Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear editor,
We read with interest the recent publication by Aksan et al. that compared the cost-effectiveness of iron products (ferric carboxymaltose [FCM], iron isomaltoside [IIM], iron sucrose [IS], and oral iron) when administered to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in a Swiss setting [1]. The cost-effectiveness assessed the additional cost per additional responder (hemoglobin [Hb] normalization or increase of at least 2.0 g/dl) and concluded that FCM was the superior choice in Switzerland and would save costs for healthcare payers. In our opinion, the underlying methodology for comparison of the intravenous (IV) iron preparations in this analysis has several weaknesses, and the authors’ conclusion needs to be re-considered.
The Hb and body weight parameters for calculation of the iron dose were obtained from two randomized controlled trials with FCM conducted in international non-Swiss-specific IBD populations [2, 3], and in one of the trials the Hb cut-off for anemia was 10.0–11.0 g/dl [3], which is lower than recommended for adult non-pregnant IBD patients in the current clinical guideline [4]. Furthermore, the Hb and body weight data were provided as mean values with standard errors (SE) instead of standard deviations (SD). The resulting Hb of 9.6 (0.1) g/dl and body weight of 66.6 (0.7) kg used in the analysis are thus low and have an apparent narrower range than expected for a broad real-world heterogenous IBD population with IDA. A European survey of anemia management in IBD patients in routine practice reported a higher mean Hb value of 10.5 g/dl in a cohort of 79 Swiss IBD patients [5]. The mean body weight for a Swiss IBD population is probably also higher than the one in the present analysis considering that around 11.0% of IBD patients in Switzerland are obese with a body mass index of 30.0 kg/m2 or higher [6]. Moreover, in a Scandinavian observational study with IIM treatment in gastroenterology patients with IDA, the mean (SD) Hb in the IBD group of 100 patients was 10.8 (1.4) g/dl and the mean (SD) body weight was 75.4 (17.4) kg [7].
The base case analysis demonstrated cost savings with FCM driven by a lower dose of iron compared to IIM and by a reduced number of infusions compared to IS; however, the cost comparisons were done using different methods to calculate the iron need. The iron dose for FCM was calculated with the Ganzoni formula as recommended in the Swiss label [8], while the iron doses for IIM and IS were obtained from the simplified dosing table with reference to the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) anemia guideline [4]. This is an unexpected approach considering that the Swiss labels for IIM and IS also offer the possibility of using the Ganzoni formula to estimate the iron need [9, 10]. In addition, there is no simplified dosing table in the Swiss label for IS [10]. From a clinical perspective, it should be noted that the Ganzoni formula underestimates the iron requirements in IBD patients with IDA [3, 11], and the simplified dosing table is recommended in the clinical guideline when estimating the iron need for any IV iron therapy [4]. The simplified dosing table, however, was not present in the Swiss FCM label dated from August 2020 and at the time of the analysis by Aksan et al. The use of the Ganzoni formula for FCM resulted in a lower iron dose and consequently fewer infusions for total dose administration and reduced costs compared to the higher iron doses for IIM and IS that were obtained from the simplified dosing table. Thus, the different dose calculation methods contributed to a favorable outcome for FCM, i.e., lower costs. The correct approach would have been to use the same method for calculation of the dose for all three IV iron preparations, and the Ganzoni formula is an option in all three Swiss labels for FCM, IIM, and IS [8,9,10]. When using the same dose calculation method for all IV iron preparations, as done in the scenario analysis with the Ganzoni formula in the present analysis, FCM was less costly than IS, but more costly than IIM. The changed outcome versus IIM was due to fewer infusions per patient for full IIM dose administration compared to FCM. This opposite result in cost for FCM versus IIM compared to the base case analysis, now in favor of IIM, was not mentioned in either the discussion or in the conclusion. The cost advantage of IIM over FCM by saving of infusions has also been reported in other cost comparison analyses in IBD patients [12,13,14].
The efficacy comparisons of the iron treatments in this analysis were based on calculated Hb responses using odds ratios from a previous network meta-analysis (NMA) in IBD patients with IDA to obtain the percent values for IIM, IS, and oral iron relative to FCM [15]. This NMA had several limitations as it compared the IV iron preparations based on data from clinical trials that differed markedly in design regarding baseline characteristics, efficacy endpoint definition, method for calculating the iron need, administered IV iron dose, and treatment duration [16, 17]. The number of patients contributing with data for each iron drug in the analysis also differed considerably [15]. The results in the NMA demonstrated no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the IV iron formulations, although there was a trend for better efficacy with FCM compared to IIM and IS [15]. It should be noted that efficacy was compared based on Hb response rates for the IV iron formulations at different doses; the mean dose for FCM was > 50.0% higher than that for IIM [15]. Hb change is a more clinically informative measure of efficacy than response rate, and it allows for dose-adjusted comparisons. A recently published observational study that directly compared the treatment effects of FCM and IIM in IBD patients with IDA at equal doses showed similar Hb efficacies and a nonsignificant trend for a greater response with IIM compared to FCM treatment [18].
