Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of different silicate minerals on silicon activation by Ochrobactium sp. T-07-B

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a kind of solid waste with a high silicon content, electrolytic manganese residue (EMR) can be utilized as silicon source by plants through bioleaching processes. EMR contains a variety of silicate minerals. In order to determine the source of available silicon in the bioleaching process of EMR, it is necessary to investigate the influence of silicate minerals in EMR on silicon-activating behavior of specific minerals. In this study, Ochrobactium sp. T-07-B was used to conduct bioleaching experiments on five kinds of silicate minerals with different structures (quartz, muscovite, biotite, olivine, and rhodonite); the growth of Ochrobactium sp. T-07-B, their acid- and polysaccharide-producing capacity, and evolution of surface morphology and structure of the silicate minerals in different systems were determined, so as to explore the silicon-activating capacity of Ochrobactium sp. T-07-B and the selectivity toward different minerals in the bioleaching process. Results showed that the effects of Ochrobactium sp. T-07-B for different silicate minerals were obviously different, and the sequence of silicon-activating efficiency from high to low was as follows: muscovite (65.84 mg·L−1) > biotite (63.84 mg·L−1) > olivine (55.76 mg·L−1) > rhodonite (50.98 mg·L−1) > quartz (23.63 mg·L−1). Results of this study may be of guiding significance for the future research on the silicon-activating behavior of solid waste.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Chen Z (2019) Isolation of silicate activating bacteria and its activation of effective silicon in electrolytic manganese slag. South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, pp 15–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Li J, Du D, Ye H, Lan J, Lv Y (2018) Study on activation of effective silicon in electrolytic manganese slag by silicate bacteria. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY 37:3581–3586

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan W, Shi L (2015) Determination of available silica content in silicon fertilizer by molybdenum blue spectrophotometry. Journal of Analytical Science 31:389–392

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur S, Kumar J, Kumar D, Chauhan DK, Prasad SM, Srivastava PK (2020) Fascinating impact of silicon and silicon transporters in plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 202:110885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Rizwan M, Li M, Song F, Zhou S, He X, Ding R, Dai Z, Yuan Y, Cao M, Xiong S, Tu S (2019) Comparative efficacy of organic and inorganic silicon fertilizers on antioxidant response, Cd/Pb accumulation and health risk assessment in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ Pollut 255:113146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, M, Du, Y, Du, D, Deng, Y, Chen, N, 2014. Technology for producing silicon-manganese fertilizer from EMM residue. China's Manganese Industry 32:16–19+24.

  • Li J, Du D, Peng Q, Wu C, Lv K, Ye H, Chen S, Zhan W (2018) Activation of silicon in the electrolytic manganese residue by mechanical grinding-roasting. J Clean Prod 192:347–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Y, Li J, Ye H, Du D, Gan C, Wuri L, Sun P, Wen J (2019a) Bioleaching of silicon in electrolytic manganese residue using single and mixed silicate bacteria. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 42:1819–1828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Y, Li J, Ye H, Du D, Li J, Sun P, Ma M, Wen J (2019b) Bioleaching behaviors of silicon and metals in electrolytic manganese residue using silicate bacteria. J Clean Prod 228:901–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Y, Li J, Ye H, Du D, Sun P, Ma M, Zhang TC (2020) Bioleaching of silicon in electrolytic manganese residue (EMR) by Paenibacillus mucilaginosus: impact of silicate mineral structures. Chemosphere 256:127043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J (2010) Isolation and identification of extracellular polysaccharides producing bacteria. Anhui University, Hefei, pp 65–68

  • Man, L, Xiao, G, Zhang, X, Sun, D, 2015. Bioleaching of bauxite by silicate bacteria and change of bacterial community structure during leaching process. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology) 46:394–403.

  • Peng Q, Li J, Du D, Ye H (2018) Optimization of microwave activated effective silicon process conditions for electrolytic manganese residue by response surface methodology. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY 37:2548–2554

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, J, Puppe, D, 2021. Heat improves silicon availability in mineral soils. Geoderma 386.

