Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Analysis of Nineteenth Century Pharmacopoeias in the Southern United States: A Case Study Based on the Gideon Lincecum Herbarium1

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Comparative Analysis of Nineteenth Century Pharmacopoeias in the Southern United States: A Case Study Based on the Gideon Lincecum Herbarium. The Gideon Lincecum Herbarium represents the pharmacopoeia of Dr. Gideon Lincecum, a botanical physician practicing in Mississippi and Texas during the first half of the nineteenth century. The herbarium contains 313 specimens representing 309 species, 242 genera, and 96 families, and includes ethnobotanical annotations for 286 medicinal taxa. The collection data provided by Lincecum indicate that the specimens were collected between 1835 and 1852. With the exception of 22 specimens considered by Campbell (1951), this is the first study to place this pharmacopoeia in a historical context. Taxonomic determinations of the herbarium specimens were confirmed or corrected. Comparative analyses were conducted to investigate the relationship of Lincecum’s pharmacopoeia to those of six other medical traditions practiced in the southern United States during the nineteenth century. Cluster analyses based on Jaccard co-efficient placed the historical pharmacopoeias of medical traditions in the early nineteenth century into distinct Euro–American and American Indian groups. Despite the recognition of distinct allopathic and botanical medical traditions, an extensive overlap in the composition of their pharmacopoeias is observed. This may reflect the reliance of these traditions on allopathic principles and drugs of plant origin during the first half of the nineteenth century. In contrast, Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Creek pharmacopoeias show limited overlap with each other in composition despite a long history of interaction between these groups. Lincecum’s pharmacopoeia shares a larger Jaccard co–efficient value with the Choctaw pharmacopoeia than would be expected based on their placement in distinct Euro–American and American Indian groups in the dendrogram. The large proportion of Lincecum’s citations that reference Choctaw informants provides direct evidence for the incorporation of Choctaw medical knowledge and taxa into Lincecum’s pharmacopoeia. These data suggest that the composition of historical pharmacopoeias is influenced by both contemporary medical practices and the regional and cultural contexts in which the pharmacopoeias are utilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Akers, D. L. 2004. Living in the Land of Death: The Choctaw Nation, 1830–1860. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, W. 1789. Observations on the Creek and Cherokee Indians. Pages 527–567 in T. P. Slaughter, ed., William Bartram: Travels and Other Writings. The Library of America, New York.

  • Beach, W. M. D. 1833. The American Practice of Medicine: A Treatise of the Character, Causes, Symptoms, Morbid Appearances and Treatment of the Diseases of Men, Women and Children, of all Climates, on Vegetable or Botanical Principles. [S.N.], New York.

  • Berman, A. 1956a. A Striving for Scientific Respectability: Some American Botanics and the Nineteenth–Century Plant Materia Medica. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 30:7–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1956b. Neo–Thomsonianism in the United States. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 11:133–155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, J. L. 2004. The Gideon Lincecum Herbarium: A Floristic and Ethnobotanic Analysis. M.A. Thesis. School of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

  • Burkhalter, L. W. 1965. Gideon Lincecum 1793–1874: A Biography. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell, D. I. J. 1909. The Choctaw of Bayou Lacomb, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana. Bureau of American Ethnology 48:1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T. N. 1951. Medicinal Plants Used by Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Creek Indians in the Early Nineteenth Century. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 41:285–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1959a. Choctaw Subsistence: Ethnographic Notes from the Lincecum Manuscript. Florida Anthropologist 12:9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1959b. The Choctaw Afterworld. Journal of American Folklore 72:146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colney, R. J. 2005. Cherokee Medicine Man: The Life and Work of a Modern–Day Healer. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. H. 1865. Physio–Medical Recorder 29:189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, D. L. 1984. The Impact of the Materia Medica of the North American Indians on Professional Practice. Pages 51–63 in W. H. Heing, ed., Botanical Drugs of the Americas in the Old and New Worlds: Invitational Symposium at the Washington–Congress 1983. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft MBH, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, L. D. King, and N. G. Lordi. 1981. Nineteenth Century Drug Therapy: Computer Analysis of the 1854 Prescription File of a Burlington Pharmacy. Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey 78:758–761.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, H. B. 1899. History of the Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Natchez Indians. [S.N.], Greenville, Texas.

  • Duffy, J. 1977. Pharmacy in Franco–Spanish Louisiana. Pages 15–26 in G. A. Bender and J. Parascandola, eds., American Pharmacy in the Colonial and Revolutionary Periods: A Bicentennial Symposium. American Institution of the History of Pharmacy, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. The Healers: A History of American Medicine. University of Illinois Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, J. W. 1980. Therapeutic Practice in Colonial New England: A Conference Held by the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, May 25–26, 1978. Pages 289–383 in P. Cash, E. H. Christianson, and J. W. Estes, eds., Medicine in Colonial Massachusetts. Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Patterns of Drug Usage in Colonial America. New York State Journal of Medicine 87:37–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, P. 1995. Choctaw Genesis 1500–1700. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gideon Lincecum Collection. 1821–1933a. License to Practice Medicine from 1866 to 1867, Box 2E365, The Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, The University of Texas at Austin.

  • ———. 1821–1933b. Hyoscyamus niger Specimen, Box 3So15a, Folder Pentandria, The Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, The University of Texas at Austin.

  • ———. 1821–1933c. Broadsides, 1838, undated, Box 2E363, The Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Gifford, G. E. J. 1978. Botanic Remedies in Colonial Massachusetts: A Conference Held by the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, May 25–26, 1978. Pages 263–288 in P. Cash, E. H. Christianson, and J. W. Estes, eds., Medicine in Colonial Massachusetts: 1620–1820. Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, J. S. J. 1981. American Medicine in Transition. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Medical Protestants: The Eclectics in American Medicine, 1825–1939. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. N. B. 1939. Notes on the Creek Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 123:119–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. 1833. An Improved System of Botanic Medicine. [S.N.], Columbus, Ohio.

  • Hudson, C. 1976. The Southeastern Indians. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, L. 1992. Cherokee Healing: Myth, Dreams, and Medicine. American Indian Quarterly 16:237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, P. 1901. Étude Comparative de la Distribution Florale dans une Portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin del la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37:547–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartesz, J. T. 1999. A Synonymized Checklist and Atlas with Biological Attributes for the Vascular Flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland, First Edition. In J. T. Kartesz and C. A. Meacham, Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

  • Kelton, P. 2004. Avoiding the Smallpox Spirits: Colonial Epidemics and Southeastern Indian Survival. Ethnohistory 51:45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, R. M. 2004. “This Godforsaken Town”: Death and Disease at Helena, Arkansas, 1862–63. Civil War History 50:109–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincecum, G. 1839–1840. To the editor. Botanico–Medical Recorder 8:304–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1840–1841a. To the editor. Botanico–Medical Recorder 9:130.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1840–1841b. To the editor. Botanico–Medical Recorder 9:116–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1840–1841c. To the editor. Botanico–Medical Recorder 9:81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1844. To the editor. Botanico–Medical Recorder 13:4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincecum, J. B. and E. H. Phillips, eds. 1994. Adventures of a Frontier Naturalist: The Life and Times of Dr. Gideon Lincecum. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E. 1991. The Medicinal Flora of Native North America: An Analysis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 31:1–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Native American Ethnobotany. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, R. W. Pemberton, D. Kiefer, and B. Berlin. 1999. A Comparative Analysis of Five Medicinal Floras. Journal of Ethnobiology 19:49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, J. 1891. The Sacred Formulas of the Cherokees. Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1885–1886. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and F. M. Olbrechts. 1932. The Swimmer Manuscript: Cherokee Sacred Formulas and Medicinal Prescriptions. Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 99. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Medical Convention. 1820. The Pharmacopoeia of the United States of America, [S.N.], Boston, Massachusetts.

  • ———. 1831. The Pharmacopoeia of the United States of America, [S.N.], Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

  • Pisces Conservation Ltd. 2004. Community Analysis Package version 3.01, Lymington, Hampshire, UK.

  • Porcher, F. P. 1849. Report on the Indigenous Medical Plants of South Carolina. Transactions of the American Medical Association 2:677–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdue, T. and M. D. Green. 2001. The Columbia Guide to American Indians of the Southeast. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, W. G. 1972. American Physicians in the Nineteenth Century. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. The Botanical Movements and Orthodox Medicine. Pages 29–51 in N. Gevitz, ed., Other Healers: Unorthodox Medicine in America. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. 1830. The Botanic Physician: Being a Compendium of the Practice of Physic, upon Botanical Principles. Murphy & Bingham, Printers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck, F. G. 1907. Some Outlines of Aboriginal Culture in the Southeastern States. American Anthropologist, New Series 9:287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, J. R. 1928a. Religious Beliefs and Medicinal Practices of the Creek Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Report 42:473–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1928b. Social and Religious Beliefs and Usages of the Chickasaw Indians. Bureau American Ethnology Annual Report 44:169–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1931. Source Material for the Social and Ceremonial Life of the Choctaw Indians. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. Social Organization and Social Usages of the Indians of the Creek Confederacy. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. A. 1940. Plants Used as Curatives by Certain Southeastern Tribes. Botanical Museum of Harvard University (reprinted in 1978 by AMS Press), Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S. 1835. New Guide to Health; or Botanic Family Physician. Samuel Thomson, Boston, Massachusetts.

  • USDA NRCS. 2008. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Center. Baton Rouge, Louisiana. http://plants.usda.gov (12 August 2009).

  • Vogel, V. J. 1970. American Indian Medicine. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H. 1963. Hierarchical Groups to Optimize an Objective Function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58:234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. L. 1979. Southeastern Indians since the Removal Era. The University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. L. 1993. The Traditional History of the Chahta People: An Analysis of Gideon Lincecum’s Manuscript. Ph.D. dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Requests for images of the voucher specimens in the Gideon Lincecum Herbarium can be directed to the Dolph Briscoe Center for American History (DBCAH), University of Texas at Austin, SRH 2.101, Austin, Texas 78712 (http://www.cah.utexas.edu). The author would like to thank the DBCAH for the loan of the GLH to the Plant Resources Center (TEX/LL). The late Sarah Clark Moriaty, past Head of Archives and Manuscripts at the DBCAH, brought the GLH to the attention of Dr. T. Wendt and Dr. B. B. Simpson. The guidance of Dr. Simpson and Dr. Wendt, who identified the GLH as a potential research project and supervised the research as part of the author’s Master’s thesis at the University of Texas at Austin, is gratefully acknowledged. Dr. Wendt, Dr. P. Fryxell and Dr. S. Jury provided assistance in specimen identification. M. Lurie provided assistance with statistical analyses. Dr. B. Harms assisted in preparation of the digital images. This manuscript benefited from revisions and comments provided by Dr. Simpson, Dr. Wendt, Dr. D. Moerman, K. Brown, and three anonymous reviewers. Financial support was provided by the Office of Graduate Studies and Plant Biology Graduate Program at the University of Texas at Austin and the Graduate Student Organization at the University of Hawaii at Manoa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanne L. Birch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birch, J.L. A Comparative Analysis of Nineteenth Century Pharmacopoeias in the Southern United States: A Case Study Based on the Gideon Lincecum Herbarium1 . Econ Bot 63, 427–440 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-009-9101-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-009-9101-8

Key Words

Navigation