Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sequential addition of aprepitant in patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a challenging issue. Although aprepitant is sometimes used as a therapeutic option in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, the potential benefit of sequential addition of aprepitant to dexamethasone and a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist during the second cycle of carboplatin-based chemotherapy remains unclear. Chemo-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received carboplatin-based chemotherapy were treated with doublet antiemetic therapy with dexamethasone and a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Aprepitant was then added during the second cycle of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall complete response rate, defined as no vomiting and no rescue therapy during the 120 h after administration of chemotherapy. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled, 63 of whom were eligible after two cycles of chemotherapy. The overall complete response rate was significantly improved in the second cycle [87.3 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 76.5–94.4 %] compared with the first cycle (65.1 %, 95 % CI 52.0–76.7 %; p < 0.001). Improvement was observed in the delayed phase, but not in the acute phase. Subsequent addition of aprepitant significantly improved the overall complete response rate in NSCLC patients receiving a second cycle of carboplatin-based chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Hickok JT, Stern RM. Nausea and vomiting remain a significant clinical problem: trends over time in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in 1413 patients treated in community clinical practices. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;20:113–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hesketh PJ. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2482–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T, Nakanishi Y, Kamura T, Baba H, Yoshida K, et al. Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20:855–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Azzoli CG, Temin S, Aliff T, Baker S, Brahmer J, Johnson B, et al. 2011 Focused update of 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3825–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Roila F, Herrstedt J, Aapro M, Gralla RJ, Einhorn LH, Ballatori E, et al. Guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results of the Perugia consensus conference. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 5:v232–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Feyer PC, Somerfield MR, et al. Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4189–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ettinger DS, Armstrong DK, Barbour S, Berger MJ, Bierman PJ, Bradbury B, et al. Antiemesis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10:456–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanioka M, Kitao A, Matsumoto K, Shibata N, Yamaguchi S, Fujiwara K, et al. A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of aprepitant in nondrinking women younger than 70 years receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:859–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD, Julie Ma G, Eldridge K, Hipple A, et al. Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer. 2003;97:3090–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito Y, Karayama M, Inui N, Kuroishi S, Nakano H, Nakamura Y, et al. Aprepitant in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Lung Cancer. 2014;84:259–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rapoport BL, Jordan K, Boice JA, Taylor A, Brown C, Hardwick JS, et al. Aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with a broad range of moderately emetogenic chemotherapies and tumor types: a randomized, double-blind study. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soukop M, McQuade B, Hunter E, et al. Ondansetron compared with metoclopramide in the control of emesis and quality of life during repeated chemotherapy for breast cancer. Oncology. 1992;49:295–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sigsgaard T, Herrstedt J, Andersen LJ, Stewart A, Kaye S, Cassidy J, et al. Granisetron compared with prednisolone plus metopimazine as anti-emetic prophylaxis during multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:412–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamen C, Tejani MA, Chandwani K, Janelsins M, Peoples AR, Roscoe JA, et al. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;722:172–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hesketh PJ, Younger J, Sanz-Altamira P, Krentzin M, Bushey J, Trainor B, et al. Aprepitant as salvage antiemetic therapy in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17:1065–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saito M, Aogi K, Sekine I, Yoshizawa H, Yanagita Y, Sakai H, et al. Palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, comparative phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Murakami M, Hashimoto H, Yamaguchi K, Yamaguchi I, Senba S, Siraishi T. Effectiveness of palonosetron for preventing delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22:905–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aapro MS. Palonosetron as an anti-emetic and anti-nausea agent in oncology. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3:1009–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Massa E, Astara G, Madeddu C, Dessì M, Loi C, Lepori S, et al. Palonosetron plus dexamethasone effectively prevents acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in pre-treated patients who have failed to respond to a previous antiemetic treatment: comparison between elderly and non-elderly patient response. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009;70:83–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kusagaya H, Inui N, Karayama M, Fujisawa T, Enomoto N, Kuroishi S, et al. Evaluation of palonosetron and dexamethasone with or without aprepitant to prevent carboplatin-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2015;90:410–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by research fund from our institution. We would like to thank Edanz [http://www.edanzediting.co.jp] for editing and reviewing this manuscript for English language.

Author contributions

S.S. is the guarantor of the study. S.S and K.M. contributed to the study design, data acquisition and analysis, data interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, critical review, revision and final approval of the manuscript. I.N. contributed to the study design, data analysis and interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, critical review, revision and final approval of the manuscript. S.K., T.F., N.E., Y.N., H.N., K.Y., M.T., S.I., T.S., M.M., T.Y., H.W. and H.H. contributed to the study design, data acquisition and interpretation, critical review, revision and final approval of the manuscript. T.S. contributed to the study design, data interpretation, critical review, revision and final approval of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoki Inui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suzuki, S., Karayama, M., Inui, N. et al. Sequential addition of aprepitant in patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Med Oncol 33, 65 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0780-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0780-6

Keywords

Navigation