Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Articulating China’s Science and Technology: Knowledge Collaboration Networks Within and Beyond the Yangtze River Delta Megalopolis in China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we reconsider the defining but often overlooked ‘hinge’ function of megalopolises by analyzing how megalopolises have articulated national and international urban systems in the context of a globalizing knowledge economy. Taking the case of China’s Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, we particularly focus on knowledge circulation within and beyond the YRD region by analyzing the pattern and process of knowledge collaboration at different geographical scales during the 2004–2014 period. Results show that the structure of scientific knowledge collaboration as reflected by co-publications has been strongest at the national scale whereas that of technological knowledge collaboration as measured by co-patents has been strongest at the global scale. Despite this difference, the structure of both scientific and technological knowledge collaboration has been functionally polycentric at the megalopolitan scale but become less so at the national and global scales. The ‘globally connected but locally disconnected’ pattern of Shanghai’s external knowledge collaboration suggests that the gateway role of the YRD megalopolis in promoting knowledge collaboration at different geographical scales will take time before it is fully realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin A, Thrift N, 1995. Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson D E, Gunessee S, Matthiessen C W et al., 2014. The geography of Chinese science. Environment and Planning A, 46(12): 2950–2971. doi: 10.1068/a130283p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P, 2004. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger M, Meijers E, 2012. Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49(5): 1127–1149. doi: 10.1177/0042098011407095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger M J, van der Knaap B, Wall R S, 2014. Polycentricity and the multiplexity of urban networks. European Planning Studies, 22(4): 816–840. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.771619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells M, 2000. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe N M, Hess M, Yeung H W C et al., 2004. ‘Globalizing’ regional development: a global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4): 468–484. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00142.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Goei B, Burger M J, Van Oort F G et al., 2010. Functional polycentrism and urban network development in the Greater South East, United Kingdom: evidence from commuting patterns, 1981–2001. Regional Studies, 44(9): 1149–1170. doi: 10.1080/00343400903365102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derudder B, Taylor P J, Hoyler M et al., 2013. Measurement and interpretation of connectivity of Chinese cities in world city network, 2010. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(3): 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R, Gulden T, Mellander C, 2008. The rise of the megaregion. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3): 459–476. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsn018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Guan J C, Rousseau R, 2011. Mapping collaborative knowledge production in China using patent co-inventorships. Scientometrics, 88(2): 343–362. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0404-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gault F, 2013. Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J, 1957. Megalopolis or the urbanization of the northeastern seaboard. Economic Geography, 33(3): 189–200. doi: 10.2307/142307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J, 1961. Megalopolis. The urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J, 1976. Megalopolitan systems around the world. Ekistics, 41(243): 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z, 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661–1707. doi: 10.3386/w3301

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssens H, Derudder B, Van Aelst S et al., 2014. Assessing the functional polycentricity of the mega-city-region of Central Belgium based on advanced producer service transaction links. Regional Studies, 48(12): 1939–1953. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.759650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J, Hoyler M, 2015. Megaregions: Globalization’s New Urban Form? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hennemann S, Derudder B, 2014. An alternative approach to the calculation and analysis of connectivity in the world city network. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3): 392–412. doi: 10.1068/b39108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman J, Frenken K, van Oort F, 2009. The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3): 721–738. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0252-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y C, Phelps N, 2016. Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta Region in China, 2014. Urban Studies. doi: 10.1177/0042098016656971

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y C, Phelps N A, 2017. Knowledge polycentricity and the evolving Yangtze River delta megalopolis. Regional Studies, 51(7): 1035–1047. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1240868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X J, Derudder B, Wu K, 2016. Measuring polycentric urban development in China: an intercity transportation network perspective. Regional Studies, 50(8): 1302–1315. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1004535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu L C, Huang R, 2012. Urban hierarchy of innovation capability and inter-city linkages of knowledge in post-reform China. Chinese Geographical Science, 22(5): 602–616. doi: 10.1007/s11769-012-0555-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Lachang, Li Yong, 2010. A research on Chinese renovation urban system based on urban renovation function. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(2): 177–190. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma H T, Fang C L, Pang B et al., 2015. Structure of Chinese city network as driven by technological knowledge flows. Chinese Geographical Science, 25(4): 498–510. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0731-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X L, Timberlake M, 2013. World city typologies and national city system deterritorialisation: USA, China and Japan. Urban Studies, 50(2): 255–275. doi: 10.1177/0042098012453859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen C W, Schwarz A W, Find S, 2002. The top-level global research system, 1997–99: centres, networks and nodality. An analysis based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 39(5–6): 903–927. doi: 10.1080/00420980220128372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen C W, Schwarz A W, Find S, 2010. World cities of scientific knowledge: Systems, networks and potential dynamics. An analysis based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 47(9): 1879–1897. doi: 10.1177/0042098010372683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board, 2016. Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. NSB-2016-1. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

  • Nijman J, 2011. Miami: Mistress of the Americas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2005. Oslo Manual: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. 3rd ed. Paris: OECD.

  • Partha D, David P A, 1994. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5): 487–521. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps N A, Ozawa T, 2003. Contrasts in agglomeration: proto-industrial, industrial and post-industrial forms compared. Progress in Human Geography, 27(5): 583–604. doi: 10.1191/0309132503ph449oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren S L, Rousseau R, 2002. International visibility of Chinese scientific journals. Scientometrics, 53(3): 389–405. doi: 10.1023/A:1014877130166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi E C, Taylor P J, 2005. Banking networks across Brazilian cities: interlocking cities within and beyond Brazil. Cities, 22(5): 381–393. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2005.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherngell T, Hu Y J, 2011. Collaborative knowledge production in China: Regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 45(6): 755–772. doi: 10.1080/00343401003713373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott A J, 2001. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur R, 2012. Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities, 29(S2): S9–S18. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short J R, Breitbach C, Buckman S et al., 2000. From world cities to gateway cities: extending the boundaries of globalization theory. City, 4(3): 317–340. doi: 10.1080/713657031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmie J, 2003. Innovation and urban regions as national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge. Regional Studies, 37(6–7): 607–620. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000108714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes D E, 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y T, 2016. The structure and dynamics of intra- and interregional research collaborative networks: the case of China (1985–2008). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108: 70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P J, Catalano G, Walker D R F, 2002. Measurement of the world city network. Urban Studies, 39(13): 2367–2376. doi: 10.1080/00420980220080011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P J, Evans D M, Pain K, 2008. Application of the interlocking network model to mega-city-regions: measuring polycentricity within and beyond city-regions. Regional Studies, 42(8): 1079–1093. doi: 10.1080/00343400701874214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P J, Derudder B, Hoyler M et al., 2014. City-dyad analyses of China’s integration into the world city network. Urban Studies, 51(5): 868–882. doi: 10.1177/0042098013494419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Zedtwitz M, 2004. Managing foreign R&D laboratories in China. R&D Management, 34(4): 439–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Zhiqiang, Lu Tianzhan, 2015. Gravity and networks: network structure and characteristics of innovative city cluster in the Yangtze River Delta Region. Urban Planning Forum, (2): 31–39. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China

    Yingcheng Li

  2. Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London, WC1H 0NN, UK

    Yingcheng Li & Nicholas A. Phelps

Authors
  1. Yingcheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas A. Phelps
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingcheng Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Phelps, N.A. Articulating China’s Science and Technology: Knowledge Collaboration Networks Within and Beyond the Yangtze River Delta Megalopolis in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 28, 247–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0944-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0944-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation