Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Invasive Fungal Infections: A Continuing Challenge Report from the 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host, Genoa, Italy, 24–27 July 2012

  • Invited Commentary
  • Published:
Current Fungal Infection Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remains a challenge to the most experienced clinicians and mycologists as the therapeutic landscape continues to change. Delegates to the 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host heard that fungal epidemiology, patient demographics, diagnosis and treatment are all evolving. Diagnosis-driven therapy—pre-emptive or targeted—is the ideal approach to managing IFIs, but is dependent on reliable biomarker assays to identify, or at least strongly suggest, the organism(s) responsible. Biomarkers, however, are subject to ongoing research and so are also evolving. Some assays also may not be available in a particular centre. The same applies to investigations such as CT-scans and bronchoscopy that need to be performed in a timely fashion to help confirm an IFI. Thus, for patients with febrile neutropenia despite broad-spectrum antibiotic cover, clinicians without the appropriate diagnostic facilities prefer to start antifungal (AF) treatment immediately whilst attempting to confirm the diagnosis. Empirical therapy therefore looks likely to have a role for some time. For high-risk patients, such as those with haematological malignancies and/or undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the preferred strategy is to prevent IFIs using AF prophylaxis although regular screening with biomarkers is an alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group

  2. 3rd European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia

  3. Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

  4. Infectious Diseases Society of America

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. • Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Park BJ, Alexander BD, Anaissie EJ, Walsh TJ, et al. Prospective surveillance for invasive fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2001-2006: overview of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) Database. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(8):1091–100. This study provides recent data for incidence and epidemiology of invasive fungal disease collated from a number of US stem cell transplant centers.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Jones RN, Messer SA, Hollis RJ. Trends in antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp. isolated from pediatric and adult patients with bloodstream infections: SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997 to 2000. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(3):852–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rabello M, Zubiet M, Viviani T, Diaz C, Medel L, Ibanez M. Air sampling monitoring and risk of nosocomial invasive aspergillosis infection in children with cancer and neutropenia. 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host; 24-27 June, 2012; Genoa. Abstract 41.

  4. Dignani M, Chiller T, Davel G, et al. Invasive mold disease (IMD) in immunocompromised (IC) non-HIV patients. Preliminary data from the first Argentinian registry for invasive mycosis (REMIN). 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host; 24-27 June, 2012; Genoa. Abstract 42.

  5. de Pauw B. Between over- and undertreatment of invasive fungal disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(9):1251–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. • Pagano L, Caira M, Candoni A, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a SEIFEM-2008 registry study. Haematologica. 2010;95(4):644–50. This study is important in describing the occurrence and outcome of aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukaemia patients in Italy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. • Pagano L, Akova M, Dimopoulos G, Herbrecht R, Drgona L, Blijlevens N. Risk assessment and prognostic factors for mould-related diseases in immunocompromised patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66 Suppl 1:i5–14. This paper provides a comprehensive review of risk factors for invasive fungal infection in the immunocompromised.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stanzani M, Lewis R, Fiacchini M, et al. Development and validation of a new risk score for invasive mold disease in patients with haematological malignancies. 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host 24-27 June, 2012; Genoa. Abstract 34.

  9. Becker MJ, Lugtenburg EJ, Cornelissen JJ, Van Der Schee C, Hoogsteden HC, De Marie S. Galactomannan detection in computerized tomography-based broncho-alveolar lavage fluid and serum in haematological patients at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Br J Haematol. 2003;121(3):448–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher C, Stevens AM, Leisenring W, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan testing contributes significantly to the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and is not affected by mold-active therapy. 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host; 24–27 June, 2012; Genoa. Abstract 21.

  11. Avni T, Leibovici L, Paul M. PCR diagnosis of invasive candidiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(2):665–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. • Nguyen MH, Wissel MC, Shields RK, Salomoni MA, Hao B, Press EG, et al. Performance of Candida real-time polymerase chain reaction, beta-D-glucan assay, and blood cultures in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(9):1240–8. This study evaluates non-culture based diagnostics for diagnosis of invasive candidiasis and describes their strengths and weaknesses.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gherna M, Merz WG. Identification of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata within 1.5 hours directly from positive blood culture bottles with a shortened peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization protocol. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(1):247–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rigby S, Procop GW, Haase G, Wilson D, Hall G, Kurtzman C, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes for rapid identification of Candida albicans directly from blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(6):2182–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shepard JR, Addison RM, Alexander BD, Della-Latta P, Gherna M, Haase G, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the Candida albicans/Candida glabrata peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization method for simultaneous dual-color identification of C. albicans and C. glabrata directly from blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(1):50–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson DA, Joyce MJ, Hall LS, Reller LB, Roberts GD, Hall GS, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a Candida albicans peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization probe for characterization of yeast isolates from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2909–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alexander B, Dodds Ashley E, Reller B, Reed SD. Cost savings with implementation of PNA FISH testing for identification of Candida albicans in blood cultures. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2006;54:277–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1813–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. • Agrawal SHW, Sinkó J, Kibbler C. Optimizing management of invasive mould diseases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66 Suppl 1:145–53. This care pathway for management of invasive fungal infection provides a thoughtful overview of the decision making processes in choosing antifungal therapy.

    Google Scholar 

  20. • Cordonnier C, Pautas C, Maury S, Vekhoff A, Farhat H, Suarez F, et al. Empirical versus preemptive antifungal therapy for high-risk, febrile, neutropenic patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(8):1042–51. The first randomised study to evaluate the impact of serum galactomannan on use of antifungal therapy.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maertens J, Theunissen K, Verhoef G, Verschakelen J, Lagrou K, Verbeken E, et al. Galactomannan and computed tomography-based preemptive antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients at high risk for invasive fungal infection: a prospective feasibility study. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(9):1242–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Walsh TJ, et al. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):348–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ullmann AJ, Lipton JH, Vesole DH, Chandrasekar P, Langston A, Tarantolo SR, et al. Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):335–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. • Even C, Bastuji-Garin S, Hicheri Y, Pautas C, Botterel F, Maury S, et al. Impact of invasive fungal disease on the chemotherapy schedule and event-free survival in acute leukemia patients who survived fungal disease: a case-control study. Haematologica. 2011;96(2):337–41. A study showing the impact of a diagnosis of fungal infection on the chemotherapy schedule and overall survival.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maertens J, Marchetti O, Herbrecht R, Cornely OA, Fluckiger U, Frere P, et al. European guidelines for antifungal management in leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: summary of the ECIL 3–2009 update. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011;46(5):709–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marks DI KC, Pagliuca A, et al. Voriconazole vs. itraconazole for primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection (IFI) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. 49th ICAAC; 12-15 September 2009; San Francisco.

  27. Marks DI, Pagliuca A, Kibbler CC, Glasmacher A, Heussel CP, Kantecki M, et al. Voriconazole versus itraconazole for antifungal prophylaxis following allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2011;155(3):318–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Maertens J, Frere P, Lass-Florl C, Heinz W, Cornely O. 3rd European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. Antifungal prophylaxis in leukemia patients. 2009 update of the ECIL-1 and 2 guidelines. http://www.ebmt.org/Contents/Resources/Library/ECIL/Documents/ECIL3%20%202009%20Update%20Antifungal%20prophylaxis.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2012.

  29. Castagnola E, Cesaro S, Dalle J-H, et al. ECIL 4 – Pediatric group considerations for fungal diseases and antifungal treatment in children. http://www.ebmt.org/Contents/Resources/Library/ECIL/Documents/ECIL%204%202011%20Paediatric%20guidelines%20Fungi%20and%20antifungals.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2012.

  30. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):e56–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sipsas NV, Kontoyiannis DP. Clinical issues regarding relapsing aspergillosis and the efficacy of secondary fungal prophylaxis in patients with hematological malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(11):1584–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Carlesse F, Ginani V, Marconcini J, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for patients with active invasive fungal infections: the importance of prophylaxis with granulocyte infusions. 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host; 24-27 June, 2012; Genoa. Abstract 57.

  33. Haider S LM, Rotstein C, et al. . Early salvage therapy with posaconazole for invasive fungal infections caused by molds and yeasts. 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host; 24–27 June, 2012; Genoa.

  34. Marr K, Schlamm H, Rottinghaus ST, et al. A randomised, double-blind study of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis 22nd European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; London. Abstract LB2812.

  35. Ullmann A, Cuenca-Estrella M, et al. EW 16: Presentation of the ESCMID diagnostic & management guideline for Candida diseases 2011. http://www.antmedical.com/3117EW16_Handout_Candida_Guidelines.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2012.

Download references

Disclosure

M. Slavin: grants from Merck, Pfizer and Gilead, payment for lectures from Pfizer and Merck; L. M. Grist: meeting attendance and contribution to the writing of this report was supported by MSD

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica A. Slavin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slavin, M.A., Grist, L.M. Invasive Fungal Infections: A Continuing Challenge Report from the 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host, Genoa, Italy, 24–27 July 2012. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 7, 83–88 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-012-0123-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-012-0123-9

Keywords

Navigation