Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of a novel bent-up bars system not interacting with concrete

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing the bending and shear capacities of reinforced concrete members is an interesting issue in structural engineering. In recent years, many studies have been carried out to improve capacities of reinforced concrete members such as using post and pre-tensioning, Fiber Reinforced Polymer and other techniques. This paper proposes a novel and significant technique to increase the flexural capacity of simply supported reinforced concrete beams. The proposed method uses a new reinforcement bar system having bent-up bars, covered with rubber tubes. This technique will avoid interaction of bent-up bars with concrete. They are located in the zone where compressive and tensile forces act against one another. The compressive force in the upper point of the bent-up bars is exerted to the end point of these bars located under neutral axis. Moreover, the tensile stress is decreased in reinforcements located under the neutral axis. This will cause the Reinforced Concrete (RC) beam to endure extra loading before reaching yield stress. These factors may well be considered as reasons to increase bending capacity in the new system. The laboratory work together with finite element method analysis were carried out in this investigation. Furthermore, bending capacity, ductility, strength, and cracking zone were assessed for the new proposed system and compared with the conventional model. Both the FEM simulation and the experimental test results revealed that the proposed system has significant impact in increasing the load bearing capacity and the stiffness of the RC beams. In the present study, an equation is formulated to calculate bending capacity of a new reinforcement bar system beam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Figeys W, Verstrynge E, Brosens K, Van Schepdael L, Dereymaeker J, Van Gemert D, Schueremans L. Feasibility of a novel system to prestress externally bonded reinforcement. Materials and Structures, 2011, 44(9): 1655–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotynia R, Cholostiakow S. New proposal for flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using CFRP T-shaped profiles. Polymers, 2015, 7(11): 2461–2477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Papanicolaou C G, Triantafillou T C, Papathanasiou M, Karlos K. Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: Out-of-plane cyclic loading. Materials and Structures, 2007, 41(1): 143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pham T M, Hao H. Review of concrete structures strengthened with FRP against impact loading. Structures, 2016, 7: 59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanarslan H M. Flexural strengthening of RC beams with prefabricated ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete laminates. Engineering Structures, 2017, 151: 337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rasheed H A, Abdalla J, Hawileh R, Al-tamimi A K. Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with externally bonded Aluminum Alloy plates. Engineering Structures, 2017, 147: 473–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wobbe E, Silva P, Barton B L, Dharani L R, Birman V, Nanni A, Alkhrdaji T, Thomas J, Tunis G. Flexural capacity of RC beams externally bonded with SRP and SRG. In: Proceedings of Society for the Advancement of material and Process Engineering 2004 Symposium, 2004, 16–20

    Google Scholar 

  8. Esfandiari M J, Rahimi Bondarabadi H, Sheikholarefin S, Dehghan Manshadi S H. Numerical investigation of parameters influencing debonding of FRP sheets in shear-strengthened beams. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(2): 246–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oehlers D J. Reinforced concrete beams with plates glued to their soffits. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1992, 118(8): 2023–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daly A F, Witarnawan W. Strengthening of bridges using external post-tensioning. In: International Conference of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  11. Altun F. An experimental study of the jacketed reinforced-concrete beams under bending. Construction & Building Materials, 2004, 18(8): 611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaallal O, Nollet M J, Perraton D. Strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with externally bonded fiber-reinforced-plastic plates: design guidelines for shear and flexure. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1998, 25(4): 692–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith S T, Teng J G. FRP-strengthened RC beams. I: Review of debonding strength models. Engineering Structures, 2002, 24(4): 385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ross C A, Jerome D M, Tedesco J W, Hughes M L. Strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with externally bonded composite laminates. Structural Journal, 1999, 96(2): 212–220

    Google Scholar 

  15. Urgessa G S, Esfandiari M. Review of polymer coatings used for blast strengthening of reinforced concrete and masonry structures. In: International Congress on Polymers in Concrete (ICPIC 2018), 2018, 713–719

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee H Y, Jung W T, Chung E. Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with pre-stressed near surface mounted CFRP systems. Composite Structures, 2017, 163: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seraj S M, Kotsovos M D, Pavlović M N. Compressive-force path and behaviour of prestressed concrete beams. Materials and Structures, 1993, 26(2): 74–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shatarat N, Katkhuda H, Abdel-Jaber M, Alqam M. Experimental investigation of reinforced concrete beams with spiral reinforcement in shear. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 125: 585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang K H, Kim G H, Yang H S. Shear behavior of continuous reinforced concrete T-beams using wire rope as internal shear reinforcement. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25(2): 911–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karayannis C G, Chalioris C E. Shear tests of reinforced concrete beams with continuous rectangular spiral reinforcement. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 46: 86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghasemi M R, Shishegaran A. Role of slanted reinforcement on bending capacity SS beams. Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, 2017, 11: 195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dassault Systems Simulia Corp. ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual 6.10-EF, 2010

  23. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(37–40): 2437–2455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: A simplified mesh free method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A geometrically nonlinear three dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4740–4758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Application of particle methods to static fracture of reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 137(1–4): 19–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. A three dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(29–30): 2777–2799

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghorashi S S, Valizadeh N, Mohammadi S, Rabczuk T. T-spline based XIGA for fracture analysis of orthotropic media. Computers & Structures, 2015, 147: 138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Amiri F, Anitescu C, Arroyo M, Bordas S P A, Rabczuk T. XLME interpolants, a seamless bridge between XFEM and enriched meshless methods. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(1): 45–57

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Areias P, Msekh M A, Rabczuk T. Damage and fracture algorithm using the screened Poisson equation and local remeshing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 158: 116–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Areias P, Rabczuk T. Steiner-point free edge cutting of tetrahedral meshes with applications in fracture. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2017, 132: 27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Areias P, Reinoso J, Camanho P P, César de Sá J, Rabczuk T. Effective 2D and 3D crack propagation with local mesh refinement and the screened Poisson equation. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 189: 339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ren H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 318: 762–782

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Ren H, Zhuang X, Cai Y, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon Peridynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 108(12): 1451–1476

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Jankowiak T, Lodygowski T. Identification of parameters of concrete damage plasticity constitutive model. Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2005, 6(1): 53–69

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hamdia K M, Silani M, Zhuang X, He P, Rabczuk T. Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, 206(2): 215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Andersson S, Karlsson H. Structural response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to explosions, time dependent transformation factors, support reactions and distribution of section forces. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Chalmers: Chalmers University of Technology, 2012, 6–110

    Google Scholar 

  39. FEA. Finite Element Analyses. Abaqus/CAE version 6.13: Computer Aided Engineering. Dassault Systemes, 2013

  40. ASTM S. Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. 615/A 615M-09b, 2009

  41. ASTM C. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. C348-18, 2018

  42. RCSC Committee. Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), 2004

  43. ASTM C. Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar. C1437, 2007

  44. ASTM C. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. C39/C39M-12, 2012

  45. Iribarren B S. Progressive collapse simulation of reinforced concrete structures: Influence of design and material parameters and investigation of the strain rate effects. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Brussel: Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schlaich J, Schäfer K, Jennewein M. Toward a consistent design of structural concrete. PCI Journal, 1987, 32(3): 74–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. ACI Committee. Qualification of post-installed mechanical anchors in concrete and commentary. ACI Comm, ACI 355.2, 2004

  48. ACI Committee. Code Requirements for nuclear safely related concrete structures. ACI Comm, ACI 349R-9, 1990

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Ghasemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shishegaran, A., Ghasemi, M.R. & Varaee, H. Performance of a novel bent-up bars system not interacting with concrete. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 13, 1301–1315 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0552-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0552-4

Keywords

Navigation