Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many innovative teaching approaches lack classroom impact because teachers consider the proposals impractical. Making a teaching approach practical requires instrumentality (procedures), congruence (local fit), and affordable cost (limited time and resources).This paper concerns a study on the development and effects of a participatory design based teacher training trajectory aimed at making guided discovery learning (GDL) practical for student biology teachers. First, we identified practical heuristics for designing GDL lessons by analyzing design protocols made by biology teachers who are experts in GDL. Next we inventoried student responses to their regular lessons and to GDL based lessons. Based on this we prepared a teacher training program for eleven student biology teachers in which they applied the heuristics and stepwise extended their teaching repertoire in the direction of GDL. The participants’ design processes and resulting lesson plans were scored on both use of design heuristics and GDL characteristics. The participants were interviewed about their motivational beliefs before and after the program. Results showed that student teachers are able to design GDL lessons and used the heuristics to design GDL lessons. Their motivation for implementing GDL in their classroom had increased substantially. The paper concludes with a critical reflection on our method of participatory design and its applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2008). Scaling and testing multiplicative combinations in the expectancy-value model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2222–2247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (vol 7, pp. 548–556). Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 201–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 815–843. doi:10.1002/tea.20171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam, M., Janssen, F. J. J. M., & van Driel, J. H. (2013). Concept-contextonderwijs leren ontwerpen en uitvoeren—een onderwijsvernieuwing praktisch bruikbaar maken voor docenten [How to make concept-context education practical for biology teachers]. Pedagogische Studiën, 90(2), 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., Petis, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Research of Educational Research, 76, 607–651. doi:10.3102/00346543076004607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea?. New York: Simon Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. (1977). The ethic of practicality and teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior. The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. L. (2009). A conception of teaching. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Striking a blow for sanity in theories of rationality. In M. Augier & J. G. March (Eds.), Models of a man: Essays in memory of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 389–409). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C., Duncan, R., & Chinn, C. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107. doi:10.1080/00461520701263368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F. J. J. M. (1999). Ontwerpend leren in het biologieonderwijs. Uitgewerkt en beproefd voor immunologie [Learning by designing in biology education: Exemplified and tested for immunology]. Academisch proefschrift. Utrecht: CD-ß-press.

  • Janssen, F. J. J. M., de Hullu, A. E., & Tigelaar, D. H. (2008). Positive experiences as input for reflection by student teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14, 115–127. doi:10.1080/13540600801965903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F. J. J. M., & Waarlo, A. J. (2010). Learning biology by designing. Journal of Biological Education, 44(2), 87–96. doi:10(1080/00219266).2010.9656199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F. J. J. M., Westbroek, H. B., Doyle, W., & van Driel, J. H. (2013). How to make innovations practical. Teachers College Record, 115(7), 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F. J. J. M., Westbroek, H. B. & Doyle, W. (accepted). The practical turn in teacher education. Designing core practice training sequences. Journal of Teacher Education.

  • Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39, 591–598. doi:10.3102/0013189X10390804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys, C., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Education, 38, 641–654. doi:10.1002/tea.1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005). Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 645–660. doi:10.1348/000709905X43616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). Participatory Instructional redesign by students and teachers in secondary education: Effects on perceptions of instruction. Instructional Science, 39, 737–762. doi:10.1080/00131881003588204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewens, T. (2009). Seven types of adaptationism. Biology and Philosophy, 24, 161–182. doi:10.1007/s10539-008-9145-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P. L., & Klaassen, C. W. J. M. (2004). Didactical structures as an outcome of research on teaching-learning sequences? International Journal of Science Education, 26, 537–554. doi:10.1080/09500690310001614753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macalalag, A.Z. & Duncan, R.G. (2010). Changes in teachers’ ability to design inquiry-based lessons. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (vol. 1), Chicago, IL, (pp. 199–209).

  • Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. L. (2006). Thinking about acting. Logical foundations for rational decision making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–500. doi:10.3102/0034654307310317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., & Quinlan, K. M. (1996). The comparative psychology of school subjects. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 399–422). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, J., & Robertson, T. (2012). Routledge international handbook of participatory design. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J., Reiser, B., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387–431. doi:10.3102/00346543072003387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, A. G. (2007). Design explanations: Determining the constraints on what can be alive. Erkenntnis, 67, 65–80. doi:10.1007/s10670-007-9045-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICLON, Leiden University Graduate School of Teaching, P.O. Box 905, 2300 AX, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Fred J. J. M. Janssen & Jan H. van Driel

  2. Centre for Educational Training, Assessment and Research, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Hanna B. Westbroek

Authors
  1. Fred J. J. M. Janssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanna B. Westbroek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan H. van Driel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred J. J. M. Janssen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janssen, F.J.J.M., Westbroek, H.B. & van Driel, J.H. How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers. Instr Sci 42, 67–90 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9296-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9296-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation