Skip to main content
Log in

The determinants of organizations’ usage of employee dismissal: Evidence from Australia

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Substantial variation exists across organizations in their use of dismissal. While it has been suggested that this variation reflects organizational-level factors relating to disciplinary issues, little evidence exists regarding the effect of these factors. Using data from 1,596 workplaces in the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey, we examine how organizational-level factors that reflect the incidence of disciplinary problems as well as the expected costs and benefits of dismissal are related to dismissal usage. For each organization, data were collected on organizational characteristics and practices in interviews with the employee relations manager and the senior line manager. Data were also collected on whether or not dismissal was used by the firm and on the number of employees dismissed. Using both logistic regression and tobit analysis, our results suggest that dismissal is affected by procedural and institutional restrictions on the use of discipline, interactions among those restrictions, compensation level, labor market factors, workforce human capital, operating capacity, work group influence, the use of incentive pay, workforce size, and industry classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alderfer, Clay P., and David C. Brown. “Designing an Empathie Questionnaire for Organizational Research.” Journal of Applied Psychology 56 (August 1972): 456–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvey, Richard D., and Allen P. Jones. “The Use of Discipline in Organizational Settings.” In Research in Organizational Behavior. Barry M. Staw and Larry L. Cummings, eds. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1985, pp. 367–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, Janice M., and Harrison M. Trice. “A Field Study of the Use and Perceived Effects of Discipline in Controlling Work Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 27 (December 1984): 743–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of National Affairs. Personnel Policies Forum Survey No. 139. Washington, D.C.: BNA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callus, Ron, Alison Morehead, Mark Cully, and John Buchanan. Industrial Relations at Work: The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey. Canaberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, Peter, and Keith Chauvin. “An Interplant Test of the Efficiency Wage Hypothesis.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (August 1991): 769–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, Greg H., and Jeanne M. Russell. “The Biasing Effects of Subordinate Likableness on Leaders’ Responses to Poor Performance: A Laboratory and a Field Study.” Personnel Psychology 39 (Winter 1986): 759–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “The Neighbors Stay Home.” Economist, April 22, 1995.

  • Edwards, P. K., and Hugh Scullion. “Deviancy Theory and Industrial Praxis: A Study of Discipline and Social Control in an Industrial Setting.” Sociology 16 (August 1982): 322–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, David W. Justice on the Job. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Stephen E. The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, John A., Richard D. Arvey, Carol A. Paradise, and Nancy E. Robbins. “Modeling the Skills Obsolescence Process: A Psychological/Economic Integration.” Academy of Management Review 11 (April 1986): 362–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frierson, James G. Preventing Employment Lawsuits: An Employer’s Guide to Hiring, Discipline and Discharge. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Steven G., and Robert C. Liden. “Contextual and Attributional Influences on Control Decisions.” Journal of Applied Psychology 65 (August 1980): 453–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, Herbert G. III, Robert L. Heneman, and Timothy Judge. Staffing Organizations. Middleton, Wisc: Mendota House, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepson, Barbara. “Notes of Discord in the Orchestra Pit.” Wall Street Journal, April 20 1994.

  • Katz, Harry C., Thomas A. Kochan, and Kenneth R. Gobeille. “Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, QWL Programs: An Interplant Analysis.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 37 (October 1983): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaas, Brian S., and Hoyt N. Wheeler. “Managerial Decision-Making about Discipline: A Policy Capturing Approach.” Personnel Psychology 43 (Spring 1990): 117–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaas, Brian S., and Greg G. Dell’omo. “The Determinants of Disciplinary Decisions: The Case of Employee Drug Use.” Personnel Psychology 44 (Winter 1991): 813–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labig, Chalmer E., Jr., and I. B. Helburn. “Union and Management Influences on Grievance Initiation.” Journal of Labor Research 7 (Summer 1986): 269–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, David, and Richard B. Peterson. The Modern Grievance Procedure in the United States. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Patrick C. “Is Your Discipline Process the Victim of Red Tape?” Personnel Journal 65 (March 1986): 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David. G. “An Empirical Examination of the Effects of Grievant Value, Union Politics, and Seriousness of Offense on the Severity of Discipline.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management Meetings, Miami, 1992.

  • Rees, Albert, and George Schultz. Workers and Wages in an Urban Labor Market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saari, Lise M., Terry R. Johnson, Steven D. McLaughlin, and Denise M. Zimmerle. “A Survey of Management Training and Education Practices in U.S. Companies.” Personnel Psychology 41 (Winter 1988): 731–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Neal W., and Richard J. Klimoski. Research Methods in Human Resource Management. Cincinnati: South-Western, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slichter, Sumner H., James J. Healy, and E. Robert Livernash. The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smither, James, Richard B. Skov, and Seymour Adler. "Attributions for the Poorly Performing Blackjack Dealer: In the Cards or Inability?" Personnel Psychology 39 (Spring 1986): 123–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieber, Jack, and Robert Rogers. "Discharge for Cause: History and Development in the United States." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 536 (November 1994): 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, Lawrence H. “Relative Wages, Efficiency Wages, and Keynesian Unemployment.” American Economic Review 78 (May 1988): 383–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulman, Lloyd. “Why Should Human Resource Managers Pay High Wages?” British Journal of Industrial Relations 30 (June 1992): 177–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westin, Alan F., and Alfred G. Feliu. Resolving Employment Disputes without Litigation. Washington D. C.: Bureau of National Affairs, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Hoyt N., and Jacques Rojot. Workplace Justice: Employment Obligations in International Perspectives. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Copies of the AWIRS Data set are available for purchase from the Australian Government Publishing Service, Commonwealth Department of Industrial Relations, Canaberra, Australia. The authors thank Alan Morris and Lindsay Turner for their assistance in managing the AWIRS data set. Michelle Brown is now at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, WI 53201.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klaas, B.S., Brown, M. & Heneman, H.G. The determinants of organizations’ usage of employee dismissal: Evidence from Australia. J Labor Res 19, 149–164 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-998-1007-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-998-1007-1

Keywords

Navigation