Abstract
The onset of a pulmonary infiltrate in a solid organ transplant (SOT) recipient is both a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We outline the potential aetiologies of a pulmonary infiltrate in a SOT recipient, with particular attention paid to fungal pathogens. A diagnostic and empirical therapy approach to a pulmonary infiltrate, especially invasive fungal disease (IFD) in SOT recipients, is provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The differential diagnosis of a new pulmonary infiltrate in the solid organ transplant (SOT) recipient is diverse, ranging from non-infective and immunosuppressant toxicity to invasive opportunistic infection (OI) such as invasive fungal disease (IFD). Approximately two-thirds of pulmonary infiltrates are infective in origin [1]. A prospective prevalence study of European SOT recipients estimated the incidence of pneumonia to be 10.1 episodes per 1000 SOT patients/year and where known, identified the causative pathogen to be bacteria in 87 %, viruses in 29 % and fungi in 6.4 % [2•]. The likely causative organism is dependent on degree of immunosuppression, time post transplantation, local epidemiology and host risk factors. Irrespective of aetiology, the development of a pulmonary infiltrate in a SOT patient is associated with increased mortality (21–35 %), significantly higher if there is nosocomial acquisition or infection is due to IFD [1, 3–6]. A targeted management approach of pulmonary infiltrates in SOT recipients is hence required to reduce patient mortality. We outline an approach to assessment, diagnosis and empirical therapy, with a focus on IFD, including Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP).
Infectious Aetiologies of Pulmonary Infiltrates in SOT Recipients
The infective aetiology of a pulmonary infiltrate falls into the major broad categories of viral, bacterial, mycobacterial and fungal origin. In one mixed population SOT study, there was no difference in aetiology according to type of transplant [1]. The likelihood of certain pathogens can in part be extrapolated from a ‘time-post-transplant’ assessment (Fig. 1). However, the ‘time-post-transplant’ concept is dynamic considering the net state of immunosuppression may change (i.e., rejection episode requiring further immunosuppression), resulting in patients brought into a risk category comparable to an ‘earlier’ transplant period [7]. We briefly outline the major pathogens within these key groups and associated risk factors.
Viral
Viral pathogens should be considered as the primary insult in many pneumonic processes in SOT recipients. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) especially in the intermediate and late transplant period (Fig. 1) [2•, 9, 10]. CMV is more commonly encountered as isolated viraemia, colitis or hepatitis in SOT recipients, and pneumonitis is uncommon outside of lung SOT cohorts; pneumonitis incidence is further reduced in patients with sirolimus-based immunosuppression [11]. Influenza is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially if occurring early post-transplant and/or in lung transplant recipients [12–14]. The risk of influenza infection is consistent across the post transplant period, additional risks being pulse steroids, rejection and lymphocyte depletion [15]. Of note, the clinical presentation may be atypical; in the 2009 pandemic, cough (91 %) and myalgia (50 %) were common symptoms [12].
Bacterial
In a prospective multicentre point prevalence study in Europe, pneumonia was identified as primarily a late complication (70 %), community acquired (40 %) and bacterial in origin (87 %) [2•]. The rate of bacterial pneumonia in SOT is upward of 40 % [10]. The most common bacteria isolates reported are Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [2•, 3, 10], and mortality in modern cohorts is 1.9–20 % [3, 4, 16]. Empirical therapy should be targeted towards local epidemiology and routine microbiology [17, 18]. Less frequently, nocardiosis can present as bronchopneumonia, however, classical descriptions are of a nodular radiological appearance with or without cavitation or “halo sign” [19–21]. Nocardia affects 0.7–3.5 % of SOT recipients, traditionally in SOT other than lung [18, 22, 23] but with growing infection rates in lung SOT (3.5 %), and with rates in heart, intestine, kidney and liver recipients 2.5, 1.3, 0.2 and 0.1 %, respectively [20]. Infection typically occurs within the first or second year post transplantation (median time to infection 34–38 months) [17, 20, 24]. Risk factors are similar to other OIs, namely increased immunosuppression, corticosteroids and high plasma calcineurin levels in the preceding 30 days [18, 20, 24]. Legionella spp. is another bacteria that can present with a lobar, reticular, nodular or cavitary pulmonary disease in the SOT recipient. Concurrent bacteraemia is rare and if Legionella spp. is suspected then specific, sputum/BAL culture or PCR should be requested [25–28].
Mycobacterial
Mycobacterial infections can occur at any time point following SOT, occurring most frequently in lung SOT [29, 30]. The frequency of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) causing a pulmonary infiltrate is dependent on locale (0.53–6.4 % in developed countries), the risk nonetheless still 20- to 74-fold higher than in the general population and associated with 30 % mortality [1, 10, 30–34]. Lung infiltrates are the primary TB manifestation in 50 % of SOT recipients. TB infection following pre-transplant treatment of latent TB is rare, as most cases are due to reactivation rather than de novo acquisition. Donor-derived TB (<5 % of TB in SOT) with modern screening practices is also infrequent [34, 35]. Pulmonary TB generally presents with a protracted period of symptoms prior to diagnosis (median 30 days). Although TB in SOT can occur in the first year post transplant, typically it is a late manifestation (median 64 months in a Spanish SOT cohort) [30]. Empirical therapy for TB without microbiological confirmation (by culture or PCR tests) should not occur without a high probability of disease considering the toxicity associated with therapy (41 % in liver SOT, 4.5 % in heart/lung SOT, 2.5 % in renal SOT) and potential rifampicin-induced disruption to immunosuppressant regimens [36].
Pneumocystis jirovecii
Although the causative pathogen is a fungus, the diagnostic approach to PCP is discussed separately. PCP in SOT in the early transplant period is considered rare due to the almost universal uptake of prophylaxis [37], predominately with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole which reduces the risk by 91 % [38, 39]. PCP occurs most frequently in heart SOT recipients (7.3 per 1000 patient-years), followed by kidney (2.7 per 1000 patient-years) and liver transplant recipients (2.6 per 1000 patient-years) [40, 41]. Risk factors in the era of universal prophylaxis were evaluated in one retrospective case control study that identified most cases occurred in the second year post transplant (33 %) and that age, total lymphocyte count and CMV infection were established risk factors [37]. The finding of CMV infection and lymphocyte count as risk factors has been previously demonstrated, as has graft rejection [37-39, 42, 43] Despite the second year post SOT being the most common time for PCP, it can present at any time post transplant [41, 44].
In contrast to that in HIV populations, disease in SOT recipients is more acute and severe fulminant respiratory failure is common as is fever and hypoxia out of proportion to physical findings. Lymphadenopathy is uncommon [45, 46, 47]. Secondary cases irrespective of secondary prophylaxis are relatively uncommon [48]. Isolated cases or outbreaks are described in SOT patients without obvious risk factors for PCP [49–51]. PCP should remain a considered differential in patients with pneumonia late post transplant, especially if known risk associations are present or a concurrent outbreak is evident.
Invasive Fungal Disease (IFD)
Epidemiology
Estimation of the incidence of IFD in SOT recipients is problematic due varied definitions and interpretations of colonisation vs. invasive disease. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains the most common cause of pulmonary IFD with the incidence estimated broadly at 2.7–60 % [1, 10, 33, 52]. The most common infecting species is Aspergillus fumigatus but infections due to Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus flavus are also encountered [53•]. In one retrospective study, IA accounted for 65.1 % of IFD [54]. The overall incidence for IFD among lung, kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients was 49, 2, 11 and 10 per 1000 person-years in a single transplant centre 10-year review [54]. The incidence of pulmonary IA was estimated at 0.4–5 % in renal, liver 1–8 %, heart 1–14 % and 6–16 % in lung SOT [1, 6, 10, 54–62]. In lung SOT recipients, IA is estimated to account for almost 50 % of IFD [53•].
Recipient-derived infections may relate to exposure to endemic fungi (e.g. Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis and Paracoccidioides brasiliensis) or activities/travel (e.g. raising pigeons for Cryptococcus neoformans or marijuana use for Aspergillus spp.) [63]. In a Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRASNET) study, histoplasmosis was the most commonly reported endemic pathogen (0.102 % incidence) with a bimodal presentation similar to that seen in smaller studies (40 % first 6 months, 34 % 2–11 years post SOT) [63–66]. IFD other than IA is less frequently reported. Invasive Scedosporium apiospermum and Scedosporium prolificans donor-derived infection from donors with a near-drowning episode prior to death has been reported, however Scedosporium spp. infection is more commonly diagnosed in lung transplant recipients with evidence of previous colonisation. Scedosporium spp. IFD is infrequent in liver and heart transplant recipients [67]. Scedosporium spp. infection is associated with high mortality early post SOT (median 80.5 days) and presents as isolated pulmonary or disseminated disease in over 85 % of cases [67–69]. Mucormycosis is reported to affect more commonly liver and lung SOT patients, overall contributing approximately 2–8.5 % of IFDs and associated with T-cell depleting immunosuppressive regiments [67, 70–72]. The most common pathogens in order are Rhizopus, Mucor, Rhizomucor and Cunninghamella spp. [67, 71].
Cryptococcus neoformans incidence in SOT recipients is 0.3–5 %, causing 7–8 % of IFD in SOT recipients, more frequently occurring in kidney and liver SOT. Infection typically presents as disseminated disease, occurring 16–24 months post transplantation [70, 73, 74]. A pulmonary infiltrate occurs in 54 % of cases [74]. Fusarium spp. also causes IFD. The TRANSNET study reported that 38.9 % of Fusarium IFD had a pulmonary only presentation and 22 % had disseminated disease [67].
Risk Factors
Universal risk factors for IFD amongst SOT recipients include environmental exposure and net state of immunosuppression [75, 76]. Overall, risk factors for early (<3 months post SOT) pulmonary IA include recurrent bacterial infection, a complicated post-operative period, renal failure requiring dialysis and CMV disease [6, 75, 77, 78]. In late onset IA (>3 months), risk factors have been identified to be advanced age (age >50 years), recurrent bacterial infection, increased immunosuppression, chronic graft rejection, immunosuppression-related lymphoma and renal failure [5, 6, 77]. Certain SOT cohorts have specific additional risk factors for IA, for example Aspergillus spp. colonisation (within 6 months of transplant) in lung SOT recipients and hepatitis C infection and pre-transplant fulminant hepatic failure in the liver recipients [6, 76, 77]. In renal transplant patients, the universal risk factors include prolonged immunosuppression (i.e. with corticosteroids) and graft failure requiring dialysis [79–81]. For heart SOT, in addition to the above risk factors, the presence of an IA episode in the heart transplant program 2 months before or after is an additional risk [59]. Other studies have reported in lung SOT recipients that cystic fibrosis, bronchiolitis obliterans, airway ischemia, hypogammaglobulinemia, bronchial stent and single lung transplant are IA risk factors [53•, 55, 78, 82, 83]. From a matched case control study, zygomycosis in SOT was associated with diabetes, renal failure and prior voriconazole or caspofungin use [84].
Clinical Presentation
The clinical presentation of IFD varies depending on type of SOT. This ranges from asymptomatic colonisation to tracheobronchitis (especially in lung SOT), locally invasive disease, empyema or dissemination [83]. Fungal tracheobronchitis can lead to local ulceration, airway obstruction or stent occlusion. Disseminated IFD is more likely in liver and lung transplant patients [6]. The onset of IFD is reportedly occurring later in modern cohorts, commonly greater than 3 months post SOT [5, 33]. Gavalda et al. in a retrospective case control study demonstrated that 57 % of IA were in the first 3 months post transplant, the mean time 234 days (range 2–3025) with no difference in mortality if IA was early (<3 months) or late (>3 months) post SOT [6]. This description of earlier onset IA compared to previous reports may be related to centre-specific antifungal prophylaxis, as a recent global survey of lung transplant centres indicated that universal prophylaxis was used in the first 6 months post transplant [85]. Early pre-emptive/prophylaxis therapy in colonised patients is known to reduce IFD incidence and IFD-related mortality [86]. In some cohorts, renal IA has been reported later than other SOT, whilst liver and lung typically early [55, 57, 62]. Unique to lung SOT, IA is further reported to occur at the site of anastomosis [87].
For mucormycosis, a pulmonary presentation occurs in 53–56 % of cases, with the risk of dissemination 5-fold higher in liver SOT recipients [84, 88, 89••]. Liver transplant patients are also more likely to have disease earlier after transplant than other SOT recipients [84]. The median time from transplant to mucormycosis infection in all SOT is 5.5 months [88]. The pulmonary presentation can be consolidation/mass (29 %), nodularity (25 %) or cavitation (23 %) [88]. For cryptococcosis, although a pulmonary presentation occurs in >50 % of patients, 33 % are fungaemic (usually concurrent) and 53–72 % have disseminated disease or CNS involvement. The risk of disseminated disease is 6-fold higher in liver SOT recipients [74, 90].
Outcomes
In SOT recipients with IA, hepatic insufficiency, malnutrition, liver and lung SOT, prior antibiotic therapy, mechanical ventilation, transfusion therapy and CNS involvement are associated with increased risk of death [6, 33, 52]. Nonetheless, survival is still greater in SOT within those with stem cell transplants [6, 52]. The mortality rate of mucormycosis in SOT has been demonstrated to be between 38 and 48 % with renal failure and disseminated disease associated with poorer outcomes [71, 84]. The mortality of cryptococcal disease ranges from 33 to 42 %, and if respiratory failure is present, the prognosis is grave [74, 90].
IFD Diagnostics for a Pulmonary Infiltrate in SOT Recipient
The definitions used for IFD in SOT are extrapolated from those routinely used in cancer and stem cell transplant settings assigned by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections and Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) [91]. Whilst revised definitions for colonisation, invasive disease and tracheobronchitis have been proposed in lung SOT, there remains a lack of consensus guidelines for IFD and IA in SOT [92].
The absence of microbiological confirmation for a pulmonary infiltrate in SOT is estimated at just over 50 % [10]. Delayed diagnosis of IFD in SOT is associated with graft loss and mortality [93••]. To this end, the combined use of radiological, microbiological and molecular diagnostics are central to an approach to a pulmonary infiltrate in a SOT recipient.
Although molecular methods are superior to culture, routine culture remains central to any IFD diagnostic schematic. It is important to note that upper respiratory tract specimens lack both sensitivity and specificity for IFD, the positive predictive value (PPV) of a sputum culture for Aspergillus fumigatus only 67 % [94, 95]. Whilst lower respiratory tract sampling (BAL or lung tissue) may also lack relative sensitivity for IFD when compared with molecular methods, it remains more specific than upper respiratory tract sampling [96]. The PPV for IFD of a lower respiratory tract fungal culture is however significantly reduced in the SOT when compared with stem cell transplant cohort [97].
A ‘suggested’ algorithm for routine and advanced respiratory diagnostics, including a stepwise approach to investigating a pulmonary infiltrate in SOT recipient including empirical therapy, is outlined in Fig. 2. Evidence supporting the practice of the more commonly used diagnostics is outlined below.
Tissue Biopsy and Histopathology
The use of tissue biopsy for investigation of a pulmonary infiltrate has only been evaluated in a small number of studies, primarily for pulmonary nodules or masses. Although histopathology may offer the only method of diagnosis, it cannot differentiate within the fungus genus/class [99–101]. In a retrospective single centre review of lung, liver, renal and heart SOT recipients, a percutaneous lung biopsy was performed in 3 %, the procedure yielding a diagnosis in 45 % of cases. The diagnostic yield was increased if a core biopsy was performed in addition to a fine needle aspirate, for IA [102, 103]. The combination of lung biopsy and culture was demonstrated to diagnose 52.6 % of mucormycosis from 116 SOT patients with IFD [71].
Radiology
The most predominant thoracic CT radiological findings in SOT with a pulmonary infiltrate are consolidation (49.4 %), pleural effusion (12 %), nodular infiltration (5.6 %), lymphadenopathy (3.4 %) or cavitation (1.1 %) [1]. Whilst the classical teachings of “halo” and “air crescent” signs are pathognomonic for IA in stem cell transplant patients, they are less strongly associated with IA in SOT recipients [58]. Radiological findings thus cannot be relied upon in SOT transplant with a suspicion of IFD. Bronchoscopy should be employed early to further evaluate the possibility of IFD in high risk patients. In a small study of heart SOT with IA, patients with the CT findings of airway-invasive (AIR) disease (peribronchial consolidation or tree-in-bud pattern) were compared with angio-invasive disease (ANG), ‘AIR patients’ having later onset presentation, higher rates of haemodialysis, more frequent intercurrent bacterial pneumonia and greater IA attributable mortality [104].
