Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosing and Managing Primary Aldosteronism in Hypertensive Patients: a Case-Based Approach

  • Hypertension (AJ Peixoto and DS Geller, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary aldosteronism with a prevalence of 8 % of hypertension and 20 % of pharmacologically resistant hypertension is the most common secondary cause of hypertension. Yet, the diagnosis is missed in the vast majority of patients. Current clinical practice guidelines recommend screening for primary aldosteronism in patients with sustained elevation of blood pressure (BP) ≥150/100 mmHg if possible prior to initiation of antihypertensive therapy, and in patients with resistant hypertension, spontaneous or diuretic-induced hypokalemia, adrenal incidentaloma, obstructive sleep apnea, a family history of early onset of hypertension or cerebrovascular accident <age 40, and first-degree relatives of patients with primary aldosteronism. Clinical and laboratory methods of screening, confirmatory testing, subtype classification, and medical and surgical management are systematically reviewed and illustrated with a clinical case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. World Health Organization. A global brief on hypertension. Geneva: World Health Orgaanization; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Franco OH, Peeters A, Bonneux L, et al. Blood pressure in adulthood and life expectancy with cardiovascular disease in men and women: life course analysis. Hypertension. 2005;46:280–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:957–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roth GA, Nguyen G, Forouzanfar MH, et al. Estimates of global and regional premature cardiovascular mortality in 2025. Circulation. 2015;132:1270–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petruski-Ivleva N, Viera AJ, Shimbo D, et al. Longitudinal patterns of change in systolic blood pressure and incidence of cardiovascular disease. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Hypertension. 2016;67:1150–56.

  8. SPRINT Research Group, Wright Jr JT, Williamson JD, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–16. This landmark clinical trial randomized hypertensive patients at increased risk for cardiovascular disease to a standard vs. intensive BP lowering protocol. The study demonstrated major improvement in cardiovascular outcomes at with intensive BP lowering to <120 mmHg compared to < 140 mmHg.

  9. Whelton PK. The elusiveness of worldwide blood pressure control. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:109–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, et al. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee. Hypertension. 2008;51:1403–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Persell SD. Prevalence of resistant hypertension in the United States, 2003–2008. Hypertension. 2011;57:1076–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mulatero P, Stowasser M, Loh KC, et al. Increased diagnosis of primary aldosteronism, including surgically correctable forms, in centers from five continents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:1045–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Calhoun DA. Hyperaldosteronism as a common cause of resistant hypertension. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:233–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Funder JW, Carey RM, Mantero F, et al. The management of primary aldosteronism: case detection, diagnosis, and treatment: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:1889–916. This updated Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline recommends screening for primary aldosteronism in any patient with sustained BP ≥ 150/100 mmHg. The Guideline recommends methods and conditions for screening, confirmation of the diagnosis, lateralization and treatment.

  15. Milliez P, Girerd X, Plouin PF, et al. Evidence for increased rate of cardiovascular events in patients with primary aldosteronism. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;19:1243–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Savard S, Amar L, Plouin PF, et al. Cardiovascular complications associated with primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2013;62:331–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernini G, Galetta F, Franzoni F, et al. Arterial stiffness, intima-media thickness and carotid artery fibrosis in patients with primary aldosteronism. J Hypertens. 2008;26:2399–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed AH, Cowley D, Wolley M, et al. Seated saline suppression testing for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:2745–53. This study is the first to show that saline suppression testing in the seated rather than recumbent position is at least as specific as other confirmatory tests for primary aldosteronism, including the fludrocortisone suppression test.

  19. Reardon MA, Angle JF, Abi-Jaoudeh N, et al. Intra-procedural cortisol levels in the evaluation of proper catheter placement in adrenal venous sampling. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:1175–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shada A, Stokes JB, Simpson GB, et al. Adrenalectomy for adrenal-mediated hypertension: national surgical quality improvement program analysis of an institutional experience. Am Surg. 2014;80:1152–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghorayeb NE, Mazzuco TL, Bourdeua I, et al. Basal and post ACTH aldosterone and its ratios are useful during adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:1826–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolley M, Ahmed A, Gordon R, et al. Does contralateral suppression at adrenal venous sampling predict outcome following unilateral adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism? A retrospective study. J Hypertens. 2015;33 Suppl 1, e121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Monticone S, Satoh F, Viola A, et al. Clinical significance of contralateral adrenal suppression during adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism. J Hypertens. 2015;33 Suppl 1, e120. This study is the first to convincingly demonstrate the value of contralateral aldosterone suppression during AVS as predictive of positive surgical outcomes. The study recommends contralateral suppression, along with selectivity and lateralization indices, as routine measures with which to interpret AVS results.

  24. Eisenhofer F, Dekkers T, Peitzsch M, et al. Mass spectroscopy-based adrenal and peripheral venous steroid profiling for subtyping primary aldosteronism. Clin Chem. 2016;62:514–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Umakoshi H, Naruse M, Wada N, et al. Adrenal venous sampling in patients with positive screening but negative confirmatory testing for primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2016;67:1014–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Iwakura Y, Ito S, Morimoto R, et al. Renal resistive index predicts postoperative blood pressure outcome in primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2016;67:654–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghazi L, Dudenbostel T, Lin CP, et al. Urinary sodium excretion predicts blood pressure response to spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension independent of aldosterone status. J Hypertens. 2016;34:1005–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Carey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Robert M. Carey declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Hypertension

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carey, R.M. Diagnosing and Managing Primary Aldosteronism in Hypertensive Patients: a Case-Based Approach. Curr Cardiol Rep 18, 97 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0774-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0774-1

Keywords

Navigation