Abstract
Developing nations are rushing towards economic developments; however, this development is increasing the ecological footprints. In this regard, it has become important to identify the factors of environmental degradation. For sound economic growth, countries are enhancing their human resources with sound financial institutions. Therefore, this work examines the effects of human capital (HC), financial development (FD), and institutional quality (IQ) on ecological footprints (EF) in the group of 11 countries. This work also checks the interactional effect of FD, human capital, and IQ on ecological footprints. This work employs the annual data of 1984–2017 and utilizes the cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lag approach for panel data analysis (CS-ARDL). The findings show that FD is degrading the environmental quality by 0.04%. Furthermore, IQ and HC are improving environmental quality by 0.07% and 0.01%. The findings also reveal that FD is lowering ecological footprints through the channel of HC and IQ. Based on the findings, these countries need to extend human capital with an efficient institutional network for environmental sustainability. These countries need to allocate funds to the health and education sector to develop human capital. Moreover, human resource management tools should be strengthened to cope with the challenges of environmental problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not required.
References
Abbasi F, Riaz K (2016) CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90:102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2015.12.017
Abid M (2016) Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa economies. Util Policy 41:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.009
Acheampong AO (2019) Modelling for insight: does financial development improve environmental quality? Energy Econ 83:156–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.025
Adams S, Klobodu EKM (2017) Urbanization, democracy, bureaucratic quality, and environmental degradation. J Policy Model 39:1035–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.04.006
Agyekum EB, Kumar NM, Mehmood U et al (2021) Decarbonize Russia — a best–worst method approach for assessing the renewable energy potentials, opportunities and challenges. Energy Rep 7:4498–4515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.039
Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Raza MY (2020) Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? evidence from belt and road countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08748-7
Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K (2020) Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resour Policy 67:101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2020.101677
Ahmed Z, Nathaniel SP, Shahbaz M (2021) The criticality of information and communication technology and human capital in environmental sustainability: evidence from Latin American and Caribbean countries. J Clean Prod 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125529
Ahmed Z (2019) Wang Z (2019) Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2626(26):26782–26796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05911-7
Anwar A, Sinha A, Sharif A et al (2021) The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy consumption, financial development, and CO2 emissions: evidence from selected Asian countries. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01716-2
Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K (2019) Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 266(26):6199–6208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9
Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model 40:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.03.005
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom 188:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
Danish HST, Baloch MA et al (2019) Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2019.101516
Danish UR (2020) The pathway toward pollution mitigation: does institutional quality make a difference? Bus Strateg Environ 29. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2597
Dasgupta S, De Cian E (2018) The influence of institutions, governance, and public opinion on the environment: synthesized findings from applied econometrics studies. Energy Res Soc Sci 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.023
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006
Eberhardt M, Teal F (2020) The magnitude of the task ahead: macro implications of heterogeneous technology. Rev Income Wealth 66:334–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/ROIW.12415
Hashem Pesaran M, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142:50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Hassan ST, Danish KSUD et al (2020) Role of institutions in correcting environmental pollution: an empirical investigation. Sustain Cities Soc 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101901
Jalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.003
Javid M, Sharif F (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:406–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2015.10.019
Khan I, Hou F (2021a) The dynamic links among energy consumption, tourism growth, and the ecological footprint: the role of environmental quality in 38 IEA countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10861-6
Khan I, Hou F (2021b) Does multilateral environmental diplomacy improve environmental quality? the case of the United States. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12005-2
Khan Z, Ali S, Dong K, Li RYM (2021) How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? the roles of institutions and human capital. Energy Econ 94:105060. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2020.105060
Mehmood U (2020) Globalization-driven CO<inf>2</inf> emissions in Singapore: an application of ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11368-w
Mehmood U (2021a) Renewable-nonrenewable energy : institutional quality and environment nexus in South Asian countries
Mehmood U (2021b) Biomass energy consumption and its impacts on ecological footprints : analyzing the role of globalization and natural resources in the framework of EKC in SAARC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res
Mehmood U (2021c) Transport energy consumption and carbon emissions: the role of urbanization towards environment in SAARC region. Integr Environ Assess Manag ieam.4463. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4463
Mehmood U (2021d) Contribution of renewable energy towards environmental quality: the role of education to achieve sustainable development goals in G11 countries. Renew Energy 178:600–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.118
Mehmood U (2021e) Examining the role of financial inclusion towards CO2 emissions : presenting the role of renewable energy and globalization in the context of EKC. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16898-5
Mehmood U (2021f) Renewable energy and foreign direct investment: does the governance matter for CO2 emissions? application of CS-ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17222-x
Mehmood U, Askari MU, Saleem M (2021) The assessment of environmental sustainability: the role of research and development in ASEAN countries. Integr Environ Assess Manag. https://doi.org/10.1002/IEAM.4569
Mehmood U, Mansoor A (2021) CO2 emissions and the role of urbanization in East Asian and Pacific countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14838-x
Mehmood U, Tariq S (2020) Globalization and CO 2 emissions nexus: evidence from the EKC hypothesis in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09774-1/Published
Nasir MA, Canh NP, Le Lan TN (2021) Environmental degradation & role of financialisation, economic development, industrialisation and trade liberalisation. J Environ Manage 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111471
Nathaniel SP, Yalçiner K, Bekun FV (2021) Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. Resour Policy 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101924
Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.025
Pata UK, Aydin M, Haouas I (2021) Are natural resources abundance and human development a solution for environmental pressure? evidence from top ten countries with the largest ecological footprint. Resour Policy 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101923
Pata UK, Caglar AE (2021) Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy 216:119220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220
Pesaran, M.H. (2004) ‘General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels.’ Cambridge Work Pap Econ
Rizk R, Ben SM (2018) Modelling the relationship between poverty, environment, and institutions: a panel data study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3051-6
Salahuddin M, Alam K (2015) Internet usage, electricity consumption and economic growth in Australia: a time series evidence. Telemat Informatics 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.011
Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A, Sumayya, (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518
Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2018.07.020
Shahbaz M, Sinha A, Raghutla C, Vo XV (2022) Decomposing scale and technique effects of financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy consumption. Energy 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121758
Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G et al (2020) Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 57:102138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138
Sinha A, Mishra S, Sharif A, Yarovaya L (2021) Does green financing help to improve environmental & social responsibility? designing SDG framework through advanced quantile modelling. J Environ Manage 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112751
Tamazian A, Bhaskara Rao B (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2009.04.004
Tamazian A, Rao BB (2009) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? evidence from transitional economies. Econ Econom Res Inst
Tawiah VK, Zakari A, Khan I (2021) The environmental footprint of China-Africa engagement: an analysis of the effect of China – Africa partnership on carbon emissions. Sci. Total Environ. 756
Wang J, Dong K (2019) What drives environmental degradation? evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 656:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.11.354
Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2008) A Simple Test for Cointegration in Dependent Panels with Structural Breaks å 5:665–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00513.x
Zafar MW, Sinha A, Ahmed Z et al (2021) Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: the role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110868
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR et al (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resour Policy 63:101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428
Zhang L, Godil DI, Bibi M et al (2021) Caring for the environment: how human capital, natural resources, and economic growth interact with environmental degradation in Pakistan? a dynamic ARDL approach. Sci Total Environ 774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145553
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Usman Mehmood conducted the analysis and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not required.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehmood, U. Environmental degradation and financial development: do institutional quality and human capital make a difference in G11 nations?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 38017–38025 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18825-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18825-8