Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgery for Dystonia and Tremor

  • Movement Disorders (S Fox, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical procedures for dystonia and tremor have evolved over the past few decades, and our understanding of risk, benefit, and predictive factors has increased substantially in that time. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most utilized surgical treatment for dystonia and tremor, though lesioning remains an effective option in appropriate patients. Dystonic syndromes that have shown a substantial reduction in severity secondary to DBS are isolated dystonia, including generalized, cervical, and segmental, as well as acquired dystonia such as tardive dystonia. Essential tremor is quite amenable to DBS, though the response of other forms of postural and kinetic tremor is not nearly as robust or consistent based on available evidence. Regarding targeting, DBS lead placement in the globus pallidus internus has shown marked efficacy in dystonia reduction. The subthalamic nucleus is an emerging target, and increasing evidence suggests that this may be a viable target in dystonia as well. The ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus is the preferred target for essential tremor, though targeting the subthalamic zone/caudal zona incerta has shown promise and may emerge as another option in essential tremor and possibly other tremor disorders. In the carefully selected patient, DBS and lesioning procedures are relatively safe and effective for the management of dystonia and tremor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Okun MS. The transition of deep brain stimulation from disease specific to symptom specific indications. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2012;52(11):891–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, et al. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013;28(7):863–73. doi:10.1002/mds.25475.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallett M. Neurophysiology of dystonia: the role of inhibition. Neurobiol Dis. 2011;42(2):177–84. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2010.08.025.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tarsy D, Simon DK. Dystonia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(8):818–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kupsch A, Benecke R, Muller J, et al. Pallidal deep-brain stimulation in primary generalized or segmental dystonia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(19):1978–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vidailhet M, Vercueil L, Houeto JL, et al. Bilateral deep-brain stimulation of the globus pallidus in primary generalized dystonia. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(5):459–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamani C, Moro E. Surgery for other movement disorders: dystonia, tics. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20(4):470–6. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e32825ea69d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mundinger F. New stereotactic treatment of spasmodic torticollis with a brain stimulation system (author’s translation). Med Klin. 1977;72(46):1982–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benabid AL, Benazzouz A, Hoffmann D, Limousin P, Krack P, Pollak P. Long-term electrical inhibition of deep brain targets in movement disorders. Mov Disord. 1998;13 Suppl 3:119–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eltahawy HA, Saint-Cyr J, Giladi N, Lang AE, Lozano AM. Primary dystonia is more responsive than secondary dystonia to pallidal interventions: outcome after pallidotomy or pallidal deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(3):613–9. discussion 619-21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coubes P, Cif L, El Fertit H, et al. Electrical stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in patients with primary generalized dystonia: long-term results. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(2):189–94. doi:10.3171/jns.2004.101.2.0189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruggemann N, Kuhn A, Schneider SA, et al. Short- and long-term outcome of chronic pallidal neurostimulation in monogenic isolated dystonia. Neurology. 2015;84(9):895–903. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001312. Bruggemann et al. studied the effect of DBS in patients with monogenic isolated dystonia—eight patients with DYT6 and nine with DYT1—as well as patients without known monogenic cause of dystonia. GPi DBS was effective in all cohorts, but responses were less predictable in DYT6-positive patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fonoff ET, Campos WK, Mandel M, Alho EJ, Teixeira MJ. Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation for generalized dystonia after bilateral pallidotomy. Mov Disord. 2012;27(12):1559–63. doi:10.1002/mds.25127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao C, Pan Y, Li D, Zhan S, Zhang J, Sun B. Subthalamus deep brain stimulation for primary dystonia patients: a long-term follow-up study. Mov Disord. 2013;28(13):1877–82. doi:10.1002/mds.25586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schjerling L, Hjermind LE, Jespersen B, et al. A randomized double-blind crossover trial comparing subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonia. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(6):1537–45. doi:10.3171/2013.8.JNS13844. Schjerling et al. performed this prospective, double-blind crossover study of DBS in 12 patients with dystonia. Each patient underwent 6 months of stimulation to either the GPi or STN followed by 6 months of stimulation to the other. There was a higher mean improvement in BMDRS scores following the 6 months of stimulation to the STN as compared to the GPi; at the least, this suggests that the STN is an effective alternative anatomical target for DBS in the treatment of dystonia.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vercueil L, Krack P, Pollak P. Results of deep brain stimulation for dystonia: a critical reappraisal. Mov Disord. 2002;17 Suppl 3:S89–93. doi:10.1002/mds.10148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kupsch A, Klaffke S, Kuhn AA, et al. The effects of frequency in pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary dystonia. J Neurol. 2003;250(10):1201–5. doi:10.1007/s00415-003-0179-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrews C, Aviles-Olmos I, Hariz M, Foltynie T. Which patients with dystonia benefit from deep brain stimulation? A metaregression of individual patient outcomes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(12):1383–9. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2010.207993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vidailhet M, Vercueil L, Houeto JL, et al. Bilateral, pallidal, deep-brain stimulation in primary generalised dystonia: a prospective 3 year follow-up study. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(3):223–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tarsy D, Vitek J, Starr P, Okun MS. Deep brain stimulation in neurological and psychiatric disorders. In: Tarsy D, editor. Current clinical neurology. Louisville: Humana; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kiss ZH, Doig-Beyaert K, Eliasziw M, et al. The Canadian multicentre study of deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 11):2879–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Walsh RA, Sidiropoulos C, Lozano AM, et al. Bilateral pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia: blinded evidence of benefit beyond 5 years. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 3):761–9. doi:10.1093/brain/awt009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Skogseid IM, Ramm-Pettersen J, Volkmann J, Kerty E, Dietrichs E, Roste GK. Good long-term efficacy of pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia: a prospective, observer-blinded study. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(4):610–5. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03591.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Volkmann J, Mueller J, Deuschl G, et al. Pallidal neurostimulation in patients with medication-refractory cervical dystonia: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(9):875–84. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70143-7. In this randomized sham-controlled trial, Volkmann et al. demonstrated the efficacy of GPi DBS for the treatment of cervical dystonia. After all patients underwent surgery, roughly half were randomly selected to receive no stimulation via the DBS. At 3-month follow-up, patients receiving stimulation had an improvement of 5.1 points on TWSTRS, as compared to an improvement of 1.3 points in the sham-stimulated group, a mean difference between the two groups of 3.8 points.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaikh AG, Mewes K, DeLong MR, et al. Temporal profile of improvement of tardive dystonia after globus pallidus deep brain stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(2):116–9. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.11.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gruber D, Trottenberg T, Kivi A, et al. Long-term effects of pallidal deep brain stimulation in tardive dystonia. Neurology. 2009;73(1):53–8. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181aaea01.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trottenberg T, Volkmann J, Deuschl G, et al. Treatment of severe tardive dystonia with pallidal deep brain stimulation. Neurology. 2005;64(2):344–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mills KA, Markun LC, San Luciano M, et al. Effect of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on dual-task cognitive and motor performance in isolated dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(4):404–9. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-307942.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ostrem JL, Racine CA, Glass GA, et al. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in primary cervical dystonia. Neurology. 2011;76(10):870–8. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820f2e4f.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kleiner-Fisman G, Liang GS, Moberg PJ, et al. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for severe idiopathic dystonia: impact on severity, neuropsychological status, and quality of life. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(1):29–36. doi:10.3171/JNS-07/07/0029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pahapill PA, O’Connell B. Long-term follow-up study of chronic deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for cervical dystonia. Neuromodulation. 2010;13(1):26–30. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00231.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fukaya C, Katayama Y, Kano T, et al. Thalamic deep brain stimulation for writer’s cramp. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(5):977–82. doi:10.3171/JNS-07/11/0977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pauls KA, Hammesfahr S, Moro E, et al. Deep brain stimulation in the ventrolateral thalamus/subthalamic area in dystonia with head tremor. Mov Disord. 