Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental regulations and outward foreign direct investment—empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of the new economic normal, environmental protection and economic growth have become the focus of academic attention. This paper explores the effect and impact mechanism of environmental regulations on the outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) of enterprises by using data from the China Industrial Enterprise Database and the Directory of Overseas Investment Enterprises (Institutions) for the years 2004 to 2010. The findings are summarised as follows. Firstly, environmental regulations have a significant positive effect on the OFDI of Chinese enterprises, and this result remains robust after considering the outcomes of robustness tests and endogeneity issues. Secondly, the promotion effect of environmental regulations on the OFDI of Chinese enterprises obviously differs across investment motivations and industry characteristics. Thirdly, productivity gains are important channels through which environmental regulations promote the OFDI of enterprises. These findings have great significance for the effective formulation of environmental regulatory policies and the stable development of the OFDI of Chinese enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data and code used in this study are available on request from the first author and corresponding author.

References

  • Ai H, Hu S, Li K, Shao S (2020) Environmental regulation, total factor productivity, and enterprise duration: evidence from China. Bus Strateg Environ 29:2284–2296

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7.

  • Berman E, Bui LTM (2001) Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. RvE&S 83

  • Bhagwat V, Brogaard J, Julio B (2021) A bit goes a long way: bilateral investment treaties and cross-border mergers. J Financ Econ 140:514–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Zhu B, Zhang H, Li L, Xie M (2020) Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sci Total Environ 746:140810

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z, Kong S (2022) The effect of environmental regulation on green total-factor productivity in China’s industry. Environ Impact Assess Rev 94:106757

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shimamoto K (2004) Why the grass is not always greener: the competing effects of environmental regulations and factor intensities on us specialization. Ecol Econ 54:95–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechezlepretre A, Sato M (2017) The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Rev Environ Econ Policy 11:183–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Tian J, Ye J (2021) Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: evidence from China’s outward fdi. Finance Research Letters 39

  • Dunning JH, Lundan SM (2008) Multinational enterprises and the global economy, second edition. Books.

  • Eaton J, Kortum S, Kramarz F (2004) Dissecting trade: firms, industries, and export destinations. Am Econ Rev 94:150–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland GS, Harrison AE (2003) Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. J. Devel. Econ 70

  • Ferjani A (2011) Environmental regulation and productivity: a data envelopment analysis for Swiss dairy farms. Agricultural Economics Review 12

  • Fu J, Li L (2010) An empirical study on environmental regulation, factor endowment and industrial international competitiveness——Panel data based on Chinese manufacturing. Management of the world 87-98+187 (In Chinese)

  • Girma S, Kneller R, Pisu M (2005) Exports versus fdi: an empirical test. Review of World Economics / Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 141:193–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong M, Yi M, Liu H, Jiang X (2020) Environmental regulation, hidden economy, and China’s outward foreign direct investment. Chinese J Population Resour Environ 18:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo LL, Qu Y, Tseng M-L (2017) The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. J Clean Prod 162:894–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeyeon Y, Almas H (2021) Do environmental regulations affect fdi decisions? The pollution haven hypothesis revisited. Sci Public Policy 48:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Melitz MJ, Yeaple SR (2004) Export versus fdi with heterogeneous firms. Am Econ Rev 94:300–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong J, Zhou C, Wu Y, Wang R, Marinova D (2019) Technology gap, reverse technology spillover and domestic innovation performance in outward foreign direct investment: evidence from China. China & World Economy 27:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu G, Wang X, Wang Y (2021) Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Econ 98:105134

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Chen X, Huang B, Yang X (2017) Economic and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment in China: a spatial spillover analysis. China Econ Rev 45:289–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Renyong C (2014) Chinese private firms’ outward foreign direct investment: does firm ownership and size matter? Thunderbird. Int Bus Rev 56

  • Kong Q, Tong X, Peng D, Wong Z, Chen H (2021) How factor market distortions affect ofdi: an explanation based on investment propensity and productivity effects. Int Rev Econ Financ 73:459–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie P, Patry M, Lajeunesse R (2008) Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis. J Prod Anal 30:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie PL, Aurent-Lucchetti J, Johnstone N, Ambec S (2011) Environmental policy, innovation and performance: new insights on the porter hypothesis. J Econ Manag Strateg 20:803–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Xian G, Bao Q (2018) Does “bringing in” promote “going global”?—the influence of foreign investment on Chinese enterprises’ foreign direct investment. Econ Res 53:142–156 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Salman M, Lu Z (2021) Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China. Sci Total Environ 759:143744

