Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting damping ratio of fine-grained soils using soft computing methodology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate prediction of dynamic soil properties is very important to basic understanding of soil behavior and also practical soil modeling. Shear modulus and damping ratio play a vital role in the design of geotechnical structures subjected to dynamic loads. In this study, artificial neural network (ANN), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) were employed for prediction of damping ratio of fine-grained soils. Most effective factors that affect this parameter include shear strain, plasticity index, and effective confining pressure. A wide-ranging database of soil element tests was used to develop an advanced model, capable of predicting soil damping ratio accurately. Results of geotechnical centrifuge tests were also involved during the training process for adequate generalization of the algorithm for future predictions. Contributions of the effective variables were evaluated through a parametric study. It was found that the ANN model developed with feed-forward back propagation (FFBF) algorithm exhibits higher performance in prediction of soil damping ratio than those developed by radial basis function (RBF) and ANFIS. The results indicate that the soft computing-based model could provide accurate and reasonable predictions, compared with the available practical charts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbulut S, Hasiloglu AS, Pamukcu S (2004) Data generation for shear modulus and damping ratio in reinforced sands using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:805–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkroosh I, Nikraz H (2012) Predicting axial capacity of driven piles in cohesive soils using intelligent computing. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25:618–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baziar MH, Ghorbani A (2005) Evaluation of lateral spreading using artificial neural networks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baziar MH, Jafarian Y (2007) Assessment of liquefaction triggering using strain energy concept and ANN model; capacity energy. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:1056–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthold M, Hand DJ (2007) Intelligent data analysis: an introduction. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden RH, Shao L, Gupta A (1994) Construction related vibrations Rep. No. FHWA/NC/94-007, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC

  • Borden RH, Shao L, Gupta A (1996) Dynamic properties of Piedmont residual soils. J Geotech Eng ASCE 122(10):813–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan AJ, Thusyanthan NI, Madabhushi SPG (2005) Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131(12):1488–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broomhead DS, Lowe D (1988) Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Syst 2(3):321–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2011) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh Province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS. Comput Geosci 45:199–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using artificial neural network. Geomorphology 171–172:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabalar AF, Cevik A (2009) Modelling damping ratio and shear modulus of sand–mica mixtures using neural networks. Eng Geol 104:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caserta A, Martino S, Bozzano F, Govoni A, Marra F (2012) Dynamic properties of low velocity alluvial deposits influencing seismically-induced shear strains: the Grottaperfetta valley test-site (Rome, Italy). Bull Earthq Eng 10(4):1133–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan CL, Low BK (2012) Probabilistic analysis of laterally loaded piles using response surface and neural network approaches. Comput Geotech 43:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Cowan CFN, Grant PM (1991) Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2(2):302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darendeli MB (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

  • Dobry R, Vucetic M (1987) State-of-the-art report: dynamic properties and response of soft clay deposites. Proc Int Symp Geotech Eng Soft Soils 2:51–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Electric Power Research Institute (1993) Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions. Final Report, EPRI TR-102293, Palo Alto, CA, November

  • Erzin Y, Gul TO (2014) The use of neural networks for the prediction of the settlement of one-way footings on cohesionless soils based on standard penetration test. Neural Comput & Applic 2014:891–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugro-McClelland Inc. (1992) Dynamic laboratory test data. Mark Clark Expressway Stono River Crossing, Charleston, South Carolina

  • Haddad A, Ghazvinian S (2009) In situ damping ratio profiling of cemented sandy and gravelly soils by surface wave measurements. Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, pp 1357–1363

  • Haddad A, Shafabakhsh G (2007) Non-invasive continuous surface wave measurements for in situ damping ratio profiling of soils. Int J Civ Struct Eng 5(2):93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall L, Bodare A (2000) Analyses of the cross-hole method for determining shear wave velocities and damping ratios. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO, Drenvich VP (1972a) Shear modulus and damping in soils; design equations and curves. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(7):667–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972b) Shear modulus and damping in soils; measurement and parameter effects. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(6):603–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin S (1994) Neural networks. Macmillan College Publishing Company Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang SK (1997) Dynamic properties of natural soils. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