  • Shu J, Li B, Chen M, Sun D, Wei L, Wang Y, Wang J (2020) An innovative method for manganese (Mn(2+)) and ammonia nitrogen (NH4(+)-N) stabilization/solidification in electrolytic manganese residue by basic burning raw material. Chemosphere 253:126896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Chen Y, Cao F (2012) Effects of mineral environments on desilicon from bauxite by silicate bacteria. Chem Eng J 31:2341–2347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Chen Y, Cao F (2013a) Influence of microbe-mineral contact Medol on decomposition of bauxite. J China Univ Min Technol 42:122–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Wang H, Zhang Q (2013b) Effects of Bacillus circulans on decomposition behavior of bauxite. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals 23:1119–1128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teng Q, Feng Y, Li H (2018) Effects of silicate-bacteria pretreatment on desiliconization of magnesite by reverse flotation. Colloids Surf, A 544:60–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Sun Z, Zhu B, Yu C (2014) Research progress of polypropylene/silicate composites. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY 33:1700–1705

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Chu C, Wei H, Zhang L, Ahmad Z, Wu S, Xie B (2020) Ameliorative effects of silicon fertilizer on soil bacterial community and pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) grown on soil contaminated with multiple heavy metals. Environ Pollut 267:115411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao G, Dai J, Sun D (2013) Effects of biofilm and passivation coating forming on bacterial desilicon from bauxite. J China Univ Min Technol 42:824–831

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Jiangnan T, Jian D, Shili Z, Yinghong W (2021) Preparation of silicon-potassium fertilizer from low-iron red mud of Bayer process and silicon-potassium activation mechanism. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology 44:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye M, Liang J, Liao X, Li L, Feng X, Qian W, Zhou S, Sun S (2020) Bioleaching for detoxification of waste flotation tailings: relationship between EPS substances and bioleaching behavior. J Environ Manage 279:111795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan X, Wang L, Wang L, Gong J, Wang X, Song X, Xu T (2020) Co-sintering MSWI fly ash with electrolytic manganese residue and coal fly ash for lightweight ceramisite. Chemosphere 263:127914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Wu W, Zhang X, Zhu M, Tan W (2017) Characteristics of bio-desilication and bio-flotation of Paenibacillus mucilaginosus BM-4 on aluminosilicate minerals. Int J Miner Process 168:40–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong C, Xiao G, Cao F, Sun D (2013) Orientation screening and desilicon abilities of silicon-releasing microorganisms from bauxite. Geological Journal of China Universities 19:692–699

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank South-Central University for Nationalities and National Engineering Laboratory of Biohydrometallurgy, GRINM Group Corporation Limited, China, for their support during the experiments.

Funding

This project is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 51804354, 51974279), the National Key Research & Development Program of China (grant numbers 2018YFC18018, 2018YFC18027), KeJunPing (2018) No. 159, the Guangxi Scientific Research and Technology Development Plan (grant numbers GuikeAB16380287 and GuikeAB17129025), and GRINM Science and Development (grant number 2020 No 75), which are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jia Li provided the idea of this work. Ying Lv and Zhenxing Chen performed the experiments, collected samples, and detected and analyzed the data. Ying Lv and Xuan Ke prepared the figures and wrote the manuscript. Ying Lv and Zhenxing Chen detected physiochemical properties. Xingyu Liu, Bowei Chen, Mingjiang Zhang, and Tian C. Zhang were involved in experimental design. Tian C. Zhang revised the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Diane Purchase

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• The crystal structure of silicate minerals influences the silicon-activating effect.

Ochrobactium sp. T-07-B is selective in different silicate minerals regarding silicon activation.

• The growth and metabolic capacities of Ochrobactium sp. T-07-B are different.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, Y., Li, J., Chen, Z. et al. Effects of different silicate minerals on silicon activation by Ochrobactium sp. T-07-B. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 87393–87401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21824-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21824-4

Keywords

Navigation