Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A review of E-voting: the past, present and future

  • Published:
Annals of Telecommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electronic voting systems are those which depend on some electronic technology for their correct functionality. Many of them depend on such technology for the communication of election data. Depending on one or more communication channels in order to run elections poses many technical challenges with respect to verifiability, dependability, security, anonymity and trust. Changing the way in which people vote has many social and political implications. The role of election administrators and (independent) observers is fundamentally different when complex communications technology is involved in the process. Electronic voting has been deployed in many different types of election throughout the world for several decades. Despite lack of agreement on whether this has been a ‘success’, there has been—in the last few years—enormous investment in remote electronic voting (primarily as a means of exploiting the internet as the underlying communication technology).

This paper reviews the past, present and future of on-line voting. It reports on the role of technology transfer, from research to practice, and the range of divergent views concerning the adoption of on-line voting for critical elections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/expeditions/expedition18/vote.html

  2. The EU Cybervote Project. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/search/index.cfm?fuseaction=proj.document&PJ_RCN=4850479.

  3. A comprehensive view of the state of electronic voting in all the countries in the world can be found at https://www.e-voting.cc/en/it-elections/world-map/.

  4. An excellent report—City of Toronto RFP #3405-13-3197—can be found at https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1310860/toronto-internet-voting-security-report.pdf.

References

  1. Adida B (2008) Helios: Web-based open-audit voting. In: USENIX Security Symposium, vol 17, pp 335–348

  2. Alvarez RM, Hall TE, Hyde SD (2009) Election fraud: detecting and deterring electoral manipulation. Brookings Institution Press

  3. Aranha DF, Ribeiro H, Paraense ALO (2016) Crowdsourced integrity verification of election results. Annals of Telecommunications:1–11. doi:10.1007/s12243-016-0511-1

  4. Araújo R, Rajeb NB, Robbana R, Traoré J, Youssfi S (2010) Towards practical and secure coercion-resistant electronic elections. In: Cryptology and Network Security. Springer, pp 278– -297

  5. Arthur JK, Adu-Manu KS (2014) A trustworthy architectural framework for the administration of e-voting: the case of Ghana. Int J Comput Sci Issues (IJCSI) 11(3):97

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bell S, Benaloh J, Byrne MD, DeBeauvoir D, Eakin B, Kortum P, McBurnett N, Pereira O, Stark PB, Wallach DS et al (2013) Star-vote: a secure, transparent, auditable, and reliable voting system. In: 2013 Electronic Voting Technology Workshop/Workshop on Trustworthy Elections (EVT/WOTE 13)

  7. Braun N (2005) Stimmgeheimnis: Eine rechtsvergleichende und rechtshistorische Untersuchung unter Einbezug des geltenden Rechts Stampfli Verlag

  8. Braun N, Brändli D Swiss e-voting pilot projects: Evaluation, situation analysis and how to proceed. In: Krimmer [34], pp 27–36

  9. Budurushi J, Renaud K, Volkamer M, Woide M (2016) An investigation into the usability of electronic voting systems for complex elections. Annals of Telecommunications pp 1–14. doi:10.1007/s12243-016-0510-2

  10. Carback R, Chaum D, Clark J, Conway J, Essex A, Herrnson PS, Mayberry T, Popoveniuc S, Rivest RL, Shen E, et al. Scantegrity ii municipal election at takoma park: The first e2e binding governmental election with ballot privacy (2010). http://static.usenix.org/legacy/events/sec10/tech/full_papers/Carback.pdf

  11. Carter L, Bélanger F (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors*. Inf Syst J 15(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarkson ME, Chong S, Myers AC (2007) Civitas: a secure remote voting system. In: Chaum D., Kutylowski M., Rivest R. L., Ryan P. Y. A. (eds) Frontiers of Electronic Voting, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, vol 07311. Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum fuer Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany

  13. Cranor LF, Cytron RK (1997) Sensus: a security-conscious electronic polling system for the internet. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1997, vol 3. IEEE, pp 561–570

  14. Culnane C, Ryan PY, Schneider S, Teague V (2015) vvote: a verifiable voting system. ACM Trans Inf Syst Secur (TISSEC) 18(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies DW, Bartlett KA, Scantlebury RA, Wilkinson PT (1967) A digital communication network for computers giving rapid response at remote terminals. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles, SOSP ’67. doi:10.1145/800001.811669. ACM, NY, USA, pp 2.1–2.17

  16. Fernandes NC, Moreira MD, Moraes IGM, Ferraz LHG, Couto RS, Carvalho HE, Campista MEM, Costa LHM, Duarte OCM (2011) Virtual networks: isolation, performance, and trends. Ann Telecommun-Annal Télécommun 66(5-6):339–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuller RB (1967) No more secondhand god: And other writings. Southern Illinois University Press

  18. Gjøsteen K, Lund AS (2016) An experiment on the security of the norwegian electronic voting protocol. Annals of Telecommunications:1–9. doi:10.1007/s12243-016-0509-8

  19. Gonggrijp R, Hengeveld WJ (2007) Studying the Nedap/Groenendaal ES3b voting computer: A computer security perspective. In: EVT’07: Proceedings Of the USENIX/Accurate Electronic Voting Technology Workshop 2007 on Electronic Voting Technology Workshop. USENIX Association, CA, USA

  20. Goodman NJ (2014) Internet voting in a local election in Canada. In: The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective. Springer, pp 7–24

  21. Gritzalis D (2002) Principles and requirements for a secure e-voting system. Comput Secur 21(6):539–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gronke P, Galanes-Rosenbaum E, Miller PA, Toffey D (2008) Convenience voting. Annu Rev Polit Sci 11:437–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haber S, Benaloh J, Halevi S (2010) The helios e-voting demo for the international association for cryptologic research (IACR). IACR

  24. Halderman JA, Teague V (2015) The new south wales ivote systevem: Security failures and verification flaws in a live online election. In: E-voting and Identity. Springer, pp 35–53

  25. Heiberg S, Parsovs A, Willemson J (2015) Log analysis of Estonian internet voting 2013–2014. Springer, pp 19–34

  26. Hiltz SR, Turoff M (1993) The network nation: Human communication via computer. MIT Press

  27. Horst M, Kuttschreuter M, Gutteling JM (2007) Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Comput Hum Behav 23(4):1838–1852. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Horster P, Michels M (1995) Der vertrauensaspekt in elektronischen wahlen. In: Trust Center. Springer, pp 180–189

  29. Jacobs B, Pieters W (2009) Electronic voting in the Netherlands: from early adoption to early abolishment. In: Foundations of Security Analysis and Design V. Springer, pp 121–144

  30. Juels A, Catalano D, Jakobsson M (2005) Coercion-resistant electronic elections. In: Atluri V., Di Vimercati S.D.C., Dingledine R. (eds) WPES. doi:10.1145/1102199.1102213. ACM, pp 61–70

  31. Kiniry JR, Morkan AE, Cochran D, Fairmichael F, Chalin P, Oostdijk M, Hubbers E (2006) The koa remote voting system: a summary of work to date. In: montanari U., Sannella D., Bruni R. (eds) TGC, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4661. Springer, pp 244–262

  32. Kiniry JR, Morkan AE, Cochran D, Oostdijk M, Hubbers E (2006) Formal techniques in a remote voting system. SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 31(6):1–2. doi:10.1145/1218776.1218793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kohno T, Stubblefield A, Rubin AD, Wallach DS (2004) Analysis of an electronic voting system. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (s&p04). IEEE, pp 27–40

  34. Krimmer R. (ed) (2006) Electronic Voting 2006: 2nd International Workshop, Co-organized by Council of Europe, ESF TED, IFIP WG 8.6 and E-Voting.CC, August, 2nd - 4th, 2006 in Castle Hofen, Bregenz, Austria, LNI, vol. 86. GI

  35. Krimmer R, Volkamer M (2005) Bits or paper? comparing remote electronic voting to postal voting. In: Andersen K. V., Grönlund Å.A., Traunmüller R., Wimmer M. (eds) EGOV (Workshops and posters), Schriftenreihe Informatik, vol 13. Universitätsverlag Rudolf Trauner, Linz, Austria, pp 225–232

  36. Lindeman M, Stark PB (2012) A gentle introduction to risk-limiting audits. IEEE Security & Privacy (5), pp 42–49

  37. Locher P, Haenni R (2016) Receipt-free remote electronic elections with everlasting privacy. Annals of Telecommunications, pp 1–14. doi:10.1007/s12243-016-0519-6

  38. Maaten E (2004) Towards remote e-voting: Estonian case. In: prosser A., Krimmer R. (eds) Electronic Voting in Europe, vol 47. LNI, GI, pp 83–100

  39. Madise Ü., Martens T E-voting in estonia 2005. the first practice of country-wide binding internet voting in the world. In: Krimmer [34], pp 15–26

  40. McGaley M, Gibson JP (2003) E-Voting: A Safety Critical System. Technical Report NUIM-CSTR- 2003-02, NUI Maynooth, Computer Science Department

  41. Mercuri R (2002) A better ballot box?. IEEE Spectr. 39(10):46–50. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2002.1038569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mercurio B (2003) Democracy in decline: can internet voting save the electoral process. J Marshall J Comput Info L 22:409

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mohen J, Glidden J (2001) The case for internet voting. Commun ACM 44:72–85. doi:10.1145/357489.357511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Monnoyer-Smith L How e-voting technology challenges traditional concepts of citizenship: an analysis of french voting rituals. In: Krimmer [34], pp 61–68

  45. Mote Jr C (2000) Report of the national workshop on internet voting: issues and research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Annual National Conference on Digital Government Research. Digital Government Society of North America, pp 1–59

  46. Neumann S, Volkamer M, Jurlind B, Prandrini M (2016) Secivo: a quantitative security assessment model for internet voting schemes. Annals Telecommunication pp 1–14

  47. Pammett JH, Goodman N (2013) Consultation and evaluation practices in the implementation of internet voting in Canada and europe. Elections Canada, Research Report, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pinault T, Courtade P (2012) E-voting at expatriates’ mps elections in France. In: Electronic Voting, pp 189–195

  49. Serdult U, Germann M, Mendez F, Portenier A, Wellig C (2015) Fifteen years of internet voting in Switzerland [history, governance and use]. In: 2015 Second International Conference on Edemocracy & Egovernment (ICEDEG). IEEE, pp 126–132

  50. Springall D, Finkenauer T, Durumeric Z, Kitcat J, Hursti H, MacAlpine M, Halderman JA (2014) Security analysis of the Estonian internet voting system. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, pp 703–715

  51. Staveley ES (1972) Greek and rOman Voting and Elections. [London] Thames & Hudson

  52. Villafiorita A, Weldemariam K, Tiella R (2009) Development, formal verification, and evaluation of an e-voting system with vvpat. Trans Info For Sec 4(4):651–661. doi:10.1109/TIFS.2009.2034903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zissis D, Lekkas D (2011) Securing e-government and e-voting with an open cloud computing architecture. Gov Inf Q 28(2):239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr Gibson acknowledges the funding he received from the French ANR project IMPEX (13-INSE-0001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SAMOVAR, Télécom Sud Paris, CNRS, Université Paris Saclay, 9 rue Charles Fourier, Evry Cedex, 91011, Paris, France

    J Paul Gibson

  2. Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia Tee 3, 12618, Tallinn, Estonia

    Robert Krimmer

  3. University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Vanessa Teague

  4. CIPPEC, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Julia Pomares

Authors
  1. J Paul Gibson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Krimmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vanessa Teague
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julia Pomares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Paul Gibson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gibson, J.P., Krimmer, R., Teague, V. et al. A review of E-voting: the past, present and future. Ann. Telecommun. 71, 279–286 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-016-0525-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-016-0525-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation