Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retention and efficacy of ultra-low volume pesticide applications on Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To combat mosquitoes and the public health hazards they present, spraying chemical adulticides is an efficient and timely control method for immediate reduction of adult populations. With the growing consciousness of environmental and public health concerns, effective mosquito control means not only maximizing the effectiveness (in terms of mosquito mortality rates) of the pesticide application, but also minimizing the unintended effects (health hazard and environmental pollution). A series of experiments was carried out to assess the efficacy and deposition of ultra-low volume (ULV) sprays on adult mosquitoes which included the influence of chemical type, spray volume, spray concentration, droplet size, and deposit location (where the droplets land on the mosquito). A modified Potter Tower was used to apply an extremely fine spray (volume median diameter ∼20 μm) on caged adult mosquitoes (Culex quinquefasciatus). Reslin® (50 g/L bioresmethrin) was diluted in either water or D-C-Tron® plus spray oil (782 g/L paraffinic petroleum oil), Twilight® (89 g/L phenothrin) was diluted in D-C-Tron®, and the mosquito mortality was assessed 24 h after spraying. A fluorescent tracer was added to the spray mixture to determine the amount of spray on mosquitoes. A fluorescent microscope was also used to view the deposit of droplets on mosquitoes. It was found that droplet retention and mortality were reduced with the larger droplet sizes. Large water-based droplets tend to bounce off adult mosquitoes. There is a tendency for droplets approximately 20 μm in size to be retained on the fine hairs on the mosquito. The largest spray deposit was found on the adult mosquito wings and the lowest deposit on the head. Mortality was higher for formulations diluted with oil compared to those diluted with water. ULV applications with ultra-fine sprays (VMD 20 μm) and oil-based products resulted in maximum target efficacy under laboratory conditions, at minimum cost, and with the minimum amount of chemical adulticides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoo AOJ, Xue RD, Qualls WA, Quinn BP, Bernier UR (2008) Residual efficacy of field-applied permethrin, d-phenothrin, and resmethrin on plant foliage against adult mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 24(4):543–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anees AM (2008) Larvicidal activity of Ocimum sanctum Linn. (Labiatae) against Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say). Parasitol Res 103(6):1451–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antwi FB, Peterson RKD (2009) Toxicity of δ-phenothrin and resmethrin to non-target insects. Pest Manag Sci 63:300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antwi FB, Shama LM, Peterson RKD (2008) Risk assessments for the insect repellents DEET and picaridin. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51:31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arredondo-Jimenez JI, Rivero NE (2006) Space treatments of insecticide for control of dengue virus vector Aedes aegypti in southern Mexico. I. Baseline penetration trials in open field and houses. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 22:301–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bache DH (1994) The trapping of spray droplets by insects. Pestic Sci 41:351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonds JA, Greer M, Coughlin J, Patel V (2010) Caged mosquito bioassay: studies on cage exposure pathways, effects of mesh on pesticide filtration, and mosquito containment. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 26:50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos J, Andrade CFS (2003) Larval susceptibility of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus populations to chemical insecticides. Rev Saude Publica 37(4):523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaskopoulou A, Nguyen S, Pereira RM, Scharf ME, Koehler PG (2009) Toxicities of 31 volatile low molecular weight compounds against Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. J Med Entomol 46:328–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperband MF, Golden FV, Clark GG, Jany W, Allan SA (2010) Prallethrin-induced excitation increases contact between sprayed ultralow volume droplets and flying mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a wind tunnel. J Med Entomol 47:1099–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukes JC, Hallmon CF, Shaffer KR, Hester PG (1990) Effects of pressure and flow rate on Cythion droplet size produced by three different ground ULV aerosol generators. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 6:279–282

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fradin MS, Day JF (2002) Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. N Engl J Med 347:13–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haile DG, Mount GA, Pierce NW (1982) Effect of droplet size of malathion aerosols on kill of caged adult mosquitoes. Mosq News

  • Kain KC, MacPherson DW, Kelton T, Keystone JS, Mendelson J, MacLean JD (2001) Malaria deaths in visitors to Canada and in Canadian travellers: a case series. Can Med Assoc J 164:654–659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraiss H, Cullen EM (2008) Efficacy and nontarget effects of reduced-risk insecticides on Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and its biological control agent Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J Econ Entomol 101:391–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Jr GE, Khadri MS et al (1996) Ultralow volume application of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis for the control of mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 12(4):651–655

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milam CD, Farris JL, Wilhide JD (2000) Evaluating mosquito control pesticides for effect on target and nontarget organisms. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:324–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mount GA (1998) A critical review of ultralow-volume aerosols of insecticide applied with vehicle-mounted generators for adult mosquito control. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 14:305–334

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mount GA, Biery TL, Haile DG (1996) A review of ultralow-volume aerial sprays of insecticide for mosquito control. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 12:601–608

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy K, Rácz G, Matsumoto T et al (2014) Evaluation of the genotoxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide phenothrin. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 770(8):1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preftakes CJ, Schleier JJ, Peterson RKD (2011) Bystander exposure to ultra-low-volume insecticide applications used for adult mosquito management. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8(6):2142–2152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pridgeon JW, Meepagala KM, Becnel JJ, Clark GG, Pereira RM, Linthicum KJ (2007) Structure-activity relationships of 33 piperidines as toxicants against female adults of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 44:263–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pridgeon JW, Pereira RM, Becnel JJ, Allan SA, Clark GG, Linthicum KJ (2008) Susceptibility of Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus Say, and Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say to 19 pesticides with different modes of action. J Med Entomol 45:82–87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pridgeon JW, Becnel JJ, Clark GG, Linthicum KJ (2009) A high-throughput screening method to identify potential pesticides for mosquito control. J Med Entomol 46:335–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins SC (1998) Spatial distribution of insecticide resistance in Caribbean populations of Aedes aegypti and its significance. Pan Am J Public Health 4(4):243–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MR, Spielman A, Lepore TJ, Henley D, Kiszewski AE, Reiter P (2006) Efficacy of resmethrin aerosols applied from the road for suppressing Culex vectors of West Nile virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somboon P, Prapanthadara L-a, Suwonkerd W (2003) Insecticide susceptibility tests of Anopheles minimus sl, Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus in northern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 34:87–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thatheyus AJ, Selvam ADG (2013) Synthetic pyrethroids: toxicity and biodegradation. Appl Ecol Environ Sci 1:33–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DM, Urena B (2001) A model describing the evolution of West Nile-like encephalitis in New York City. Math Comput Model 34:771–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author is grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 31371963), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20130965), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) for providing financial assistance. This research was part of an Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage project (LP0669659) with funding provided by ARC, Pacific Biologics/Clarke Mosquito Control, Logan City Council, Gold Coast City Council, and Sunshine Coast Regional Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary J. Dorr.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(pdf 10503 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Dorr, G.J. & Hewitt, A.J. Retention and efficacy of ultra-low volume pesticide applications on Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 16492–16501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5480-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5480-9

Keywords

Navigation