Abstract
Purpose
Forest headwater streams are important linkages for material transfer and information exchange between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Herein, we aimed to assess the degradation of acid-hydrolyzable carbohydrates (ACID) and acid-unhydrolyzable residue (AUR), and to check their driving factors during Castanopsis carlesii and Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) foliar litter decomposition in a headwater stream in subtropical forests.
Materials and methods
Using the litterbag method, changes in ACID and AUR of C. carlesii and Chinese fir foliar litter were analyzed during decomposition in a forest headwater stream, compared with those on the forest floor, and then calculated the lignocellulose index (LCI). A partial least squares (PLS) analysis was performed to reveal the relative importance of environmental factors and chemical compositions on ACID and AUR degradation rates.
Results
The cumulative loss rates of ACID in C. carlesii and Chinese fir foliar litter in the stream were 72.14% and 49.83%, respectively, exceeding those on the forest floor. The results indicate that the stream environment promotes ACID degradation in the foliar litter, driven mainly by precipitation, flow velocity, and dissolved oxygen. In contrast, the cumulative loss rates of AUR from C. carlesii and Chinese fir foliar litter in the stream were 23.36% and 8.84%, respectively. The degradation rates of AUR were negative in the early stage and then increased. The temperature was the only important environmental factor that was observed to be beneficial for the degradation rates of AUR. Moreover, the increase of LCI was detected as litter decomposition proceeding for both species, implying that litter quality decreases considerably with decomposition. C. carlesii foliar litter quality decreased more rapidly than that of Chinese fir in the stream.
Conclusions
The ACID in a foliar litter can be more easily degraded than AUR in a subtropical forest stream. Precipitation, flow velocity, and dissolved oxygen are important environmental factors that would facilitate the degradation rates of ACID, whereas few such effects were observed in AUR. These results provide a new reference for deepening our understanding of the dynamic characteristics of litter decomposition in subtropical forest streams.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aerts R (2006) The freezer defrosting: global warming and litter decomposition rates in cold biomes. J Ecol 94:713–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01142.x
Almendros G, Dorado J, González-Vila FJ, Blanco MJ, Lankes U (2000) 13C NMR assessment of decomposition patterns during composting of forest and shrub biomass. Soil Boil Biochem 32:793–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00202-3
Baerlocher F, Sridhar KR (2014) Association of animals and fungi in leaf decomposition. In: Jones EBG, Pang K-L (eds) Freshwater Fungi and Fungal-like Organisms, 1st edn. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 413–442
Bennett AE, Grussu D, Kam J, Caul S, Halpin C (2015) Plant lignin content altered by soil microbial community. New Phytol 206:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13171
Berg B (2014) Decomposition patterns for foliar litter - a theory for influencing factors. Soil Biol Biochem 78:222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.08.005
Berg B, Matzner EJER (1997) Effect of N deposition on decomposition of plant litter and soil organic matter in forest systems. Environ Rev 5:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1139/a96-017
Berg B, Mcclaugherty C (2020) Plant litter:decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Springer, Berlin
Boyero L, Lopez-Rojo N, Tonin A et al (2021) Impacts of detritivore diversity loss on instream decomposition are greatest in the tropics. Nat Commun 12:3700. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23930-2
Bradford MA, Berg B, Maynard DS, Wieder WR, Wood SA (2016) Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition. J Ecol 104:229–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12507
Carey N, Chester ET, Robson BJ (2021) Flow regime change alters shredder identity but not leaf litter decomposition in headwater streams affected by severe, permanent drying. Freshwater Biol 66:1813–1830. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13794
Chomel M, Guittonny-Larcheveque M, Fernandez C, Gallet C, DesRochers A, Pare D, Jackson BG, Baldy V (2016) Plant secondary metabolites: a key driver of litter decomposition and soil nutrient cycling. J Ecol 104:1527–1541. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12644
Corti R, Datry T, Drummond L, Larned ST (2011) Natural variation in immersion and emersion affects breakdown and invertebrate colonization of leaf litter in a temporary river. Aquat Sci 73:537–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0216-5
Dang CK, Schindler M, Chauvet E, Gessner MO (2009) Temperature oscillation coupled with fungal community shifts can modulate warming effects on litter decomposition. Ecology 90:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1974.1
De Marco A, Spaccini R, Vittozzi P, Esposito F, Berg B, De Santo AV (2012) Decomposition of black locust and black pine leaf litter in two coeval forest stands on Mount Vesuvius and dynamics of organic components assessed through proximate analysis and NMR spectroscopy. Soil Biol Biochem 51:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.025
Ferreira V, Graca MAS, de Lima J, Gomes R (2006) Role of physical fragmentation and invertebrate activity in the breakdown rate of leaves. Arch Hydrobiol 165:493–513. https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0165-0493
Garcia-Palacios P, McKie BG, Handa IT, Frainer A, Hattenschwiler S (2016) The importance of litter traits and decomposers for litter decomposition: a comparison of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems within and across biomes. Funct Ecol 30:819–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12589
Gomes PP, Ferreira V, Tonin AM, Medeiros AO, Goncalves JF (2018) Combined effects of dissolved nutrients and oxygen on plant litter decomposition and associated fungal communities. Microb Ecol 75:854–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1099-3
Graca MAS, Ferreira V, Canhoto C, Encalada AC, Guerrero-Bolano F, Wantzen KM, Boyero L (2015) A conceptual model of litter breakdown in low order streams. Int Rev Hydrobiol 100:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201401757
Grossman JJ, Cavender-Bares J, Hobbie SE (2020) Functional diversity of leaf litter mixtures slows decomposition of labile but not recalcitrant carbon over two years. Ecol Monogr 90:e01407. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECM.1407
Guo H, Wu F, Zhang X, Wei W, Zhu L, Wu R, Wang D (2022) Effects of habitat differences on microbial communities during litter decomposing in a subtropical forest. Forests 13:919. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13060919
Herman J, Moorhead D, Berg B (2008) The relationship between rates of lignin and cellulose decay in aboveground forest litter. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2620–2626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.07.003
Hou JF, Li F, Wang ZH, Li XQ, Yang WQ (2021) Budget of plant litter and litter carbon in the subalpine forest streams. Forests 12:1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121764
Ice GG, Hale VC, Light JT, Muldoon A, Simmons A, Bousquet T (2021) Understanding dissolved oxygen concentrations in a discontinuously perennial stream within a managed forest. Forest Ecol Manag 479:118531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118531
Maasri A, Schechner AE, Erdenee B, Dodds WK, Chandra S, Gelhaus JK, Thorp JH (2019) Does diel variation in oxygen influence taxonomic and functional diversity of stream macroinvertebrates? Freshw Sci 38:692–701. https://doi.org/10.1086/705916
Melillo JM, Aber JD, Linkins AE, Ricca A, Fry B, Nadelhoffer KJ (1989) Carbon and nitrogen dynamics along the decay continuum: plant litter to soil organic matter. Plant Soil 115:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02202587
Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL (2006) A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecol Monogr 76:151–174. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0151:Atmold]2.0.Co;2
Nuven D, Tonin AM, Rezende RD, Rabelo RS, Sena G, Bambi P, Concalves JF (2022) Habitat heterogeneity increases leaf litter retention and fragmentation in a Cerrado savanna stream. Limnologica 92:125945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2021.125945
Osono T (2017) Leaf litter decomposition of 12 tree species in a subtropical forest in Japan. Ecol Res 32:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1449-0
Preston CM, Nault JR, Trofymow JA (2009a) Chemical changes during 6 years of decomposition of 11 litters in some Canadian forest sites. Part 2. C-13 Abundance, Solid-State C-13 NMR Spectroscopy and the Meaning of “Lignin.” Ecosystems 12:1078–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9267-z