2014;29(7):953–9. doi:10.1002/mds.25884. Pauls et al. retrospectively studied the effects of DBS in seven patients with head dystonia/tremor. Primary outcome was change in FTMTRS and BFMDRS pre- to post-operatively for assessment of tremor and dystonia. The median improvement was 57 % in tremor and 70 % in dystonia. Further analysis comparing thalamic vs subthalamic vs thalamic/subthalamic area stimulation showed superiority of stimulating the thalamic/subthalamic area as compared to the thalamus alone for the indication of reducing head tremor. This illustrates how the anatomical target of DBS in specific types of tremor continues to evolve.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Woehrle JC, Blahak C, Kekelia K, et al. Chronic deep brain stimulation for segmental dystonia. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87(6):379–84. doi:10.1159/000249819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Morishita T, Foote KD, Haq IU, Zeilman P, Jacobson CE, Okun MS. Should we consider vim thalamic deep brain stimulation for select cases of severe refractory dystonic tremor. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2010;88(2):98–104. doi:10.1159/000289354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Capelle HH, Weigel R, Krauss JK. Bilateral pallidal stimulation for blepharospasm-oromandibular dystonia (Meige syndrome). Neurology. 2003;60(12):2017–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Muta D, Goto S, Nishikawa S, et al. Bilateral pallidal stimulation for idiopathic segmental axial dystonia advanced from Meige syndrome refractory to bilateral thalamotomy. Mov Disord. 2001;16(4):774–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Trottenberg T, Paul G, Meissner W, Maier-Hauff K, Taschner C, Kupsch A. Pallidal and thalamic neurostimulation in severe tardive dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(4):557–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sako W, Goto S, Shimazu H, et al. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in tardive dystonia. Mov Disord. 2008;23(13):1929–31. doi:10.1002/mds.22100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bereznai B, Steude U, Seelos K, Botzel K. Chronic high-frequency globus pallidus internus stimulation in different types of dystonia: a clinical, video, and MRI report of six patients presenting with segmental, cervical, and generalized dystonia. Mov Disord. 2002;17(1):138–44. doi:10.1002/mds.1250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Castelnau P, Cif L, Valente EM, et al. Pallidal stimulation improves pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(5):738–41. doi:10.1002/ana.20457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sidiropoulos C, Hutchison W, Mestre T, et al. Bilateral pallidal stimulation for Wilson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2013;28(9):1292–5. doi:10.1002/mds.25446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Comella CL, Leurgans S, Wuu J, Stebbins GT, Chmura T, Dystonia Study Group. Rating scales for dystonia: a multicenter assessment. Mov Disord. 2003;18(3):303–12. doi:10.1002/mds.10377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Comella C, Fox S, Bhatia K, et al. Development of the comprehensive cervical dystonia rating scale: methodology. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2015;2(2):135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Moro E, Gross RE, Krauss JK. What’s new in surgical treatment for dystonia? Mov Disord. 2013;28(7):1013–20. doi:10.1002/mds.25550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Alterman RL, Tagliati M. Deep brain stimulation for torsion dystonia in children. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23(9):1033–40. doi:10.1007/s00381-007-0382-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Isaias IU, Alterman RL, Tagliati M. Outcome predictors of pallidal stimulation in patients with primary dystonia: the role of disease duration. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 7):1895–902. doi:10.1093/brain/awn120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Valldeoriola F, Regidor I, Minguez-Castellanos A, et al. Efficacy and safety of pallidal stimulation in primary dystonia: results of the Spanish multicentric study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(1):65–9. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.174342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Isaias IU, Volkmann J, Kupsch A, et al. Factors predicting protracted improvement after pallidal DBS for primary dystonia: the role of age and disease duration. J Neurol. 2011;258(8):1469–76. doi:10.1007/s00415-011-5961-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Burkhard PR, Vingerhoets FJ, Berney A, Bogousslavsky J, Villemure JG, Ghika J. Suicide after successful deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Neurology. 2004;63(11):2170–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Foncke EM, Schuurman PR, Speelman JD. Suicide after deep brain stimulation of the internal globus pallidus for dystonia. Neurology. 2006;66(1):142–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kosel M, Sturm V, Frick C, et al. Mood improvement after deep brain stimulation of the internal globus pallidus for tardive dyskinesia in a patient suffering from major depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41(9):801–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Halbig TD, Gruber D, Kopp UA, Schneider GH, Trottenberg T, Kupsch A. Pallidal stimulation in dystonia: effects on cognition, mood, and quality of life. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(12):1713–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jahanshahi M, Czernecki V, Zurowski AM. Neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, and quality of life issues in DBS for dystonia. Mov Disord. 2011;26 Suppl 1:S63–78. doi:10.1002/mds.23511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pillon B, Ardouin C, Dujardin K, et al. Preservation of cognitive function in dystonia treated by pallidal stimulation. Neurology. 2006;66(10):1556–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Coubes P, Roubertie A, Vayssiere N, Hemm S, Echenne B. Treatment of DYT1-generalised dystonia by stimulation of the internal globus pallidus. Lancet. 2000;355(9222):2220–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Jankovic J. Treatment of dystonia. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(10):864–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Vercueil L, Pollak P, Fraix V, et al. Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of severe dystonia. J Neurol. 2001;248(8):695–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sharott A, Grosse P, Kuhn AA, et al. Is the synchronization between pallidal and muscle activity in primary dystonia due to peripheral afferance or a motor drive? Brain. 2008;131(Pt 2):473–84. doi:10.1093/brain/awm324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Schönecker T, Gruber D, Kivi A, et al. Postoperative MRI localisation of electrodes and clinical efficacy of pallidal deep brain stimulation in cervical dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;86:833–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheung T, Noecker AM, Alterman RL, McIntyre CC, Tagliati M. Defining a therapeutic target for pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonia. Ann Neurol. 2014;76(1):22–30. doi:10.1002/ana.24187. Cheung et al. retrospectively studied the effects of DBS in 21 patients with DYT1-positive primary dystonia, combining clinical data, neuroimaging, and stimulation data to create an atlas of the GPi for the purposes of DBS. By refining the anatomical target, an atlas may aid in surgical planning to provide better clinical outcomes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Alterman RL, Miravite J, Weisz D, Shils JL, Bressman SB, Tagliati M. Sixty hertz pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary torsion dystonia. Neurology. 2007;69(7):681–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Schrader C, Capelle HH, Kinfe TM, et al. GPi-DBS may induce a hypokinetic gait disorder with freezing of gait in patients with dystonia. Neurology. 2011;77(5):483–8. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318227b19e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Berman BD, Starr PA, Marks Jr WJ, Ostrem JL. Induction of bradykinesia with pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with cranial-cervical dystonia. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87(1):37–44. doi:10.1159/000195718.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Gross RE. What happened to posteroventral pallidotomy for Parkinson’s disease and dystonia? Neurotherapeutics. 2008;5(2):281–93. doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2008.02.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Louis ED, Ferreira JJ. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2010;25(5):534–41. doi:10.1002/mds.22838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hallett M. Tremor: pathophysiology. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20 Suppl 1:S118–22. doi:10.1016/S1353-8020(13)70029-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Axelrad JE, Louis ED, Honig LS, et al. Reduced Purkinje cell number in essential tremor: a postmortem study. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(1):101–7. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2007.8.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Pedrosa DJ, Reck C, Florin E, et al. Essential tremor and tremor in Parkinson’s disease are associated with distinct ‘tremor clusters’ in the ventral thalamus. Exp Neurol. 2012;237(2):435–43. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Louis ED. Clinical practice. Essential tremor. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):887–91. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp010928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zesiewicz TA, Elble R, Louis ED, et al. Practice parameter: therapies for essential tremor: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2005;64(12):2008–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Schuurman PR, Bosch DA, Bossuyt PM, et al. A comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(7):461–8. doi:10.1056/NEJM200002173420703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Koller W, Pahwa R, Busenbark K, et al. High-frequency unilateral thalamic stimulation in the treatment of essential and Parkinsonian tremor. Ann Neurol. 1997;42(3):292–9. doi:10.1002/ana.410420304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, et al. Long-term evaluation of deep brain stimulation of the thalamus. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(4):506–12. doi:10.3171/jns.2006.104.4.506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sydow O, Thobois S, Alesch F, Speelman JD. Multicentre European study of thalamic stimulation in essential tremor: a six year follow up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(10):1387–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Putzke JD, Uitti RJ, Obwegeser AA, Wszolek ZK, Wharen RE. Bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation: midline tremor control. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(5):684–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Blomstedt P, Sandvik U, Hariz MI, et al. Influence of age, gender and severity of tremor on outcome after thalamic and subthalamic DBS for essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011;17(8):617–20. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Rehncrona S, Johnels B, Widner H, Tornqvist AL, Hariz M, Sydow O. Long-term efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor: double-blind assessments. Mov Disord. 2003;18(2):163–70. doi:10.1002/mds.10309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hariz GM, Blomstedt P, Koskinen LO. Long-term effect of deep brain stimulation for essential tremor on activities of daily living and health-related quality of life. Acta Neurol Scand. 2008;118(6):387–94. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01065.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Kumar R, Lozano AM, Sime E, Lang AE. Long-term follow-up of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential and Parkinsonian tremor. Neurology. 2003;61(11):1601–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gao D, et al. Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg. 1996;84(2):203–14. doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Kagnoff MN, Jimenez-Shahed J, Fekete R, Jankovic J. The safety and efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: 10 years and beyond. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(5):567–72. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-304943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Pinsker M, Amtage F, Berger M, Nikkhah G, van Elst LT. Psychiatric side-effects of bilateral deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2013;117:47–51. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-1482-7_8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Borretzen MN, Bjerknes S, Saehle T, et al. Long-term follow-up of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor—patient satisfaction and mortality. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:120–2377. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-14-120.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ehlen F, Schoenecker T, Kuhn AA, Klostermann F. Differential effects of deep brain stimulation on verbal fluency. Brain Lang. 2014;134:23–33. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Blomstedt P, Fytagoridis A, Tisch S. Deep brain stimulation of the posterior subthalamic area in the treatment of tremor. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009;151(1):31–6. doi:10.1007/s00701-008-0163-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Murata J, Kitagawa M, Uesugi H, et al. Electrical stimulation of the posterior subthalamic area for the treatment of intractable proximal tremor. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(4):708–15. doi:10.3171/jns.2003.99.4.0708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Plaha P, Javed S, Agombar D, et al. Bilateral caudal zona incerta nucleus stimulation for essential tremor: outcome and quality of life. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(8):899–904. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2010.222992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Hamel W, Herzog J, Kopper F, et al. Deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic area is more effective than nucleus ventralis intermedius stimulation for bilateral intention tremor. Acta Neurochir. 2007;149(8):749–58. doi:10.1007/s00701-007-1230-1. discussion 758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Fytagoridis A, Sandvik U, AstrÃm M, Bergenheim T, Blomstedt P. Long term follow-up of deep brain stimulation of the caudal zona incerta for essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(3):258–62. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2011-300765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Blomstedt P, Sandvik U, Tisch S. Deep brain stimulation in the posterior subthalamic area in the treatment of essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2010;25(10):1350–6. doi:10.1002/mds.22758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Sandvik U, Lars-Owe K, Anders L, Patric B. Thalamic and subthalamic DBS for essential tremor: where is the optimal target? Neurosurgery. 2011. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182367437.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Espay AJ, Duker AP, Chen R, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in medically refractory orthostatic tremor: preliminary observations. Mov Disord. 2008;23(16):2357–62. doi:10.1002/mds.22271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. COOPER IS. Neurosurgical alleviation of intention tremor of multiple sclerosis and cerebellar disease. N Engl J Med. 1960;263:441–4. doi:10.1056/NEJM196009012630905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Roy HA, Aziz TZ. Deep brain stimulation and multiple sclerosis: therapeutic applications. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2014;3(4):431–9. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2014.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Hassan A, Ahlskog JE, Rodriguez M, Matsumoto JY. Surgical therapy for multiple sclerosis tremor: a 12-year follow-up study. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(5):764–8. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03626.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Oyama G, Thompson A, Foote KD, et al. Deep brain stimulation for tremor associated with underlying ataxia syndromes: a case series and discussion of issues. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2014;4:228. doi:10.7916/D8542KQ5.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Flora ED, Perera CL, Cameron AL, Maddern GJ. Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a systematic review. Mov Disord. 2010;25(11):1550–9. doi:10.1002/mds.23195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Verla T, Marky A, Farber H, et al. Impact of advancing age on post-operative complications of deep brain stimulation surgery for essential tremor. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:872–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. O’Suilleabhain PE, Frawley W, Giller C, Dewey Jr RB. Tremor response to polarity, voltage, pulsewidth and frequency of thalamic stimulation. Neurology. 2003;60(5):786–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Barbe MT, Pochmann J, Lewis CJ, et al. Utilization of predefined stimulation groups by essential tremor patients treated with VIM-DBS. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20(12):1415–8. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.09.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Young RF, Li F, Vermeulen S, Meier R. Gamma knife thalamotomy for treatment of essential tremor: long-term results. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(6):1311–7. doi:10.3171/2009.10.JNS09332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Ohye C, Higuchi Y, Shibazaki T, et al. Gamma knife thalamotomy for Parkinson disease and essential tremor: a prospective multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(3):526–35. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182350893. discussion 535-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Witjas T, Carron R, Krack P, et al. A prospective single-blind study of gamma knife thalamotomy for tremor. Neurology. 2015. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002087.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Schuurman PR, Bosch DA, Merkus MP, Speelman JD. Long-term follow-up of thalamic stimulation versus thalamotomy for tremor suppression. Mov Disord. 2008;23(8):1146–53. doi:10.1002/mds.22059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Rughani AI, Hodaie M, Lozano AM. Acute complications of movement disorders surgery: effects of age and comorbidities. Mov Disord. 2013;28(12):1661–7. doi:10.1002/mds.25610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Fenoy AJ, Simpson Jr RK. Risks of common complications in deep brain stimulation surgery: management and avoidance. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(1):132–9. doi:10.3171/2013.10.JNS131225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Ondo W, Almaguer M, Jankovic J, Simpson RK. Thalamic deep brain stimulation: comparison between unilateral and bilateral placement. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(2):218–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Elias WJ, Sansur CA, Frysinger RC. Sulcal and ventricular trajectories in stereotactic surgery. J Neurosurg. 2009;110(2):201–7. doi:10.3171/2008.7.17625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Elkay M, Silver K, Penn RD, Dalvi A. Dystonic storm due to Batten’s disease treated with pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord. 2009;24(7):1048–53. doi:10.1002/mds.22515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Hashimoto T, Naito K, Kitazawa K, Imai S, Goto T. Pallidotomy for severe tardive jaw-opening dystonia. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2010;88(2):105–8. doi:10.1159/000280822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Kyriagis M, Grattan-Smith P, Scheinberg A, Teo C, Nakaji N, Waugh M. Status dystonicus and Hallervorden-Spatz disease: treatment with intrathecal baclofen and pallidotomy. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004;40(5-6):322–5. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2004.00374.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Rakocevic G, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, Overman JW, Pahwa R. Bilateral pallidotomy for severe dystonia in an 18-month-old child with glutaric aciduria. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2004;82(2-3):80–3. doi:10.1159/000077405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Dwarakanath S, Zafar A, Yadav R, et al. Does lesioning surgery have a role in the management of multietiological tremor in the era of deep brain stimulation? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;125:131–6. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Elias WJ, Huss D, Voss T, et al. A pilot study of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(7):640–8. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1300962. Elias et al. completed a pilot study of 15 patients with medication-refractory essential tremor. Transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound was targeted at the ventral intermediate thalamus. There was a 75 % relative reduction in tremor in the contralateral hand when assessed at 12-month follow-up. This study showcases one emerging surgical therapy for tremor and indicates the need for more studies to assess efficacy and safety.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Moro E, Schwalb JM, Piboolnurak P, et al. Unilateral subdural motor cortex stimulation improves essential tremor but not Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 7):2096–105. doi:10.1093/brain/awr072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Gironell A, Kulisevsky J, Lorenzo J, Barbanoj M, Pascual-Sedano B, Otermin P. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum in essential tremor: a controlled study. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(3):413–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, PO Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA

    Jason L. Crowell & Binit B. Shah

Authors
  1. Jason L. Crowell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Binit B. Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Binit B. Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Jason L. Crowell and Binit B. Shah declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Movement Disorders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crowell, J.L., Shah, B.B. Surgery for Dystonia and Tremor. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 16, 22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-016-0627-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-016-0627-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation