Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Disrupting and democratising higher education provision or entrenching academic elitism: towards a model of MOOCs adoption at African universities

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Challenges of broadening access, escalating cost, maintaining desirable quality and enhancing meaningful learning experiences in African higher education (HE) have spurred debates on how to restructure higher education delivery to meet the diverse needs of heterogeneous learners and adapt pedagogical models to the educational realities of low-income African countries. In view of these complexities, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been advanced by Western Consortia, universities and online platform providers as panaceas for disrupting/transforming existing education models African universities. MOOCs have been touted as disruptive innovations with the potential to create new niche markets for HE courses, disrupt traditional models of instruction and content delivery and create new revenue streams for higher education. Yet academic elitism which manifests in the exclusive selection of top American universities to develop, host and deliver MOOCs, MOOC providers’ use of university brand and reputation as benchmarks for charging recruitment fees on headhunters recruiting MOOC graduates and their complex business models involving the sale of students’ big data (e.g. learning analytics) for profit seem to be inconsistent with claims about philanthropic and egalitarian drive of MOOCs. Drawing on disruptive innovation theory and a review of mainstream literature on MOOCs adoption in American and African tertiary sectors, this study argues that behind the MOOC rhetoric of disrupting and democratizing higher education lies the projection of top academic brands on the marketing pedestal, financial piggybacking on the hype and politics of academic exclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiel, T. (2013). Identifying Barriers to the Remix of Translated Open Educational Resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1351/2428.

  • Amussen, S., & Poska, A. (2013). MOOCs: Gender, class and empire. historiann (Posted May 15, 2013). http://www.historiann.com/2013/05/15/guest-post-on-the-lords-of-mooc-creation-whos-really-for-change-and-who-in-fact-is-standing-athwart-history-yelling-stop.

  • Anderson, T. (2013). Promise and/or peril: MOOCs and open and distance education. Athabasca: Athabasca University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Trade Commission. (2013). More than MOOCs: Opportunities arising from disruptive technologies in education. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boga, S., & McGreal, R. (2014). Introducing MOOCs to Africa: New economy skills for Africa Program-ICT. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. (2016). The state of broadband: Broadband catalyzing sustainable development. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union and UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, N. (2013). OERs and MOOCs: Old wine in new skins? In the Elearning Africa Report. International Conferences, Workshops and Exhibitions, 30–31 (Posted July 18, 2013). www.elearning-africa.com/…/oers-and-moocs-old-wine-in-new-skins/.

  • Cheverie, J. (2013). MOOCs and intellectual property: Ownership and use rights [Web log]. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/blogs/cheverij/moocsand-intellectual-property-ownership-and-use-rights.

  • Christensen, C. M. (2011). Future of state universities conference. Texas: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., Caldera, L., & Soares, L. (2011). Disrupting College: How disruptive innovation can deliver quality and affordability to postsecondary education. www.americanprogress.org.

  • Christensen, C., & Raynor, M. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (n.d.). htpp://www.consumerfinance.gov/pressleases/consumer-finance-protection-bureau-and-u-s-department-of-education-joint-report-finds-a-cycle-of-boom-and-bust-in-private-student-loan-market/.

  • Cost, J., Miller, J., McLeod, J., St. George, M., Haro, P., & Mahler, J. (2013). Unthinking technophilia (Posted January 14, 2013). https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/01/14/essay-says-faculty-involved-moocs-may-be-making-rope-professional-hangings.

  • Cwele, S (2016). National Internet Governance Forum. Speech delivered by Minister Dr Siyabonga Cwele at the National Internet Governance Forum and the launch of the Southern Africa Development Community Internet Exchange Point in Johannesburg, 22 September 2016.

  • Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Walji, S. (2014). Developing world MOOCs: A curriculum view of the MOOC landscape. Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies, 2(3), 122–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jager, A., & Van Reijswoud, V. (2014). ICT for Education in Africa: MOOCs and SPOCs provide new opportunities. Management and Information Systems for Africa.

  • De Waard, I., et al, (2014). Challenges for conceptualising EU MOOC for vulnerable learner groups. http://michaelseangallagher.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/deWaardEtAl_ChallengesForConceptualisingEUMOOC_forVulnerableLearnerGroups_final.pdf.