Preston CM, Nault JR, Trofymow JA, Smyth C, Grp CW (2009b) Chemical changes during 6 years of decomposition of 11 litters in some canadian forest sites. Part 1. Elemental Composition, Tannins, Phenolics, and Proximate Fractions. Ecosystems 12:1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9266-0
Raymond PA, Hartmann J, Lauerwald R, Sobek S, McDonald C, Hoover M, Butman D, Striegl R, Mayorga E, Humborg C, Kortelainen P, Durr H, Meybeck M, Ciais P, Guth P (2013) Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503:355–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12760
Royer TV, Minshall GW (2003) Controls on leaf processing in streams from spatial-scaling and hierarchical perspectives. J N Am Benthol Soc 22:352–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/1468266
Shipley B, Tardif A (2021) Causal hypotheses accounting for correlations between decomposition rates of different mass fractions of leaf litter. Ecology 102:e03196. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3196
Swan CM, Boyero L, Canhoto C (2021) The ecology of plant litter decomposition in stream ecosystems: an overview. In: Swan CM, Boyero L, Canhoto C (eds) The Ecology of Plant Litter Decomposition in Stream Ecosystems. Springer, Cham, pp 3–5
Tiegs SD, Costello DM, Isken MW et al (2019) Global patterns and drivers of ecosystem functioning in rivers and riparian zones. Sci Adv 5:eaav0486. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav0486
Wang LF, Chen YM, Zhou Y, Zheng HF, Xu ZF, Tan B, You CM, Zhang L, Li H, Guo L, Wang LX, Huang YY, Zhang J, Liu Y (2021) Litter chemical traits strongly drove the carbon fractions loss during decomposition across an alpine treeline ecotone. Sci Total Environ 753:142287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142287
Webster JR, Meyer JL (1997) Organic matter budgets for streams: a synthesis. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:141–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1468247
Whittinghill KA, Currie WS, Zak DR, Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS (2012) Anthropogenic N deposition increases soil C storage by decreasing the extent of litter decay: analysis of field observations with an ecosystem model. Ecosystems 15:450–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9521-7
Yang Y, Wang L, Yang Z, Xu C, Xie J, Chen G, Lin C, Guo J, Liu X, Xiong D, Lin W, Chen S, He Z, Lin K, Jiang M, Lin TC (2018) Large ecosystem service benefits of assisted natural regeneration. J Geophys Res-Biogeo 123:676–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jg004267
Yao YZ, Tian HQ, Shi H, Pan SF, Xu RT, Pan NQ, Canadell JG (2020) Increased global nitrous oxide emissions from streams and rivers in the Anthropocene. Nat Clim Change 10:138–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0665-8
Yue K, De Frenne P, Van Meerbeek K, Ferreira V, Fornara DA, Wu Q, Ni X, Peng Y, Wang D, Heděnec P, Yang Y, Wu F, Peñuelas J (2022) Litter quality and stream physicochemical properties drive global invertebrate effects on instream litter decomposition. Biol Rev 97:2023–2038. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12880
Yue K, Peng CH, Yang WQ, Peng Y, Zhang C, Huang CP, Wu FZ (2016) Degradation of lignin and cellulose during foliar litter decomposition in an alpine forest river. Ecosphere 7:e01523. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1523
Zhang MH, Cheng XL, Geng QH, Shi Z, Luo YQ, Xu X (2019) Leaf litter traits predominantly control litter decomposition in streams worldwide. Global Ecol Biogeogr 28:1469–1486. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12966
Zhang QF, Xie JS, Lyu MK, Xiong DC, Wang J, Chen YM, Li YQ, Wang MK, Yang YS (2017) Short-term effects of soil warming and nitrogen addition on the N: P stoichiometry of Cunninghamia lanceolata in subtropical regions. Plant Soil 411:395–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3037-4
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32022056, 31922052, and 32171641).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, W.W., F.W. and X.Z.; data curation, W.W.; formal analysis, W.W.; funding acquisition, F.W.; investigation, W.W., X.Z., H.G., L.Z., R.W. and X.Z.; visualization, W.W.; writing-original draft, W.W.; writing-review and editing, W.W. and F.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Yongfu Li.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, W., Zheng, X., Guo, H. et al. Changes in acid-hydrolyzable carbohydrates and acid-unhydrolyzable residue during foliar litter decomposition of Castanopsis carlesii and Chinese fir in a subtropical forest headwater stream. J Soils Sediments 23, 1617–1627 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03421-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03421-7