Skip to main content
Log in

The dissipation of three fungicides in a biobed organic substrate and their impact on the structure and activity of the microbial community

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biopurification systems (BPS) have been introduced to minimise the risk for point source contamination of natural water resources by pesticides. Their depuration efficiency relies mostly on the high biodegradation of their packing substrate (biomixture). Despite that, little is known regarding the interactions between biomixture microflora and pesticides, especially fungicides which are expected to have a higher impact on the microbial community. This study reports the dissipation of the fungicides azoxystrobin (AZX), fludioxonil (FL) and penconazole (PC), commonly used in vineyards, in a biomixture composed of pruning residues and straw used in vineyard BPS. The impact of fungicides on the microbial community was also studied via microbial biomass carbon, basal respiration and phospholipid fatty acid analysis. AZX dissipated faster (t 1/2 = 30.1 days) than PC (t 1/2 = 99.0 days) and FL (t 1/2 = 115.5 days). Fungicides differently affected the microbial community. PC showed the highest adverse effect on both the size and the activity of the biomixture microflora. A significant change in the structure of the microbial community was noted for PC and FL, and it was attributed to a rapid inhibition of the fungal fraction while bacteria showed a delayed response which was attributed to indirect effects by the late proliferation of fungi. All effects observed were transitory and a full recovery of microbial indices was observed 60 days post-application. Overall, no clear link between pesticide persistence and microbial responses was observed stressing the complex nature of interactions between pesticides in microflora in BPS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adetutu EM, Ball AS, Osborn AM (2008) Azoxystrobin and soil interactions: degradation and impact on soil bacterial and fungal communities. J Appl Microbiol 105:1777–1790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bending GD, Rodriguez-Cruz MS, Lincoln SD (2007) Fungicide impacts on microbial communities in soils with contrasting management histories. Chemosphere 69:82–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brinch UC, Ekelund F, Jacobsen CS (2002) Method of spiking soil samples with organic compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1808–1816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo MP, Torstensson L (2007) Effect of biobed composition, moisture and temperature on the degradation of pesticides. J Agric Food Chem 55:5725–5733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo MP, Torstensson L, Stenstrom J (2008) Biobeds for environmental protection from pesticide use—a review. J Agric Food Chem 56:6206–6219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola L, Castillo MP, Monaci E, Vischetti C (2007) Adaptation of the biobed composition for chlorpyrifos degradation to southern Europe conditions. J Agric Food Chem 55:396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola L, Castillo MP, Vischetti C (2011a) Degradation of isoproturon and bentazone in peat-and compost-based biomixtures. Pest Manag Sci 67:107–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola L, Comitini F, Casucci C, Milanovic V, Monaci E, Marinozzi M, Taccari M, Ciani M, Vischetti C (2011b) Fungicides degradation in an organic biomixture: impact on microbial diversity. New Biotechnol 29:99–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde T, Spanoghe P, Debaer C, Ryckeboer J, Springael D, Jaeken P (2007) Overview of on-farm bioremediation systems to reduce the occurrence of point source contamination. Pest Manag Sci 63:111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumontet S, Mathur SP (1989) Evaluation of respiration-based methods for measuring microbial biomass in metal-contaminated acidic mineral and organic soils. Soil Biol Biochem 21:431–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Agency (2008) Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance penconazole. EFSA Scientific Report 175:1–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Federle TW (1986) Microbial distribution in soil—new techniques. In: Megusar F, Gantar M (eds) Perspectives in microbial ecology. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Microbial Ecology, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Slovene Society for Microbiology, pp. 493–498

  • Findlay RH (2004) Determination of microbial community structure using phospholipids fatty acid profiles. Molecular microbial ecology manual, second edition 4.08. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 983–1004

  • FOOTPRINT (2012) The FOOTPRINT pesticide properties database. University of Hertfordshire as part of the EU-funded FOOTPRINT project (FP6-SSP-022704). 2006. Available at: http://430sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/footprint/. Accessed 1 April 2011