  • Ishibashi I, Zhang X (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils Found 33(1):182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarian Y, Kermani E, Baziar MH (2010) Empirical predictive model for the v max/a max ratio of strong ground motions using genetic programming. Comput Geosci 36(12):1523–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarian Y, Vakili R, Sadeghi A (2013) Prediction of cyclic resistance ratio for silty sands and its applications in the simplified liquefaction analysis. Comput Geotech 52:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarian Y, Haddad A, Javdanian H (2014) Predictive model for normalized shear modulus of cohesive soils. Acta Geodyn Geomater 11(1):89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang JR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst 23:665–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang JSR, Chuen-Tsai S (1995) Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control. Proc IEEE 83:378–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan Z, El-Naggar MH, Cascante G (2011) Frequency dependent dynamic properties from resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests. J Franklin I 348:1363–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TC, Novak M (1981) Dynamic properties of some cohesive soils of Ontario. Can Geotech J 18:371–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T, Yoshida Y, Esashi Y (1982) Dynamic properties of soft clay for wide strain range. Soils Found 22(4):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzo G, Vucetic M, Doroudian M (1997) Reduction of shear modulus at small strains in simple shear. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123(11):1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC (1990) Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller. IEEE Trans Syst 20:404–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee RC (1996) Investigations of nonlinear dynamic soil properties at the Savannah River Site. WSRC-TR-96-0062, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC

  • Lee CJ, Sheu SF (2007) The stiffness degradation and damping ratio evolution of Taipei Silty Clay under cyclic straining. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:730–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters T (1993) Practical neural network recipes in C++. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombie P, Wilkinson P (2002) The use of the simple genetic algorithm in finding the critical factor of safety in slope stability analysis. Comput Geotech 29:699–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menq FY (2003) Dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

  • Najafzadeh M, Azamathulla H (2013) Neuro-fuzzy GMDH to predict the scour pile groups due to waves. J Comput Civ Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000376

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafzadeh M, Barani GA (2011) Comparison of group method of data handling based genetic programming and back propagation systems to predict scour depth around bridge piers. Sci Iran 18(6):1207–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh HJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 7(9):1264–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okur DV, Ansal A (2007) Stiffness degradation of natural fine grained soils during cyclic loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:843–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Sandberg IW (1993) Approximation and radial basis function networks. Neural Comput 5(2):305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010a) Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ Earth Sci 60(5):1037–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010b) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: back-propagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modeling. Environ Model Softw 25(6):747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010c) Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron High-land, Malaysia. Landslides 7(1):13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide prone area (Cameron Highland, Malaysia). IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(12):4164–4177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richart FE, Hall JR, Woods RD (1970) Vibrations of soils and foundations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • S&ME Inc. (1993) Seismic soil pile interaction analyses—Mark Clark expressway/Stono River crossings, Charleston, South Carolina. Project Rep. No. 1131-92-162, Mount Pleasant, SC

  • S&ME Inc. (1998) Second report of seismic analysis—Daniel Island terminal, Charleston, South Carolina. Project Rep. No. 1131-97-741, Mount Pleasant, S.C.

  • Senetakis K, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2012) Dynamic properties of dry sand/rubber (SRM) and gravel/rubber (GRM) mixtures in a wide range of shearing strain amplitudes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 33:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senetakis K, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K, Coop MR (2013) The dynamics of a pumice granular soil in dry state under isotropic resonant column testing. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 45:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezer EA, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2011) Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia. Expert Syst Appl 38(7):8208–8219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver ML, Seed HB (1971) Deformation characteristics of sands under cyclic loading. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(8):1081–1098

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe KHII, Darendeli MB (1998) Laboratory evaluation of the dynamic properties of intact soil specimens: Garner Valley, California. Geotechnical Engineering Report GR98-3, Civil Engineering Department, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, March

  • Stokoe KHII, Hwang SK, Lee NJ, Andrus RD (1994) Effects of various parameters on the stiffness and damping of soils at small to medium strains. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Prefailure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Sapporo, Japan, 2:785–816

  • Stokoe KHII, Darendeli MB, Andrus RD, Brown LT (1999) Dynamic soil properties: laboratory, field and correlation studies. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 3:811–845

  • Stokoe KHII, Darendeli MB, Gilbert RB, Menq FY, Choi WK (2004) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Uncertainties in Nonlinear Soil Properties and their Impact on Modeling Dynamic Soil Response, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California

  • Sun JI, Golesorkhi R, Seed HB (1988) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils. Report, UCB/EERC-88/15, Univ. of California at Berkeley, 48 pp

  • Tizpa P, Jamshidi Chenari R, Karimpour Fard M, Machado SL (2014) ANN prediction of some geotechnical properties of soil from their index parameters. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-014-1304-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng ASCE 117(1):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JMR (1988) A theoretical and experimental investigation into the dynamic behavior of soils. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

  • Xu K, Xie M, Tang LC, Ho SL (2003) Application of neural networks in forecasting engine systems reliability. Appl Soft Comput 2:255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab J Geosci 6(8):2873–2888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Andrus RD, Juang CH (2005) Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131(4):453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their thanks to Professor Ronald D. Andrus for his efficient help in preparing experimental database of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaser Jafarian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javdanian, H., Jafarian, Y. & Haddad, A. Predicting damping ratio of fine-grained soils using soft computing methodology. Arab J Geosci 8, 3959–3969 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1493-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1493-9

Keywords

Navigation