indigenous wellbeing in Australia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2503–2525.
McNamee, P., & Mendolia, S. (2014). The effect of chronic pain on life satisfaction: Evidence from Australian data. Social Science and Medicine, 121, 65–73.
OECD. (2017). How’s life? 2017: Measuring wellbeing. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Oesch, D., & Lipps, O. (2013). Does unemployment hurt less if there is more of it around? A panel analysis of life satisfaction in Germany and Switzerland. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 955–967.
Parker, P. D., Jerrim, J., & Andres, J. (2016). What effect did the global financial crisis have upon youth wellbeing? Evidence from four Australian cohorts. Developmental Psychology, 52(4), 640–651.
Shorrocks, A., Davies, J., & Lluberas, R. (2013). Global wealth report 2013. Zurich: Credit Suisse AG.
Shorrocks, A., Davies, J., & Lluberas, R. (2014). Global wealth report 2014. Zurich: Credit Suisse AG.
Shorrocks, A., Davies, J., & Lluberas, R. (2015). Global wealth report 2015. Zurich: Credit Suisse AG.
Shorrocks, A., Davies, J., Lluberas, R., & Koutsoukis, A. (2016). Global wealth report 2016. Zurich: Credit Suisse AG.
Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Vatter, A. (2012). Does satisfaction with democracy really increase happiness? Direct democracy and individual satisfaction in Switzerland. Political Behavior, 35, 535–559.
StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Summerfield, M., Bevitt, A., Fok, K., Hahn, M., La, N., Macalalad, N., et al. (2018). HILDA user manual: Release 17. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.
Suter, C., & Iglesias, K. (2005). Relative deprivation and well-being: Switzerland in a comparative perspective. In H. P. Kriesi, P. Farago, M. Kohli, & M. Zarin-Nejadan (Eds.), Contemporary Switzerland: Revisiting the Special Case (pp. 9–37). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Suter, C., Iglesias, K., & Moussa, J. (2015). From dissonance to well-being and adaptation? Quality of life in Switzerland over the past decades. In W. Glatzer (Ed.), The Global Handbook of Wellbeing and Quality of Life (pp. 685–714). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Tillman, R., Masia, M., & Budowski, M., et al. (2016). Poverty, precarity, prosperity and wellbeing in Switzerland. In F. Ehrler (Ed.), Swiss social report 2016: Wellbeing (pp. 162–178). Seismo: Zurich.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2019). Human development report 2019. New York: UNDP.
Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37(1), 1–46.
Wernli, B., & Zella, S. (2018). Family trajectories and life satisfaction: The Swiss case. In: R. Tillman, M. Voorpostel, P. Farago (Eds.), Social Dynamics in Swiss Policy. Life Course Research and Social Policies 9 (pp. 61–79).
World Bank. (2019). Indicators: GDP/capita. Retrieved from June 11, 2019, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/.
Yang, Y. (2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 204–226.
Acknowledgements
The paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey and the Swiss Household Panel (SHP). The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (MIAESR). The SHP is based at the Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Science (FORS). The project is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to either DSS, MIAESR, FORS or the SNSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chesters, J., Simona, J. & Suter, C. Cross-National Comparison of Age and Period Effects on Levels of Subjective Well-Being in Australia and Switzerland During Volatile Economic Times (2001–2016). Soc Indic Res 154, 361–391 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02567-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02567-6