Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Systematic Review on Breast Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques

  • Review article
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer is a common health problem in women, with one out of eight women dying from breast cancer. Many women ignore the need for breast cancer diagnosis as the treatment is not secure due to the exposure of radioactive rays. The breast cancer screening techniques suffer from non-invasive, unsafe radiations, and specificity of diagnosis of tumor in the breast. The deep learning techniques are widely used in medical imaging. This paper aims to provide a detailed survey dealing with the screening techniques for breast cancer with pros and cons. The applicability of deep learning techniques in breast cancer detection is studied. The performance measures and datasets for breast cancer are also investigated. The future research directions associated with breast cancer are studied. The primary aim is to provide a comprehensive study in this field and to help motivate the innovative researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bahramiabarghouei H, Porter E, Santorelli A, Gosselin B, Popovíc M, Rusch LA (2015) Flexible 16 antenna array for microwave breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62(10):2516–2525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2434956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu J et al (2016) Stacked sparse autoencoder (SSAE) for nuclei detection on breast cancer histopathology images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(1):119–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2015.2458702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Cancer Registry Programme (2008) Report of population based cancer registries 2012–2018 National Cancer Registry Programme. National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research. and Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore. https://www.ncdirindia.org/Reports.aspx. Accessed 3 Dec 2020

  4. Eismann J et al (2019) Interdisciplinary management of transgender individuals at risk for breast cancer: case reports and review of the literature. Clin Breast Cancer 19(1):e12–e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2018.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone JP, Hartley RL, Temple-Oberle C (2018) Breast cancer in transgender patients: a systematic review. Part 2: female to male. Eur J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gooren LJ, van Trotsenburg MAA, Giltay EJ, van Diest PJ (2013) Breast cancer development in transsexual subjects receiving cross-sex hormone treatment. J Sex Med 10(12):3129–3134. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Blok CJM et al (2019) Breast cancer risk in transgender people receiving hormone treatment: Nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikolic DV et al (2012) Importance of revealing a rare case of breast cancer in a female to male transsexual after bilateral mastectomy. World J Surg Oncol 10:2–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen D, Huang M, Li W (2019) Knowledge-powered deep breast tumor classification with multiple medical reports. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcbb.2019.2955484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duffy SW et al (2002) The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties: a collaborative evaluation. Cancer 95(3):458–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Watine J (2002) “Prognostic factors for patients with small lung carcinoma. Cancer 94(2):576–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duffy S, Tabár L, Smith RA (2002) The mammographic screening trials: commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gøtzsche. J Surg Oncol 81(4):68–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.10193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferlay J et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J cancer 136(5):E359–E386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. US Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Clinical Guidelines Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137(11):917–933

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boyd NF et al (2006) Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(11):2086–2092. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM (2003) Erratum: Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography (Annals of Internal Medicine (2003) 138 (168–175)). Ann Intern Med 138(9):771. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Elter M, Horsch A (2009) CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review. Med Phys 36(6):2052–2068. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3121511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, Dewar JA, Thompson SG, Wilcox M (2013) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br J Cancer 108(11):2205–2240. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gu X et al (2020) Age-associated genes in human mammary gland drive human breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res 22(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-01299-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferguson NL et al (2013) Prognostic value of breast cancer subtypes, Ki-67 proliferation index, age, and pathologic tumor characteristics on breast cancer survival in caucasian women. Breast J 19(1):22–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rana P, Ratcliffe J, Sussman J, Forbes M, Levine M, Hodgson N (2017) Young women with breast cancer: needs and experiences. Cogent Med 4(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205x.2017.1278836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson BO et al (2008) Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries: Overview of the breast health global initiative Global Summit 2007. Cancer 113(8 Suppl.):2221–2243. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hopp T, Duric N, Ruiter NV (2015) Image fusion of Ultrasound Computer Tomography volumes with X-ray mammograms using a biomechanical model based 2D/3D registration. Comput Med Imaging Graph 40:170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pisano ED et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: Exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 246(2):376–383. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2461070200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yassin NIR, Omran S, El Houby EMF, Allam H (2018) Machine learning techniques for breast cancer computer aided diagnosis using different image modalities: a systematic review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 156:25–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta NP, Malik PK, Ram BS (2020) A review on methods and systems for early breast cancer detection. In: Proceedings of international conference on computation, automation and knowledge management (ICCAKM 2020), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAKM46823.2020.9051554

  27. Lu Y, Li JY, Su YT, Liu AA (2018) A review of breast cancer detection in medical images. In: VCIP 2018—IEEE international conference on visual communications and image processing conference, pp 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/VCIP.2018.8698732

  28. Huppe AI, Mehta AK, Brem RF (2018) Molecular breast imaging: a comprehensive review. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 39(1):60–69. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2017.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oyelade ON, Ezugwu AES (2020) A state-of-the-art survey on deep learning methods for detection of architectural distortion from digital mammography. IEEE Access 8:148644–148676. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Al Husaini MAS, Habaebi MH, Hameed SA, Islam MR, Gunawan TS (2020) A systematic review of breast cancer detection using thermography and neural networks. IEEE Access 8:208922–208937. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hartley RL, Stone JP, Temple-Oberle C (2018) Breast cancer in transgender patients: a systematic review. Part 1: male to female. Eur J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.06.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Page MJ et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372(71):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  33. Agarwal T, Kumar V (2021) A systematic review on bat algorithm: theortical foundations, variants, and applications. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09673-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yin T, Ali FH, Reyes-Aldasoro CC (2015) A robust and artifact resistant algorithm of ultrawideband imaging system for breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62(6):1514–1525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2393256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li Q et al (2015) Direct extraction of tumor response based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition for image reconstruction of early breast cancer detection by UWB. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 9(5):710–724. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2015.2481940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alexandrou G et al (2021) Detection of multiple breast cancer ESR1 mutations on an ISFET based Lab-on-chip platform. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 15(3):380–389. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2021.3094464

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Suckling J. The mini-MIAS database of mammograms. http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/info/mias.html

  38. Kopans D. DDSM: digital database for screening mammography. http://www.eng.usf.edu/cvprg/Mammography/Database.html. Accessed 24 Dec 2020

  39. Moreira IC, Amaral I, Domingues I, Cardoso A, Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS (2012) Inbreast: toward a full-field digital mammographic database. Acad Radiol 19(2):236–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Prapavesis S, Fornage BD, Weismann CF, Palko A, Zoumpoulis P (2003) Breast ultrasound and US-guided interventional techniques: a multimedia teaching file. Thessaloniki, Greece

  41. Yap MH et al (2018) Automated breast ultrasound lesions detection using convolutional neural networks. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf 22(4):1218–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Al-Dhabyani W, Gomaa M, Khaled H, Fahmy A (2020) Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data Br 28:104863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Man Ng HH et al (2019) Hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has distinct clinical, pathological and radiological characteristics: a systematic review. Surg Gastroenterol Oncol 24(1):5. https://doi.org/10.21614/sgo-24-1-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Commean P. RIDER breast MRI. https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/RIDER+Breast+MRI

  45. Kirby J. QIN breast DCE-MRI. https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/QIN+Breast+DCE-MRI

  46. Silva LF et al (2014) A new database for breast research with infrared image. J Med Imaging Heal Inf 4(1):92–100. https://doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2014.1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bhowmik MK, Gogoi UR, Majumdar G, Bhattacharjee D, Datta D, Ghosh AK (2017) Designing of ground-truth-annotated DBT-TU-JU breast thermogram database toward early abnormality prediction. IEEE J Biomed Heal Inf 22(4):1238–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mahrooghy M et al (2015) Pharmacokinetic tumor heterogeneity as a prognostic biomarker for classifying breast cancer recurrence risk. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62(6):1585–1594. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2395812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Singh VP, Srivastava S, Srivastava R (2017) Effective mammogram classification based on center symmetric-LBP features in wavelet domain using random forests. Technol Health Care 25(4):709–727. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-170851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ribli D, Horváth A, Unger Z, Pollner P, Csabai I (2018) Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with Deep Learning. Sci Rep 8(1):16–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22437-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ekici S, Jawzal H (2020) Breast cancer diagnosis using thermography and convolutional neural networks. Med Hypotheses 137:109542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Roslidar R, Saddami K, Arnia F, Syukri M, Munadi K (2019) A study of fine-tuning CNN models based on thermal imaging for breast cancer classification. In: Proceedings of Cybernetics 2019—2019 International conference on cybernetics and computational intelligence: towards a smart and human-centered cyber world, pp 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBERNETICSCOM.2019.8875661

  53. Wang Z, Zhang L, Shu X, Lv Q, Yi Z (2020) An end-to-end mammogram diagnosis: a new multi-instance and multi-scale method based on single-image feature. IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2019.2963682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang Y et al (2020) Deeply-supervised networks with threshold loss for cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(4):866–876. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2936500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shu X, Zhang L, Wang Z, Lv Q, Yi Z (2020) Deep neural networks with region-based pooling structures for mammographic image classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(6):2246–2255. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.2968397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Dogra N, Kumar V (2021) A comphrehensive review on deep synergistic drug prediction techniques for cancer. Arch Comput Methods Eng 29:1443–1461

    Google Scholar 

  57. Helwan A, Abiyev R (2016) Shape and texture features for the identification of breast cancer. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering, vol 2226, pp 542–547

  58. Pandit VR, Bhiwani RJ (2015) Image fusion in remote sensing applications: a review. Int J Comput Appl 120(10):22–32. https://doi.org/10.5120/21263-3846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. El Hami A, Pougnet P (2019) Embedded mechatronic system 2: analyses of failures, modeling, simulation and optimization. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 300

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yang Y, Wan W, Huang S, Yuan F, Yang S, Que Y (2016) Remote sensing image fusion based on adaptive IHS and multiscale guided filter. IEEE Access 4:4573–4582. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2599403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Naidu VPS, Raol JR (2008) Pixel-level image fusion using wavelets and principal component analysis. Def Sci J 58(3):338–352. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.58.1653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Murtaza G et al (2020) Deep learning-based breast cancer classification through medical imaging modalities: state of the art and research challenges. Artif Intell Rev 53(3):1655–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09716-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Agarwal S (2014) Data mining: data mining concepts and techniques. In: 2013 International conference on machine intelligence and research advancement (ICMIRA)

  64. Edman MC, Marchelletta RR, Hamm-Alvarez SF (2010). Lacrimal gland overview. In: Encyclopedia of the eye, pp 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374203-2.00049-X.

  65. Barnes NLP, Ooi JL, Yarnold JR, Bundred NJ (2012) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. BMJ 344(7846):1430–1441. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Schnitt SJ (2010) Classification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy. Mod Pathol 23:60–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Gupta A, Shridhar K, Dhillon PK (2015) A review of breast cancer awareness among women in India: cancer literate or awareness deficit? Eur J Cancer 51(14):2058–2066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Brooks AD et al (2009) Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review. Int J Biomed Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/902326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Nam KJ et al (2015) Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers. Breast 24(5):649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2015.07.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Abdelhafiz D, Yang C, Ammar R, Nabavi S (2019) Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications. BMC Bioinf. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2823-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Heidari M, Mirniaharikandehei S, Liu W, Hollingsworth AB, Liu H, Zheng B (2020) Development and assessment of a new global mammographic image feature analysis scheme to predict likelihood of malignant cases. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(4):1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2946490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Shen S et al (2015) A multi-centre randomised trial comparing ultrasound vs mammography for screening breast cancer in high-risk Chinese women. Br J Cancer 112(6):998–1004. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Brem RF, Lenihan MJ, Lieberman J, Torrente J (2015) Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future. Am J Roentgenol 204(2):234–240. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.12072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225(1):165–175. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2251011667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang X, Chen X, Cao C (2019) Hierarchically engineering quality-related perceptual features for understanding breast cancer. J Vis Commun Image Represent 64:102644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2019.102644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Nyayapathi N et al (2020) Dual scan mammoscope (DSM)—a new portable photoacoustic breast imaging system with scanning in craniocaudal plane. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 67(5):1321–1327. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2019.2936088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L (2019) Reviews and commentary—state of the art. Radiology 292(3):520–536. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sun P, Wang D, Mok VC, Shi L (2019) Comparison of feature selection methods and machine learning classifiers for radiomics analysis in glioma grading. IEEE Access 7:102010–102020. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2928975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Wu N et al (2020) Deep neural networks improve radiologists’ performance in breast cancer screening. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39(4):1184–1194. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2945514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kale MC, Clymer BD, Koch RM, Heverhagen JT, Sammet S, Stevens R, Knopp MV (2008) Multispectral co-occurrence with three random variables in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27(10):1425–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Srivastava S, Sharma N, Singh SK, Srivastava R (2014) Quantitative analysis of a general framework of a CAD tool for breast cancer detection from mammograms. J Med Imaging Heal Inf 4(5):654–674. https://doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2014.1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Haeri Z, Shokoufi M, Jenab M, Janzen R, Golnaraghi F (2016) Electrical impedance spectroscopy for breast cancer diagnosis: clinical study. Integr. Cancer Sci Ther 3(6):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Huerta-Nuñez LFE et al (2019) A biosensor capable of identifying low quantities of breast cancer cells by electrical impedance spectroscopy. Sci Rep 9(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42776-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Lederman D, Zheng B, Wang X, Wang XH, Gur D (2011) Improving breast cancer risk stratification using resonance-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy through fusion of multiple classifiers. Ann Biomed Eng 39(3):931–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0210-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ward LC, Dylke E, Czerniec S, Isenring E, Kilbreath SL (2011) Confirmation of the reference impedance ratios used for assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy. Lymphat Res Biol 9(1):47–51. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2010.0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Etehadtavakol M, Chandran V, Ng EYK, Kafieh R (2013) Breast cancer detection from thermal images using bispectral invariant features. Int J Therm Sci 69:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Recinella AN, Kandlikar SG, Dabydeen D, Medeiros L, Phatak P (2020) An inverse heat transfer approach for patient-specific breast cancer detection and tumor localization using surface thermal images in the prone position. Infrared Phys Technol 105:103202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Mambou SJ, Maresova P, Krejcar O, Selamat A, Kuca K (2018) Breast cancer detection using infrared thermal imaging and a deep learning model. Sensors (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Casalegno F et al (2019) Caries detection with near-infrared transillumination using deep learning. J Dent Res 98(11):1227–1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519871884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Klemm M, Leendertz JA, Gibbins D, Craddock IJ, Preece A, Benjamin R (2009) Microwave radar-based breast cancer detection: Imaging in inhomogeneous breast phantoms. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 8:1349–1352. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2009.2036748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Grzegorczyk TM, Meaney PM, Kaufman PA, Diflorio-Alexander RM, Paulsen KD (2012) Fast 3-D tomographic microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 31(8):1584–1592. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2012.2197218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Tunçay AH, Akduman I (2015) Realistic microwave breast models through T1-weighted 3-D MRI data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62(2):688–698. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2364015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Botterill T, Lotz T, Kashif A, Chase JG (2014) Reconstructing 3-D skin surface motion for the DIET breast cancer screening system. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33(5):1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2304959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Kao TJ et al (2008) Regional admittivity spectra with tomosynthesis images for breast cancer detection: preliminary patient study. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27(12):1762–1768. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2008.926049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Baran P et al (2018) High-resolution X-ray phase-contrast 3-d imaging of breast tissue specimens as a possible adjunct to histopathology. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37(12):2642–2650. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2845905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. McKnight AL, Kugel JL, Rossman PJ, Manduca A, Hartmann LC, Ehman RL (2002) MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 178(6):1411–1417. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Goddi A, Bonardi M, Alessi S (2012) Breast elastography: a literature review. J Ultrasound 15(3):192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Landhuis E (2020) Deep learning takes on tumours. Nature 580(7804):551–553. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01128-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Bengio Y (2009) Learning deep architectures for AI. Found Trends Mach Learn 2(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  100. Fu B, Liu P, Lin J, Deng L, Hu K, Zheng H (2019) Predicting invasive disease-free survival for early stage breast cancer patients using follow-up clinical data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 66(7):2053–2064. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2018.2882867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Dheeba J, Selvi ST (2011) A CAD system for breast cancer diagnosis using modified genetic algorithm optimized artificial neural network. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), vol 7076, Part 1, pp 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27172-4_43

  102. Gubern-Mérida A, Kallenberg M, Mann RM, Martí R, Karssemeijer N (2015) Breast segmentation and density estimation in breast MRI: a fully automatic framework. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf 19(1):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2014.2311163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Bándi P et al (2019) From detection of individual metastases to classification of lymph node status at the patient level: the CAMELYON17 challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38(2):550–560. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2867350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Le H et al (2020) Utilizing automated breast cancer detection to identify spatial distributions of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in invasive breast cancer. Am J Pathol 190(7):1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Shen L, Margolies LR, Rothstein JH, Fluder E, McBride R, Sieh W (2019) Deep learning to improve breast cancer detection on screening mammography. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48995-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Graziani M, Andrearczyk V, Müller H (2018) Regression concept vectors for bidirectional explanations in histopathology. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), vol 11038, pp 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02628-8_14

  107. Jonnalagedda P, Schmolze D, Bhanu B (2018) MVPNets: multi-viewing path deep learning neural networks for magnification invariant diagnosis in breast cancer. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE 18th international conference on bioinformatics and bioengineering (BIBE 2018), pp 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2018.00044

  108. Arya N, Saha S (2020) Multi-modal classification for human breast cancer prognosis prediction: proposal of deep-learning based stacked ensemble model. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 5963:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2020.3018467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Sanyal R, Kar D, Sarkar R, Member S (2021) Carcinoma type classification from high-resolution breast microscopy images using a hybrid ensemble of deep convolutional features and gradient boosting trees classifiers. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 5963:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2021.3071022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Wang D, Khosla A, Gargeya R, Irshad H, Beck AH (2016) Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer, pp 1–6. http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05718

  111. Reis S et al (2017) Automated classification of breast cancer stroma maturity from histological images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64(10):2344–2352. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2017.2665602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Feng X et al (2019) Accurate prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy pathological complete remission (PCR) for the four sub-types of breast cancer. IEEE Access 7:134697–134706. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69(1):7–34. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Hajela P, Pawar AV, Ahirrao S (2018) Deep learning for cancer cell detection and segmentation: a survey. In: 1st International conference on data science and analytics (PuneCon 2018)—proceedings, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PUNECON.2018.8745420

  115. Quellec G, Lamard M, Cozic M, Coatrieux G, Cazuguel G (2016) Multiple-instance learning for anomaly detection in digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(7):1604–1614. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2016.2521442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Sehgal CM, Weinstein SP, Arger PH, Conant EF (2006) A review of breast ultrasound. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 11(2):113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-006-9018-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ (2017) Shear-wave elastography in breast ultrasonography: the state of the art. Ultrasonography 36(4):300–309. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.17024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Roslidar R et al (2020) A review on recent progress in thermal imaging and deep learning approaches for breast cancer detection. IEEE Access 8:116176–116194. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Hooker KA (2014) Installing concrete anchors. Concr Constr World Concr 59(3):25–30

    Google Scholar 

  120. Baker MJ et al (2014) Using Fourier transform IR spectroscopy to analyze biological materials. Nat Protoc 9(8):1771–1791. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Recinella AN, Kandlikar SG, Dabydeen D, Medeiros L, Phatak P (2019) Technology, application and potential of dynamic breast thermography for the detection of breast cancer. Int J Heat Mass Transf 131:558–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Meaney PM, Kaufman PA, Muffly LS, Click M, Poplack SP, Wells WA, Schwartz GN, di Florio-Alexander RM, Tosteson TD, Li Z, Geimer SD (2013) Microwave imaging for neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: initial clinical experience. Breast Cancer Res 15(2):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, India

    Kamakshi Rautela & Dinesh Kumar

  2. National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, India

    Vijay Kumar

Authors
  1. Kamakshi Rautela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dinesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vijay Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijay Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rautela, K., Kumar, D. & Kumar, V. A Systematic Review on Breast Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques. Arch Computat Methods Eng 29, 4599–4629 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09744-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09744-5

Search

Navigation