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manderson E, Kneller R (2012) Environmental regulations, outward fdi and heterogeneous firms: are countries used as pollution havens? Environ. Res Econ 51:317–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen JR (1997) Costly pollution abatement, competitiveness and plant location decisions. Resource Energy Econ 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti J, Alguacil M, Orts V (2015) Firm heterogeneity and location choice of European multinationals. MPRA Paper

  • Mbanyele W, Wang F (2022) Environmental regulation and technological innovation: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:12890–12910

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcguire CM (1982) Regulation, factor rewards, and international trade. J Public Econ 17:335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71:1695–1725

    Google Scholar 

  • Murty MN, Kumar S (2003) Win-win opportunities and environmental regulation: testing of porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries. J Environ Manag 67:139–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton HT (2014) To shut down or to shift: Multinationals and environmental regulation. Ecol Econ 102:113–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang X, Li Q, Du K (2020) How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy 139:111310

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng H, Shen N, Ying H, Wang Q (2021) Can environmental regulation directly promote green innovation behavior?-- based on situation of industrial agglomeration. J Clean Prod 314:128044

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Linde CVD (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan JP (2004) The determinants of outward foreign direct investment: a firm-level analysis of indian manufacturing. Oxford Devel. Stud 32

  • Rubashkina Y, Galeotti M, Verdolini E (2015) Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the porter hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83

  • Santis RD, Esposito P, Jona LC (2021) Environmental regulation and productivity growth: main policy challenges. Int Econ 165:264–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y, Shang Y (2016) Decisions of ofdi engagement and location for heterogeneous multinational firms: evidence from Chinese firms. Technol Forecast Soc Change 112:178–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang K, Qiu Y, Zhou D (2020) Does command-and-control regulation promote green innovation performance? Evidence from China’s industrial enterprises. Sci Total Environ 712:136362

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian W, Yu M. (2020) Distribution, outward fdi, and productivity heterogeneity: China and cross-countries’ evidence. J Intl Financial Mark Inst Money 67

  • Wang B, Tan Y, Yu M, Huang Y (2016) Outward direct investment, firm productivity and credit constraints: evidence from Chinese firms. Pac Econ Rev 21:72–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner M, Hong NS, Xiaojun X (2004) ‘Late development’ experience and the evolution of transnational firms in the people’s republic of China. Asia Pacific Bus Rev 10:324–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y, Zheng N, Liu X, Lu J (2014) Expanding to outward foreign direct investment or not? A multi-dimensional analysis of entry mode transformation of Chinese private exporting firms. Int Bus Rev 23:356–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams C, Lukoianova T, Martinez CA (2017) The moderating effect of bilateral investment treaty stringency on the relationship between political instability and subsidiary ownership choice. Int Bus Rev 26:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Wu Y, Shi Y (2021) Emission reduction and foreign direct investment nexus in China*. J Asian Econ 74:101305

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan B, Zhang Y, Shen Y, Han J (2018) Productivity, financial constraints and outward foreign direct investment: firm-level evidence. China Econ Rev 47:47–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Wang D (2022) Heterogeneous environmental regulation, foreign direct investment, and regional carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from China. Sustainability 14:6386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeaple SR (2009) Firm heterogeneity and the structure of us multinational activity. J Int Econ 78:206–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Li Y (2020) Effect of environmental regulation policy tools on the quality of foreign direct investment: an empirical study of China. J Clean Prod 270:122346

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, He G, Mol APJ (2015) China’s new environmental protection law: a game changer? Environ. Dev 13:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y-J, Peng Y-L, Ma C-Q, Shen B (2017) Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 100:18–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Liu C, Yang M (2018) The effects of environmental regulation on China’s total factor productivity: an empirical study of carbon-intensive industries. J Clean Prod 179:325–334

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 19FJLB024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Y. and H.Z.; methodology, H.Z.; software, L.Y.; validation, L.Y.; formal analysis, L.Y.; investigation, L.Y.; resources, L.Y.; data curation, L.Y.; writing (original draft preparation), L.Y.; writing (review and editing), H.Z.; visualization, L.Y.; supervision, H.Z.; project administration, H.Z.; funding acquisition, H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haibo Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, L., Zhang, H. Environmental regulations and outward foreign direct investment—empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 1072–1084 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22236-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22236-0

Keywords

Navigation