Given the multitude of choices of iron drugs today, cost-effectiveness comparisons are valuable tools to help decide the optimal treatment for patients, clinicians, and payers. The present cost-effectiveness analysis by Aksan et al. comes along with multiple biases in favor of FCM for both cost and efficacy and therefore should be interpreted with caution.
References
Aksan A, Schoepfer A, Juillerat P, et al. Iron formulations for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Switzerland. Adv Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01553-1.
Evstatiev R, Marteau P, Iqbal T, et al. FERGIcor, a randomized controlled trial on ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(3):846–53.
Kulnigg S, Stoinov S, Simanenkov V, et al. A novel intravenous iron formulation for treatment of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: the ferric carboxymaltose (FERINJECT) randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(5):1182–92.
Dignass AU, Gasche C, Bettenworth D, et al. European consensus on the diagnosis and management of iron deficiency and anaemia in inflammatory bowel diseases. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9(3):211–22.
Stein J, Bager P, Befrits R, et al. Anaemia management in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: routine practice across nine European countries. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25(12):1456–63.
Greuter T, Porchet F, Braga-Neto MB, et al. Impact of obesity on disease activity and disease outcome in inflammatory bowel disease: results from the Swiss inflammatory bowel disease cohort. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2020;8(10):1196–207.
Frigstad SO, Haaber A, Bajor A, et al. The NIMO Scandinavian Study: a prospective observational study of iron isomaltoside treatment in patients with iron deficiency. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:4585164.
Compendium.ch. FERINJECT Inj Lös 100 mg/2 ml. 2021. https://compendium.ch/product/1080875-ferinject-inj-los-100-mg-2ml/mpro. Accessed 01 Feb 2021
Compendium.ch. MONOFER Inj Inf Präp 100 mg/ml (iH 12/19). 2021. https://compendium.ch/product/1423093-monofer-inj-inf-prap-100-mg-ml/mpro. Accessed 01 Feb 2021
Compendium.ch. VENOFER Inj Lös 100 mg/5 m. 2021. https://compendium.ch/product/46040-venoferinj-los-100-mg-5ml/mpro. Accessed 01 Feb 2021
Reinisch W, Staun M, Tandon RK, et al. A randomized, open-label, non-inferiority study of intravenous iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer) compared with oral iron for treatment of anemia in IBD (PROCEED). Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(12):1877–88.
Pollock RF, Muduma G. Intravenous iron treatments for iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: a budget impact analysis of iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer) in the UK. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2017;14(12):1439–46.
Pollock RF, Muduma G. An economic evaluation of iron isomaltoside 1000 versus ferric carboxymaltose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and iron deficiency anemia in Denmark. Adv Ther. 2018;35(12):2128–37.
Pollock RF, Muduma G. An economic analysis of ferric derisomaltose versus ferric carboxymaltose in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Norway, Sweden, and Finland. ClinicoEconomics Outcomes Res. 2021;13:9–18.
Aksan A, Isık H, Radeke HH, Dignass A, Stein J. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and tolerability of different intravenous iron formulations for the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(10):1303–18.
Kennedy NA, Goodhand JR, Rampton DS. Editorial: which iron preparation for patients with IBD? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(2):194–5.
Reinisch W, Lindgren S. Letter: the importance of dosing and baseline haemoglobin when establishing the relative efficacy of intravenous iron therapies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(7):704–5.
Detlie TE, Lindstrøm JC, Jahnsen ME, et al. Incidence of hypophosphatemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with ferric carboxymaltose or iron isomaltoside. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50(4):397–406.
Acknowledgements
Funding
No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article.
Medical Writing/Editorial Assistance
The authors thank Sylvia Simon for writing and editing assistance. Ms Simon is a paid employee of Pharmacosmos A/S, Holbaek, Denmark. No other funding was received in connection with the conception, writing, publication, or any other aspect of this article.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Author Contributions
Manuel Muñoz and Walter Reinisch contributed equally to the preparation, review, and revision of this article.
Disclosures
Manuel Muñoz has received honoraria for consultancies and/or lectures from Vifor Pharma and Pharmacosmos A/S. Walter Reinisch has served as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Pharmacosmos A/S, and as a speaker and consultant for Vifor Pharma.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Muñoz, M., Reinisch, W. Letter to the Editor Regarding ‘Iron Formulations for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Switzerland’. Adv Ther 39, 811–814 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-02000-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-02000-5