Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The relationship between panoramic radiomorphometric indices and the femoral bone mineral density of edentulous patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the relative efficacy of panoramic radiomorphometric indices in detecting osteoporosis, and optimal thresholds for referral for osteoporosis investigation in edentulous patients.

Methods

Forty-nine edentulous patients, age 41–78 years, were divided into normal and osteopenic/osteoporotic groups according to femoral bone mineral density. Panoramic radiographs were obtained to determine the mandibular cortical index (C1, normal; C2, mild; and C3, severe erosion of mandibular cortex), mental index (cortical thickness in the mental foramen region), and panoramic mandibular index (ratio of thickness of the mandibular cortex to distance between the inferior margin of the mental foramen and the inferior mandibular cortex). Results were compared using a chi-squared test and Student’s t-test.

Results

Categories C1 and C3 were more frequent in the normal and osteopenic/osteoporotic groups, respectively (p = 0.007). The mean mental index and panoramic mandibular index values were significantly lower in the osteopenic/osteoporotic group than in the normal group (p = 0.002 for mental index, p = 0.019 for panoramic mandibular index). The sensitivity and specificity were 71.4% for the mandibular cortical index. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve enabled moderately accurate identification of patients with osteoporosis using the mental index and less accurate identification using the panoramic mandibular index.

Conclusions

The mandibular cortical index and mental index are better than the panoramic mandibular index for identifying patients with osteoporosis. Within the limits of this study, edentulous male or female patients in category C3 with a mental index <3.5 mm should be referred for further osteoporosis investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. von Wowern N. General and oral aspects of osteoporosis: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 2001;5:71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakamoto T, Taguchi A, Ohtsuka M, Suei Y, Fujita M, Tanimoto K, et al. Dental panoramic radiograph as a tool to detect postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: untrained general dental practitioners’ diagnostic performance. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:659–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drozdzowska B, Pluskiewicz W, Tarnawska B. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:361–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee BD, White SC. Age and trabecular features of alveolar bone associated with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Law AN, Bollen AM, Chen SK. Detecting osteoporosis using dental radiographs: a comparison of four methods. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:1734–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Horner K, Devlin H. Clinical bone densitometric study of mandibular atrophy using dental panoramic tomography. J Dent. 1992;20:33–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka K, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Ohtaki M. Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. Width and morphology of inferior cortex of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996;25:263–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishii K, Taguchi A, Nakamoto T, Ohtsuka M, Sutthiprapaporn P, Tsuda M, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of alveolar bone loss of the mandible for identifying postmenopausal women with femoral osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007;36:28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zlataric DK, Celebic A. Clinical bone densitometric evaluation of the mandible in removable denture wearers dependent on the morphology of the mandibular cortex. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:86–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horner K, Devlin H. The relationship between mandibular bone mineral density and panoramic radiographic measurements. J Dent. 1998;26:337–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klemetti E, Kolmakow S, Kroger H. Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res. 1994;102:68–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taguchi A, Tsuda M, Ohtsuka M, Kodama I, Sanada M, Nakamoto T, et al. Use of dental panoramic radiographs in identifying younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:387–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ledgerton D, Horner K, Devlin H, Worthington H. Radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in a British female population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:173–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horner K, Devlin H, Harvey L. Detecting patients with low skeletal bone mass. J Dent. 2002;30:171–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Devlin H, Karayianni K, Mitsea A, Jacobs R, Lindh C, van der Stelt P, et al. Diagnosing osteoporosis by using dental panoramic radiographs: the OSTEODENT project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:821–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991;71:349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Devlin H, Horner K, Ledgerton D. A comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(3):323–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Knezovic-Zlataric D, Celebic A, Lazic B, Baucic I, Komar D, Stipetic Ovcaricek J, et al. Influence of age and gender on radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in removable denture wearers. Coll Anthropol. 2002;26:259–66.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gulsahi A, Yüzügüllü B, İmirzalioglu P, Genç Y. Assessment of panoramic radiomorphometric indices of Turkish patients in different age groups, gender and dental status. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:288–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Horner K, Devlin H. The relationship between two indices of mandibular bone quality and bone mineral density measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998;27:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonen M, Heller G. Analysing receiver operating characteristic curves with SAS. Press series; 2007.

  22. Halling A, Persson GR, Berglund J, Johansson O, Renvert S. Comparison between the Klemetti index and heel DXA BMD measurements in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density in the elderly. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:999–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dutra V, Yang J, Devlin H, Susin C. Radiomorphometric indices and their relation to gender, age, and dental status. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:479–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bras J, van Ooij CP, Abraham-Inpijn L, Kusen GJ, Wilmink JM. Radiographic interpretation of the mandibular angular cortex: a diagnostic tool in metabolic bone loss. Part I. Normal state. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;53:541–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. White SC, Taguchi A, Kao D, Wu S, Service SK, Yoon D, et al. Clinical and panoramic predictors of femur bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:339–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dutra V, Devlin H, Susin C, Yang J, Horner K, Correa Fernandez AR. Mandibular morphological changes in low bone mass edentulous females: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:663–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Devlin H, Horner K. Mandibular radiomorphometric indices in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:373–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Watson EL, Katz RV, Adelezzi R, Gift HC, Dunn SM. The measurement of mandibular cortical bone height in osteoporotic vs. non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women. J Spec Care Dentist. 1995;15:124–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klemetti E, Kolmakow S, Heiskanen P, Vainio P, Lassila V. Panoramic mandibular index and bone mineral densities in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;75:774–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayse Gulsahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gulsahi, A., Özden, Ş., İlker Cebeci, A. et al. The relationship between panoramic radiomorphometric indices and the femoral bone mineral density of edentulous patients. Oral Radiol 25, 47–52 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-009-0015-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-009-0015-z

Keywords

Navigation