Skip to main content
Log in

Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM): Combining Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and System Dynamics (SD)

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM), a systemic methodology product of the combination of two widely used systems-based methodologies from two different systems thinking paradigms, Systems Dynamics (SD) and Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), is presented. The paper argues that by combining some of SD and SSM stages, within the intellectual framework proposed by SSDM, a methodology developed by one of the authors1 much can be gained in a systemic intervention to tackle complex social problematic situations. A framework for comparing the ontological, epistemological and methodological principles of SD, SSM and SSDM is proposed and the synthesizing and dialectical role of SSDM is advanced. The 10 stages of SSDM are outlined and illustrated by an application on a small Peruvian company; and a set of conclusions and points for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Hamid, T., and Madnick, S. E. (1991). Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, D. F., and Richardson, G. P. (1997). Scripts for group model-building. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 13(2), 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocklesby, J., and Cummings, S. (1995). Combining hard, soft, and critical methodologies in systems research: The cultural constraints. Syst. Res. 12(3), 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocklesby, J. (1997). Becoming multimethdology literate: An assessment of the cognitive difficulties of working across paradigms. In Mingers, J., and Gill (eds.), Multimethodology, Wiley, Chichester.

  • Buzan, T., and Buzan, B. (1996). El libro de los mapas mentales: Cómo utilizar al máximo las capacidades de la mente, Ediciones Urano, Barcelona.

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., and Casar, A. (1986). Vicker’s concept of an appreciative system: A systemic account. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 13, 3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1986). Conflicts: A Better Way to Resolve Them, Penguin Books, Middlesex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbecq, A., Van de Ven, A., and Gustafson, D. (1975). Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi, Scott Foresman, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R., and Jackson, M. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. MIT press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1992). Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1997). Pluralism is systems thinking and practice. In Mingers, J., and Gill (eds.), Multimethodology, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1999). Towards coherent pluralism in management science. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 50, 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems Approaches to Management, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2003). System Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. C., and Oliva, R. (1994). The Greater Whole: Towards a Synthesis of the System Dynamics and Soft System Methodology, Working Papers Series, City University Business School, London.

  • Lane, D. (1999). Social theory and system dynamics practice, Eur. J. Operat. Res. 113, 501–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. (2000). Should systems dynamics be described as ‘hard’ or ‘deterministic’ systems approach? Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 17(1).

  • Lane, D. (2001a). Rerum Cognoscere Causas: Part I. How do the ideas of system dynamics relate to traditional social theories and the voluntarism/determinism debate. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 17(2), 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. (2001b). Rerum Cognoscere Causas: Part II. Opportunities generated by the agency/structure debate and suggestions for clarifying the social theoretic position of system dynamics. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 17(4), 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledington, P., et al. (1997). Soft OR and management practice: A study of the adoption of SSM. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 48, 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam, R. D., and Packham, R. G. (1989). A case study in the use of SSM restructuring and academic organisation to facilitate education of systems agriculturists. Agric. Syst. 30(4), 352–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam, R. D., et al. (1990). The use of SSM to improve the adoption by Australian cotton growers of the siratac computer-based crop management system. Agric. Syst. 34(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam, R. D., et al. (1995). A case study in development planning using a systems learning approach—Generating a master plan for the livestock sector in Nepal. Agric. Syst. 49(3), 299–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1997a). Multi-paradigm multimethodology. In Mingers, J. and Gill (eds.), Multimethodology, Wiley, Chichester.

  • Mingers, J. (1997b). Towards critical pluralism. In Mingers, J. and Gill (eds.), Multimethodology, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1984). Subjectivism and soft systems methodology—A critique. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 11, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1999). A comparative characterisation of management sciences methodologies. Systemist 21(2), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., and Brocklesby, J. (1996). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for critical pluralism. Systemist 18(3), 101–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., and Taylor, S. (1992). The use of soft systems methodology in practice. J. Operat. Res. 43(4), 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montbrun, A., and Porras, L. (1998). Informe de Trabajo Grupal, International Workshop in Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM), Lima, April 1998.