  • Helweg A, Bay H, Hansen HPB, Rabolle M, Sonnenborg A, Stenvang L (2002) Pollution at and below sites used for mixing and loading of pesticides. Int J Environ Anal Chem 82:583–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karanasios E, Tsiropoulos NG, Karpouzas DG, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U (2010a) Novel biomixtures based on local Mediterranean ligninocellulosic materials: evaluation for use in biobed systems. Chemosphere 80:914–921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karanasios E, Tsiropoulos NG, Karpouzas DG, Ehaliotis C (2010b) Degradation and adsorption of pesticides in compost-based biomixtures as potential substrates for biobeds in south Europe. J Agric Food Chem 58:9147–9156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karanasios E, Karpouzas DG, Tsiropoulos NG (2012) Key parameters and pesticide practices controlling pesticide degradation efficiency of biobed substrates. J Environ Sci Health B 47:589–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karpouzas DG, Walker A (2000) Factors influencing the ability of Pseudomonas putida epI to degrade ethoprophos in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 2000(32):1753–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur A, Chaudhary A, Kaur A, Choudhary R, Kaushik R (2005) Phospholipid fatty acid—a bioindicator of environment monitoring and assessment in soil ecosystem. Curr Sci 89:1103–1112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kravariti K, Tsiropoulos N, Karpouzas DG (2010) Terbuthylazine and chlorpyrifos fate in various biomix substrates originated from composted cotton crop residues. Pest Manag Sci 2010(66):1122–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macalady JL, Fuller ME, Scow KM (1988) Effect of metham sodium fumigation on soil microbial activity and community structure. J Environ Qual 27:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Leoz B, Ruiz-Romera E, Antigüedad I, Garbisu C (2011) Tebuconazole application decreases soil microbial biomass and activity. Soil Biol Biochem 43:2176–2183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Grego S, Ceccanti B (1990) Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. In: Bollag JM, Stotzky G (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol. 6. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 293–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Puglisi E, Vasileiadis S, Demiris C, Bassi D, Karpouzas DG, Capri E, Cocconceli PS, Trevisan M (2012) Fungicides impact on the diversity and function of non-target ammonia oxidizing microorganisms residing in a litter soil cover. Microb Ecol (in press)

  • Ramwell CT, Johnson PD, Boxall ABA, Rimmer DA (2004) Pesticide residues on the external surfaces of field crop sprayers: environmental impact. Pest Manag Sci 60:795–802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP, West AW (1988) A direct extraction method to estimate soil microbial C. Calibration in situ using microbial respiration and 14C labelled cells. Soil Biol Biochem 20:337–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spyrou IM, Karpouzas DG, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U (2009) Do botanical pesticides alter the structure of the soil microbial community. Microb Ecol 58:715–727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torstensson L (2000) Experiences of biobeds in practical use in Sweden. Pestic Outlook 11:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torstensson L, Castillo MP (1997) Use of biobeds in Sweden to minimize environmental spillages from agricultural spraying equipment. Pestic Outlook 8:24–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (1997). Pesticide fact sheet: azoxystrobin. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/factsheets/azoxystr.pdf

  • Vischetti C, Monaci E, Cardinali A, Casucci C, Perucci P (2008) The effect of initial concentration, co-application and repeated applications on pesticide degradation in a biobed mixture. Chemosphere 72:1739–1743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vischetti C, Monaci E, Coppola L, Marinozzi M, Casucci C (2011) Evaluation of BiomassBed system in bio-cleaning water contaminated by fungicides applied in vineyard. Int J Environ An Ch. doi:10.1080/03067319.2011.609934

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White PM, Potter TL, Culbreath AK (2010) Fungicide dissipation and impact on metolachlor aerobic soil degradation and soil microbial dynamics. Sci Total Environ 408:1393–1402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Costantino Vischetti.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Robert Duran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marinozzi, M., Coppola, L., Monaci, E. et al. The dissipation of three fungicides in a biobed organic substrate and their impact on the structure and activity of the microbial community. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 2546–2555 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1165-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1165-9

Keywords

Navigation