Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets

Strategies for New Venture Creation in Uncertain Institutional Contexts

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

  • This paper focuses on the importance of the institutional context in shaping the nature of entrepreneurship in emerging markets. More specifically, the paper argues that while the high degree of institutional uncertainty in emerging markets often acts as a barrier to entrepreneurship, it can also provide important opportunities for entrepreneurs.

  • We argue for the usefulness of recent work in neo-institutional theory as an approach to understanding the institutional context of emerging economies, and in particular for exploring the relationship between institutional uncertainty and entrepreneurship in emerging markets.

  • Drawing on neo-institutional theory, the paper develops a typology of possible institutional strategies available to entrepreneurs in emerging markets. Three strategies are identified: institutional brokering, spanning institutional voids, and bridging institutional distance. The success factors associated with each strategy are also considered. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the framework for theory development and points to a number of areas for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We would like to thank one of our reviewers for raising this important point.

  2. At least three different terms are used interchangeably in the literature—organizational field (e.g. DiMaggio and Powell 1983), interorganizational field (e.g. Leblebici et al. 1991), and institutional field (e.g. Phillips et al. 2000). We will use the term organizational field in this paper.

References

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2006). Venture capital in emerging economies: Networks and institutional change. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(2), 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aidis, R. (2005). Institutional barriers to small- and medium-sized enterprise operations in transition countries. Small Business Economics, 25(4), 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. J., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). New strategies in emerging markets. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthurs, J. D., & Busenitz, L. W. (2006). Dynamic capabilities and venture performance: The effects of venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggart, N. W., & Guillén, M. F. (1999). Developing difference: Social organization and the rise of the auto industries of South Korea, Taiwan, Spain, and Argentina. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 722–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Lost in translation: The making of danish diversity management. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 939–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxenbaum, E., & Battilana, J. (2005). Importation as innovation: Transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization, 3(4), 355–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buencamino, L., & Gorbunov, S. (2002). Informal money transfer systems: Opportunities and challenges for development finance. Discussion Paper of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, No. 26.

  • Cavusgil, T., Ghauri, P., & Agarwal, M. (2002). Doing business in emerging markets: Entry and negotiation strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, P., & Tirupati, D. (2003). Business Strategies for Managing Complex Supply Chains in Large Emerging Economies: The story of AMUL. Working Paper, Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India.

  • DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking and convening. Organization Studies, 26(3), 385–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, K., Hawk, A., Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2006). Institutional obstacles to entrepreneurship. In M. Casson, B. Yeung, A., Basu, & N. Wadeson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 540–579). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of sun microsystems and java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby R. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, B. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensmans, M. (2003). Social movement organizations: A metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organization Studies, 24(3), 355–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R., Eden, L., Lau, C., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karra, N., Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. (2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 862–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karra, N., Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. (2008). Building the born global firm: Developing entrepreneurial capabilities for international new venture success. Long Range Planning, 41(4), 440–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2006). Emerging giants: Building world class companies in developing countries. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S., (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25(2), 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Phillips, N. (2004). From moby dick to free willy: Macro-Cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization, 11(5), 689–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Winn, M. I., & Jennings, P. D. (2001). The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 624–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 333–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, T., & Hart, S. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 350–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Ibrayeva, E. S. (2006). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy in central Asian transition economies: Quantitative and qualitative analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32(1), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R. C. O. (1986). The economics of institutions and sources of growth. Economic Journal, 96(384), 903–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. (2001). Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001). How Can the Digital Divide Between Nations and Sectors Be Bridged? Geneva: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2000). Business strategies in transition economies. Thousand Oaks: Sage .

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2001). How entrepreneurs create wealth in transition economies. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2002). Toward an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2000). Interorganizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. (2007). Opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial capabilities and bricolage: Connecting institutional theory and entrepreneurship in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., Tracey, P., & Karra, N. (2009). Rethinking institutional distance: Strengthening the tie between new institutional theory and international management. Strategic Organization, 7(3), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2004). Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits.Philadelphia: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon, (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 69–92). Berlin: Walter de Gruyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. F. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2008). Entrepreneurship and small business development in post-socialist economies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1985). Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism. American Psychologist, 40(12), 1285–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2002). World development report: Building institutions for markets. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., & Pangarkar, N. (2006). Rising to the global challenge: Strategies for firms in emerging markets. Long Range Planning, 39(3), 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 608–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1993). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior: A critique and extension. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17(4), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Paul Tracey

  2. Imperial College Business School, London, UK

    Nelson Phillips

Authors
  1. Paul Tracey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nelson Phillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Tracey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tracey, P., Phillips, N. Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets. Manag Int Rev 51, 23–39 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0066-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0066-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation