Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated adsorption and absorption process for post-combustion CO2 capture

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored the feasibility of integrating an adsorption and solvent scrubbing process for post-combustion CO2 capture from a coal-fired power plant. This integrated process has two stages: the first is a vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) process using activated carbon as the adsorbent, and the second stage is a solvent scrubber/stripper system using monoethanolamine (30 wt-%) as the solvent. The results showed that the adsorption process could enrich CO2 in the flue gas from 12 to 50 mol-% with a CO2 recovery of > 90%, and the concentrated CO2 stream fed to the solvent scrubber had a significantly lower volumetric flowrate. The increased CO2 concentration and reduced feed flow to the absorption section resulted in significant reduction in the diameter of the solvent absorber, bringing the size of the absorber from uneconomically large to readily achievable domain. In addition, the VSA process could also remove most of the oxygen initially existed in the feed gas, alleviating the downstream corrosion and degradation problems in the absorption section. The findings in this work will reduce the technical risks associated with the state-of-the art solvent absorption technology for CO2 capture and thus accelerate the deployment of such technologies to reduce carbon emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markewitz P, Kuckshinrichs W, Leitner W, Linssen J, Zapp P, Bongartz R, Schreiber A, Muller T E. Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(6): 7281–7305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. IEA. Transforming Industry through CCUS. 2019

  3. Rochelle G T. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science, 2009, 325 (5948): 1652–1654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ye B, Jiang J, Zhou Y, Liu J, Wang K. Technical and economic analysis of amine-based carbon capture and sequestration at coal-fired power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 222: 476–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oko E, Wang M, Joel A S. Current status and future development of solvent-based carbon capture. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2017, 4(1): 5–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell K L S, Zhao Y, Hall J J, Williams D R. The effect of CO2-loaded amine solvents on the corrosion of a carbon steel stripper. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 47: 376–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Krzemień A, Więckol-Ryk A, Smoliński A, Koteras A, Więcław-Solny L. Assessing the risk of corrosion in amine-based CO2 capture process. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 43: 189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fredriksen S B, Jens K J. Oxidative degradation of aqueous amine solutions of MEA, AMP, MDEA, Pz: a review. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 1770–1777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimura H, Kubo T, Shimada M, Kitamura H, Fujita K, Suzuki K, Yamamoto K, Akai M. Environmental risk assessment of MEA and its degradation products from post-combustion CO2 capture pilot plant: drafting technical guidelines. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 6490–6500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saiwan C, Supap T, Idem R O, Tontiwachwuthikul P. Part 3: corrosion and prevention in post-combustion CO2 capture systems. Carbon Management, 2011, 2(6): 659–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moser P, Wiechers G, Schmidt S, Garcia Moretz-Sohn Monteiro J, Charalambous C, Garcia S, Sanchez Fernandez E. Results of the 18-month test with MEA at the post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem—new impetus to solvent management, emissions and dynamic behaviour. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 95: 102945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rezakazemi M, Heydari I, Zhang Z. Hybrid systems: combining membrane and absorption technologies leads to more efficient acid gases (CO2 and H2S) removal from natural gas. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2017, 18: 362–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Belaissaoui B, Le Moullec Y, Willson D, Favre E. Hybrid membrane cryogenic process for post-combustion CO2 capture. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 415–416: 424–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu K, Neathery J K, Remias J E, Li X. Method for removing CO2 from coal-fired power plant flue gas using ammonia as the scrubbing solution, with a chemical additive for reducing NH3 losses, coupled with a membrane for concentrating the CO2 stream to the gas stripper. US Patent, 8328911, 2011

