Abstract
Objective
The provision of healthcare itself is associated with abundant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study aims to determine the carbon footprints of peritoneal dialysis (PD) with the different modalities and treatment regimes.
Methods
A total of 68 subjects performed with PD treatment were enrolled in this study. Emissions factors were applied to data that were collected for energy consumption, travel, and procurement.
Results
The carbon footprints generated by the provision of PD treatment for the individual patient were calculated and normalized to a 2-l PD dialysate volume. The fixed emissions were higher in patients who received PD therapy in center than at home, mostly attributing to the consumption of electricity. Conversely, PD treatment performed in center yielded less variable emissions than that of at home, which resulted from reduced constituent percentage of waste disposal and transportation. Collectively, packaging consumption mostly contributed to the total carbon footprints of PD.
Conclusion
This study for the first time demonstrates the delivery of PD is associated with considerable GHG emissions, which is mainly attributed to packaging materials, transportation, electricity, and waste disposal. These results suggest that carbon reduction strategies focusing on packaging consumption in PD treatment are likely to yield the greatest benefits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Ball S, Bell S, Bellamy R et al (2009) Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet 373(9676):1693–1733
Liu X, Zhang Y, Han W, Tang A, Shen J, Cui Z et al (2013) Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494(7438):459–462
Markandya A, Armstrong BG, Hales S, Chiabai A, Criqui P, Mima S et al (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: low-carbon electricity generation. Lancet 374(9706):2006–2015
Baillie J (2012) Surveys show support for green ‘activities’. Health Estate 66(3):17–20
McGain F (2010) Sustainable hospitals? An Australian perspective. Perspect Public Health 130(1):19–20
Agar JW (2013) It is time for “green dialysis”. Hemodial Int 17(4):474–478
Connor A, Lillywhite R, Cooke MW (2011) The carbon footprints of home and in-center maintenance hemodialysis in the United Kingdom. Hemodial Int 15(1):39–51
Agar JW (2012) Personal viewpoint: hemodialysis–water, power, and waste disposal: rethinking our environmental responsibilities. Hemodial Int 16(1):6–10
Jain AK, Blake P, Cordy P, Garg AX (2012) Global trends in rates of peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 23(3):533–544
Sinnakirouchenan R, Holley JL (2011) Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis: risks, benefits, and access issues. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 18(6):428–432
Li PK, Chow KM (2013) Peritoneal dialysis-first policy made successful: perspectives and actions. Am J Kidney Dis 62(5):993–1005
Berger A, Edelsberg J, Inglese GW, Bhattacharyya SK, Oster G (2009) Cost comparison of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease. Am J Manag Care 15(8):509–518
Baboolal K, McEwan P, Sondhi S, Spiewanowski P, Wechowski J, Wilson K (2008) The cost of renal dialysis in a UK setting—a multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23(6):1982–1989
Lee H, Manns B, Taub K, Ghali WA, Dean S, Johnson D et al (2002) Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis 40(3):611–622
BSI (British Standards Institute) (2011) PAS 2050: 2011. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institute, London. http://shop.bsigroup.com/upload/Shop/Download/PAS/PAS2050.pdf
Kyoto protocol reference manual on accounting of emissions and assigned amount. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/08_unfccc_kp_ref_manual.pdf
University of Bath (2009) Inventory of carbon and energy (ICE). http://www.circularecology.com/embodied-energy-and-carbon-footprint-database.html
Yanming J (2011) The provincial power industry carbon emissions situation and trend analysis in China. Electr Power Technol Econ 10(23):56–60
The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) (2012) Guidelines to Defra/DECC’s GHG conversion factors for company reporting. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69554/pb13773-ghg-conversion-factors-2012.pdf
Morris DS, Wright T, Somner JE, Connor A (2013) The carbon footprint of cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 27(4):495–501
Venkatesh R, van Landingham SW, Khodifad AM, Haripriya A, Thiel CL, Ramulu P et al (2016) Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 27(1):82–88
Pollard AS, Taylor TJ, Fleming LE, Stahl-Timmins W, Depledge MH, Osborne NJ (2013) Mainstreaming carbon management in healthcare systems: a bottom-up modeling approach. Environ Sci Technol 47(2):678–686
Connor A, Lillywhite R, Cooke MW (2010) The carbon footprint of a renal service in the United Kingdom. QJM 103(12):965–975
Lim AE, Perkins A, Agar JW (2013) The carbon footprint of an Australian satellite haemodialysis unit. Aust Health Rev 37(3):369–374. doi:10.1071/AH13022
DiConsiglio J (2008) Reprocessing SUDs reduces waste, costs. Mater Manag Health Care 17(9):40–42
Hawkes N (2012) Cutting emissions by drug industry is crucial to reducing NHS’s carbon footprint. BMJ 345:e8243
Simpson M (2008) Reducing NHS carbon footprint: time for a culture change. BMJ 336(7649):848
Woods DL, McAndrew T, Nevadunsky N, Hou JY, Goldberg G, Yi-Shin Kuo D et al (2015) Carbon footprint of robotically-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: a comparison. Int J Med Robot 11(4):406–412
Lee BK, Ellenbecker MJ, Moure-Eraso R (2002) Analyses of the recycling potential of medical plastic wastes. Waste Manag 22(5):461–470
Lenzen M (2008) Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: a review. Energy Convers Manag 49(8):2178–2199
The Revision of China’s Energy and Coal Consumption Data: A preliminary analysis (2015). http://www.theenergycollective.com/hao-tan/2292551/revision-china-s-energy-and-coal-consumption-data-preliminary-analysis
Kenway SJ PA, CookS, Seo S, Inman M, GregoryA (2008) Energy use in the provision and consumption of urban water in Australia and New Zealand. CSIRO: water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship. https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/download?pid=csiro:EP116078&dsid=DS1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, M., Zhou, R., Du, C. et al. The carbon footprints of home and in-center peritoneal dialysis in China. Int Urol Nephrol 49, 337–343 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1418-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1418-5