Skip to main content
Log in

Bandwidth Partitioning and SINR Threshold Analysis of Fractional Frequency Reuse in OFDMA Cellular Networks for Real Time and Best Effort Traffic

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To achieve high capacity in cellular networks, frequency reuse factor of unity is used. However, it suffers from heavy co-channel interference at cell edge regions. This leads to poor Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio (SINR) and hence poor performance. fractional frequency reuse (FFR) is one of the methods being considered to improve cell edge performance. In this work we present the impact of SINR threshold and bandwidth partitioning on the successful deployment of FFR scheme. We have considered both real time (RT) and best effort (BE) traffic. In FFR, the total frequency resource is divided logically into cell center and cell edge user bands. However, while frequency resource is partitioned into two segments, the amount of bandwidth required by cell center and cell edge users is quite different and influences the system performance. We developed the semi analytical approach to evaluate the average bandwidth required by cell center and edge band users. From the analysis and simulation results it is seen that while grade of service (GoS) fair based method of choosing bandwidth partitioning ratio is best for RT traffic, while the only feasible method for BE traffic is dividing the bandwidth based on probability of a user to be in a given band which we termed as ‘Probability’ method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Korowajczuk, L. (2011). LTE, WiMAX and WLAN network design, optimization and performance analysis. UK: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. M2135 (2008). Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-advanced. ITU, Technical Report.

  3. Boudreau, G., Panicker, J., Guo, N., Chang, R., Wang, N., & Vrzic, S. (2009). Interference coordination and cancellation for 4G networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(4), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiang, Y., Luo, J., & Hartman, C. (2007). Inter-cell interference mitigation through flexible resource reuse in OFDMA based communication networks. In 13th IEEE European wireless conference, (pp. 1–7).

  5. Lei, H., & Zhang, X. (2007). A novel frequency reuse scheme for multi-cell OFDMA systems. In IEEE vehicular technology conference—fall proceedings (pp. 347–351).

  6. Elayoubi, S.-E., Ben Haddada, O., & Fourestie, B. (2008). Performance evaluation of frequency planning schemes in OFDMA based networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(5), 1623–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qian, M., Hardjawana, W., Li, Y., Vucetic, B., Shi, J., & Yang, X. (2012). Inter-cell interference coordination through adaptive soft frequency reuse in LTE networks. In IEEE Wireless communications and networking conference (pp. 1618–1623).

  8. Chiu, C.-S., & Huang, C.-C. (2009). A hybrid inter-cell interference mitigation scheme for an OFDMA downlink system. IEICE Transactions on, Communication, E93-B(1), 73–81

  9. Xu, Z., Li, G., & Yang, C. (2011). Optimal threshold design for FFR schemes in multi-cell OFDMA networks. In IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 1–5).

  10. Novlan, T., Ganti, R., Ghosh, A., & Andrews, J. (2011). Analytical evaluation of fractional frequency reuse for OFDMA cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(12), 4294–4305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stuber, G. L. (1996). Principles of mobile communications. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Molisch, A. F., Mehta, N. B., Wu, J., & Zhang, J. (2007). Approximating a sum of random variables with a log normal. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(7), 2690–2699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Turkmani, A. M. D. (1992). Probability of error for m-branch macroscopic selection diversity. IEEE Proceedings in Communication Speech Vision, 139, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mogensen, P. et al. (2007). LTE capacity compared to Shannon bound. In IEEE 65th vehicular technology conference—fall proceedings (pp. 1234–1238).

  15. Batabyal, S., & Das, S. (2012). Distance dependent call blocking probability, and area Erlang efficiency of cellular networks. In IEEE 75th vehicular technology conference—spring (pp. 1–5).

  16. Das, S. S., Ghosh, P., & Chandhar, P. (2012). Estimation of effective radio resource usage for VoIP scheduling in OFDMA cellular networks. In IEEE 75th vehicular technology conference, spring (pp. 1–6).

  17. Guerin, R., et al. (1991). Equivalent capacity and its application to bandwidth allocation in high-speed networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas on Communications, 9(7), 968–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghosh, P., Das, S. S., & Chandhar, P. (2012). VoIP scheduling with reduced overhead and radio resource usage estimation-effect on best effort capacity. In IEEE national conference on communications (pp. 1–5).

  19. Karray, M. (2010). Analytical evaluation of QoS in the downlink of OFDMA wireless cellular networks serving streaming and elastic traffic. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(5), 1799–1807.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufman, J. S. (1981). Blocking in a shared resource environment. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 29(10), 1474–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subba Rao Boddu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boddu, S.R., Mukhopadhyay, A., Philip, B.V. et al. Bandwidth Partitioning and SINR Threshold Analysis of Fractional Frequency Reuse in OFDMA Cellular Networks for Real Time and Best Effort Traffic. Wireless Pers Commun 75, 325–347 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-013-1365-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-013-1365-8

Keywords

Navigation