  15. Webley P A, Qader A, Ntiamoah A, Ling J, Xiao P, Zhai Y. A new multi-bed vacuum swing adsorption cycle for CO2 capture from flue gas streams. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114(Suppl C): 2467–2480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Webley P A. Adsorption technology for CO2 separation and capture: a perspective. Adsorption, 2014, 20(2–3): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saeed I M, Alaba P, Mazari S A, Basirun W J, Lee V S, Sabzoi N. Opportunities and challenges in the development of monoethanolamine and its blends for post-combustion CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 79: 212–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazari S A, Alaba P, Saeed I M. Formation and elimination of nitrosamines and nitramines in freshwaters involved in postcombustion carbon capture process. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 103111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yi H, Li F, Ning P, Tang X, Peng J, Li Y, Deng H. Adsorption separation of CO2,CH4 and N2 on microwave activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 215–216: 635–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vargas D, Giraldo L, Moreno-Piraján J C. Carbon dioxide and methane adsorption at high pressure on activated carbon materials. Adsorption, 2013, 19(6): 1075–1082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Idris I, Abdullah A, Shamsudin I K, Othman M R. Optimizing purity and recovery of hydrogen from syngas by equalized pressure swing adsorption using palm kernel shell activated carbon adsorbent. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2019, 2124(1): 020059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang X X, Xiao P, Sun C Y, Luo G X, Ju J, Wang X R, Wang H X, Yang H. Optimal activated carbon for separation of CO2 from (H2 + CO2) gas mixture. Petroleum Science, 2018, 15(3): 625–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu D, Xiao P, Zhang J, Li G, Xiao G, Webley P A, Zhai Y. Effects of water vapour on CO2 capture with vacuum swing adsorption using activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 230: 64–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. You Y Y, Liu X J. Modeling of CO2 adsorption and recovery from wet flue gas by using activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 369: 672–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Raganati F, Chirone R, Ammendola P. CO2 capture by temperature swing adsorption: working capacity as affected by temperature and CO2 partial pressure. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(8): 3593–3605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. The world biggest water ring vacuum pump is made by Huacheng. Zibo Water Ring Vacuum Pump Factory Co. Ltd. website, 2011

  27. Xiao G, Saleman T L, Zou Y, Li G, May E F. Nitrogen rejection from methane using dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption with a kinetically-selective adsorbent. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 372: 1038–1046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zou Y, Xiao G, Li G, Lu W, May E F. Advanced non-isothermal dynamic simulations of dual reflux pressure swing adsorption cycles. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2017, 126: 76–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. May-Vázquez M M, Gómez-Castro F I, Rodríguez-Ángeles M A. Rate-based modelling and simulation of pilot scale distillation column. In: Kiss A A, Zondervan E, Lakerveld R, Özkan L, eds. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019, 625–630

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Y, Chen H, Chen C C, Plaza J M, Dugas R, Rochelle G T. Rate-based process modeling study of CO2 capture with aqueous monoethanolamine solution. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(20): 9233–9246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lawal A, Wang M, Stephenson P, Obi O. Demonstrating full-scale post-combustion CO2 capture for coal-fired power plants through dynamic modelling and simulation. Fuel, 2012, 101: 115–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramezan M, Skone T J, ya Nsakala N, Liljedahl G N. Carbon dioxide capture from existing coal-fired power plants. Report DOE/NETL-401/110907. 2007

  33. Li L, Maeder M, Burns R, Puxty G, Clifford S, Yu H. The Henry coefficient of CO2 in the MEA-CO2-H2O system. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 1841–1847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu X, Wang M, Liao P, Shen J, Li Y. Solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture for power plants: a critical review and perspective on dynamic modelling, system identification, process control and flexible operation. Applied Energy, 2020, 257: 113941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li K, Leigh W, Feron P, Yu H, Tade M. Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: technoeconomic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements. Applied Energy, 2016, 165: 648–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vega F, Sanna A, Maroto-Valer M M, Navarrete B, Abad-Correa D. Study of the MEA degradation in a CO2 capture process based on partial oxy-combustion approach. International Journal of Green-house Gas Control, 2016, 54: 160–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Morken A K, Pedersen S, Nesse S O, Flø N E, Johnsen K, Feste J K, de Cazenove T, Faramarzi L, Vernstad K. CO2 capture with monoethanolamine: solvent management and environmental impacts during long term operation at the Technology Centre Mongstad (TCM). International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 82: 175–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fang M, Yi N, Di W, Wang T, Wang Q. Emission and control of flue gas pollutants in CO2 chemical absorption system: a review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 93: 102904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hammond G P, Spargo J. The prospects for coal-fired power plants with carbon capture and storage: a UK perspective. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 86: 476–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge financial assistance provided to the CO2CRC by the Australian Government through its CRC program and through Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development (ANLEC R&D). ANLEC R&D is supported by Australian Coal Association Low Emissions Technology Limited and the Australian Government through the Clean Energy Initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gongkui Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, G., Xiao, P., Hoadley, A. et al. Integrated adsorption and absorption process for post-combustion CO2 capture. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 15, 483–492 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1964-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1964-3

Keywords

Navigation