Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptualization of the Neolithic world in incised equid phalanges: anthropomorphic figurine from Çatalhöyük (GDN Area)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The opening of the final excavation area in Çatalhöyük and the zooarcheological research conducted there have revealed an equid phalanx with incision marks shaped to resemble eyes. We argue that the choice of bone as raw material for the artifact (the first bone figurine from Çatalhöyük) is related to its anatomy and to availability. We show that the figurine and other modified equid first phalanges at Çatalhöyük were associated with food storage rooms, which exclusively represent the late phases of occupation. In these terms, they differ from the known practices of the Near East.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almagro Gorbea, M.J. (1973) Los ídolos del Bronce I Hispano. Bibliotheca Praehistorica Hispana. Volume XII. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, pp.354

  • Barański MZ (2014) Late Neolithic architecture. Çatalhöyük 2013 archive report. Çatalhöyük Research Project, Cambridge, pp 194–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Barański MZ (2016) GDN research on the Late Neolithic architecture. Çatalhöyük 2016 archive report. Çatalhöyük Research Project, Cambridge, pp 269–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Barański MZ, Nowak A, Regulska K, Saj M (2015) GDN Area: research on Late Neolithic architecture. Çatalhöyük 2015 archive report. Çatalhöyük Research Project, Cambridge, pp 248–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss A, Brock F, Farid S, Hodder I, Southon J, Taylor RE (2015) Getting to the bottom of it all: a Bayesian approach to dating the start of Çatalhöyük. J World Prehist 28(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best J, Demirergi A, Jones J, Orton D, Mulville J, Pawłowska K, Powell A, Twiss K, Wolfhagen J (2012) Faunal remains, 2012. Çatalhöyük 2012 archive report. Çatalhöyük Research Project, Cambridge, pp 155–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Borić D, Cristiani E (2016) Social networks and connectivity among the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic foragers of the Balkans and Italy. In: Krauß R, Floss H (eds) Southeast Europe before the Neolithisation. University of Tübingen, Tübingen, pp 73–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana DV, Crabtree PJ (2018) Bone implements from Chalcolithic Tepecik-Çiftlik: traces of manufacture and wear on two classes of bone objects recovered from the 2013 excavation season. Quat Int 472:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauvin J (2000) The birth of the gods and the origin of agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Choyke AM (2003) Bronze Age bone and antler working at the Jászdózsa-Kápolnahalom tell. In: Luik H, Choyke A, Batey C, Lougas L (eds) From hooves to horns, from mollusc to mammoth. Manufacture and use of bone artefacts from prehistoric times to the present. Tallinn Book Printers, Tallinn, pp 129–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Christidou R, Coqueugniot E, Gourichon L (2009) Neolithic figurines manufactured from phalanges of equids from Dja’de el Mughara, Syria. J Field Archaeol 34(3):319–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duru R (1994) Höyücek kazilan. Höyücek excavations 1990. Belletin 58:725–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Galili E, Yaroshevich A, Rosen B, Getzov N, Milevski I, Orrelle E, Horwitz LK (2016) Figurative representations from Neveh Yam and other sites in Israel: markers of the Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic south Levant cultures. Israel Explor J 66(2):129–150

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gijn AL (2005) A functional analysis of some late Mesolithic bone and antler implements from the Dutch coastal zone. In: Luik H, Choyke A, Batey C, Lougas L (eds) From hooves to horns, from mollusc to mammoth. Manufacture and use of bone artefacts from prehistoric times to the present. Tallinn Book Printers, Tallinn, pp 47–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder I (2013) Dwelling at Çatalhöyük. In: Hodder I (ed) Humans and landscapes of Çatalhöyük: reports from the 2000–2008 seasons. Cotsen Institute, Los Angeles, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J, Madgwick R, Mulville J, Pawłowska K, Powell A, Twiss K (2013) East Mound faunal remains, 2013. Çatalhöyük 2013 archive report. Çatalhöyük Research Project, Cambridge, pp 134–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisner V (1965) Die Megalithgräbrer der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Westen, Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin, p 308

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisner G, Leisner V (1943) Die Megalithgräber der Iberischen Halbinsel, Der Süden, Gruyter & Co, pp 122–Berlin

  • Maigrot Y (2003) Étude technologique et fonctionnelle de l’outillageen matières dures animales, la station 4 de Chalain (Néolithique final, Jura, France). Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université de Paris 1

  • Maisels CK (2005) The Near East: archaeology in the ‘cradle of civilization’. Routledge, London & New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin L, Meskell L (2012) Animal figurines from Neolithic Çatalhöyük: figural and faunal perspectives. Camb Archaeol J 22(3):401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meskell L, Nakamura C, King R, Farid S (2008) Figured lifeworlds and depositional practices at Çatalhöyük. Camb Archaeol J 18(2):139–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SL, Harding DG (2008) Women’s attire and possible sacred role in 4th millennium northern Kazakhstan. In: Linduff KM, Rubinson KS (eds) Are all warriors male?: gender roles on the ancient Eurasian steppe. AltaMira press, Plymouth, pp 67–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Orelle E, Horwitz LK (2016) The pre-iconography, iconography and iconology of a sixth to fifth millennium BC Near Eastern incised bone. Time Mind 9(1):2–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrelle E (2014) Material images of humans from the Natufian to the Pottery Neolithic periods in the Levant. BAR International Series S2595. Archaeopress, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton D, Anvari J, Gibson C, Last J, Bogaard A, Rosenstock E, Biehl PF (2018) A tale of two tells: dating the Çatalhöyük West Mound. Antiquity 92(363):620–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özbaşaran M, Duru G (2014) Istanbul (IST) area of the East Mound. In: Hodder I (ed) Çatalhöyük excavations. The 2000-2008 seasons. Cotsen Institute, Los Angeles, pp 621–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawłowska K (2014) The smells of Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey: time and space of human activity. J Anthropol Archaeol 36(2014):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawłowska K (in press) Animals at Late Neolithic Çatalhöyük: subsistence, food processing and depositional practices. In: Czerniak L, Marciniak M (eds) Late Neolithic at Çatalhöyük East: excavations of upper levels in the Team Poznan Area. Los Angeles, Cotsen Institute. Submitted in 2012.

  • Pawłowska K, Garcia-Diaz V, Wolfghagen J (2017) Faunal remains from the GDN Area, 2017. Çatalhöyük 2017 archive report. Çatalhöyük Research Project, Cambridge, pp 151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell N, Griffitts JL (2014) Çatalhöyük worked bone: south and 4040 areas. In: Hodder I (ed) Substantive technologies at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 2000–2008 seasons. Cotsen Institute, Los Angeles, pp 277–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarre C (2017) Neolithic figurines of Western Europe, in The Oxford handbook of prehistoric figurines. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 877–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Valera AC (2015) Ídolos Falange, Cervídeos e Equídeos Dados e Problemas a partir dos Perdigões Apontamentos de Arqueologia e Património 10: 6–20

  • Yeomans L (2014) Building 45. In: Hodder I (ed) Çatalhöyük excavations. The 2000-2008 seasons. Cotsen Institute, Los Angeles, pp 283–298

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Arkadiusz Klimowicz, Katarzyna Regulska, Marta Saj, Heeli Schechter, and Jesse Wolfhagen for their technical assistance. We would also like to thank Virginia García-Díaz for her help in technological analysis. Special thanks go to Nerissa Russell for useful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript and to the reviewers for their suggestions. We are also grateful to Ian Hodder for the possibility of participating in the Çatalhöyük Research Project. The deposit from TPC Area was excavated by Marek Z. Barański and Kamilla Pawłowska in 2012. The TPC equid phalanx discussed here was examined by Kamilla Pawłowska in 2012.

Financial disclosure

The GDN research was funded by the National Science Centre of Poland (DEC-2013/11/N/HS3/04889) (MZB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Institute of Geology, Ul. Krygowskiego 12, 61-680, Poznań, Poland

    Kamilla Pawłowska

  2. Academy of Fine Arts, Targ Węglowy 6, 80-836, Gdańsk, Poland

    Marek Z. Barański

Authors
  1. Kamilla Pawłowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marek Z. Barański
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamilla Pawłowska.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The funders had no role in study, design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pawłowska, K., Barański, M.Z. Conceptualization of the Neolithic world in incised equid phalanges: anthropomorphic figurine from Çatalhöyük (GDN Area). Archaeol Anthropol Sci 12, 18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-01006-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-01006-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation