Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Occurrence, removal, and fate of progestogens, androgens, estrogens, and phenols in six sewage treatment plants around Dianchi Lake in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence and behavior of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in sewage treatment plants (STPs), especially estrogens and phenols, have been closely concerned in previous studies. However, the systematical researches about progestogens and androgens were scarce in STPs adopting different treatment technologies. This work investigated the occurrence, removal, and fate of one progestogen, three androgens, four estrogens, and six phenols in six STPs around Dianchi Lake in China, where the influents, effluents of primary treatment, secondary treatment, and advanced treatment, as well as excess sludge samples, were analyzed. All of the above EDCs were detected out in influents of the six STPs. Bisphenol A, nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate, and nonylphenol-diethoxylate were the dominant EDCs detected in those influent samples with the concentrations that varied from 637.6 to 1,684.0 ng/L, 633.8 to 1,540.0 ng/L, and 648.7 to 2,246.0 ng/L, respectively; E1 and dihydrotestosterone were the major steroids with the mean concentration of 126.8 and 277.4 ng/L. For effluents and sludges, phenols showed higher concentration (366.8–1,233.0 ng/L and 1,478.1–6,948.9 ng/g dry weight (dw)) and detection rate (100 %). The total removal rates were more than 80 % for most compounds in wastewater treatment processes, and high removal efficiency (86–100 %) was found for androgens and progestogens compared with estrogens (75–92 %) and phenols (62–85 %). The secondary treatment processes play significant roles on degrading EDCs, whereas the primary sedimentation has little effects. The treatment capacity of anoxic-anaerobic-anoxic membrane bioreactor and anaerobic/anoxic/oxic technologies was superior to the conventional oxidation ditch in the degradation of EDCs. The advanced treatment process, two units of filter (D-type or V-type), and ultraviolet disinfection were adopted and presented effective to remove these compounds. According to fate analysis, it was obvious that biological degradation was the main pathway on the removal of EDCs in STPs compared with adsorption. Risk quotients were calculated to assess ecological risks of those EDCs. Risk quotients of 54 and 61 % were more than 1 in effluents and sludges, respectively, showing potential hazard of effluents and sludges to the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen H, Siegrist H (2003) Fate of estrogens in a municipal sewage treatment plant. Environ Sci Technol 37(18):4021–4026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arditsoglou A, Voutsa D (2008) Determination of phenolic and steroid endocrine disrupting compounds in environmental matrices. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15(3):228–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braga O, Smythe GA, Schafer Feitz AJ (2005) Fate of steroid estrogens in Australian inland and coastal wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 39:3351–3358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell DJ, Mastrocco F, Anderson PD, Länge R, Sumpter JP (2012) Predicted-no-effect concentrations for the steroid estrogens estrone, 17beta-estradiol, estriol, and 17alpha-ethinylestradiol. Environ Toxicol Chem 31(6):1396–1406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Wu S, Hu J, Asami M, Kunikane S (2008) Trace analysis of androgens and progestogens in environmental waters by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1195(1–2):44–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Wan Y, Wu SM, Fan ZL, Hu JY (2011) Occurrence of androgens and progestogens in wastewater treatment plants and receiving river waters: comparison to estrogens. Water Res 45(2):732–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clara M, Kreuzinger N, Strenn B, Gans O, Kroiss H (2005) The solids retention time: a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants. Water Res 39(1):97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clara M, Scharf S, Scheffknecht C, Gans O (2007) Occurrence of selected surfactants in untreated and treated sewage. Water Res 41:4339–4348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duong CN, Ra JS, Cho J, Kim SD, Choi HK, Park JH, Kim KW, Inam E, Kim SD (2010) Estrogenic chemicals and estrogenicity in river waters of South Korea and seven Asian countries. Chemosphere 78(3):286–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada-Arriaga EB, Mijaylova PN (2011) Influence of operational parameters (sludge retention time and hydraulic residence time) on the removal of estrogens by membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18(7):1121–1128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan ZL, Wu SM, Chang H, Hu JY (2011) Behaviors of glucocorticoids, androgens and progestogens in a municipal sewage treatment plant: comparison to estrogens. Environ Sci Technol 45(7):2725–2733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner K, Kooijman C, Scheringer M, Hungerbühler K (2002) Including transformation products into the risk assessment for chemicals: the case of nonylphenol ethoxylate usage in Switzerland. Environ Sci Technol 36:1147–1154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez MP, Ikonomou MG, Buchanan I (2007) An assessment of estrogenic organic contaminants in Canadian wastewaters. Sci Total Environ 373(1):250–269

  • Fine DD, Breidenbach GP, Price TL, Hutchins SR (2003) Quantitation of estrogens in ground water and swine lagoon samples using solid-phase extraction, pentafluorobenzyl/trimethylsilyl derivatizations and gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1017:167–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harries JE, Sheahan DA, Jobling S, Matthiessen P, Neall P (1997) Estrogenic activity in five United Kingdom rivers detected by measurement of vitellogenesis in caged male trout. Environ Toxicol Chem 16(3):534–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heidler J, Heidler RU (2007) Mass balance assessment of triclosan removal during conventional sewage treatment. Chemosphere 66(2):362–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Pan XJ, Wan X, Liu JL, Zhao SM, Hu P, Li FR (2011) Simultaneous determination of steroid environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals in water by solid phase extraction-derivatization-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Chin J Anal Chem 39(4):449–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Wang B, Ren D, Jin W, Liu JL, Peng JH, Pan XJ (2013) Occurrence, removal and bioaccumulation of steroid estrogens in Dianchi Lake catchment, China. Environ Int 59:262–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin W, Huang B, Wang B, Wang DW, Zhao SM, Pan XJ (2013) Simultaneous determination of androgens and progestogen in surface water and sediment by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Chin J Anal Chem 41(2):205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AC, Sumpter J (2001) Removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in activated sludge treatment works. Environ Sci Technol 35:4697–4703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AC, Aerni HR, Gerritsen A, Gibert M, Giger W, Hylland K, Jürgens M, Nakari T, Pickering A, Suter MJ-F, Svenson A, Wettstein FE (2005) Comparing steroid estrogen, and nonylphenol content across arange of European sewage plants with different treatment and management practices. Water Res 39:47–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joss A, Andersen H, Ternes T, Richle PR, Siegrist H (2004) Removal of estrogens in municipal wastewater treatment under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: consequences for plant optimization. Environ Sci Technol 38:3047–3055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karickhoff SW (1981) Semi-empirical estimation of sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments and soils. Chemosphere 10(8):833–846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SD, Cho J, Kim IS, Vanderford BJ, Snyder SA (2007) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in South Korean surface, drinking, and waste waters. Water Res 41:1013–1021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koh YK, Chiu TY, Boobis AR, Scrimshaw MD, Bagnall JP, Soares A, Pollard S, Cartmell E, Lester JN (2009) Influence of operating parameters on the biodegradation of steroid estrogens and nonylphenolic compounds during biological wastewater treatment processes. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6646–6654

  • Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LB, Buxton HT (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202–1211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legler J, Zeinstra LM, Schuitemaker F, Lanser PH, Bogerd J, Brouwer A, DickVethaak A, Voogt PD, Murk AJ, van der Burg B (2002) Comparison of in vivo and in vitro reporter gene assays for short-term screening of estrogenic activity. Environ Sci Technol 36:4410–4415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BL, Tokai A, Nakanishi J (2005) Approaches for establishing predicted-no-effect concentrations for population-level ecological risk assessment in the context of chemical substances management. Environ Sci Technol 39:4833–4840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZH, Kanjo Y, Mizutani S (2009a) Removal mechanisms for endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in wastewater treatment-physical means, biodegradation, and chemical advanced oxidation: a review. Sci Total Environ 407(2):731–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZH, Kanjo Y, Mizutani S (2009b) Urinary excretion rates of natural estrogens and androgens from humans, and their occurrence and fate in the environment: a review. Sci Total Environ 407(18):4975–4985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JL, Wang RM, Huang B, Lin C, Wang Y, Pan XJ (2011) Distribution and bioaccumulation of steroidal and phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in wild fish species from Dianchi Lake, China. Environ Pollut 159(10):2815–2822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JL, Wang RM, Huang B, Lin C, Zhou JL, Pan XJ (2012a) Biological effects and bioaccumulation of steroidal and phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in high-back crucian carp exposed to wastewater treatment plant effluents. Environ Pollut 162:325–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Ying GG, Zhao JL, Zhou LJ, Yang B, Chen ZF, Lai HJ (2012b) Occurrence and fate of androgens, estrogens, glucocorticoids and progestagens in two different types of municipal wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Monit 14:482–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loos R, Hanke G, Umlauf G, Eisenreich SJ (2007) LC-MS-MS analysis and occurrence of octyl- and nonylphenol, their ethoxylates and their carboxylates in Belgian and Italian textile industry, waste water treatment plant effluents and surface waters. Chemosphere 66(4):690–699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mills LJ, Chichester C (2005) Review of evidence: are endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the aquatic environment impacting fish populations? Sci Total Environ 343:1–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakada N, Tanishima T, Shinohara H, Kiri K, Takada H (2006) Pharmaceutical chemicals and endocrine disrupters in municipal wastewater in Tokyo and their removal during activated sludge treatment. Water Res 40(17):3297–3303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nie YF, Qiang ZM, Zhang HQ, Ben WW (2012) Fate and seasonal variation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in a sewage treatment plant with A/A/O process. Sep Purif Technol 84:9–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Øverli Ø, Kotzian S, Winberg S (2002) Effects of cortisol on aggression and locomotor activity in rainbow trout. Horm Behav 42(1):53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks LG, Lambright CS, Orlando EF, Guillette LJ, Ankley GT, Gray LE (2001) Masculinization of female mosquitofish in kraft mill effluent-contaminated Fenholloway river water is associated with androgen receptor agonist activity. Toxicol Sci 62:257–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng XZ, Yu YY, Tang CM, Tan JH, Huang QX, Wang ZD (2008) Occurrence of steroid estrogens, endocrine-disrupting phenols, and acid pharmaceutical residues in urban riverine water of the Pearl River Delta, South China. Sci Total Environ 397(1–3):158–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder SA, Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Sedlak DL (2003) Pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and endocrine disruptors in water: implications for the water industry. Environ Eng Sci 20:449–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stasinakis AS, Gatidou G, Mamais D, Thomaidis NS, Lekkas TD (2008) Occurrence and fate of endocrine disrupters in Greek sewage treatment plants. Water Res 42(6–7):1796–1804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svenson A, Allard AS, Ek M (2003) Removal of estrogenicity in Swedish municipal sewage treatment plants. Water Res 37:4433–4443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan BLL, Hawker DW, Müller JF, Tremblay LA, Chapman HF (2007a) Comprehensive study of endocrine disrupting compounds using grab and passive sampling at selected wastewater treatment plants in South East Queensland, Australia. Environ Int 33:654–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan BLL, Hawker DW, Müller JF, Leusch FD, Tremblay LA, Chapman HF (2007b) Modelling of the fate of selected endocrine disruptors in a municipal wastewater treatment plant in South East Queensland, Australia. Chemosphere 69(4):644–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsumi O (2005) Assessment of human contamination of estrogenic endocrine-disrupting chemicals and their risk for human reproduction. J Steroid Biochem Mol Boil 93(2–5):325–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler CR, Jobling S, Sumpter JP (1998) Endocrine disruption in wildlife: a critical review of the evidence. Crit Rev Toxicol 28(4):319–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Wan X, Zhao SM, Wang Y, Yu F, Pan XJ (2011) Analysis of six phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in surface water and sediment. Chromatographia 74(3–4):297–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Huang B, Jin W, Wang Y, Zhao SM, Li FR, Hu P, Pan XJ (2012) Seasonal distribution, source investigation and vertical profile of phenolic endocrine disrupting compounds in Dianchi Lake, China. J Environ Monit 14(4):1275–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Huang B, Jin W, Zhao SM, Li FR, Hu P, Pan XJ (2013a) Occurrence, distribution, and sources of six phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in the river estuaries around Dianchi Lake in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(5):3185–3194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang RM, Liu JL, Yang XX, Lin C, Huang B, Jin W, Pan XJ (2013b) Biological response of high-back crucian carp (Carassius auratus) during different life stages to wastewater treatment plant effluent. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(12):8612–8620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright-Walters M, Volz C, Talbott E, Davis D (2011) An updated weight of evidence approach to the aquatic hazard assessment of Bisphenol A and the derivation a new predicted no effect concentration (Pnec) using a non-parametric methodology. Sci Total Environ 409(4):676–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Wu LS, Chang AC (2013) Seasonal variation of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 442:310–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhou JL (2008) Occurrence and removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals in wastewater. Chemosphere 73(5):848–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21267012), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20125314110003), Application Fundamental Key Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. 2013FA011), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2013M531987), and Application Fundamental Research Foundation of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. 2012FB124).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, 650500, China

    Bin Huang, Xiaoman Li, Wenwen Sun, Dong Ren, Xiao Li, Xiaonan Li, Ying Liu, Qiang Li & Xuejun Pan

Authors
  1. Bin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoman Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenwen Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dong Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaonan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ying Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qiang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xuejun Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuejun Pan.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ester Heath

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, B., Li, X., Sun, W. et al. Occurrence, removal, and fate of progestogens, androgens, estrogens, and phenols in six sewage treatment plants around Dianchi Lake in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21, 12898–12908 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3236-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3236-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation