Abstract
Purpose
To consider whether feed supplements that reduce methane emissions from dairy cows result in a net reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity when productivity changes and emissions associated with extra manufacturing and management are included.
Methods
A life cycle assessment was undertaken using a model farm based on dairy farms in Victoria, Australia. The system boundary included the creation of farm inputs and on-farm activities up to the farm gate where the functional unit was 1 L of fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM). Electricity and diesel (scaled per cow), and fertiliser inputs (scaled on farm size) to the model farm were based on average data from a survey of farms. Fertiliser applied to crops was calculated per area of crop. Animal characteristics were based on available data from farms and literature. Three methane-reducing diets (containing brewers grain, hominy or whole cotton seed) and a control diet (cereal grain) were modelled as being fed during summer, with the control diet being fed for the remainder of the year in all cases.
Results and discussion
Greenhouse gas intensity (kg CO2-eq/L FPCM) was lower than the control diet when the hominy (97 % compared with control) and brewers grain (98 %) diets were used but increased when the whole cottonseed diet was used (104 %). On-farm GHG emissions (kg CO2-eq) were lower than the control diet when any of the methane-reducing diets were used (98 to 99.5 % of emissions when control diet fed). Diesel use in production and transport of feed supplements accounted for a large portion (63 to 93 %) of their GHG intensity (kg CO2-eq/t dry matter). Adjusting fertiliser application, changing transport method, changing transport fuel, and using nitrification inhibitors all had little effect on GHG emissions or GHG intensity.
Conclusions
Although feeding strategies that reduce methane emissions from dairy cows can lower the GHG emissions up to the farm gate, they may not result in lower GHG intensities (g CO2-eq/L FPCM) when pre-farm emissions are included. Both transport distance and the effect of the feed on milk production have important impacts on the outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APVMA (2011) Public chemical registration information system. http://services.apvma.gov.au/PubcrisWebClient/welcome.do. Accessed 20 June 2011
Bashford LL (1999) Nebraska OECD tractor test 1761—Summary 275. Case IH MX 270 Diesel, 18 speed, Agricultural Research Division, Institute of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska. Lincoln, Lincoln
Beer T, Grant T, Williams D, Watson H (2002) Fuel-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from alternative fuels in Australian heavy vehicles. Atmos Environ 36:753–763
Berners-Lee M. (2010) How bad are bananas? The carbon footprint of everything. Profile Books Ltd
Browne NA, Eckard RJ, Behrendt R, Kingwell RS (2011) A comparative analysis of on-farm greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural enterprises in south eastern Australia. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:641–652
Case IH (2011) Specification catalogues for Patriot 3330 sprayer and axial-flow combines from http://www.caseih.com/australia/Pages/Home.aspx. Accessed 26 May 2011
Centre for Design at RMIT and Life Cycle Strategies Pty Ltd (2010) Australian LCI database version 2010.5, data released in SimaPro LCA Software. Life Cycle Strategies, Melbourne
Cordella M, Tugnoli A, Spadoni G, Santarelli F, Zangrando T (2008) LCA of an Italian lager beer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):133–139
CSD (2008) Summer crops—gross margin analysis. Cotton Seed Distributors, Wee Waa, NSW, Australia
DAF (2011) Barley nutrition. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth, Australia http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/PC_92013.html?s=0. Accessed 26 May 2011
Dayani O, Ghorbani GR, Esmailizadeh AK (2011) Supplementation with whole cottonseed changes milk composition and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cows. Anim Prod Sci 51:95–101
DCCEE (2010) Australian national greenhouse accounts. National Inventory Report 2008 Volume 1. The Australian Government Submission to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change May 2010. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Canberra, Australia
de Klein CAM, Eckard RJ (2008) Target technologies for nitrous oxide abatement from animal agriculture. Aus J Exp Agric 48:14–20
DPI (2010) Dairy Industry Farm Monitor Project—2009/10. Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Eady S, Carre A, Grant T (2012) Life cycle assessment modelling of complex agricultural systems with multiple food and fibre co-products. J Cleaner Prod 28:143–149
ecoinvent Centre (2007) ecoinvent data version 2.0, reports No. 1–25, as implemented in SimaPro 7.2. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf
Feng H, Rubin OD, Babcock BA (2010) Greenhouse gas impacts of ethanol from Iowa corn: life cycle assessment versus system wide approach. Biomass Bioenerg 34:912–921
Flysjö A, Henriksson M, Cederberg C, Ledgard S, Englund J (2011a) The impact of various parameters on the carbon footprint of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Agric Syst 104:459–469
Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M, Ledgard S (2011b) How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:420–430
Forster P et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 129–234
Freer M, Dove H, Nolan JV (eds) (2007) Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia
Automation G (2000) Energy surveys of selected Victorian dairy farms. A report to Bonlac Foods and Sustainable Energy Authority. Genesis Automation, Hartwell, Victoria, Australia
Grainger C, Williams R, Clarke T, Wright A-DG, Eckard RJ (2010) Supplementation with whole cottonseed causes long-term reduction of methane emissions from lactating dairy cows offered a forage and cereal grain diet. J Dairy Sci 93:2612–2619
Grant T, Beer T (2006) Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from irrigated maize: The life-cycle analysis. In ‘6th Australian Maize Association Conference, 21–23 February 2006’ Maize Association of Australia: Griffith, NSW, Australia
Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2005) Environmental analysis of beer production. Int J Agric Resour Gov Ecology 4(2):152–162
Hoy RM (2008) Nebraska OECD tractor test 1909—Summary 577. Case IH Steiger 430 Diesel, also Case IH STX 430 Diesel, also Case IH Steiger 435 Diesel 16 speed, Agricultural Research Division, Institute of Agricultural and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska, Lincoln
IDF (2010) A common carbon footprint approach for dairy, The IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology for the dairy sector. Bulletin 445/2010 of the International Dairy Federation. International Dairy Federation. Brussels, Belgium
Incitec Pivot (2011) Granulok Starter Z. Incitec Pivot Limited, Southbank, Victoria, Australia. http://www.incitec.com.au/zone_files/PDFs/GranulockBrochure1.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2011
Koroneos C, Roumbas G, Gabari Z, Papagiannidou E, Moussiopoulos N (2005) Life cycle assessment of beer production in Greece. J Cleaner Prod 13(4):433–439
Lechón Y, Cabal H, Sáez R (2005) Life cycle analysis of wheat and barley crops for bioethanol production in Spain. Int J Agric Resour Gov Ecology 4:113–122
Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M (2010) Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4:351–365
Miller WF, Shirley JE, Titgemeyer EC, Brouk MJ (2009) Comparison of full-fat corn germ, whole cottonseed, and tallow as fat sources for lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 92:3386–3391
Moate PJ, Williams SRO, Grainger C, Hannah MC, Ponnampalam EN, Eckard RJ (2011) Influence of cold-pressed canola, brewers grains and hominy meal as dietary supplements suitable for reducing enteric methane emissions from lactating dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:254–264
Meyer PE, Green EH, Corbett JJ, Mas C, Winebrake JJ (2011) Total fuel-cycle analysis of heavy-duty vehicles using biofuels and natural gas-based alternative fuels. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 61:285–294
O'Brien D, Shalloo L, Grainger C, Buckley F, Horan B, Wallace M (2010) The influence of strain of Holstein–Fresian cow and feeding system on greenhouse gas emissions from pastoral dairy systems. J Dairy Sci 93:3390–3402
O'Brien D, Shalloo L, Patton J, Buckley F, Grainger C, Wallace M (2011) The effect of methodology on estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from grass-based dairy systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:39–78
Pritchard & Dettmann (2011) Lucerne Agronomy Checklist. Pritchard & Dettmann, Kyneton, Victoria, Australia http://www.crtkyneton.com.au/lucerneagronomy.htm Accessed: 18 May 2011
Talve S (2001) Life cycle assessment of a basic lager beer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(5):293–298
The Climate Conservancy (2008) The carbon footprint of Fat Tire® amber ale. The Climate Conservancy, Palo Alto, California, United States
Thomassen MA, Dalgaard R, Heijungs R, de Boer I (2008) Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:339–349
Acknowledgments
This study was undertaken through funding from the Department of Primary Industries' Future Farming Systems Research Division. The suggestions and feedback provided by Richard Eckard are greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Barbara Nebel
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, S.R.O., Fisher, P.D., Berrisford, T. et al. Reducing methane on-farm by feeding diets high in fat may not always reduce life cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19, 69–78 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0619-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0619-8