  • Munro, I., and Mingers, J. (2002). The use of multimethodology in practice-results of a survey of practitioners. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 53(4), 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft, J. D., and Sterman, J. D. (1994). Modelling for Learning Organizations, Portland Productivity Press.

  • Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, I. (1999). La Organización Creadora de Conocimiento, Oxford University Press, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paucar-Caceres, A. (2002). Mapping the Stages of the Development of Management Sciences Methodologies in the UK: From Single Solving Methods to Multimethodology, UK Systems Society, 7th International Conference on Systems Theory & Practice in the Knowledge Age, 7July 2002, University of York, Plenum Publishers, New York, 2002.

  • Randers, J. (1977). The Potential in Simulation of Macro-Social Processes, Gruppen for Ressusrsstudier, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. P. (1991). Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory, University of Pensylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. P., and Andersen, D. F. (1995). Teamwork in group—Model building. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 11(2), 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. (2001). An Introduction to Systems Thinking, High Performance Systems, Hanover, New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (1988). The problem solving system: Another problem content system. Syst. Practice 1(2), 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (1994a). La Sistémica, los Sistemas Blandos y los Sistemas de Información, Biblioteca de Textos Universitarios, Universidad del Pacífico, Lima.

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (1994b). Casos en Sistemas de Información: La Experiencia Peruana, Biblioteca de Textos Universitarios, Universidad del Pacífico, Lima.

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (1995). Libro de la Conferencia SISTEMICA’94, Instituto Andino de Sistemas, IAS, Lima.

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (1999). Soft System Dynamics Methodology—SSDM: A Tool for Social Systems Analysis and Design, Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the International Systems Sciences Society, ISSS, Asilomar.

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (2002a). Informes Seguridad Ciudadana No. 1 y No. 2, Proyecto Programa de Seguridad Ciudadana, Proyecto BID AR-0247, Unidad de Seguridad Ciudadana, Ministerio del Interior, República Argentina.

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (2002b). The Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM): The Fusion of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and System Dynamics (SD), Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Electromechanics and Systems Engineering, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, IPN, México, DF.

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (2002c). A Dynamic Balanced Scorecard for Sustainable Development of La Libertad Region (Peru) using Soft System Dynamics Methodology—SSDM, Internal Paper, Instituto Andino de Sistemas, IAS, Lima.

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (2003). Soft Systems Methodology. In The Virtual Encyclopedia of Life Support System (EOLSS) (www.eolss.net), UNESCO, París.

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R. A. (in press). Soft System Dynamics Methodology—SSDM: A tool for social systems analysis and design. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci.

  • Rodríguez-Ulloa, R., and Paucar-Caceres, A. (2004). Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM): A Combination of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and System Dynamics (SD), Proceedings of the 22nd International Systems Dynamics Conference, 25–29 July 2004, Oxford, England.

  • Rouwette, B. A. J. A., Vinnex, J. A. M., and Van Mullekom, T. V. (2002). Group model-building effectiveness: A review of assessment studies. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 18(1), 5–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline, The Art and Practice of Learning Organization, Century Business.

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix, J. A. M. (1996). Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix, J. A. M., Akkermans, H. A., and Rouwette, B. J. A. (1996). Group model-building to facilitate organizational change: An exploratory study. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 12(1), 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix, J. A. M., Richardson, G. P., and Andersen, D. F. (1997a). Foreword: Group model building, art and science. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 13(2), 103–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix, J. A. M., Richardson, G. P., and Andersen, D. F. (1997b). Group model-building: Adding more science to the craft. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 13(2), 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix, J. A. M. (1999). Group model-building: Tackling messy problems. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 15(4), 379–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. (2002). Competitive Strategy Dynamics, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (2002). Modelling Complex Projects, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1984). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (2001). Soft Systems Methodology, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltensholme, E. F. (1990). System Enquiry: A System Dynamics Approach, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Paucar-Caceres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodriguez-Ulloa, R., Paucar-Caceres, A. Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM): Combining Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and System Dynamics (SD). Syst Pract Act Res 18, 303–334 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-005-4816-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-005-4816-7

Keywords

Navigation