Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of CPAP in patients with obstructive apnoea: is the presence of allergic rhinitis relevant?

  • Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Breathing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study is to compare the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the nasal cavities of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and with or without allergic rhinitis (AR/nonAR).

Methods

This paper is a prospective, longitudinal study. Thirty-four consecutive CPAP treatment-adherent patients with OSA (17 AR and 17 nonAR) were evaluated before and 2 months after treatment, by means of clinical (otorhinolaryngological symptoms, daytime sleepiness, overall and rhinoconjunctivitis-specific quality of life), anatomical (otorhinolaryngological examination), functional (auditory function, tubal function, nasal airflow, and mucociliary clearance), and biological variables (nasal cytology). No humidifier or anti-allergy medicines were used during treatment.

Results

Before treatment, patients with AR presented a higher score, compared to nonAR in rhinitis symptoms (4.82 ± 2.53 vs. 0.93 ± 1.02, p = 0.000), otologic symptoms (2.06 ± 1.95 vs. 0.44 ± 0.72, p = 0.004), cutaneous/ocular symptoms (2.12 ± 2.17 vs. 0.65 ± 1.17, p = 0.052), immunoglobulin E (181.82 ± 126.09 vs. 66.13 ± 97.97, p = 0.004), and nasal neutrophils (14.42 ± 31.94 vs. 0.16 ± 0.39, p = 0.031). After treatment, nonAR and AR groups improved in daytime sleepiness (11.53 ± 4.60 vs. 7.53 ± 2.87, p = 0.000 and 13.76 ± 4.93 vs. 7.53 ± 4.41, p = 0.001) respectively and increased nasal neutrophil (0.16 ± 0.39 vs. 5.78 ± 9.43, p = 0.001 and 14.42 ± 31.94 vs. 79.47 ± 202.08, p = 0.035). The symptoms and quality of life improved in patients with AR. NonAR patients, significantly increase nasal dryness (1.65 ± 1.27 vs. 0.00, p = 0.002) and mucociliary clearance times (38.59 ± 24.90 vs. 26.82 ± 23.18, p = 0.016).

Conclusions

CPAP produces inflammation with increased nasal neutrophil levels in AR and nonAR patients. Nevertheless, patients with AR observed an improvement in nasal symptoms and quality of life, whereas in patients without AR, a relevant worsening of nasal dryness and mucociliary transport was observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basner R (2007) Continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 356(17):1751–1758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Catcheside PG (2010). Preditors of continuous positive airway pressure adherence. F1000 medicine reports 2: 70.

  3. Devouassoux G, Lévy P, Rossini E et al (2007) Sleep apnea is associated with bronchial inflammation and continuous positive airway pressure-induced airway hyperresponsiveness. J Allergy Clin Immunol 119(3):597–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weaver TE, Grunstein RR (2008) Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy: the challenge to effective treatment. Proc Am Thorac Soc 5(2):173–178

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauchau V, Durham SR (2004) Prevalence and rate of diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in Europe. Eur Respir J 24:758–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grupo Español de Sueño (2005). Consenso Nacional sobre el síndrome de apneas-hipopneas del sueño. Arch Bronconeumol 41: 3–110.

  7. Vilaseca I, Lehrer-Coriat E, Torres M, Aguilar F, Almendros I, Martínez-Vidal BM, Montserrat JM (2016) Early effects of continuous positive airway pressure in a rodent model of allergic rhinitis. Sleep Med 27-28:25–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lloberes P, Durán-Cantolla J, Martínez-García MA, Marín JM, Ferrer A, Corral J et al (2011) Diagnosis and treatment of sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery. Arch Bronconeumol 47(3):143–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aguilar F, Cisternas A, Montserrat JM, Ávila M, Torres-López M, Iranzo A, Berenguer J, Vilaseca I (2016) Efecto de la presión positiva continua nasal sobre las fosas nasales de pacientes con Síndrome de Apneas del Sueño sin patología nasal previa. Factores predictivos de cumplimiento. Arch Bronconeumol 52:519–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dreborg S, Backma A, Basomba A, Bousquet J, Dieges P, Malling HJ (1989) Skin tests used in type I allergy testing. Allergy 44:1–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johns MW (1993) Daytime sleepiness, snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. The Epworth Sleepniness Scale. Chest 103(1):30–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vilagut G, Ferrer M, Rajmil M, Rebollo P, Permanyer-Miralda G, Quintana JM et al (2005) El cuestionario de salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos. Gac Sanit 19(2):135–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Juniper EF, Thompson AK, Ferrie PJ, Roberts JN (1999) Validation of a standardised version of the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire. J allergy Clin Immunol 104(2pt1):364–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart MG, Witsell DI, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueti B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surg 130(2):157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rasp G, Kramer MF, Ostertag P, Kastenbauer E (2000) A new system for the classification of ethmoid polyposis. Effect of combined local and systemic steroid therapy. Laryngorhinootologie 79(5):266–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rasp G (2002) Eosinophil inflammation of the nasal mucosa. Laryngorhinootologie 81(7):491–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fabra Llopis JM (1990) Rinomanometría anterior activa informatizada: criterios de normalidad y fiabilidad de la prueba. Doctoral Thesis. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andersen IB, Camner P, Jensen PL, Philipson K, Proctor DF (1974) A comparison of nasal and tracheobroncuial clearance. Arch Environ Health 29(5):290–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Portmann M, Portmann C (1979). Audiometría Clínica. Barcelona: Toray-Masson (3rd edition).

  20. Skoczinski S, Ograbek-Król M, Tazbirek M, Semik-Orzech A, Pierzehala W (2008) Short-term CPAP treatment induces a mild increase in inflammatory cells in patients with sleep apnea syndrome. Rhinology 46(2):144–150

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gelardi M, Carbonara G, Maffezzoni E, Marvisi M, Quaranta N, Ferri R (2012) Regular CPAP utilization reduces nasal inflammation assessed by nasal cytology in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep Med 13(7):859–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pawankar R, Hayashi M, Yamanishi S, Igarashi T (2015) The paradigm of cytokine networks in allergic airway inflammation. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 15(1):41–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martinez B, Farré R, Montserrat JM, Torres M, Almendros I, Aguilar F et al (2010) Effects of heated humidification on nasal inflammation in a CPAP rat model. Sleep Med 11(4):413–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lacedonia D, Salerno FG, Carpagnano GE, Sabato R, Depalo A, Foschino-Barbaro MP (2011) Effects of CPAP-therapy on bronchial and nasal inflammation in patients affected of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Rhinology 49(2):232–237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bossi R, Piatti G, Roma E, Ambrosetti U (2004) Effects of long-term nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy on morphology, function, and mucociliary clearance of nasal epithelium in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Laryngoscope 114(8):1431–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saka C, Vuralkan E, Fırat IH, Alicura S, Hücümenoğlu S, Akın I et al (2012) The effects of CPAP treatment on nasal mucosa in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(9):2065–2067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Maite Carrión, Ainhoa Asensio, and Carmen León for their help carrying out this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Aguilar.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded under Grant FISS PI07/0318. The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cisternas, A., Aguilar, F., Montserrat, J.M. et al. Effects of CPAP in patients with obstructive apnoea: is the presence of allergic rhinitis relevant?. Sleep Breath 21, 893–900 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1510-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1510-9

Keywords

Navigation