Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From horticultural plantings into wild populations: movement of pollen and genes in Lobelia cardinalis

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the potential movement of genes from horticultural plantings into conspecific wild populations requires fundamental knowledge of pollen flow distances and of the siring abilities of genetically differentiated pollen types on local plants. We addressed these issues using Lobelia cardinalis, a native, hummingbird-pollinated species, which is available horticulturally both as wild types and cultivated varieties. Potential pollen and gene flow between relatively isolated populations were measured in an artificial array experiment. Potted plants were placed at discrete distances (50, 100, 500, and 1000 m) from either a local or one of three non-local potted pollen sources and scored for pollen and gene flow. Pollen movement was assessed with a dye analogue. The pollen source population did not significantly influence the results, but dye movement, fruit set, and to a lesser degree fruit volume declined with distance from the pollen source. Even at 1 km away from the pollen source, 20–50% of flowers set fruit, indicating substantial gene movement. Siring ability of four non-local pollen types on local plants was assessed by comparing paternity success when each type comprised 75, 50, and 25% of the pollen in controlled mixed load pollinations. Pollen type affected the percentage of non-local offspring. A cultivated variety of L. cardinalis showed poor siring success on the Virginia maternal plants at all mix ratios. Mating was random in mixes with Virginia pollen and pollen from geographically distant wild-type varieties. Finally, pollen from a neighboring county was significantly favored over local sires. These results demonstrate that pollen movement from horticultural plantings into native populations and the production of hybrid seed on native plants is possible in L. cardinalis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam D (2003) Transgenic crop trial’s gene flow turns weeds into wimps. Nature 421:462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arias DM, Rieseberg LH (1994) Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflowers. Theor Appl Genet 89:655–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arriola PE, Ellstrand NC (1996) Crop-to-weed gene flow in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae): spontaneous interspecific hybridization between johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense, and crop sorghum, S. bicolor. Am J Bot 83:1153–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI (1982) The ruby-throated hummingbird and its major food plants: ranges, flowering phenology, and migration. Can J Zool 60:210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden WM (1948) Artificial hybrids of some North American species of Lobelia. Am J Bot 35:789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker JL, Kwack BH (1963) The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Bot 50:859–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Britton NL, Brown A (1970) An illustrated flora of the northern United States and Canada, 2nd edn. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA (2002) Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83:2328–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR (1985) Pollen and gene dispersal: the influences of competition for pollination. Evolution 39:418–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR (1991) Comparing pollen dispersal and gene flow in a natural population. Evolution 45:1965–1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR, Waser NM (1989) Variation in pollen flow within and among populations of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 43:1444–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney SE, Cruzan MB, Arnold ML (1994) Reproductive interactions between hybridizing irises: analyses of pollen-tube growth and fertilization success. Am J Bot 81:1169–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin B (1986) Studies on the female and male reproductive functions with a hermaphroditic species, Lobelia cardinalis. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA

  • Devlin B, Stephenson AG (1984) Factors that influence the duration of the staminate and pistillate phases of Lobelia cardinalis flowers. Bot Gaz 145:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin B, Stephenson AG (1985) Sex differential floral longevity, nectar section, and pollinator foraging in a protandrous species. Am J Bot 72:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz A, Macnair MR (1999) Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progenitor M. guttatus. New Phytol 144:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doebley J (1990) Molecular evidence for gene flow among Zea species. Bioscience 40:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC (1988) Pollen as a vehicle for the escape of engineered genes. Trends Biotechnol 6:S30–S32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC (1992) Gene flow among seed plant populations. New Forests 6:214–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Marshall DL (1985) Interpopulation gene flow by pollen in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. Am Nat 126:606–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:539–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway L F, Etterson JR (2005) Population differentiation and hybrid success in Campanula americana: geography and genome size. J Evol Biol 18:81–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser TP, Jørgensen RB, Østergård H (1997) Preferential exclusion of hybrids in mixed pollinations between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 84:756–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW (1985) Genetics of populations. Jones and Bartlett, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufford KM, Mazer SJ (2003) Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 18:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LMK (1996) The ecotype concept in an applied ecological context: the biology of two native ornamental plant species: Lobelia cardinalis and Rudbeckia hirta. MS Thesis, University of Virginia

  • Johnston MO (1991a) Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Lobelia with different pollinators. Evolution 45:1468–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MO (1991b) Pollen limitation of female reproduction in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Ecology 72:1500–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MO (1992) Effects of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Evolution 46:688–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MO (1993) Tests of two hypotheses concerning pollen competition in a self-compatible, long-styled species (Lobelia cardinalis: Lobeliaceae). Am J Bot 80:1400–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick KJ, Wilson HD (1988) Interspecific gene flow in Cucurbita; C. texana vs. C. pepo. Am J Bot 75:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger T, Arriola PE, Ellstrand NC (1992) Crop-weed hybridization in radish (Raphanus sativus): effects of distance and population size. Am J Bot 79:1431–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger T, Elam DR, Ellstrand NC (1991) Radish as a model system for the study of engineered gene escape rates via crop-weed mating. Cons Biol 5:531–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1993) Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74:2145–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1981) Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann Mo Bot Garden 68:223–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Cheng Z, Smith W, Ellis D, Chen Y, Zheng X, Pei Y,Luo K, Zhao D, Yao Q, Duan H, Li Q (2004) Invasive ornamental plants: problems, challenges, and molecular tools to neutralize their invasiveness. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart YB (1973) Ecological and behavioral determinants of pollen dispersal in hummingbird pollinated Heliconia. Am Nat 107:511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (1991) The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45:622–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay JK, Christian CE, Harrison S, Rice KJ (2005) “How local is local?”—a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Rest Ecol 13:432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL (1975) Gamete competition in plants and animals. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth N (2003) Gene flow might turn wimps into superweeds. Nature 421:785–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy ES, Rice KJ (1997) Local adaptation in two subspecies of an annual plant: implications for migration and gene flow. Evolution 51:1079–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papa R, Gepts P (2003) Asymmetry of gene flow and differential geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica. Theor Appl Genet 106:239–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1981) Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: rule of movement between inflorescences. Anim Behav 29:889–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rademaker MCJ, De Jong TJ (1998) Effects of flower number on estimated pollen transfer in natural populations of three hermaphroditic species: an experiment with fluorescent dye. J Evol Biol 11:623–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raybould AF, Gray AJ (1993) Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J Appl Ecol 30:199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards CM, Church S, McCauley DE (1999) The influence of population size and isolation on gene flow by pollen in Silene alba. Evolution 53:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2003) SAS/STAT version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulke B, Waser NM (2001) Long-distance pollinator flights and pollen dispersal between populations of Delphinium nuttallianum. Oecologia 127:239–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogsmyr I, Lankinen A (1999) Selection on pollen competitive ability in relation to stochastic factors influencing pollen deposition. Evol Ecol Res 1:971–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth CA, Hamrick JL (1987) Realized gene flow via pollen in artificial populations of musk thistle, Carduus nutans L. Evolution 41:613–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA, Palma PM (1997) Commercialization of transgenic plants: potential ecological risks. BioScience 47:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA, Pilson D, Rieseberg LH, Paulsen MJ, Pleskac N, Reagon MR, Wolf DE, Selbo SM (2003) A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecol Appl 13:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song ZP, Lu BR, Zhu YG, Chen JK (2003) Gene flow from cultivated rice to the wild species Oryza rufipogon under experimental field conditions. New Phytol 157:657–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strausbaugh PD, Core EL (1977) Flora of West Virginia, 2nd edn. Seneca Books, Grantsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Price MV, Waser NM, Stratton DA (1986) Comparative studies of pollen and fluorescent dye transport by bumble bees visiting Erythronium grandiflorum. Oecologia 69:561–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1988) Comparative pollen and dye transfer by pollinators of Delphinium nelsonii. Funct Ecol 2:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1982) A comparison of pollen and fluorescent dye carry-over by natural pollinators of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology 63:1168–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CJ, Bawa KS (1983) Pollen dispersal by hummingbirds and butterflies: a comparative study of two lowland tropical plants. Evolution 37:1258–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werth CR (1985) Implementing an isozyme laboratory at a field station. Va J Sci 36:53–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan RJ, Roberts DG, England PR, Ayre DJ (2006) The potential for genetic contamination vs. augmentation by native plants in urban gardens. Biol Conserv 128:493–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitton JD, Wolf E, Arias DM, Snow AA, Rieseberg LH (1997) The persistence of cultivar alleles in wild populations of sunflowers five generations after hybridization. Theor Appl Genet 95:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willi Y, Van Buskirk J (2005) Genomic compatibility occurs over a wide range of parental genetic similarity in an outcrossing plant. Proc R Soc B 272:1333–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson H, Manhart J (1993) Crop/weed gene flow: Chenopodium quinoa Willd. and C. berlandieri Moq. Theor Appl Genet 86:642–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf LL, Hainsworth FR (1991) Hummingbird foraging patterns: visits to clumps of Ipomopsis aggregata inflorescences. Anim Behav 41:803–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded in part by NSF grant DEB-0073316. The authors thank Blandy Experimental Farm and its staff for use of the property; L. Hosticka and W. Crannage, L. Ries, K. Vandecar for invaluable greenhouse, lab, and field assistance; and D. Carr, E. Nagy, D. Roach, D. Taylor, and H. Wilbur for comments on the project and manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Linda M. K. Johnson

    Present address: Department of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Science, Christopher Newport University, 1 University Place, Newport News, VA, 23606, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Virginia, P. O. Box 400328, Charlottesville, VA, 22903-4328, USA

    Linda M. K. Johnson & Laura F. Galloway

Authors
  1. Linda M. K. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura F. Galloway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda M. K. Johnson.

Appendix 1: seed sources and locations

Appendix 1: seed sources and locations

Seeds for Mississippi population

Barbara Bridges

Southern Perennials & Herbs

Tylertown, MS 39667

(latitude 31°06′55″N, longitude 90°08′10″W)

Seeds for Wisconsin population

Little Valley Farm

5673 Snead Creek Road

Spring Green, WI 53588

(latitude 43°10′36″N, longitude 90°04′11″W)

Seeds for CV ‘Queen Victoria’

Thompson and Morgan

PO Box 1308

Jackson, NJ 08527-0308

(cultivated variety)

Seeds for VA2 population

Bentivar

Albemarle County, VA

(latitude 38°06′00″N, longitude 78°25′34″W)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, L.M., Galloway, L.F. From horticultural plantings into wild populations: movement of pollen and genes in Lobelia cardinalis . Plant Ecol 197, 55–67 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9359-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9359-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation