This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Agnarsson, I., & Kuntner, M. (2007). Taxonomy in a changing world: seeking solutions for a science in crisis. Systematic Biology, 56(3), 531–539.
Blaxter, M. L. (2004). The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 359, 669–679.
Buckup, P. A. et al. (2007). Catálogo das espécies de peixes de água doce do Brasil. Museu Nacional.
Carvalho, M. R. de et al. (2005). Revisiting the taxonomic impediment. Science, 307, 353.
Crisci, J. V. (2006). One-dimensional systematists: perils in a time of steady progress. Systematic Botany, 31(1), 217–221.
DeSalle, R. (2006). Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: response to Rubinoff. Conservation Biology, 20(5), 1545–1547.
DeSalle, R., Egan, M. G., & Siddall, M. (2005). The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 360, 1905–1916.
Ebach, M. C., & Holdrege, C. (2005a). DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy. Nature, 434, 697.
Ebach, M. C., & Holdrege, C. (2005b). More taxonomy, not DNA barcoding. BioScience, 55(10), 822–823.
Forest, F. et al. (2007). Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature, 445, 757–760.
Gaston, K.J., & O’Neill, M.A. (2004). Automated species identification: why not? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 359, 655–667.
Godfray, H.C.J. (2002). Challenges for taxonomy. Nature, 417, 17–19.
Godfray, H.C.J. (2007). Linnaeus in the information age. Nature, 446, 259–260.
Godfray, H.C.J., & Knapp, S. (2004). Introduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 359, 559–569.
Grant, T. et al. (2003). The perils of ‘point-and-click’ systematics. Cladistics, 19, 276–285.
Gropp, R.E. (2004). Threatened species: university natural science collections in the United States. Systematics and Biodiversity, 1, 285.
Lipscomb, D. et al. (2003). The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(2), 65–66.
Meyer, C. P., & Paulay G. (2005). DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology, 3(12), 2229–2238.
Miller, S. E. (2007). DNA barcoding and the renaissance of taxonomy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(12), 4775–4776.
Mooers, A. Ø. (2007). The diversity of biodiversity. Nature, 445, 717–718.
Purvis, A. et al. (2005). Phylogeny and Conservation. Oxford University Press.
Sabaj, M. H. et al. (2003). The All Catfish Species Inventory, http://silurus.acnatsci.org/
Scotland, R. et al. (2003). The Big Machine and the much-maligned taxonomist. Systematics and Biodiversity, 1(2), 139–143.
Tautz, D. et al. (2003). A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(2), 70–74.
Wheeler, Q. D. (2004). Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 359, 571–583.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Carvalho, M.R., Bockmann, F.A., Amorim, D.S. et al. Taxonomic Impediment or Impediment to Taxonomy? A Commentary on Systematics and the Cybertaxonomic-Automation Paradigm. Evol Biol 34, 140–143 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-007-9011-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-007-9011-6