Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical Development and Elder Mistreatment: Spreading Awareness and Conceptual Complexity in Examining the Management of Socio-Emotional Boundaries

  • Published:
Ageing International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper critically examines the spread of awareness of elder abuse and neglect (mistreatment) and asks how this has occurred without an accompanying growth in theoretical understanding. Three areas of conceptual development are identified that acknowledge the special qualities of elder mistreatment. These include a focus at the level of interpersonal relationships, a recognition that situations are negotiated between adults and that age, either intergenerationally or between age peers is a significant factor in the form mistreatment takes. Rather than allowing definitional inflation, it is argued that theoretical boundaries are needed to allow the complex nature of mistreatment to become visible. Reactions to emotional ambivalence are proposed as an important area that helps explain the phenomenon, both conceptually and practically. Understanding the role of emotional ambivalence it is argued, would lead to sustainable solutions to the mistreatment of older people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Action on Elder Abuse. (2008). Briefing paper: the UK Study of abuse and neglect of older people. London: Action on Elder Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., Daly, T., Armstrong, H., Lafrance, S., & Szebehely, M. (2008). Out of control: Violence against support workers in long term care. York Canada: York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S. (1999). The mature imagination. Bucks: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S. (2007). Thinking about generations: conceptual positions and policy implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 695–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S., & Powell, J. (1999). Surveillance & elder abuse: the rationalities and technologies of community care. Journal of Contemporary Health, 9, 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S., Phillipson, C., & Kingston, P. (1993). Elder abuse in perspective. Bucks: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S., Doyle, M., & Erens, B. (2009). Secondary analysis of UK prevalence study of elder mistreatment: Risk factors, multiple forms and definitions. London: NATCEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S., McCreadie, C., Manthorpe, J., Tinker, A., O’Doyle, M., & Erens, B. (2009). The First UK prevalence study of elder mistreatment. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 21, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. J., & Wallace, R. B. (2003). Elder mistreatment: Abuse, neglect and exploitation in an aging America. Washington DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1973). Folk devils and moral panics. St Albans: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, J. (1975). Aging as exchange- preface to theory. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 584–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, C. L. (1979). The aging enterprise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2008). Health and long term care in the European Union. Retrieved November 8, 2009 from <http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_283_en.pdf>.

  • Foster, A., & Roberts, V. (1999). Managing mental health in the community: Chaos and containment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness, S. (2006). Recognising and addressing elder abuse in care homes: views from residents and managers. Journal of Adult Protection, 8(1), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goergen, T. (2002). Abuse & neglect of elderly people in residential care. Research in Legal Medicine, 27, 367–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, C. (2009). Certified Nursing Assistants focus group interviews on abuse and neglect of older people. Research report to NIA Program of research on Elder Mistreatment. Texas: Health Science Center Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • HRSDC. (2008). Comparative summary of national prevalence studies. Ottawa: HRSDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussein, S., Manthorpe, J., & Penhale, B. (2007). Public perceptions of the neglect and mistreatment of older people: findings of a UK survey. Ageing & Society, 27(6), 919–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iborra, I. (2008). Elder Abuse in the Family in Spain. Doc 14. Valencia: Centro Reina Sofia.

  • International Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse (INPEA). (2009). National representatives. Retrieved November 11, 2009 from <http://www.inpea.net/contacts.html#national>.

  • Juklestad, O. (2001). Institutional care for older people- the dark side. Journal of Adult Protection, 3(2), 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachs, M., Bachman, R., Williams, C. S., & O’Leary, J. R. (2007). Resident-to-resident elder mistreatment and police contact in nursing homes; findings from a population-based cohort. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55(6), 840–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz-Meyer, D. (2001). The politics of ambivalence. Gender Institute New Working Papers Series 2. (pp. 1–24).

  • Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., & Gur-Yaish, N. (2007). Reciprocity in parent child exchange and life satisfaction among the elderly. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 865–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luescher, K., & Pillemer, K. A. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: a new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreadie, C. (2002). A review of research outcomes in elder abuse. Journal of Adult Protection, 4(2), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, V., & Caverley, S. (2004). The nature of family relationships within and between generations. In J. Nussbaum & J. Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (2nd ed., pp. 251–272). New Jersey: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center on Elder Abuse. (1998). National elder abuse incidence study: Final report. Washington DC: National Center on Elder Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D., & Fancey, P. (2008). Family violence—applying lessons learned to elder abuse (p. 22). Ottawa: HRSDC. Paper commissioned by HRSDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogg, J., & Bennett, G. (1992). Elder abuse in Britain. British Medical Journal, 305, 998–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keeffe, M., Hills, A., Doyle, M., McCreadie, C., Scholes, S., Constantine, R., et al. (2007). UK Study of abuse and neglect of older people: Prevalence survey report. London: NatCen.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, C. (1979). Elder abuse in Massachusetts; a survey of professionals and paraprofessionals. Boston: Legal Research Services for the Elderly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, C. (2004). Older workers and retirement: critical perspectives on the research literature and policy implications. Social Policy and Society, 3(2), 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillemer, K. A., & Wolf, R. S. (Eds.). (1986). Elder abuse: Conflict in the family (pp. 167–196). Dover Mass: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillemer, K. A., & Finkelhor, D. (1988). The prevalence of elder abuse; a random sample survey. The Gerontologist, 28(1), 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillemer, K. A., & Moore, D. (1989). Abuse of patients in nursing homes: findings from a survey of staff. The Gerontologist, 29(3), 314–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillemer, K. A., & Suitor, J. J. (2008). Collective ambivalence: considering new approaches to the complexity of intergenerational relations. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(6), S394–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podnieks, E. (2009). Worldwide environmental scan. Retrieved March 8, 2009 from <http://www.inpea.net/reportsresources/reports.html>.

  • Rawlins, W. (2004). Friendships in later life. In J. Nussbaum & J. Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (2nd ed., pp. 273–304). New Jersey: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, T., Lachs, M., Bharucha, A., Stevens, S., Teresi, J., Nebres, F., et al. (2008). Resident-to-resident aggression in long-term care facilities: insights from focus groups of nursing home residents and staff. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(8), 1398–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: a review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinan-Altman, S., & Cohen, M. (2009). Nurses aides’ attitudes to elder abuse in nursing homes; the effect of work stressors and burnout. The Gerontologist, 49(5), 674–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaarama, M., Peiper, R., & Sixsmith, A. (2007). Care-related quality of life in old age: Concepts, models, and empirical findings. N.Y.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. (2002). Missing voices: Views of older persons on elder abuse. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Biggs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biggs, S., Haapala, I. Theoretical Development and Elder Mistreatment: Spreading Awareness and Conceptual Complexity in Examining the Management of Socio-Emotional Boundaries. Ageing Int 35, 171–184 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9064-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9064-1

Keywords

Navigation