Galactomannan Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay (GM-ELISA)
The commercial Aspergillus GM-ELISA assay (Bio-Rad, UK) detects galactomannan (GM), a cell wall polysaccharide of most Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp. that is released in serum during growth into tissue. The GM-ELISA assay has been less well validated in SOT than haematology cohorts and appears to have inferior performance in the SOT cohort [105]. Clancy et al. described the use of GM-ELISA from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in a cohort of 81 SOT patients and found the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to be 100, 90.8, 41.7 and 100 % using a cut-off of 1 [106]. In the same study, 5 of 12 false positives were found in lung SOT, when utilising a GM cut-off of 0.5 [106]. In an earlier prospective study of GM in lung SOT, a high rate of false positives was also noted, particularly amongst cystic fibrosis patients early post transplant, with a sensitivity of 30 % and specificity of 95 % with a cut-off of 0.66 subsequently reported [107]. In liver and lung transplant cohort studies, the sensitivity and specificity were reported as 30–56 % and 87–95 %, respectively [107, 108]. A pooled meta-analysis examining serum GM-ELISA in SOT recipients illustrated poor sensitivity and specificity for proven and probable IFD—41 % and 81 %, respectively [105].
Aspergillus PCR (ASP PCR)
The utility of ASP PCR in SOT recipients and isolation of Aspergillus spp. from BAL specimens are poorly defined. Furthermore, panfungal PCR on BAL or pulmonary tissue in SOT recipients or molecular assays directed at detecting specific fungi or groups of fungi has only been reported sporadically for the investigation of IFD [109–111]. Zarrinfar et al. demonstrated poor correlation between molecular and conventional methods for diagnosing IA from BAL and higher rates of false positives with a nested PCR in a pilot study of liver, lung and renal SOT recipients [112]. Buess et al. in a study of nested ASP-PCR from BAL of immunosuppressed patients (13 % SOT) demonstrated again low sensitivity for probable-proven IFD (36 %), with higher specificity (72 %) [113]. Nonetheless, higher sensitivity of ASP PCR from BAL has been demonstrated particularly in lung SOT (80–100 %) [114, 115].
In a comparative study of ASP-PCR and GM-ELISA in lung transplant patients, the sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 88 % and 93 and 89 %, respectively. In lung transplant patients that are colonised with Aspergillus spp., BAL GM-ELISA compared with ASP-PCR had higher specificity (92 % vs. 50 %) [114]. GM-ELISA using a cut-off of 0.5–1 from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of SOT recipients with suspected IFI offers more promising results with a sensitivity and specificity of 60–90 % and >90 %, respectively [106, 107, 114]. The use of serum and BAL GM-ELISA was compared in a small cohort (n = 17) of predominately lung SOT recipients using a cut-off of 0.5; the sensitivity and specificity were 100 % in probable or proven IA, compared to serum which had a sensitivity and specificity of 77 and 100%, respectively [116].
The true utility of both GM-ELISA and ASP PCR is combination testing in BAL, improving sensitivity (97 %) whilst retaining specificity (93 %) [114]. Hoenigl et al. demonstrated that the combination of GM and ASP PCR had a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 95–98 % from BAL in a cohort of immunocompromised patients, including SOT [117]. Nonetheless, variability in sensitivity of GM-ELISA and ASP PCR in the SOT recipients compared with stem cell transplant cohort means these investigations should be employed as adjuncts, not as a sole “rule in” or “rule out” test.
Aspergillus Lateral-Flow Device (LFD)
The Aspergillus LFD is a point-of-care test that can be used on serum or BAL to diagnose IFD via detection of an extracellular glycoprotein secreted by Aspergillus spp. during growth [118]. This device had a sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 81 % when compared with a GM-ELISA result of >1 in a mixed study of haematology and SOT recipients with suspected IA [119]. Its sensitivity (81 %) for IA in a study of haematology patients appeared lower than Aspergillus PCR (96 %) yet higher than GM-ELISA (78 %) in isolation [120]. Nonetheless, it has the potential as a rapid beside test and larger clinical evaluations are the device this context are awaited.
(1-3)-β-D-Glucan
The use of the (1-3)-β-D-glucan assay has been the least extensively studied of the mentioned investigations for pneumonia in SOT recipients. The major limitation is that this test generally requires repeat investigations and although may return a positive test in infections caused by Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., Trichosporon spp., Fusarium spp., Penicillium spp., Saccharomyces, Acremonium and Pneumocystis jirovecii, is very insensitive in mucormycosis and cryptococcosis [121] This test is therefore not currently recommended for the investigation of a pulmonary infiltrate in a SOT recipient. The potential utility may lie in centres where this test is readily available and invasive methods of PCP diagnosis (i.e. bronchoscopy) cannot be performed, as (1-3)-β-D-glucan is elevated in cases of confirmed PCP and the sensitivity reported at 88–100 % [122, 123]. The use of (1-3)-β-D-glucan in SOT recipients with proven, probable and no IFD was evaluated in a prospective study of BAL specimens, with low sensitivity 79.2 % and poor specificity 38.5 % [124].
Empirical Therapy
The empirical therapy for a new pulmonary infiltrate is dependent on the risk factors, clinical presentation and prior antifungal exposure (prophylaxis and empirical therapy). An approach to empirical therapy in the setting of a diagnostic algorithm is outlined in Fig. 2.
Conclusions
The approach to a pulmonary infiltrate in a SOT recipient is challenging process due to the wide range of potential pathogens. The presence of a pulmonary infiltrate is associated with inferior outcomes irrespective of aetiology IFD having the highest associated morbidity and mortality. The use of molecular diagnostics in SOT for IFD is less well validated than in stem cell transplant populations. A stepwise approach, including multipronged investigation streams tailored to the pre-test organism probability, time post transplant, IFD risk factors and local epidemiology should be employed.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Eyuboglu FO, Kupeli E, Bozbas SS, Ozen ZE, Akkurt ES, Aydogan C, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary infections in solid organ transplant patients: 12 years of experience. Transplant Proc. 2013;45(10):3458–61.
Giannella M, Munoz P, Alarcon JM, Mularoni A, Grossi P, Bouza E. Pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective multicenter study. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(2):232–41. A modern prospective study outlining the potential infective aetiologies of a pulmonary infiltrate in SOT recipient.
Bonatti H, Pruett TL, Brandacher G, Hagspiel KD, Housseini AM, Sifri CD, et al. Pneumonia in solid organ recipients: spectrum of pathogens in 217 episodes. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(1):371–4.
Cervera C, Agusti C, Angeles Marcos M, Pumarola T, Cofan F, Navasa M, et al. Microbiologic features and outcome of pneumonia in transplanted patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;55(1):47–54.
Singh N, Avery RK, Munoz P, Pruett TL, Alexander B, Jacobs R, et al. Trends in risk profiles for and mortality associated with invasive aspergillosis among liver transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(1):46–52.
Gavalda J, Len O, San Juan R, Aguado JM, Fortun J, Lumbreras C, et al. Risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in solid-organ transplant recipients: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(1):52–9.
Fishman JA. Infection in solid-organ transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(25):2601–14.
Aung AK, Trubiano JA, Spelman DW. Travel risk assessment, advice and vaccinations in immunocompromised travellers (HIV, solid organ transplant and haematopoeitic stem cell transplant recipients): A review. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2015;13(1):31–47.
Krinzman S, Basgoz N, Kradin R, Shepard JA, Flieder DB, Wright CD, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus-associated infections in adult recipients of solid organ transplants. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998;17(2):202–10.
Hoyo I, Linares L, Cervera C, Almela M, Marcos MA, Sanclemente G, et al. Epidemiology of pneumonia in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(8):2938–40.
Ghassemieh B, Ahya VN, Baz MA, Valentine VG, Arcasoy SM, Love RB, et al. Decreased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with sirolimus in a post hoc randomized, multicenter study in lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(7):701–6.
Kumar D, Michaels MG, Morris MI, Green M, Avery RK, Liu C, et al. Outcomes from pandemic influenza A H1N1 infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(8):521–6.
Kumar D, Husain S, Chen MH, Moussa G, Himsworth D, Manuel O, et al. A prospective molecular surveillance study evaluating the clinical impact of community-acquired respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2010;89(8):1028–33.
Vilchez RA, McCurry K, Dauber J, Lacono A, Griffith B, Fung J, et al. Influenza virus infection in adult solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2002;2(3):287–91.
Ison MG. Influenza prevention and treatment in transplant recipients and immunocompromised hosts. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013;7 Suppl 3:60–6.
Sanders KM, Marras TK, Chan CK. Pneumonia severity index in the immunocompromised. Can Respir J. 2006;13(2):89–93.
Santos M, Gil-Brusola A, Morales P. Infection by Nocardia in solid organ transplantation: thirty years of experience. Transplant Proc. 2011;43(6):2141–4.
Clark NM, Reid GE, Practice ASTIDCo. Nocardia infections in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13 Suppl 4:83–92.
Bargehr J, Flors L, Leiva-Salinas C, Flohr TR, Sawyer R, Bonatti H, et al. Nocardiosis in solid-organ transplant recipients: spectrum of imaging findings. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(5):e266–71.
Peleg AY, Husain S, Qureshi ZA, Silveira FP, Sarumi M, Shutt KA, et al. Risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcome of Nocardia infection in organ transplant recipients: a matched case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(10):1307–14.
Kanne JP, Yandow DR, Mohammed TL, Meyer CA. CT findings of pulmonary nocardiosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(2):W266–72.
Lebeaux D, Morelon E, Suarez F, Lanternier F, Scemla A, Frange P, et al. Nocardiosis in transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(5):689–702.
Husain S, McCurry K, Dauber J, Singh N, Kusne S. Nocardia infection in lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002;21(3):354–9.
Minero MV, Marin M, Cercenado E, Rabadan PM, Bouza E, Munoz P. Nocardiosis at the turn of the century. Medicine (Baltimore). 2009;88(4):250–61.
Ernst A, Gordon FD, Hayek J, Silvestri RC, Koziel H. Lung abcess complicating Legionella micdadei pneumonia in an adult liver transplant recipient: case report and review. Transplantation. 1998;65(1):130–4.
Sousa D, Justo I, Dominguez A, Manzur A, Izquierdo C, Ruiz L, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised older patients: incidence, causative organisms and outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(2):187–92.
Wewalka G, Schmid D, Harrison TG, Uldum SA, Luck C, European Society of Clinical Microbiology Infectious Diseases Study Group for Legionella I. Dual infections with different Legionella strains. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(1):O13–9.
Fraser TG, Zembower TR, Lynch P, Fryer J, Salvalaggio PR, Yeldandi AV, et al. Cavitary Legionella pneumonia in a liver transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2004;6(2):77–80.
Morales P, Briones A, Torres JJ, Sole A, Perez D, Pastor A. Pulmonary tuberculosis in lung and heart-lung transplantation: fifteen years of experience in a single center in Spain. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(9):4050–5.
Bodro M, Sabe N, Santin M, Cruzado JM, Llado L, Gonzalez-Costello J, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2012;44(9):2686–9.
Aguado JM, Herrero JA, Gavalda J, Torre-Cisneros J, Blanes M, Rufi G, et al. Clinical presentation and outcome of tuberculosis in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients in Spain. Spanish Transplantation Infection Study Group, GESITRA. Transplantation. 1997;63(9):1278–86.
Munoz P, Rodriguez C, Bouza E. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in recipients of solid organ transplants. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(4):581–7.
Bodro M, Sabe N, Gomila A, Ayats J, Baliellas C, Roca J, et al. Risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2012;44(9):2682–5.
Mortensen E, Hellinger W, Keller C, Cowan LS, Shaw T, Hwang S, et al. Three cases of donor-derived pulmonary tuberculosis in lung transplant recipients and review of 12 previously reported cases: opportunities for early diagnosis and prevention. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(1):67–75.
Morris MI, Daly JS, Blumberg E, Kumar D, Sester M, Schluger N, et al. Diagnosis and management of tuberculosis in transplant donors: a donor-derived infections consensus conference report. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(9):2288–300.
Singh N, Paterson DL. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in solid-organ transplant recipients: impact and implications for management. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27(5):1266–77.
Iriart X, Challan Belval T, Fillaux J, Esposito L, Lavergne RA, Cardeau-Desangles I, et al. Risk factors of Pneumocystis pneumonia in solid organ recipients in the era of the common use of posttransplantation prophylaxis. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(1):190–9.
Green H, Paul M, Vidal L, Leibovici L. Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis pneumonia in immunocompromised non-HIV-infected patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(9):1052–9.
Green H, Paul M, Vidal L, Leibovici L. Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in non-HIV immunocompromised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3), CD005590. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005590.pub2.
Rodriguez M, Fishman JA. Prevention of infection due to Pneumocystis spp. in human immunodeficiency virus-negative immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2004;17(4): p. 770-82, table of contents.
Munoz P, Munoz RM, Palomo J, Rodriguez-Creixems M, Munoz R, Bouza E. Pneumocystis carinii infection in heart transplant recipients. Efficacy of a weekend prophylaxis schedule. Medicine (Baltimore). 1997;76(6):415–22.
Arend SM, Westendorp RG, Kroon FP, van't Wout JW, Vandenbroucke JP, van Es LA, et al. Rejection treatment and cytomegalovirus infection as risk factors for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in renal transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(6):920–5.
de Boer MG, Kroon FP, le Cessie S, de Fijter JW, van Dissel JT. Risk factors for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients and appraisal of strategies for selective use of chemoprophylaxis. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011;13(6):559–69.
Borstnar S, Lindic J, Tomazic J, Kandus A, Pikelj A, Prah J, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in renal transplant recipients: a national center experience. Transplant Proc. 2013;45(4):1614–7.
Arend SM, Kroon FP, van't Wout JW. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients without AIDS, 1980 through 1993. An analysis of 78 cases. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(22):2436–41.
Martin SI, Fishman JA. Pneumocystis pneumonia in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13 Suppl 4:272–9.
Martin SI, Fishman JA. Pneumocystis pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9 Suppl 4:S227–33.
Kim T, Sung H, Lee YM, Hong HL, Kim SH, Choi SH, et al. No recurrence of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia after solid organ transplantation regardless of secondary prophylaxis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(11):6041–3.
Hennequin C, Page B, Roux P, Legendre C, Kreis H. Outbreak of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in a renal transplant unit. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995;14(2):122–6.
Arichi N, Kishikawa H, Mitsui Y, Kato T, Nishimura K, Tachikawa R, et al. Cluster outbreak of Pneumocystis pneumonia among kidney transplant patients within a single center. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(1):170–2.
Phipps LM, Chen SC, Kable K, Halliday CL, Firacative C, Meyer W, et al. Nosocomial Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: lessons from a cluster in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011;92(12):1327–34.
Baddley JW, Andes DR, Marr KA, Kontoyiannis DP, Alexander BD, Kauffman CA, et al. Factors associated with mortality in transplant patients with invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(12):1559–67.
Shoham S, Marr KA. Invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Future Microbiol. 2012;7(5):639–55. A concise review of the range and burden of fungal pathogens causing a pulmonary infiltrate in SOT recipients.
Neofytos D, Treadway S, Ostrander D, Alonso CD, Dierberg KL, Nussenblatt V, et al. Epidemiology, outcomes, and mortality predictors of invasive mold infections among transplant recipients: a 10-year, single-center experience. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15(3):233–42.
Iversen M, Burton CM, Vand S, Skovfoged L, Carlsen J, Milman N, et al. Aspergillus infection in lung transplant patients: incidence and prognosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26(12):879–86.
Patterson JE, Peters J, Calhoon JH, Levine S, Anzueto A, Al-Abdely H, et al. Investigation and control of aspergillosis and other filamentous fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2000;2(1):22–8.
Sole A, Morant P, Salavert M, Peman J, Morales P, Valencia Lung Transplant G. Aspergillus infections in lung transplant recipients: risk factors and outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(5):359–65.
Singh N, Paterson DL. Aspergillus infections in transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(1):44–69.
Munoz P, Rodriguez C, Bouza E, Palomo J, Yanez JF, Dominguez MJ, et al. Risk factors of invasive aspergillosis after heart transplantation: protective role of oral itraconazole prophylaxis. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(4):636–43.
Montoya JG, Chaparro SV, Celis D, Cortes JA, Leung AN, Robbins RC, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in the setting of cardiac transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37 Suppl 3:S281–92.
Minari A, Husni R, Avery RK, Longworth DL, DeCamp M, Bertin M, et al. The incidence of invasive aspergillosis among solid organ transplant recipients and implications for prophylaxis in lung transplants. Transpl Infect Dis. 2002;4(4):195–200.
Hoyo I, Sanclemente G, de la Bellacasa JP, Cofan F, Ricart MJ, Cardona M, et al. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome of invasive aspergillosis in renal transplant patients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(6):951–7.
Kauffman CA, Freifeld AG, Andes DR, Baddley JW, Herwaldt L, Walker RC, et al. Endemic fungal infections in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients enrolled in the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(2):213–24.
Grim SA, Proia L, Miller R, Alhyraba M, Costas-Chavarri A, Oberholzer J, et al. A multicenter study of histoplasmosis and blastomycosis after solid organ transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14(1):17–23.
Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Avery RK, Lard M, Budev M, Gordon SM, Shrestha NK, et al. Histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant recipients: 10 years of experience at a large transplant center in an endemic area. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(5):710–6.
Freifeld AG, Iwen PC, Lesiak BL, Gilroy RK, Stevens RB, Kalil AC. Histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant recipients at a large Midwestern university transplant center. Transpl Infect Dis. 2005;7(3-4):109–15.
Park BJ, Pappas PG, Wannemuehler KA, Alexander BD, Anaissie EJ, Andes DR, et al. Invasive non-Aspergillus mold infections in transplant recipients, United States, 2001–2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(10):1855–64.
Johnson LS, Shields RK, Clancy CJ. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of Scedosporium infections among solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(4):578–87.
Kim SH, Ha YE, Youn JC, Park JS, Sung H, Kim MN, et al. Fatal scedosporiosis in multiple solid organ allografts transmitted from a nearly-drowned donor. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(3):833–40.
Neofytos D, Fishman JA, Horn D, Anaissie E, Chang CH, Olyaei A, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010;12(3):220–9.
Lanternier F, Sun HY, Ribaud P, Singh N, Kontoyiannis DP, Lortholary O. Mucormycosis in organ and stem cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(11):1629–36.
Roden MM, Zaoutis TE, Buchanan WL, Knudsen TA, Sarkisova TA, Schaufele RL, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of zygomycosis: a review of 929 reported cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(5):634–53.
Forrest GN, Bhalla P, DeBess EE, Winthrop KL, Lockhart SR, Mohammadi J, et al. Cryptococcus gattii infection in solid organ transplant recipients: description of Oregon outbreak cases. Transpl Infect Dis, 2015.
Singh N, Forrest G, Practice ASTIDCo. Cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9 Suppl 4:S192–8.
George MJ, Snydman DR, Werner BG, Griffith J, Falagas ME, Dougherty NN, et al. The independent role of cytomegalovirus as a risk factor for invasive fungal disease in orthotopic liver transplant recipients. Boston Center for Liver Transplantation CMVIG-Study Group. Cytogam, MedImmune, Inc. Gaithersburg, Maryland. Am J Med. 1997;103(2):106–13.
Silveira FP, Husain S. Fungal infections in solid organ transplantation. Med Mycol. 2007;45(4):305–20.
Fortun J, Martin-Davila P, Moreno S, De Vicente E, Nuno J, Candelas A, et al. Risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2002;8(11):1065–70.
Husni RN, Gordon SM, Longworth DL, Arroliga A, Stillwell PC, Avery RK, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection is a risk factor for invasive aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(3):753–5.
Singh N, Husain S. Invasive aspergillosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9 Suppl 4:S180–91.
Panackal AA, Dahlman A, Keil KT, Peterson CL, Mascola L, Mirza S, et al. Outbreak of invasive aspergillosis among renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2003;75(7):1050–3.
Paterson DL, Singh N. Invasive aspergillosis in transplant recipients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1999;78(2):123–38.
Goldfarb NS, Avery RK, Goormastic M, Mehta AC, Schilz R, Smedira N, et al. Hypogammaglobulinemia in lung transplant recipients. 2001;71(2):242–6.
Westney GE, Kesten S, De Hoyos A, Chapparro C, Winton T, Maurer JR. Aspergillus infection in single and double lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1996;61(6):915–9.
Singh N, Aguado JM, Bonatti H, Forrest G, Gupta KL, Safdar N, et al. Zygomycosis in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective, matched case-control study to assess risks for disease and outcome. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(6):1002–11.
Neoh CF, Snell GI, Kotsimbos T, Levvey B, Morrissey CO, Slavin MA, et al. Antifungal prophylaxis in lung transplantation—a world-wide survey. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(2):361–6.
Neoh CF, Snell GI, Levvey B, Kotsimbos T, Morrissey CO, Slavin MA, et al. Preemptive treatment with voriconazole in lung transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15(4):344–53.
Segal BH, Walsh TJ. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173(7):707–17.
Sun HY, Aguado JM, Bonatti H, Forrest G, Gupta KL, Safdar N, et al. Pulmonary zygomycosis in solid organ transplant recipients in the current era. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(9):2166–71.
Pappas PG, Alexander BD, Andes DR, Hadley S, Kauffman CA, Freifeld A, et al. Invasive fungal infections among organ transplant recipients: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(8):1101–11. A multicentre study of pathogens involved in SOT recipients.
Husain S, Wagener MM, Singh N. Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients: variables influencing clinical characteristics and outcome. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(3):375–81.
De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1813–21.
Husain S, Mooney ML, Danziger-Isakov L, Mattner F, Singh N, Avery R, et al. A 2010 working formulation for the standardization of definitions of infections in cardiothoracic transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30(4):361–74.
Farmakiotis D, Kontoyiannis DP. Emerging Issues With Diagnosis and Management of Fungal Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Am J Transplant, 2015. A modern review of the issues and roles of diagnostics in SOT recipients with a pulmonary infiltrate.
Munoz P, Alcala L, Sanchez Conde M, Palomo J, Yanez J, Pelaez T, et al. The isolation of Aspergillus fumigatus from respiratory tract specimens in heart transplant recipients is highly predictive of invasive aspergillosis. Transplantation. 2003;75(3):326–9.
Rickerts V, Mousset S, Lambrecht E, Tintelnot K, Schwerdtfeger R, Presterl E, et al. Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture, and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect invasive mold infections from biopsy specimens. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(8):1078–83.
Prattes J, Flick H, Pruller F, Koidl C, Raggam RB, Palfner M, et al. Novel tests for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in patients with underlying respiratory diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(8):922–9.
Horvath JA, Dummer S. The use of respiratory-tract cultures in the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Am J Med. 1996;100(2):171–8.
Morrissey CO, Gilroy NM, Macesic N, Walker P, Ananda-Rajah M, May M, et al. Consensus guidelines for the use of empiric and diagnostic-driven antifungal treatment strategies in haematological malignancy, 2014. Intern Med J. 2014;44(12b):1298–314.
Bialek R, Konrad F, Kern J, Aepinus C, Cecenas L, Gonzalez GM, et al. PCR based identification and discrimination of agents of mucormycosis and aspergillosis in paraffin wax embedded tissue. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58(11):1180–4.
Lass-Florl C. Zygomycosis: conventional laboratory diagnosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15 Suppl 5:60–5.
Cuenca-Estrella M, Bassetti M, Lass-Florl C, Racil Z, Richardson M, Rogers TR. Detection and investigation of invasive mould disease. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66 Suppl 1:i15–24.
Hsu JL, Kuschner WG, Paik J, Bower N, Vazquez Guillamet MC, Kothary N. The diagnostic yield of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Transpl. 2012;26(4):615–21.
Priola AM, Priola SM, Cataldi A, Errico L, Di Franco M, Campisi P, et al. Accuracy of CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of lung lesions: factors affecting diagnostic yield. Radiol Med. 2007;112(8):1142–59.
Munoz P, Vena A, Ceron I, Valerio M, Palomo J, Guinea J, et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in heart transplant recipients: two radiologic patterns with a different prognosis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33(10):1034–40.
Pfeiffer CD, Fine JP, Safdar N. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis using a galactomannan assay: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(10):1417–27.
Clancy CJ, Jaber RA, Leather HL, Wingard JR, Staley B, Wheat LJ, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among solid-organ transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(6):1759–65.
Husain S, Kwak EJ, Obman A, Wagener MM, Kusne S, Stout JE, et al. Prospective assessment of Platelia Aspergillus galactomannan antigen for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(5):796–802.
Fortun J, Martin-Davila P, Alvarez ME, Sanchez-Sousa A, Quereda C, Navas E, et al. Aspergillus antigenemia sandwich-enzyme immunoassay test as a serodiagnostic method for invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2001;71(1):145–9.
Sun W, Wang K, Gao W, Su X, Qian Q, Lu X, et al. Evaluation of PCR on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: a bivariate metaanalysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(12), e28467.
Buitrago MJ, Aguado JM, Ballen A, Bernal-Martinez L, Prieto M, Garcia-Reyne A, et al. Efficacy of DNA amplification in tissue biopsy samples to improve the detection of invasive fungal disease. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(6):E271–7.
Lass-Florl C, Mutschlechner W, Aigner M, Grif K, Marth C, Girschikofsky M, et al. Utility of PCR in diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: real-life data from a multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(3):863–8.
Zarrinfar H, Mirhendi H, Makimura K, Satoh K, Khodadadi H, Paknejad O. Use of mycological, nested PCR, and real-time PCR methods on BAL fluids for detection of Aspergillus fumigatus and A. flavus in solid organ transplant recipients. Mycopathologia. 2013;176(5-6):377–85.
Buess M, Cathomas G, Halter J, Junker L, Grendelmeier P, Tamm M, et al. Aspergillus-PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage for detection of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:237.
Luong ML, Clancy CJ, Vadnerkar A, Kwak EJ, Silveira FP, Wissel MC, et al. Comparison of an Aspergillus real-time polymerase chain reaction assay with galactomannan testing of bronchoalvelolar lavage fluid for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(10):1218–26.
Khot PD, Ko DL, Hackman RC, Fredricks DN. Development and optimization of quantitative PCR for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:73.
Tabarsi P, Soraghi A, Marjani M, Zandian P, Baghaei P, Najafizadeh K, et al. Comparison of serum and bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in diagnosing invasive aspergillosis in solid-organ transplant recipients. Exp Clin Transplant. 2012;10(3):278–81.
Hoenigl M, Prattes J, Spiess B, Wagner J, Prueller F, Raggam RB, et al. Performance of galactomannan, beta-d-glucan, Aspergillus lateral-flow device, conventional culture, and PCR tests with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(6):2039–45.
Wiederhold NP, Najvar LK, Bocanegra R, Kirkpatrick WR, Patterson TF, Thornton CR. Interlaboratory and Interstudy Reproducibility of a Novel Lateral-Flow Device and Influence of Antifungal Therapy on Detection of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;51(2):459–65.
Hoenigl M, Koidl C, Duettmann W, Seeber K, Wagner J, Buzina W, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage lateral-flow device test for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis diagnosis in haematological malignancy and solid organ transplant patients. J Infect. 2012;65(6):588–91.
White PL, Parr C, Thornton C, Barnes RA. Evaluation of real-time PCR, galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and a novel lateral-flow device for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(5):1510–6.
Yoshida M, Obayashi T, Iwama A, Ito M, Tsunoda S, Suzuki T, et al. Detection of plasma (1 → 3)-beta-D-glucan in patients with Fusarium, Trichosporon, Saccharomyces and Acremonium fungaemias. J Med Vet Mycol. 1997;35(5):371–4.
Cuetara MS, Alhambra A, Chaves F, Moragues MD, Ponton J, del Palacio A. Use of a serum (1→3)-beta-D-glucan assay for diagnosis and follow-up of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(10):1364–6.
de Boer MG, Gelinck LB, van Zelst BD, van de Sande WW, Willems LN, van Dissel JT, et al. beta-D-glucan and S-adenosylmethionine serum levels for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia in HIV-negative patients: a prospective study. J Infect. 2011;62(1):93–100.
Mutschlechner W, Risslegger B, Willinger B, Hoenigl M, Bucher B, Eschertzhuber S, et al. Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (1,3)beta-D-Glucan for the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Transplantation, 2015. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000000635
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Jason A. Trubiano declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Sharon Chen has received a grant and honoraria payments from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Australia.
Monica A. Slavin has received grants and honoraria payments from Merck and Gilead and honoraria payments from Astellas.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Advances in Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trubiano, J.A., Chen, S. & Slavin, M.A. An Approach to a Pulmonary Infiltrate in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 9, 144–154 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-015-0229-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-015-0229-y