Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of substrate removal kinetics for UASB reactors treating chlorinated ethanes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Lack of focus on the treatment of wastewaters bearing potentially hazardous pollutants like 1,1,2 trichloroethane and 1,1,2,2 tetrachloroethane in anaerobic reactors has provided an impetus to undertake this study. The objective of this exercise was to quantify the behavior of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors and predict their performance based on the overall organic substrate removal.

Methods

The reactors (wastewater-bearing TCA (R2), and wastewater-bearing TeCA (R3)) were operated at different hydraulic retention times (HRTs), i.e., 36, 30, 24, 18, and 12 h corresponding to food-to-mass ratios varying in the range of 0.2–0.7 mg chemical oxygen demand (COD) mg−1 volatile suspended solids day−1. The process kinetics of substrate utilization was evaluated on the basis of experimental results, by applying three mathematical models namely first order, Grau second order, and Michaelis-Menten type kinetics.

Results

The results showed that the lowering of HRT below 24 h resulted in reduced COD removal efficiencies and higher effluent pollutant concentrations in the reactors. The Grau second-order model was successfully applied to obtain the substrate utilization kinetics with high value of R 2 (>0.95). The Grau second-order substrate removal constant (K 2) was calculated as 1.12 and 7.53 day−1 for reactors R2 and R3, respectively.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the suitability of Grau second-order kinetic model over other models, for predicting the performance of reactors R2 and R3, in treating wastewaters containing chlorinated ethanes under different organic and hydraulic loading conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health Association (APHA) (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. APHA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Atuanya EI, Chakrabarti T (2004) Kinetics of biotransformation of 2,4-dichlorophenol using UASB-reactor. Environ Monit Assess 96(1–3):129–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boucquey JB, Renard P, Amerlynck P, Modesto FP, Agathos SN, Naveau H, Nyns EJ (1995) High-rate continuous biodegradation of concentrated chlorinated aliphatics by a durable enrichment of methanogenic origin under carrier-dependent conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng 47(3):298–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer EJ, McCarty PL (1983) Transformations of 1-carbon and 2-carbon halogenated aliphatic organic compounds under methanogenic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 45(4):1286–1294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buyukkamaci N, Filibeli A (2002) Determination of kinetic constant of an anaerobic hybrid reactor. Process Biochem 38(1):73–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Central Pollution Control Board (2007) Comprehensive Industry Document on Electroplating Industries (COINDS/70/2007). Comprehensive Industry Documents Series (COINDS). Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Puhakka JA, Ferguson JF (1996) Transformations of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane under methanogenic conditions. Environ Sci Technol 30(2):542–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chui HK, Fang HHP, Li YY (1994) Removal of formate from wastewater by anaerobic process. J Environ Eng 120(5):1308–1320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Wildeman S, Nollet H, van Langenhove H, Verstraete W (2001) Reductive biodegradation of 1,2-dichloroethane by methanogenic granular sludge in lab-scale UASB reactors. Adv Environ Res 6(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathepure BZ, Boyd SA (1988) Dependence of tetrachloroethylene dechlorination on methanogenic substrate consumption by Methanosarcina sp. strain DCM. Appl Environ Microbiol 54(12):2976–2980

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fathepure BZ, Tiedje JM (1994) Reductive dechlorination of tetrachloroethylene by a chlorobenzoate-enriched biofilm reactor. Environ Sci Technol 28(4):746–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson JF, Pietari JMH (2000) Anaerobic transformations and bioremediation of chlorinated solvents. Environ Pollut 107(2):209–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Field JA, Sierra-Alvarez R (2004) Biodegradability of chlorinated solvents and related chlorinated aliphatic compounds. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 3(3):185–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gantzer CJ, Wackett LP (1991) Reductive dechlorination catalyzed by bacterial transition-metal coenzymes. Environ Sci Technol 25(4):715–722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gavala HN, Lyberatos G (2001) Influence of anaerobic culture acclimation on the degradation kinetics of various substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng 74(3):181–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghangrekar MM (2006) Performance and correlation of sludge age and efficiency of UASB reactor during step increase in loading rates. J Inst Eng Environ Eng Div 87:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau P, Dohanyas M, Chudoba J (1975) Kinetic of multicomponent substrate removal by activated sludge. Water Res 9(7):637–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliger C, Schraa G, Stupperich E, Stams AJM, Zehnder AJB (1992) Evidence for the involvement of Corrinoids and Factor F430 in the reductive dechlorination of 1,2-dichloroethane by Methanosarcina barkeri. J Bacteriol 174(13):4427–4434

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isik M, Sponza DT (2005) Substrate removal kinetics in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor decolorising simulated textile wastewater. Process Biochem 40(3–4):1189–1198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lettinga G (1995) Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 67(1):3–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loffler FE, Champine JE, Ritalahti KM, Sprague SJ, Tiedje JM (1997) Complete reductive dechlorination of 1,2-dichloropropane by anaerobic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(7):2870–2875

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorah MM, Voytek MA (2004) Degradation of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane and accumulation of vinyl chloride in wetland sediment microcosms and in situ porewater: biogeochemical controls and associations with microbial communities. J Contam Hydrol 70(1–2):117–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete M, Rodríguez N, Amils R, Sanz JL (1999) Effect of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloro-ethane on the performance of upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactors. Water Sci Technol 40(8):153–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ning Z, Kennedy KJ, Fernandes L (1997) Anaerobic degradation kinetics of 2,4 dichlorophenol (DCP) with linear sorption. Water Sci Technol 35(2–3):67–75

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlostathis SG, Giraldo-Gomez E (1991) Kinetics of anaerobic treatment. Water Sci Technol 24(8):35–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash SM, Gupta SK (2000) Effect of carbon source on PCE dehalogenation. J Environ Eng 126(7):622–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Razo-Flores E, Luijten M, Donlon BA, Lettinga G, Field JA (1997) Biodegradation of selected azo dye under methanogenic conditions. Water Sci Technol 36(6–7):65–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sponza DT (2001) Anaerobic granule formation and tetrachloroethylene (TCE) removal in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Enzym Microb Tech 29(6–7):417–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sponza DT (2002) Simultaneous granulation, biomass retainment and carbon tetrachloride (CT) removal in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Process Biochem 37(10):1091–1101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sponza DT, Uluköy A (2008) Kinetic of carbonaceous substrate in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating 2, 4 dichlorophenol (2, 4 DCP). J Environ Manage 86(1):121–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ubay E (1994) Anaerobic treatment of municipal wastewater. Dissertation, Faculty of Science, Istanbul Technical University (Cited in Işik and Sponza 2005)

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2009). National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology (4304T)

  • van Eekert MHA, Stams AJM, Field JA, Schraa G (1999) Gratuitous dechlorination of chloroethanes by methanogenic granular sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51(1):46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, 400076, India

    Debolina Basu & Shyam R. Asolekar

Authors
  1. Debolina Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shyam R. Asolekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debolina Basu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hailong Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basu, D., Asolekar, S.R. Evaluation of substrate removal kinetics for UASB reactors treating chlorinated ethanes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19, 2419–2427 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0754-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0754-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation