Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characterization of particle deposition during crossflow filtration as influenced by permeate flux and crossflow velocity using a microfluidic filtration system

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Particle deposition during crossflow filtration is significantly influenced by the operating conditions, in particular the permeate flux and crossflow velocity. However, there is a lack of detailed knowledge about how deposit layer structures and distributions depend on operating parameters. This study uses a microfluidic visualisation filtration system to examine the influence of operating conditions on the deposition process during crossflow ultrafiltration from a microscopic perspective. Increasing the permeate flux caused an increasing amount of deposition and a thicker deposit layer. Higher crossflow velocities reduced the extent of deposition. The degree of deposition varied over a range of operating conditions due to the altered hydrodynamic forces exerted on the particles, which can be examined by the deposition probability according to an existing model. Building on this, an empirical correlation between the deposition probability and volume of deposition as a function of filtration time was developed, which gave good agreement with experimental results. The effect of solution conditions was also involved in this correlation as a interaction energies. This could be useful for predicting the dynamic deposition process during crossflow filtration over a range of operating and solution conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zeman L J, Zydney A. Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration: Principles and Applications. Florida: CRC Press, 2017, 1–618

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pabby A K, Rizvi S S, Requena A M S. Handbook of Membrane Separations: Chemical, Pharmaceutical, Food, and Biotechnological Applications. Florida: CRC Press, 2008, 1–812

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen G Q, Leong T S, Kentish S E, Ashokkumar M, Martin G J. Membrane separations in the dairy industry. In: Separation of Functional Molecules in Food by Membrane Technology. Washington: Academic Press, 2019, 267–304

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis R H. Microfiltration in pharmaceutics and biotechnology. In: Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019, 29–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Moslehyani A, Ismail A F, Matsuura T, Rahman M A, Goh P S. Recent progresses of ultrafiltration (UF) membranes and processes in water treatment. In: Membrane Separation Principles and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019, 85–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Field R. Fundamentals of fouling. Membranes for Water Treatment, 2010, 4: 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo W, Ngo H H, Li J. A mini-review on membrane fouling. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 122: 27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang C Y, Chong T H, Fane A G. Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2011, 164(1–2): 126–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang X, Zhou M, Meng X, Wang L, Huang D. Effect of protein on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane fouling behavior under different pH conditions: interface adhesion force and XDLVO theory analysis. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(4): 12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee J, Jeong S, Ye Y, Chen V, Vigneswaran S, Leiknes T, Liu Z. Protein fouling in carbon nanotubes enhanced ultrafiltration membrane: fouling mechanism as a function of pH and ionic strength. Separation and Purification Technology, 2017, 176: 323–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Di H, Martin G J, Sun Q, Xie D, Dunstan D E. Detailed, real-time characterization of particle deposition during crossflow filtration as influenced by solution properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 555: 115–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Marel P, Zwijnenburg A, Kemperman A, Wessling M, Temmink H, van der Meer W. Influence of membrane properties on fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 348(1–2): 66–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu X, Loo H E, Bai R. A novel membrane showing both hydrophilic and oleophobic surface properties and its non-fouling performances for potential water treatment applications. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 436: 47–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Simon A, Price W E, Nghiem L D. Changes in surface properties and separation efficiency of a nanofiltration membrane after repeated fouling and chemical cleaning cycles. Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 113: 42–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang X, Chen G Q, Zhang W, Deng H. Surface-modified anion exchange membranes with self-cleaning ability and enhanced antifouling properties. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2019, 105: 8–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. He Z, Miller D J, Kasemset S, Paul D R, Freeman B D. The effect of permeate flux on membrane fouling during microfiltration of oily water. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 525: 25–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. She Q, Tang C Y, Wang Y N, Zhang Z. The role of hydrodynamic conditions and solution chemistry on protein fouling during ultrafiltration. Desalination, 2009, 249(3): 1079–1087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y N, Tang C Y. Protein fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes—the role of hydrodynamic conditions, solution chemistry, and membrane properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 376(1–2): 275–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mattsson T, Lewis W J, Chew Y J, Bird M R. The use of fluid dynamic gauging in investigating the thickness and cohesive strength of cake fouling layers formed during cross-flow microfiltration. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 198: 25–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ngene I S, Lammertink R G, Wessling M, van der Meer W. A microfluidic membrane chip for in situ fouling characterization. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 346(1): 202–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding A, Liang H, Li G, Derlon N, Szivak I, Morgenroth E, Pronk W. Impact of aeration shear stress on permeate flux and fouling layer properties in a low pressure membrane bioreactor for the treatment of grey water. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 510: 382–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller D J, Kasemset S, Paul D R, Freeman B D. Comparison of membrane fouling at constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 454: 505–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi H, Zhang K, Dionysiou D D, Oerther D B, Sorial G A. Influence of cross-flow velocity on membrane performance during filtration of biological suspension. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 248(1–2): 189–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lian B, Wang Y, Le-Clech P, Chen V, Leslie G. A numerical approach to module design for crossflow vacuum membrane distillation systems. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 510: 489–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bowen W R, Jenner F. Theoretical descriptions of membrane filtration of colloids and fine particles: an assessment and review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 1995, 56: 141–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stamatakis K, Tien C. A simple model of cross-flow filtration based on particle adhesion. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1993, 39(8): 1292–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Di H, Martin G J, Dunstan D E. A microfluidic system for studying particle deposition during ultrafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 532: 68–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bowen W R, Yousef H N, Calvo J I. Dynamic crossflow ultrafiltration of colloids: a deposition probability cake filtration approach. Separation and Purification Technology, 2001, 24(1–2): 297–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. O’neill M E. A sphere in contact with a plane wall in a slow linear shear flow. Chemical Engineering Science, 1968, 23(11): 1293–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Altmann J, Ripperger S. Particle deposition and layer formation at the crossflow microfiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 1997, 124(1): 119–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed in part at the Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication (MCN) in the Victorian Node of the Australian National Fabrication Facility (ANFF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia

    Hongzhan Di, Gregory J. O. Martin & Dave E. Dunstan

Authors
  1. Hongzhan Di
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory J. O. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dave E. Dunstan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dave E. Dunstan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di, H., Martin, G.J.O. & Dunstan, D.E. Characterization of particle deposition during crossflow filtration as influenced by permeate flux and crossflow velocity using a microfluidic filtration system. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 15, 552–561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1962-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1962-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation