Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Failure factors in small and medium-sized enterprises: qualitative study from an attributional perspective

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify factors for poor performance and failure faced by small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) and to investigate a potential bias between real causes and attribution for stranding. In order to achieve this objective, we have adopted entrepreneurial personal story explorations in eight Portuguese SME. Our research reveals that the most important factors are limited access to finance, poor market conditions, inadequate staff, and lack of institutional support, as well as co-operation and networking. Hereby, at a first glance, external factors were more often cited, but qualitative analysis revealed that internal factors are imminent and not satisfactorily recognized. Even though some owner–managers showed a certain awareness regarding their internal weaknesses, many problems such as lacking strategy and vision, low educational levels, and inadequate social capital are not sufficiently recognized. Therewith, we found a strong attribution error when SME owner–managers judge the causes of their ventures’ unsuccessful performance and failure. Finally, we draw conclusions and suggestions for policymakers, small business owners, consultants, and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Gort, M. (1996). The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 489–498. doi:10.2307/2109796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., Rosen, B., & Woodward, W. (1987). The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: a longitudinal study. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 154–168.

  • Almus, M., & Nerlinger, E. A. (1999). Growth of new technology-based firms: which factors matter? Small Business Economics, 13, 141–154. doi:10.1023/A:1008138709724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. (1991). New-firm survival and the technological regime. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 441–450. doi:10.2307/2109568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. (1995). Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 441–457. doi:10.1016/0167-7187(95)00499-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Mahmood, T. (1995). New firm survival: new results using a hazard function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 97–103. doi:10.2307/2109995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J., Metcalfe, J., & Porteous, M. (1989). Barriers to growth: the ACARD study. In J. Barber, J. Metcalfe & M. Porteous (Eds.), Barriers to growth in small firms. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 551–559. doi:10.2307/2109594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (2005). Analysis of young, small firms that have closed: delineating successful from unsuccessful closures. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 343–358. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J., & Weitz, B. (1983). Attributions in the boardroom: causal reasoning in corporate annual reports. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 165–183. doi:10.2307/2392616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 107–117. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(85)90010-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & de Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23, 227–236. doi:10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000032032.21192.72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, D. (1989). Barriers to growth: the labour market. In J. Barber, J. S. Metcalfe & M. Porteous (Eds.), Barriers to growth in small firms. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., Earle, J. S., & Lup, D. (2005). What makes small firms grow? finance, human capital, technical assistance, and the business environment in Romania. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54, 33–70. doi:10.1086/431264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network support and success of newly founded businesses. Small Business Economics, 10, 213–225. doi:10.1023/A:1007997102930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (2000). Fast growing businesses: empirical evidence from a German study. International Journal of Sociology, 30, 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., Preisendörfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1992). Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review, 57, 227–242. doi:10.2307/2096207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., Preisendörfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1996). Der Erfolg neugegründeter Unternehmen—Eine empirische Studie zu den Chancen und Risiken von Unternehmensgründungen. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, A. V., Leidecker, J. K., & Harder, J. W. (1986). Patterns of failure among Silicon Valley High Technology Firms. In J. Hornaday, F. Tarpley, J. Timmons & K. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurial research (pp. 677–694). Wellesley: Babson Center for Entrepreneurial Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centro de Inovação Empresarial da Beira Interior—CIEBI. (2005). Estudo da sustentabilidade das Empresas Recém Criadas. Covilhã, Portugal.

  • Chetty, S. K. (1996). The case study method for research in small and medium sized firms. International Small Business Journal, 15, 73–85. doi:10.1177/0266242696151005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, J., & Watts, G. (2000). Learning by doing: an exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 6, 104–124. doi:10.1108/13552550010346208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. D., & Gardner, W. L. (2004). Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: an attributional and leader-member exchange perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 439–465. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Handbook of qualitative methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, M. J. (1999). Entrepreneurship: strategies and resources. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, M. (2003). Erfolgs- und Risikofaktoren bei Neugründungen. In M. Dowling & H. J. Drumm (eds.). Gründungsmanagement. Vom erfolgreichen Unternehmensstart zu dauerhaftem Wachstum (2nd ed., pp. 19–31), Berlin et al.: Springer.

  • European Network for SME Research—ENSR. (2003). Observatory of European SMEs 2003, No 7: SMEs in Europe 2003. In European Commission (Ed.), Brussels: European Commission.

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. P. (2005). Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 623–640. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, M. J. (2003). Collaboration among SMEs as a mechanism for innovation: an empirical study. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 6, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Organization. (2007). Observatory of European SMEs, No 196. In European Commission (Ed.), Brussels: European Commission.

  • García-Muiña, F. E., & Navas-López, J. E. (2007). Explaining and measuring success in new business: the effect of technological capabilities on firm results. Technovation, 27, 30–46. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2006.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatewood, E. J., Shave, K. G., & Gartner, W. B. (1995). A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviours and success at venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 371–391. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(95)00035-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadian, A., & Galler, D. N. (1996). Total quality management in SMEs. International Journal of Management Science, 16, 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno, J., Folta, T., Cooper, A., & Woo, C. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 750–783. doi:10.2307/2393656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P., & Perren, L. J. (2002). Small business and entrepreneurial research: metatheories, paradigms and prejudices. International Small Business Journal, 20(2), 185–211. doi:10.1177/0266242602202004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hemer, J., Berteit, H., Walter, G., & Göthner, M. (2006). Erfolgsfaktoren für Unternehmensausgründungen aus der Wissenschaft. In Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Ed.), Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 05–2006, Berlin.

  • IAPMEI. (2004). Estrutura empresarial em Portugal, Edição do Instituto de Apoio às Pequenas e Médias Empresas e ao Investimento, Portugal.

  • Jennings, P., & Beaver, G. (1997). The performance and competitive advantage of small firms: a management perspective. International Small Business Journal, 15, 63–75. doi:10.1177/0266242697152004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakati, M. (2003). Success criteria in high-tech new ventures. Technovation, 23, 447–457. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00014-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), The Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, R. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1995). The measurement of attributions in organizational research. In M. J. Martinko (Ed.), Attribution theory: An organizational perspective. Delray Beach: St. Lucie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15, 1–26. doi:10.1080/08985620210159220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. Y. (1998). Success factors of small-and medium sized enterprises in Taiwan: an analysis of cases. Journal of Small Business Management, 36, 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, H., Neergaard, H., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2003). Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and human capital. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10, 426–434. doi:10.1108/14626000310504738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. (1995). The nature and function of attribution theory within the organizational sciences. In M. J. Martinko (Ed.), Attribution theory: An organizational perspective. Delray Beach: St. Lucie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (1994). Life duration of new firms. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 227–245. doi:10.2307/2950567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (2002). The survival of new domestic and foreign-owned firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 323–343. doi:10.1002/smj.217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, E., Duncan, T. E., & Russell, D. W. (1992). Measuring causal attributions: the revised causal dimension scale (CDII). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 566–573. doi:10.1177/0146167292185006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in attribution of causality: fact or fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225. doi:10.1037/h0076486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, W. L. (1994). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative methods, qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon Cop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, G. (1998). Krisenhafte Entwicklungen in mittelständischen Unternehmen. Ursachenanalyse und Implikationen für die Beratung. IfM-Materialien Nr. 130. Bonn.

  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, L., Lee, K., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (1998). Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 425–440. doi:10.2307/257082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perren, L., & Ram, M. (2004). Case-study method in small business and entrepreneurial research—mapping boundaries and perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 22, 83–101. doi:10.1177/0266242604039482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990). The comparative advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, E. (1991). Família e trabalho: um quadro de estabilidade. Organizações e Trabalho, No. 5/6, 63–74.

  • Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Tang, Z., & Lohrke, F. T. (2008). Developing an entrepreneurial typology: the roles of entrepreneurial alertness and attributional style. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4, 273–294. doi:10.1007/s11365-007-0041-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40, 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, B. S. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: a resource-based approach toward competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 119–142. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00645.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, J. A. (1994). New venture creation: entrepreneurship for the 21st century. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, C. M. (2003). Business survival and success of young small business owners: an empirical analysis. Small Business Economics, 21, 1–17. doi:10.1023/A:1024453200297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, C. M., & Cramer, J. S. (2001). The roots of entrepreneurship and labor demand: individual ability and low risk aversion. Economica, 68, 45–62. doi:10.1111/1468-0335.00232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1994). The post-entry performance of new small firms in german manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 141–154. doi:10.2307/2950486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (1985). Basic content analysis. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attribution theory of achievement motivation and innovation. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Attribution theory in organizational behavior: a relationship of mutual benefit. In M. J. Martinko (Ed.), Attribution theory: an organizational perspective (pp. 3–6). Delray Beach: St. Lude.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., & Cowling, M. (1995). Employment change in independent owner-managed high-technology firms in Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 7, 111–140. doi:10.1007/BF01108686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winborg, J., & Landström, H. (2001). Financial bootstrapping in small businesses: examining small business managers’ resource acquisition behaviors. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 235–254. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00055-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woywode, M. (1998). Determinanten der Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit von Unternehmen, ZEW Wirtschaftsanalysen, Bd. 25, Baden-Baden.

  • Yin, R. (1989). Case study research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharakis, A., Meyer, G. D., & DeCastro, J. (1999). Differencing perceptions of new venture failure: a matched exploratory study of venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 37, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or the motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245–287. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00202.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior, Estrada do Sineiro, 6200, Covilhã, Portugal

    Mário Franco

  2. Faculty of Management and Economics, Worms University of Applied Sciences, Erenburgerstrasse 19, 67549, Worms, Germany

    Heiko Haase

Authors
  1. Mário Franco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heiko Haase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mário Franco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franco, M., Haase, H. Failure factors in small and medium-sized enterprises: qualitative study from an attributional perspective. Int Entrep Manag J 6, 503–521 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0124-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0124-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation