Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing alternative statistics on recent fertility trends in Australia

  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years fertility statistics in the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) publication Births, Australia have suffered from a number of issues, including delayed receipt of registration data from the Registrars and computer processing errors. They prompt questions about the quality of these statistics for measuring the level of fertility and its year-to-year changes. The aim of this paper is to compare three sets of fertility statistics, (1) ABS birth registrations, (2) ABS births by year of occurrence, and (3) births in the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC), at the national and state/territory scales. Annual births by state/territory of usual residence from the three data sources were obtained for the period 2004–2013 or 2004–2014. Recast Estimated Resident Populations from the ABS were used to calculate Total Fertility Rates. For some states and territories there are non-trivial differences in fertility as recorded by the three data sources. In Queensland the trend in fertility according to ABS birth registrations is quite different from that based on the NPDC; in Tasmania and the Northern Territory birth registrations exceed NPDC births by a notable margin. There appears to be more uncertainty about the levels and annual changes in Australian fertility than many users of the data may realise. All three fertility datasets seem to possess some limitations. It is suggested that a new Australian fertility database be created which employs data linkage to incorporate both birth registrations and perinatal data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: ABS Births Australia 2014 (2004–2014) and the AIHW National Perinatal Data Collection (2004–2013)

Fig. 2

Source: Calculated from ABS Births Australia 2014 (2004–2014) and the AIHW National Perinatal Data Collection (2004–2013)

References

  • ABS. (2012a). Births, Australia, 2011. Catalogue no. 3301.0. Canberra: ABS.

  • ABS. (2012b). Australian Demographic Statistics, December quarter 2012. Feature article 2 “Recasting 20 years of ERP”. Catalogue No. 3101.0. Canberra: ABS.

  • ABS. (2013a). Births, Australia, 2012. Catalogue no. 3301.0. Canberra: ABS.

  • ABS. (2013b). Information Paper: Australian Census Longitudinal Dataset, Methodology and Quality Assessment, 2006-2011. Catalogue no. 2080.5. Canberra: ABS.

  • ABS. (2013c) Life Tables for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 2010-2012. Catalogue no. 3302.0.55.003. Canberra: ABS.

  • ABS. (2015a). Births, Australia, 2014. Catalogue no. 3301.0. Canberra: ABS.

  • ABS. (2015b). Australian Demographic Statistics. March quarter 2015. Catalogue no. 3101.0. Canberra: ABS.

  • AIHW. (2014). Maternal mortality: data linkage methodologyFoundations for enhanced maternity data collection and reporting in Australia: National Maternity Data Development Project Stage 1. Catalogue no. PER 65. Canberra: AIHW.

  • AIHW. (2015). Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2013In Brief. Perinatal statistics series no. 31. Catalogue. no. PER 72. Canberra: AIHW.

  • AIHW. (2016). Integrating authority. AIHW web page http://www.aihw.gov.au/data-linking/integrating-authority/. Accessed 2 March 2016.

  • Corr, P. (2015). Democracy and dollars: Use of demography in distribution. In T. Wilson, E. Charles-Edwards, & M. Bell (Eds.), Demography for planning and policy: Australian case studies (pp. 9–29). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, K. (2009). Indigenous birth rates—How reliable are they? People and Place, 17(4), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, R., & Pobke, C. (2008). Recent trends in Australian fertility. Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper. Melbourne: Productivity Commission.

  • McDonald, P., & Kippen, R. (2011). Australian Census Analytic Program: Forecasting Births, 2006. Catalogue no. 2051.0. Canberra: ABS. http://tiny.cc/luto8x.

  • Parr, A., Wilson, T., & Culpin, A. (2008). Estimating and Projecting New South Wales Fertility. Paper presented at the 14th conference of the Australian Population Association, 30 June–3 July, Alice Springs.

  • Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2001). Demography: Measuring modeling population processes. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. (2011). Modelling with NEWDSS: Producing state, regional and local area population projections for New South Wales. In J. Stillwell & M. Clarke (Eds.), Population dynamics and projection methods: Essays in Honour of Philip Rees (pp. 61–97). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. (2014). Simplifying local area population and household projections with POPART. In N. Hoque & L. Potter (Eds.), Emerging techniques in applied demography (pp. 25–38). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, F., Sullivan, E. A., Black, D. A., Jackson Pulver, L. R., & Madden, R. C. (2012). Under-reporting of birth registrations in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12, 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the staff of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) for extracting and supplying births data from the National Perinatal Data Collection and for providing advice about the data. NPDC data originate from state and territory perinatal datasets, including the Victorian Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity. ABS staff were also very helpful in providing information and advice. Thanks are also due to Tony Barnes, Angelique Parr, and AIHW staff whose helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper led to a number of improvements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, T. Comparing alternative statistics on recent fertility trends in Australia. J Pop Research 34, 119–133 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-016-9176-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-016-9176-x

Keywords

Navigation