Abstract
In his seminal book “Love and Sex with Robots”, David Levy (Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human–robot relations, Harper, New York, 2007) predicted that intimate human–robot relationships will be normalized by 2050. So far, only a very small number of early adopters of love and sex robots has experienced these kinds of relationships. The majority of the population only learns about love and sex with robots through media representations, be they fictional (e.g., movies and TV series) or non-fictional (e.g., newspaper and magazine articles). The current study therefore aimed at analyzing the media representations of intimate human–robot relationships. The three research questions, based on Sexual Script Theory, addressed characteristics (1) of the involved human partner, (2) of the involved robot partner, and (3) of their mutual intimate relationship. A quota sample of N = 710 media examples from different genres (48% non-fictional, 52% fictional, originating from 1927 to 2014) was drawn and subjected to quantitative media content analysis. Results indicate that media representations of intimate human–robot relationships tend to portray the involved human partner as a man who is disadvantaged in interpersonal relationships. At the same time, media often portray the involved robot partner as a humanoid female sex robot. While non-fictional media describe intimate human–robot relationships more often in sexual terms, fictional media focus more on emotional aspects, cohabitation and even procreation between humans and robots. Overall, media representations of intimate human–robot relationships reveal stereotypical gender roles, heteronormativity and a focus on sexual versus emotional intimacy. Implications for the future development and use of love and sex robots are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Levy D (2007) Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relations, 1st edn. Harper, New York
Pearson I (2015) The futuer of sex report—the rise of the robosexuals. http://graphics.bondara.com/Future_sex_report.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2017
Borenstein J, Arkin RC (2016) Robots, ethics, and intimacy: the need for scientific research. https://www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/RobotsEthicsIntimacy-IACAP.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2019
Bruckenberger U, Weiss A, Mirnig N et al (2013) The good, the bad, the weird: audience evaluation of a “Real” robot in relation to science fiction and mass media. In: Hutchison D, Kanade T, Kittler J et al (eds) Social robotics, vol 8239. Springer, Cham, pp 301–310
Sharkey N, van Wynsberghe A, Robbins S et al (2017) Our sexual future with robots—a foundation for responsible robotics consultation report. http://responsiblerobotics.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FRR-Consultation-Report-Our-Sexual-Future-with-robots_Final.pdf. Accessed 05 Jul 2017
Bletchly R (2017) Sex robot harmony is the girlfriend of a million male fantasies—on sale for £11,700. Mirror Online
Cheok AD, Levy D, Karunanayaka K et al (2016) Lovotics: love and sex with robots. In: Karpouzis K, Yannakakis GN (eds) Emotion in games: theory and praxis. Springer, Cham, pp 303–328
Samani HA, Cheok AD, Ngiap FW et al (2010) Towards a formulation of love in human–robot interaction. In: 2010 RO-MAN: the 19th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 94–99
Gagnon JH, Simon W (2005) Sexual conduct: the social sources of human sexuality, 2nd edn. AldineTransaction, New Brunswick
Simon W, Gagnon JH (1986) Sexual scripts: permanence and change. Arch Sex Behav 15(2):97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219
Wiederman MW (2015) Sexual script theory: past, present, and future. In: DeLamater J, Plante RF (eds) Handbook of the sociology of sexualities. Springer, Cham, pp 7–22
Wiederman MW (2005) The gendered nature of sexual scripts. Fam J 13(4):496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
Eagly AH (2013) Sex differences in social behavior: a social-role interpretation. Distinguished lecture series. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken
Warner M (2011) Fear of a queer planet: queer politics and social theory, 8. Print. Cultural politics, vol 6. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Ingraham C (2013) Heterosexuality: It’s just not natural! In: Ferber AL, Holcomb K, Wentling T (eds) Sex, gender, and sexuality: the new basics: an anthology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 99–106
Mayor E (2015) Gender roles and traits in stress and health. Front Psychol 6:779
Perrone KM, Wright SL, Jackson ZV (2009) Traditional and nontraditional gender roles and work–family interface for men and women. J Career Dev 36(1):8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845308327736
Scheutz M, Arnold T (2016) Are we ready for sex robots? In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp 351–358
Yulianto B, Shidarta (2015) Philosophy of information technology. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev 6(4):67–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSESD.2015100105
Yeoman I, Mars M (2012) Robots, men and sex tourism. Futures 44(4):365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.11.004
Danaher J (2017) Robotic rape and robotic child sexual abuse: Should they be criminalised? Crim Law Philos 11(1):71–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9362-x
Gutiu S (2012) Sex robots and roboticization of consent. We Robot Conference 2012, Coral Gables, FL
Richardson K (2016) Sex robot matters: slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 35(2):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2016.2554421
Sullins JP (2012) Robots, love, and sex: the ethics of building a love machine. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 3(4):398–409. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.31
Di Nucci E (2016) Sexual rights, disability and sex robots. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2814471. Accessed 25 Jan 2019
Neuendorf KA (2002) The content analysis guidebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8(1):23–34
Choi S, Cha S, Tappert CC (2010) A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. J Syst Cybern Inform 8(1):43–48
Bortz J, Schuster C (2010) Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler [Statistics for Human and Social Science], 7, vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte. Springer, Berlin
Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W et al (2011) Multivariate Analysemethoden—Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Multivariate analyes—an application-oriented introduction], 13 überarbeitete. Springer, Berlin
Matthes J, Kohring M (2008) The content analysis of media frames: toward improving reliability and validity. J Commun 58(2):258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
Döring N (2017) Vom Internetsex zum Robotersex: forschungsstand und Herausforderungen für die Sexualwissenschaft [From internet sex to robot sex: state of research and challenges for sexology]. Z Sex-Forsch 30(01):35–57. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101471
de Graaf MM, Ben Allouch S Anticipating our future robot society: the evaluation of future robot applications from a user’s perspective. In: 2016 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 755–762
Royakkers L, van Est R (2015) A literature review on new robotics: automation from love to war. Int J Soc Robot 7(5):549–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0295-x
Richardson K (2016) The asymmetrical ‘relationship’. SIGCAS Comput Soc 45(3):290–293. https://doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874281
Johnson-Woods T (2010) Manga—an anthology of global and cultural perspectives. Continuum International Publishing, London
Bryman A (2016) Social research methods, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Neuendorf KA (2017) The content analysis guidebook, 2nd edn. SAGE, Los Angeles
Williams DJ, Thomas JN, Prior EE et al (2015) Introducing a multidisciplinary framework of positive sexuality. J Posit Sex 1:6–11
Riva G, Banos RM, Botella C et al (2012) Positive technology: using interactive technologies to promote positive functioning. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 15(2):69–77. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0139
Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M (2000) Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol 55(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Döring, N., Poeschl, S. Love and Sex with Robots: A Content Analysis of Media Representations. Int J of Soc Robotics 11, 665–677 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00517-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00517-y