Abstract
There has been a growing research debate over the relations between university teaching and research. This paper contributes to that debate by describing the variation in the way university academics’ experience research, then linking that empirical evidence with previous work to explicate the relations between variation in research, teaching, and understanding of the subject matter being taught. Previous investigations have shown that conceptual change/student-focussed approaches to teaching are associated with clear articulation of the important aspects of the subject matter being taught, how those aspects relate to each other, and how the teacher situates their understanding of the subject matter in the field as a whole. However, teachers who were unable to explain their understanding of their subject matter in these ways were more likely to experience their teaching as a process of information transfer from a teacher-focussed perspective. Since the characteristics of the first type of understanding subject matter resemble processes underlying the experience of active researchers, these findings seemed to justify a more intensive search for evidence of the link between effective university teaching and research. Interviews have been conducted with 37 university teachers who had strong publication and grant success records and who were teaching and researching in similar topic areas. They represent a range of disciplines and universities, and from both the UK and Australia. The study methods and results are described and we conclude that qualitative variation in the experience of research is related (a) moderately to experience of teaching and (b) strongly to experience of understanding the subject matter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Such a finding does not argue for the separation of teaching and research. If we separated teaching from research based upon this finding and turned all our best researchers into research only, we would lose half of our best teachers.
References
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship revisited: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Brew, A. (1999). Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 291–301.
Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with research. Higher Education, 29, 261–273.
Elton, L. R. B. (2000). Turning academics into teachers: A discourse on love. Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 257–260.
Glassick, C., Huber, M., & Maeroff, G. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507–542.
Jenkins, A., Blackman, T., Lindsay, R., & Paton-Saltzberg, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Student perspectives and policy implications. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 127–142.
Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 603–641.
Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (2000). Introduction to scholarship in teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 19, 133–137.
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.
Neumann, R. (1993). Research and scholarship: Perceptions of senior academic administrators. Higher Education, 25, 97–110.
Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K., & Ramsden, P. (2005). Academics’ experiences of understanding of their subject matter and the relationship of this to their experiences of teaching and learning. Instructional Science, 33, 137–157.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2001). Subject review reports. (http://www.qaa.ac.uk/revreps/subjrev/intro.htm).
Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23, 273–295.
Robertson, J., & Bond, C. (2001). Experiences of the relation between teaching and research: What do academics value? Higher Education Research and Development, 20, 5–19.
Rowland, S. (1996). Relationship between teaching and research. Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 7–20.
Smeby, J. (1998). Knowledge production and knowledge transmission: The interaction between research and teaching at universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 5–20.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.
Acknowledgments
The study described in this paper was supported by funding from the Australian Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K. et al. University academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instr Sci 36, 3–16 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9019-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9019-4