Skip to main content
Log in

Remarks on MOOCS and Mini-MOOCS

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an earlier issue of ETR&D, the editors provided an hierarchical framework of components to support learning and instruction. That hierarchy included information objects, knowledge objects, learning objects, instructional objects, courses, programs and ongoing efforts, with each subsequent component building on the former components. For example, a course is a structured collected of instructional objects, which in turn are structured collections of learning objects with learning activities, feedback, and assessments (both formative and summative). Based on that hierarchical perspective, most of the current massive open online courses (MOOCs) are not actually courses. This article proposes taking what is good about the MOOC concept and transforming it into something that could be considered a course—namely, a mini-MOOC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, E. (2007). 2007 Presidential address: The end(s) of testing. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 309–317. Retrieved from http://edr.sagepub.com/content/36/6/309.abstract.

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S. (2008). CCK08—The distributed course. The MOOC guide. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/themoocguide/3-cck08---the-distributed-course.

  • Hofsdadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, efficient and engaging instruction. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2012). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2014). Emerging educational technologies: Tensions and synergy. Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., Johnson, T. E., & Young, P. A. (2014). An editorial on research and development in and with educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, B. P. (Ed.). (2010). A roadmap for education technology [National Science Foundation Grant #0637190]. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, T. (2014). Massive open online courses. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational technology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Michael Spector.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spector, J.M. Remarks on MOOCS and Mini-MOOCS. Education Tech Research Dev 62, 385–392 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9339-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9339-4

Keywords

Navigation