Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developmental characteristics of children with learning disabilities aged 0–6 based on parental observations

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Early identification of children with learning disabilities (LD) is extremely important. In order for early identification to be made, it is necessary to determine the characteristics of these children in early life. The present study aimed to examine the developmental characteristics of children with LD in the age intervals of 0–2, 2–4, and 4–6, based on parental observations. For this purpose, interviews were conducted with the parents of 35 children identified with LD. The data were collected through a semi-structured interview form and they were analyzed using content analysis. The data were interpreted and classified using an inductive approach. The results indicated that children with LD have different characteristics in terms of speech and language proficiency, social, psychomotor, cognitive, and sensory skills compared to children without LD. Moreover, the participants’ responses indicated that the majority of the children had their LD identified after the first year of primary school. After a thorough discussion of the study findings, recommendations are made for future research and practice in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

  • 17 April 2023

    The original version of this article was updated to correct the article title.

References

  • Alloway, T. P. (2009). Working memory, but not IQ, predicts subsequent learning in children with learning difficulties. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 92–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).). American Psychiatric Publishing.

  • Bakır, F. H., & Babür, N. (2018). Hızlı otomatik isimlendirme testi’nin türkçeye uyarlanması. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 35(2), 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balikci, O. S., & Melekoglu, M. A. (2020). Early signs of specific learning disabilities in early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 12(1), 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, W. N., Rosenkrans, C. B., & Crane, M. K. (1999). Stress, depression, and suicide among students with learning disabilities: Assessing the risk. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(2), 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, N. F., Maki, K. E., Floyd, R. G., Eckert, T. L., Kranzler, J. H., & Fefer, S. A. (2019). A national survey of school psychologists’ practices in identifying specific learning disabilities. School Psychology, 35, 146–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bildiren, A., & Fırat, T. (2020). Giftedness or disability? Living with paradox. Education 3–13, 48(6), 746–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, R., Lee, K., & Muñez, D. (2020). Numerical magnitude understanding in kindergartners: A specific and sensitive predictor of later mathematical difficulties? Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M., Mundy, I. R., & Cunningham, A. J. (2014). The roles of family history of dyslexia, language, speech production and phonological processing in predicting literacy progress. Developmental Science, 17(5), 727–742.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, S. A., Buchanan, M., & Vercimak, D. (2007). Serving twice-exceptional preschoolers: Blending gifted education and early childhood special education practices in assessment and program planning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(3), 372–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, E. A., & Stanovich, E. K. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Second Edition). Pearson Education.

  • Çakıroğlu, O. (2017). Özel öğrenme güçlüğüne giriş. In M. A. Melekoğlu, & U. Sak (Eds.), Özel öğrenme güçlüğü ve özel yetenek (pp. 1–22). Pegem Akademi.

  • Desoete, A., Ceulemans, A., De Weerdt, F., & Pieters, S. (2012). Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 64–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Weerdt, F., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2013). Working memory in children with reading disabilities and/or mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(5), 461–472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doren, B., Murray, C., & Gau, J. M. (2014). Salient predictors of school dropout among secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(4), 150–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergül, C., Yılmaz, Ç. Ö., & Demir, E. (2018). 5–10 yaş grubu çocuklara yönelik geliştirilmiş çalışma belleği ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 14(2), 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firat, T. (2020). A multi-way intervention to improve the social acceptance of a student with learning disabilities. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fırat, T. (2021). Özel eğitim ve kaynaştırma. In U. Şahbaz (Ed.), Öğrenme güçlüleri (pp. 288–318). Pegem Akademi.

  • Fırat, T., & Bildiren, A. (2021). Strengths and weaknesses of a student with learning disabilities: From preschool to university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(7), 958–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fırat, T., & Koçak, D. (2018). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğrenme güçlüğünün tanımına ilişkin görüşleri. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 915–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fırat, T., & Koçak, D. (2020). Opinions of primary school teachers on the determination and referral of students with learning disabilities. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 13(2), 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., Coulter, W. A., Reschly, D. J., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(2), 304–331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, L., & Al Otaiba, S. (2013). Data-based individualization as a means of providing intensive instruction to students with serious learning disorders. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 526–544). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195–203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., Bailey, D. H., Littlefield, A., Wood, P., Hoard, M. K., & Nugent, L. (2009). First-grade predictors of mathematical learning disability: A latent class trajectory analysis. Cognitive Development, 24(4), 411–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E. (2004). Working memory and learning during the school years. Proceedings of the British Academy, 125, 365–380.

  • Gathercole, S. E., & Alloway, T. P. (2008). Working memory and classroom learning. In S. K. Thurman, & C. A. Fiorello (Eds.), Applied cognitive research in K-3 classrooms (pp. 17–40). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

  • Gathercole, S. E., Alloway, T. P., Willis, C., & Adams, A. M. (2006). Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(3), 265–281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E. L., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Wagner, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), 37–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J. B., Wycoff, K. L., & Fiorello, C. A. (2011). RTI and cognitive hypothesis testing for identification and intervention of specific learning disability. In D. P. Flanagan, & V. C. Alfonso (Eds.), Essentials of specific learning disability identification (pp. 173–201). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, C., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D., Lervåg, A., & Snowling, M. J. (2015). The foundations of literacy development in children at familial risk of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1877–1886.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • İzoğlu-Tok, A., & Doğan, Ö. (2022). Öğrenme güçlüğü olan çocukların tanı sürecinin yönetmelik ve kararname bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.800586

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of (IDEA) (2004). 20 U. S. C. § 1400 et seq (2004).

  • Jenkins, J. R., & O’Connor, R. E. (2002). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research to Practice, 2, 99–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelle Vuijk, P., Hartman, E., Mombarg, R., Scherder, E., & Visscher, C. (2011). Associations between academic and motor performance in a heterogeneous sample of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3), 276–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, S., & Watson, S. M. (2011). Longitudinal outcomes for mathematics achievement for students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(3), 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamps, D., Abbott, M., Greenwood, C., Wills, H., Veerkamp, M., & Kaufman, J. (2008). Effects of small-group reading instruction and curriculum differences for students most at risk in kindergarten: Two-year results for secondary-and tertiary-level interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 101–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karasu, N. (2014). Guidance and research centers of Turkey: From the perspective of parents. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 358–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargın, T., Ergül, C., Büyüköztürk, S., & Güldenoğlu, B. (2015). Anasınıfı çocuklarına yönelik erken okuryazarlık testi (EROT) gelistirme çalışması. Özel Egitim Dergisi, 16(3), 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargin, T., & Güldenoğlu, B. (2016). Learning disabilities research and practice in Turkey. Learning Disabilities – A Contemporary Journal, 14(1), 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K. A., & Mostert, M. P. (2004). Social skills interventions for individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortering, L. J., & Christenson, S. (2009). Engaging students in school and learning: The real deal for school completion. Exceptionality, 17(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, S. M., & Thompson, B. (2006). Early identification and interventions for children at risk for learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorger, T., Schmidt, M., & Vukman, K. B. (2015). The social acceptance of secondary school students with learning disabilities (LD). Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(2), 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, B. J., & Lewandowski, L. J. (2006). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Who are they? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 515–527.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, H., Aro, M., Eklund, K., Erskine, J., Guttorm, T., Laakso, M. L., & Torppa, M. (2004). The development of children at familial risk for dyslexia: Birth to early school age. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(2), 184–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, P., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2005). Language development and literacy skills in late-talking toddlers with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 55(2), 166–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, P., & Lyytinen, H. (2004). Growth and predictive relations of vocabulary and inflectional morphology in children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 397–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, B. (1998). Precursors of learning disabilities in the inclusive preschool. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, K. E., Barrett, C. A., Hajovsky, D. B., & Burns, M. K. (2020). An examination of the relationships between specific learning disabilities identification and growth rate, achievement, cognitive ability, and student demographics. School Psychology, 35(5), 343–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, K. E., Burns, M. K., & Sullivan, A. (2017). Learning disability identification consistency: The impact of methodology and student evaluation data. School Psychology Quarterly, 32, 254–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, M. (1998). Loneliness and coherence among preschool children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(2), 173–180.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocco, M. M., & Thompson, R. E. (2005). Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(3), 142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. K., Scissons, M., & Gutknecth, N. (2011). A longitudinal study of kindergarten children at risk for reading disabilities: The poor really are getting poorer. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 421–430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melekoğlu, M. (2017). Özel öğrenme güçlüğünün nedenleri ve özellikleri. M. A. In U. Melekoğlu, & Sak (Eds.), Özel öğrenme güçlüğü ve özel yetenek (pp. 24–52). Pegem Akademi.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publication.

  • Morgan, P. L., Li, H., Farkas, G., Cook, M., Pun, W. H., & Hillemeier, M. M. (2017). Executive functioning deficits increase kindergarten children’s risk for reading and mathematics difficulties in first grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 23–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Most, T., Al-Yagon, M., Tur-Kaspa, H., & Margalit, M. (2000). Phonological awareness, peer nominations, and social competence among preschool children at risk for developing learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 47(1), 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlowska, D. (1995). Parental participation in issues concerning their sons and daughters with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 10(4), 437–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozernov-Palchik, O., Norton, E. S., Sideridis, G., Beach, S. D., Wolf, M., Gabrieli, J. D., & Gaab, N. (2017). Longitudinal stability of pre‐reading skill profiles of kindergarten children: Implications for early screening and theories of reading. Developmental Science, 20(5), e12471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozok, H., Vural, M., & Avcıoğlu, H. (2008). Rehberlik araştırma merkezi müdürlerinin gönderme tanılama yerleştirme izleme ve değerlendirmeye ilişkin görüş ve önerileri. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partanen, M., & Siegel, L. S. (2014). Long-term outcome of the early identification and intervention of reading disabilities. Reading and Writing, 27(4), 665–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, P., & Fuchs, D. (2016). A meta-analysis of working memory deficits in children with learning difficulties: Is there a difference between verbal domain and numerical domain? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 3–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereles, D. A., Omdal, S., & Baldwin, L. (2009). Response to intervention and twice-exceptional learners: A promising fit. Gifted Child Today, 32, 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, S., Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., Vanderswalmen, R., & Van Waelvelde, H. (2012). Behind mathematical learning disabilities: What about visual perception and motor skills? Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, K. M., Wigg, K. G., Misener, V. L., Clarke, A., Yeung, N., Blokland, K., & Barr, C. L. (2021). Language difficulties in school-aged children with developmental dyslexia.Journal of Learning Disabilities,00222194211006207.

  • Puolakanaho, A., Ahonen, T., Aro, M., Eklund, K., Leppänen, P. H., Poikkeus, A. M., & Lyytinen, H. (2007). Very early phonological and language skills: Estimating individual risk of reading disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(9), 923–931.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M., Baum, S. M., & Burke, E. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruban, L. M., & Reis, S. M. (2005). Identification and assessment of gifted students with learning disabilities. Theory into Practice, 44(2), 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakiz, H. (2018). Students with learning disabilities within the context of inclusive education: Issues of identification and school management. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(3), 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakız, H., Sart, Z. H., Börkan, B., Korkmaz, B., & Babür, N. (2015). Quality of life of children with learning disabilities: A comparison of self-reports and proxy reports. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30(3), 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakız, H., Sart, Z. H., & Ekinci, A. (2016). Öğrenme güçlüğünde yaşanan zorlukların eğitsel çerçevede incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(40), 240–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, D. M., Gelzheiser, L. M., Vellutino, F. R., Schatschneider, C., & Sweeney, J. M. (2008). Reducing the incidence of early reading difficulties: Professional development for classroom teachers versus direct interventions for children. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(3), 346–359.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, D. M., Vellutino, F. R., Small, S. G., Fanuele, D. P., & Sweeney, J. (2005). Severe reading difficulties: Can they be prevented? A comparison of prevention and intervention approaches. Exceptionality, 13, 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(10), 618–629.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2000). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Sage.

  • Squarza, C., Picciolini, O., Gardon, L., & Giannı`, M. L. (2016). Learning disabilities in extremely low birth weight children and neurodevelopmental profiles at preschool age. Frontiers In Psychology, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J., Lervåg, A., Nash, H. M., & Hulme, C. (2019). Longitudinal relationships between speech perception, phonological skills and reading in children at high-risk of dyslexia. Developmental Science, 22(1), e12723.

  • Steele, M. M. (2004). Making the case for early identification and intervention for young children at risk for learning disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(2), 75–79.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. L., Kohli, N., Farnsworth, E. M., Sadeh, S., & Jones, L. (2017). Longitudinal models of reading achievement of students with learning disabilities and without disabilities. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(3), 336–349.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. G., Anselmo, M., Foreman, A. L., Schatschneider, C., & Angelopoulos, J. (2000). Utility of kindergarten teacher judgments in identifying early learning problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(2), 200–210.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. A., Hulme, C., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D., Hayiou-Thomas, E., & Snowling, M. J. (2015). Developmental dyslexia: Predicting individual risk. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(9), 976–987.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. (1998). Catch them before they fall: Identification and assessment to prevent failure in young children. American Educator, 22, 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torppa, M., Lyytinen, P., Erskine, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Language development, literacy skills, and predictive connections to reading in finnish children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(4), 308–321.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tur-Kaspa, H. (2004). Social‐information‐processing skills of kindergarten children with developmental learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(1), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzivinikou, S. (2018). Screening Young Children at Risk for Reading Failure. In Early Childhood Education (pp. 1–15). Intech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82081

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2008). 30th annual (2006) report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2016). 38th annual (2014) report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Author.

  • U.S. Department of Education (2019). 41th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Author.

  • van Viersen, S., de Bree, E. H., Verdam, M., Krikhaar, E., Maassen, B., van der Leij, A., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Delayed early vocabulary development in children at family risk of dyslexia. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 60(4), 937–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Viersen, S., de Bree, E. H., Zee, M., Maassen, B., van der Leij, A., & de Jong, P. F. (2018). Pathways into literacy: The role of early oral language abilities and family risk for dyslexia. Psychological Science, 29(3), 418–428.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaugh, S., Zaragoza, N., Hogan, A., & Walker, J. (1993). A four-year longitudinal investigation of the social skills and behavior problems of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(6), 404–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between reading disabled and non-reading disabled children: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 437–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viholainen, H., Ahonen, T., Cantell, M., Lyytinen, P., & Lyytinen, H. (2002). Development of early motor skills and language in children at risk for familial dyslexia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 44(11), 761–769.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.

  • Zhang, X., Räsänen, P., Koponen, T., Aunola, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2020). Early cognitive precursors of children’s mathematics learning disability and persistent low achievement: A 5-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 91(1), 7–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westendorp, M., Hartman, E., Houwen, S., Smith, J., & Visscher, C. (2011). The relationship between gross motor skills and academic achievement in children with learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2773–2779.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. M., Armstrong, D., Furrie, C., A., & Walcot, E. (2009). The mental health of Canadians with self-reported learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 24–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahsin Firat.

Ethics declarations

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

The experimenters received approval from the university’s institutional review board before recruiting participants and beginning the study. Document date/nr.: 23/12/2020-38.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this research manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Firat, T., Bildiren, A. Developmental characteristics of children with learning disabilities aged 0–6 based on parental observations. Curr Psychol 43, 2909–2921 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04526-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04526-z

Keywords

Navigation