  • de Waard, I., Gallagher, M., Zelezny-Green, M., Czerniewicz, L., Downes, S., Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Willems, J (2014) Challenges for conceptualising EU MOOCs for vulnerable learner groups. In U. Cress & C. Kloos (Eds.) Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014, eLearning Papers, European Commission.

  • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2013). The Maturing of the MOOC: Literature review of massive open online courses and other forms of online distance learning. BIS Research Paper No 130, London, September 2013.

  • Educause (2012). What campus leaders need to know about MOOCs. http://tinyurl.com/c7gqj65.

  • Epelboin, Y. (2014). Report on eMOOCs 2014, EPFL, Lausanne, 10–12 February 2014.

  • Flynn, J. (2013). MOOCS: Disruptive innovation and the future of higher education. Christian Education Journal, 10, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global statement (2014). MOOCs The magic silver bullet for Africa?: Insights from STC in South Africa. ERInet blog. http://globalstatement.wordpress.com/2014/07/24/moocs-the-magic-silver-bullet-for-africa-insights-from-stc-in-south-africa/.

  • Harrison, R. (2013). Democratising management education: The first ‘MOOC’ by Africans for Africans. info@africanmanagers.org.

  • Hodgkinson-Williams, C. A. (2014). Degrees of ease: Adoption of OER, open textbooks and MOOCs in the global south. Keynote address at the OER Asia Symposium 2014. https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/1188.

  • Hollands, F., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality full report. New York: Centre for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, S. (2013). A changing business model in higher education: emerging technologies in teaching and learning and discovery. Elon: Elon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanwar, A. & Kaushik, M. (2012). Bridging the higher education gap: The 3-R Challenge. The 18th Conference of Commonwealth Education Ministers (18CCEM), 30 August 2012. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.

  • Kolowich, S. (2012). Conventional online universities consider strategic response to MOOCs. Inside Higher Education, 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/02/conventional-online-universities-consider-strategic-response-moocs.

  • Legros, G., Havet, I., Bruce, N., & Bonjour, S. (2009). The energy access situation in developing countries: A review forcusing on the least developed countries and Sub-Saharan Africa: World Health Organization and United Nations Development Programme.

  • Lepi, K. (2012), July 14). The current state of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Edudemic, 1–4. Retrieved July 14, 2012 from http://edudemic.com/2012/07/the-current-state-of-massive-open-online-courses-moocs.

  • Lepi, K. (2012). The current state of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Edudemic, 1–4 (Posted July 14). Retrieved from http://edudemic.com/2012/07/the-current-state-of-massive-open-online-courses-moocs/.

  • Liyanagunawardena, T. R. (2012). Information communication technologies and distance education in Sri Lanka: A case study of two universities. PhD Thesis, University of Reading, Reading.

  • Macharia, J. (2014). Internet access is no longer a luxury: Fibre-optics could leap-frog Africa into the future. Africa Renewal, April 2014. http://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/april-2014/internet-access-no-longer-luxury.

  • McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens G., & Cormier, D. (2010). Massive open online courses-digital ways of knowing and learning: The MOOC model for digital practice. www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf.

  • Milligan, C., Margaryan, A., & Littlejohn, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in massive open online courses. Journal of Online Learning with Technology (Special issue on MOOCs) (under review).

  • Mitchell, A. (2013). Africa: The Underlying Inequality of MOOCs. eLearning Africa, Berlin (Posted August 27, 2013). http://allafrica.com/stories/201308280506.html.

  • Moody’s Investors Service. (2012). Shifting ground technologies begin to alter century-old business model for universities: Massive Open Online Courses produce mixed credit effects for the higher education sector. New York: U.S Public Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, N. (2014). Why MOOCs will transform Africa (Posted February 26, 2014). http://worldview.stanford.edu/blog/africa-mooc.

  • Ng’ambi, D., & Bozalek, V. (2013). Leveraging informal leadership in higher education institutions: A case of diffusion of emerging technologies in a southern context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 940–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2014). Mapping five O’s for reaping benefits from Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies and Emerging Pedagogies, 2(3), 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2016). Positioning Extension Massive Open Online Courses (xMOOCs) within the open access and the lifelong learning agendas in a developing setting. Journal of Learning for Development, 3(1), 14–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noukakis, D. (2014). MOOCs in Africa and emerging countries: A blended learning experiment. Centre for Digital Education.

  • Nyirenda-Jere, T. & Biru, T. (2015). Internet development and Internet governance in Africa. The Internet Society.

  • Omollo, K. (2013). Help us translate educational videos about microbiology and disaster management from Michigan, Ghana, and East Africa (Posted January 28, 2013). https://open.umich.edu/blog/2013/01/28/help-us-translate-health-oer-videos/.

  • Oremus, W. (2013). Free online classes are an unsustainable gimmick. Here’s a better idea. Slate Magazine. The Slate Group, September 18, 2013. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/09/spocs_small_private_online_classes_may_be_better_than_moocs.html.

  • Oxford Internet Institute. (2014). Innovation in higher education: Building a better future?. Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivard, R. (2013a). Inside Higher Ed: Coursera’s contractual elitism. Times Higher Education. www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/newsinside-highered.

  • Rivard, R. (2013b). MOOCs’ many challenges in developing world. Inside Higher Education, April 30, 2013.

  • Salerno, C. (2012). Bitter reality of MOOConomics. Inside Higher Education, 1–2. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2012/08/09/real-economics-massive-online-courses-essay.

  • Schumann, R., & Kende, M. (2013). Lifting barriers to Internet development in Africa: Suggestions for improving connectivity. Report for the Internet Society.

  • Sharpe, P. (2013). Northern land grab vs. Southern autonomy or a third way? Barriers to authentic North-South partnerships. Paper presented at UNISA-Cambridge conference on Open and Distance E-Learning 2013, Stellenbosch, 29 September–2 October 2013.

  • South African Institute of Distance Education (2015). Open Practices in Higher Education: Trends and Possibilities for Africa.

  • Spencer, B., & Waissi, G. (2014). Disruptive innovation and MOOCs: The disruptive potential of massively open online classes. Phoenix: Arizona State University. www.public.asu.edu/~brspence/DisruptiveInnovationandMOOCs.pdf.

  • Stepan, A. (2013). Massive open online courses (MOOC) Disruptive impact on higher education. Burnaby: Masters in Business Administration, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szűcs, A., et al. (2013). Open discovery space: A socially-powered and multilingual open learning infrastructure to boost the adoption of e-learning resources. Project co-funded by the European Commission within the ICT Policy Support Programme.

  • Liyanagunawardena, T. Williams, S. & Adams, A. (2013). The impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries’ perspective. eLearning Papers, 33, 1–8. www.elearningpapers.eu.

  • Tamburri, R. (2014). An interview with Canadian MOOC pioneer George Siemens: Canada’s MOOC pioneer, opens up about where the movement is headed (Posted February 12, 2014). http://www.universityaffairs.ca/an-interview-with-canadian-mooc-pioneer-george-siemens.aspx.

  • The College Board (2011). Trends in college pricing 2011. http://trends.Collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/College_Pricing_2011pdf.

  • The Elearning Africa Report (2013). International conferences, workshops and exhibitions.

  • Trucano, M. (2013). Notes from talk by Daphne Koller, Coursera. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trucano, M. (2014). Tablets & MOOCs, digital textbooks & Matthew effects: What’s new (and what isn’t) in technology use in education in developing countries. Excerpts from the World Bank’s EduTech blog (Volume V). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Agency for International Development (USAID). (2014). African higher education: Opportunities for transformative change for sustainable development. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities, U. K. (2013). Massive open online courses: Higher education’s digital moment?. London: University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidhyanthan, S. (2012,). A New Era of Unfounded Hyperbole. Cato Unbound (Posted November 16, 2012). Retrieved from http://www.catounbound.org/2012/11/16/siva-vaidhyanathan/a-new-era-of-unfounded-hyperbole/.

  • Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education,. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, L. & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. A white paper, JISC and Centre for Educational Technology and Interoperability standards. http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Support Studies, Faculty of Management Sciences, Private Bag 20539, Bloemfontein, South Africa

    Patient Rambe & Mamello Moeti

Authors
  1. Patient Rambe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mamello Moeti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patient Rambe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rambe, P., Moeti, M. Disrupting and democratising higher education provision or entrenching academic elitism: towards a model of MOOCs adoption at African universities. Education Tech Research Dev 65, 631–651 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9500-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9500-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation