Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water footprint of livestock: comparison of six geographically defined beef production systems

  • WATER USE IN LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Water use in the livestock sector has featured in the debate about sustainable food systems. Most evidence has come from virtual water calculations which lack impact assessment and adequate consideration of the heterogeneity in livestock production. This study sought new evidence, using a recently developed life cycle impact assessment method for water use to assess six geographically defined beef cattle production systems in New South Wales, Australia, a major production region.

Methods

The livestock production systems were diverse in farm practice (grass and feedlot finishing), product (yearling to heavy steers), environment (high-rainfall coastal to semi-arid inland) and local water stress. Life cycle inventories were developed from representative farm enterprise budgets. The farm water use inventories sought to describe the impact of the production system on catchment water resources and included irrigation water use as well as the reduction in flows due to the operation of stock dams.

Results and discussion

The normalised life cycle impact category results for water use, referred to as the water footprint, ranged from 3.3 to 221 L H2Oe kg−1 live weight at farm gate. Due to variation in local water stress, the impact category results were not correlated with the inventory results.

Conclusions

The substantial variability in water footprint between systems indicates that generalisations about livestock and livestock products should be avoided. However, many low input, predominantly non-irrigated, pasture-based livestock production systems have little impact on freshwater resources from consumptive water use, and the livestock have a water footprint similar to many broad-acre cereals. Globally, the majority of beef cattle are raised in non-irrigated mixed farming and grazing systems. Therefore, the general assertion that meat production is a driver of water scarcity is not supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS (2008a) 7125.0 Agricultural commodities: small area data, Australia, 2005–06 (reissue). Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://abs.gov.au. Accessed Nov 2010

  • ABS (2008b) 4618.0 Water use on Australian farms, 2005–06: estimates for Australian standard geographical classification (ASGC) regions. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://abs.gov.au. Accessed Nov 2010

  • ABS (2009) 4627.0 Land management and farming in Australia, 2007–08. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://abs.gov.au. Accessed Nov 2010

  • ABS (2010) 7121.0 Agricultural commodities, Australia, 2008–09. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://abs.gov.au. Accessed Sept 2010

  • AWA (2010) Water facts. Australian Water Association. http://www.awa.au. Accessed Dec 2010

  • Baillie C (2008) Assessment of evaporation losses and evaporation mitigation technologies for on farm water storages across Australia. Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures, Irrigation Matters Series No. 05/08

  • Barthelemy FD cited in Renault D, Wallender WW (2000) Nutritional water productivity and diets. Agr Water Manage 45:275–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayart JB, Bulle C, Deschênes L, Margni M, Pfister S, Vince F, Koehler A (2010) A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:439–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett JL, Oltjen JW (1993) Estimation of the water requirement for beef production in the United States. J Anim Sci 71:818–826

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2010) Water footprinting: how to assess water use in life cycle assessment? Sustain 2:919–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin LT, Freebairn AC, Jordan PW, Huider BJ (2009) A model for assessing the impacts of farm dams on surface waters in the WaterCAST catchment modeling framework. Proc 18th IMACS World Congress/MODSIM 09 International Congress. http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim09/. Accessed Dec 2010

  • Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY (2003) Virtual water flows between nations in relation to trade in livestock and livestock products. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa ND (2007) Reducing the meat and livestock industry’s environmental footprint. Nutr Diet 64:S185–S191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig IP (2006) Comparison of precise water depth measurements on agricultural storages with open water evaporation estimates. Agric Water Manag 85:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (2007) Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants. CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis RJ, Wiedemann SG (2009) Quantifying the water and energy usage of individual activities within Australian feedlots. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan C, Gerber P, Opio C (2010) Structural change in the livestock sector. In: Steinfeld H, Mooney HA, Schneider F, Neville LE (eds) Livestock in a changing landscape. Island, London, pp 35–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch L, Falkenmark M, Gordon L, Rockström J, Folke C (2010) Water-mediated ecological consequences of intensification and expansion of livestock production. In: Steinfeld H, Mooney HA, Schneider F, Neville LE (eds) Livestock in a changing landscape. Island, London, pp 97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M, Lannerstad M (2005) Consumptive water use to feed humanity: curing a blind spot. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2008) The state of food insecurity in the world: 2008. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Foran B, Lenzen M, Dey C (2005) Balancing act: a triple bottom line analysis of the Australian economy. CSIRO and University of Sydney, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilfedder M et al (2010) Methods to assess water allocation impacts of plantations: final report. CSIRO, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipsey MR (2006) Numerical investigation into the significance of night time evaporation from irrigation farm dams across Australia. Land & Water Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK (2007) Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resour Manag 21:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst (2005) Creep feeding beef calves. NSW Department of Industry and Investment. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au. Accessed Nov 2010

  • NSW I&I (2010) Livestock gross margin budgets. NSW Department of Industry and Investment. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au. Accessed July 2010

  • Kelliher C (2009) Background report: revised economic model. RMCG, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr RA (2010) Northern India’s groundwater is going, going, going…. Science 325:798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Abbas A, Rana T, Carroll J (2010) Dairy water use in Australian dairy farms: past trends and future prospects. CSIRO, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler A (2008) Water use in LCA: Managing the planet’s freshwater resources. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:451–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JG, Yang H, Savenije HHG (2008) China’s move to higher-meat diet hits water security. Nature 454:397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow HJ, Hayes WK, Soret S, Carter RL, Schwab ER, Sabaté J (2009) Diet and environment: does what you eat matter? Am J Clin Nutr 89:1699S–1703S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2010) The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellemann C, MacDevette M, Manders T, Eickhout B, Svihus B, Prins AG, Kaltenborn BP (eds) (2009) The environmental food crisis: the environment’s role in averting future food crises. UNEP/GRIP-Arendal, Arendal

    Google Scholar 

  • NGGIC [National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Committee] (2007) Australian methodology for the estimation of greenhouse gas emissions and sinks 2006. Australian Government, Department of Climate Change, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce F (1997) Thirsty meals that suck the world dry. New Sci 2067:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters GM, Wiedemann SG, Rowley HV, Tucker RW (2010) Accounting for water use in Australian red meat production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:311–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43:4098–4104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pimental D, Houser J, Preiss E, White O, Fang H, Mesnick L, Barsky T, Tariche S, Schreck J, Alpert S (1997) Water resources: agriculture, the environment, and society. Bioscience 47:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimental D, Berger B, Filiberto D, Newton M, Wolfe B, Karabinakis E, Clark S, Poon E, Abbett E, Nandagopal S (2004) Water resources: agricultural and environmental issues. Bioscience 54:909–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qui J (2010) China faces up to groundwater crisis. Nature 466:308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010a) A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Glob Environ Chang 20:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010b) Reducing humanity’s water footprint. Environ Sci Technol 44:6019–6021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt BG, Poulton PL (2010) Dryland and irrigated cropping systems: comparing the impacts of consumptive water use. In: Notarnicola et al. (eds) Proc VII international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector. Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, pp 153–158

  • Ridoutt BG, Eady SJ, Sellahewa J, Simons L, Bektash R (2009) Water footprinting at the product brand level: case study and future challenges. J Clean Prod 17:1228–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt BG, Sanguansri P, Nolan M, Marks N (2011) Meat consumption and water scarcity: beware of generalizations. J Clean Prod (in press) doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.027

  • Rockström J et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick ML (2011) Introduction to special section on water resources in the Murray–Darling basin: past, present, and future. Water Resour Res 47:W00G01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GW cited in Pimental D, Houser J, Preiss E, White O, Fang H, Mesnick L, Barsky T, Tariche S, Schreck J, Alpert S (1997) Water resources: agriculture, the environment, and society. Bioscience 47:97–106

  • UNESCO-WWAP (2009) The United Nations world water development report 3: water in a changing world. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts PJ (2005) Reduction of evaporation from farm dams: final report to the National Program for Sustainable Irrigation. FSA Consulting, Toowoomba

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann S, McGahan E (2010) Review of water assessment methodologies and applications to Australian agriculture. In: Notarnicola et al. (eds) Proc VII international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector. Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, pp 425–430

  • Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37:701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Andrew Moore (CSIRO Plant Industry) who provided expert advice on pasture growth rates in eastern Australia, Robert Young (CSIRO Livestock Industries) who advised on livestock husbandry practices, as well as the feedlot operator who provided data on feed composition and sourcing. This study was jointly funded by Meat and Livestock Australia and CSIRO Sustainable Agriculture National Research Flagship; the authors have exercised complete freedom in designing the research and interpreting the data. Finally, we thank Beverley Henry (Queensland University of Technology), Chris McSweeney (CSIRO Livestock Industries) and Jay Sellahewa (CSIRO Food and Nutritional Sciences) who reviewed the manuscript and made helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley G. Ridoutt.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Sarah McLaren

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ridoutt, B.G., Sanguansri, P., Freer, M. et al. Water footprint of livestock: comparison of six geographically defined beef production systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17, 165–175 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0346-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0346-y

Keywords

Navigation