Skip to main content
Log in

“Best Interests of the Child”, Australian Refugee Policy, and the (Im)possibilities of International Solidarity

  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Best interests of the child” is a key concept in international law, developed by and through institutions which maintain a stake in international solidarity. This article explores the quality of that solidarity, working to understand the modes of interrelationship between peoples and institutions which it instantiates, and which it could possibly be imagined to instantiate. Focusing on one context—the way that “best interests of the child” has developed within international politics and domestic Australian politics, through an examination of the discourses produced by policy-makers working within child refugee and asylum-seeker realms—this article examines the ways that this concept has relied on, and produced, racialized hierarchical ideas of what “best interests” entails. Looking through a history of Australian settler-colonial governmentality, this article explores the tensions between discourses of security and discourses of “best interests of the child,” historicizing the figure of the refugee child and reimagining the relationships of dependency and solidarity which could be produced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The closest is Section 4AA, article 1: In the Migration Act, section 4AA asserts the “principle that a minor shall only be detained as a measure of last resort.” See Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Sect 4AA. Available at https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00289.

  2. As defined by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, “The Stolen Generations are Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who, when they were children, were taken away from their families and communities as the result of past government policies. Children were removed by governments, churches, and welfare bodies to be brought up in institutions, fostered out or adopted by white families.” (See AIATSIS (2015)).

References

Books, Journal Articles and Other Documents

  • Abrams K (2011) Performing Interdependence: Judith Butler and Sunaura Taylor in the Examined Life. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 21:72–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Human Rights Commission (2004) A last resort? National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention. Australian Human Rights Commission. https://www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/asylum-seekers-and-refugees/publications/last-resort-national-inquiry-children-immigration. Accessed 30 October 2019

  • Australian Human Rights Commission (2014) The Forgotten Children: National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention. Australian Human Rights Commission. https://www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/asylum-seekers-and-refugees/publications/forgotten-children-national-inquiry-children. Accessed 30 October 2019

  • Bhabha J (2006) The Child - What Sort of Human? PMLA 121:1526–1535

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha J (2014) Child Migration and Human Rights in a Global Age. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birch T (2002) ‘History is never bloodless’: Getting it wrong after one hundred years of federation. Australian Historical Studies 33:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy C (2012) Implementing the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the UK: A Problem of Political Will. In: Butler C (ed) Child Rights: The Movement, International Law, and Opposition. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, pp 157–174

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crock ME (2006) Seeking asylum alone: a study of Australian law, policy and practice regarding unaccompanied and separated children. Themis Press, Annandale, N.S.W

  • Evenhuis M (2013) Child-Proofing Asylum: Separated Children and Refugee Decision Making in Australia. International Journal of Refugee Law 25:535–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher A (2018) Australia’s Human Rights Scrutiny Regime: Democratic Masterstroke or Mere Window Dressing? Melbourne University Press, Carlton

    Google Scholar 

  • Free the Children Nauru (2019) Free the Children NAURU - Home. https://www.facebook.com/childrennauru/. Accessed 9 September 2019

  • Goldstein J, Freud A, Solnit AJ (1973) Beyond the best interests of the child. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding P (2017) A New Era for Mental Health Law and Policy: supportive-decision making and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haebich A (2015) Neoliberalism, Settler Colonialism and the History of Indigenous Child Removal in Australia. Australian Indigenous Law Review 19(1):20–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings C (2012) Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory 13:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higonnet MR (2006) Child Witnesses: The Cases of World War I and Darfur. PMLA 121:1565–1576

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch M (2014) Connective Histories in Vulnerable Times: Presidential Address 2014. PMLA 129:330–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye/Kantrowitz M (2007) The Colors of Jews: Racial Politics and Radical Diasporism. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Land C (2015) Decolonizing Solidarity: Dilemmas and Directions for Supporters of Indigenous Struggles. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddell M (2010) If having child-centred policy is the answer, what’s the question? Children Australia 35:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson A (2004) The possessive logic of patriarchal white sovereignty: The High Court and the Yorta Yorta Decision. Borderlands e-journal 3(2)

  • Moreton-Robinson A (2015) The White Possessive: Property, Power and Indigenous Sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrove N, Swain S (2010) The ‘best interests of the child’: Historical Perspectives. Children Australia 35:35–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata S (2015) Childhood Citizenship, Governance and Policy: The politics of becoming adult. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg N (2018) Illusion of inclusion: challenging universalistic conceptions in international children’s rights law. Australian Journal of Human Rights 24:326–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera S (2009) Australia and the insular imagination: beaches, borders, boats, and bodies, 1st ed. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pobjoy JM (2017) The Child in International Refugee Law. Cambridge University Law, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese J (2002) Migrant Heritage in an Indigenous Context: For a decolonising migrant historiography. Journal of Intercultural Studies 23:5–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860220122368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg K (2015) The Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Vulnerability of Children. Nordic Journal of International Law 84:221–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon R (2016) The Child to Come: Life after the Human Catastrophe. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein J (2016) ‘I Am Responsible’: Histories of the Intersection of the Guardianship of Unaccompanied Child Refugees and the Australian Border. Cultural Studies Review 22:65–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v22i2.4772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein J (2017) ‘The beneficent and legal godfather’: a history of the guardianship of unaccompanied immigrant and refugee children in Australia, 1946–1975. The History of the Family 22:446–465. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2016.1265572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) (2015) Stolen Generations. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. https://aiatsis.gov.au/research/finding-your-family/before-you-start/stolen-generations. Accessed 29 October 2019

  • Ticktin M (2015) Humanitarianism’s History of the Singular. Grey Room 61(Fall):81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Ticktin M (2016) Thinking Beyond Humanitarian Borders. Social Research: An International Quarterly 83:255–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin J (2015) Understanding Children’s Rights: A Vision beyond Vulnerability. Nordic Journal of International Law 84:155–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08402002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte J (2019) The Morals of the Market: Human Rights and the Rise of Neoliberalism. Verso, London

Archival and Primary Materials - Australia

  • Allison L (2003) Questions without Notice: Immigration: Children, Parliamentary Debates Senate, 28 October

  • Evans C (2011) Questions Without Notice: Additional Answers—Asylum Seekers, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 15 September

  • Meurant J (1985) Welfare Services, ‘File Note,’ 5 February. National Archives of Australia (NAA): A446, 1985/75379

  • Vanstone A (2003) Questions without Notice: Immigration: Children, Parliamentary Debates Senate, 28 October

  • Vanstone A (2005) Questions without Notice: Treatment of Detainees, Parliamentary Debates Senate, Hansard, 10 May

International Materials

Interviews

  • Anonymous (2017) Interview, 5 September

  • Buchanan L (2018) Interview, Melbourne, 8 August

  • Evans C (2018) Interview, Perth, 4 October

  • Torpey L (2018) Interview, Melbourne, 8 March

  • Triggs G (2018) Interview, Melbourne, 28 March

  • White O (2018) Interview, Sydney, 18 April

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank those who participated in the research interviews cited in this article for their time, generosity and insight. I am grateful for their willingness to be part of this project: my research would have been impossible without them. I also wish to thank Mary Tomsic for many conversations that helped me develop my thinking, and Jodie Boyd and Savitri Taylor for the invitation to participate in this special issue.

Funding

This research was funded by the Australian Research Council LF 140100049, “Child Refugees and Australian Internationalism: 1920 to the Present.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordana Silverstein.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silverstein, J. “Best Interests of the Child”, Australian Refugee Policy, and the (Im)possibilities of International Solidarity. Hum Rights Rev 22, 389–405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00588-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00588-9

Keywords

Navigation