Abstract
Agricultural non-point source pollution causes global warming and the deterioration of air and water quality. It is difficult to identify and monitor the emission sources of agricultural pollution due to the large number of farms in China. Many studies focus on the technological aspect of achieving agricultural sustainability, but its socioeconomic aspect is poorly understood. Here, we report how group size (number of farms in a certain region) affects agricultural pollution governance through conducting a social science experiment. We found that when communication was allowed among group members, a small group size facilitated cooperation. Although deviations from the cooperation equilibrium occurred with time in all groups, the smaller the group size, the slower the cooperation equilibrium became frangible. These findings suggest that reducing number of farms and extending the length of farm property rights can benefit the mitigation of agricultural non-point pollution in China. Social science experiments can be a useful tool to understand the socioeconomic aspect of agricultural sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Bousquet F, Cardenas J, Castillo D, Lopez M, Tobias R, Vollan B, Wutich A (2011) The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance. Ecol Econ 70:1571–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.011
Balliet D (2010) Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analytic review. J Confl Resolut 54:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709352443
Beebe SA, Masterson JT (2014) Communicating in small groups: principles and practices. Pearson Press, Cambridge, 378 p
Cardenas J (2005) Bringing the lab to the field and the field to the lab: more than changing subjects. Working paper. Economics Department, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota
Cavalcanti C, Schläpfer F, Schmid B (2010) Public participation and willingness to cooperate in common-pool resource management: a field experiment with fishing communities in Brazil. Ecol Econ 69:613–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.009
Chaudhuri A (2011) Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature. Exp Econ 14:47–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-010-9257-1
Chen X, Cui Z, Fan M, Vitousek P, Zhao M, Ma W, Wang Z, Zhang W, Yan X, Yang J, Deng X, Gao Q, Zhang Q, Guo S, Ren J, Li S, Ye Y, Wang Z, Huang J, Tang Q, Sun Y, Peng X, Zhang J, He M, Zhu Y, Xue J, Wang G, Wu L, An N, Wu L, Ma L, Zhang W, Zhang F (2014) Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature 514:486–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13609
Chen B, Chang SX, Shu KL, Erisman JW, Gu B (2017) Land use mediates riverine nitrogen export under the dominant influence of human activities. Environ Res Lett 12:94018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa84bc
Erisman JW, Galloway JN, Seitzinger S, Bleeker A, Dise NB, Petrescu AMR (2013) Consequences of human modification of the global nitrogen cycle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 368:20130116. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0116
Finlay JC, Small GE, Sterner RW (2013) Human influences on nitrogen removal in lakes. Science 342:247–250. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242575
Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
Gu B, Ju X, Chang J, Ge Y, Vitousek PM (2015) Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:8792–8797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510211112
Gu B, Fan L, Ying Z, Xu Q, Luo W, Ge Y, Scott S, Chang J (2016) Socioeconomic constraints on the technological choices in rural sewage treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7267-z
Guo L (2007) Doing battle with the green monster of Taihu Lake. Science 317:1166. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.317.5842.1166
Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
Isaac RM, Walker JM, Williams AW (1994) Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods: experimental evidence utilizing large groups. J Public Econ 54:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)90068-X
Ju X, Gu B, Wu Y, Galloway J (2016) Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size. Glob Environ Chang 41:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.08.005
Ma X, Heerink N, van Ierland E, Shi X (2016) Land tenure insecurity and rural-urban migration in rural China. Pap Reg Sci 95:383–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12129
Mueller ND, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Ray DK, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2012) Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490:254–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11420
Norse D, Ju X (2015) Environmental costs of China’s food security. Agric Ecosyst Environ 209:5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.014
Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 208 p
Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:15181–15187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104
Ostrom E (2015) Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 302 p
Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. Am Polit Sci Rev 86:404–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964229
Rodriguez-Sickert C, Guzm’anc RA, Cardenas JC (2008) Institutions influence preferences: evidence from a common pool resource experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 67:215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.004
Ruhl HA, Rybicki NB (2010) Long-term reductions in anthropogenic nutrients link to improvements in Chesapeake Bay habitat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:16566–16570. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003590107
Selten R (1973) A simple model of imperfect competition, where 4 are few and 6 are many. Int J Game Theory 2:141–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01737566
Smith VL (1989) Theory, experiment and economics. J Econ Perspect 3:151–169. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.1.151
Stavins RN (2011) The problem of the commons: still unsettled after 100 years. Am Econ Rev 101:81–108. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.1.81
Stephan M (2002) Environmental information disclosure programs: they work, but why? Soc Sci Quart 83:190–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.00078
Sutton MA, Oenema O, Erisman JW, Leip A, van Grinsven H, Winiwarter W (2011) Too much of a good thing. Nature 472:159–161. https://doi.org/10.1038/472159a
Sutton MA, Bleeker A, Howard CM, Bekunda M, Grizzetti B, Vries WD, Van Grinsven H, Abrol YP, Adhya TK, Billen G et al (2013) Our nutrient world: the challenge to produce more food and energy with less pollution. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Press, Edinburgh, 128 p
Vollan B, Ostrom E (2010) Cooperation and the commons. Science 330:923–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198349
Withers P, Neal C, Jarvie H, Doody D (2014) Agriculture and eutrophication: where do we go from here? Sustainability-Basel 6:5853–5875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095853
Wu Y, Xi X, Tang X, Luo D, Gu B, Lam SK, Vitousek PM, Chen D (2018) Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:7010–7015. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806645115
Xu B, Cadsby CB, Fan L, Song F (2013) Group size, coordination, and the effectiveness of punishment in the voluntary contributions mechanism: an experimental investigation. Games 4:89–105. https://doi.org/10.3390/g4010089
Ye J (2015) Land transfer and the pursuit of agricultural modernization in China. J Agrar Chang 15:314–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12117
Zhang F, Chen X, Vitousek P (2013) Chinese agriculture: an experiment for the world. Nature 497:33–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/497033a
Zhang X, Davidson EA, Mauzerall DL, Searchinger TD, Dumas P, Shen Y (2015) Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15743
Zhang W, Cao G, Li X, Zhang H, Wang C, Liu Q, Chen X, Cui Z, Shen J, Jiang R, Mi G, Miao Y, Zhang F, Dou Z (2016) Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature 537:671–674. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19368
Funding
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2018YFC0213304), the Discovery Early Career Researcher Award by the Australian Research Council (DE170100423), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41773068, 41822701), the Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization of China, the Zhijiang Youth Grant of Zhejiang Province (G228), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SSEYI201303 and 203102*172220171). The work contributes to the UK-China Virtual Joint Centre on Nitrogen “N-Circle” funded by the Newton Fund via UK BBSRC/NERC (BB/N013484/1), and Australia-China Joint Research Centre–Healthy soils for sustainable food production and environmental quality, jointly funded by Australian Government Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, and the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 29 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, L., Yuan, Y., Ying, Z. et al. Decreasing farm number benefits the mitigation of agricultural non-point source pollution in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 464–472 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3622-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3622-6