Abstract
Statistics plays a crucial role in research, planning and decision-making in the health sciences. Progress in technologies and continued research in computational statistics has enabled us to implement sophisticated mathematical models within software that are handled by non-statistician researchers. As a result, over the last decades, medical journals have published a host of papers that use some novel statistical method. The aim of this paper is to present a review on how the statistical methods are being applied in the construction of scientific knowledge in health sciences, as well as, to propose some improvement actions. From the early twentieth century, there has been a remarkable surge in scientific evidence alerting on the errors that many non-statistician researchers were making in applying statistical methods. Today, several studies continue showing that a large percentage of articles published in high-impact factor journals contain errors in data analysis or interpretation of results, with the ensuing repercussions on the validity and efficiency of the research conducted. Scientific community should reflect on the causes that have led to this situation, the consequences to the advancement of scientific knowledge and the solutions to this problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed M (2011) Meeting report: ISOSS Lahore conference. IMS Bull 40(5):11
Altman DG (1994) The scandal of poor medical research. Br Med J 308:283–284
Altman DG (1998) Statistical reviewing for medical journals. Stat Med 17:2661–2674
Altman DG (2002) Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? J Am Med Assoc 287:2765–2767
Altman DG, Goodman SN, Schroter S (2002) How statistical expertise is used in medical research. J Am Med Assoc 287(21):2817–2820
Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS (2002) Statistical methods in medical research, 4th edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
Azoulay P, Zivin JSG, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J Econ 42(3):527–554
Basskin L (2003) Statistical interpretation can also bias research evidence. Br Med J 327(7417):752
Block WM, Morrison ML (2007) Tread lightly or carry a big stick? J Wildl Manage 71(2):301–302
Bornmann L, Daniel HD (2008) What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behaviour. J Doc 64(1):45–80
Breen KJ (2003) Misconduct in medical research: whose responsibility? Intern Med J 33:186–191
Buchan IE (2000) StatsDirect-statistical software for medical research in the 21st century. Br Med J 321:7275
Buyse M, George SL, Evans S, Geller NL, Ranstam J, Scherrer B et al (1999) The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials. Stat Med 18:3435–3451
Cartera RL, Scheafferb RL, Marksa RG (1986) The role of consulting units in statistics departments. Am Stat 40(4):260–264
Committee on Professional Ethics (1999) Ethical guidelines for statistical practice. American Statistical Association. www.amstat.org/about/ethicalguidelines.cfm. Accessed 17 Dec 2015
De Jonge B, Louwaars N (2009) Valorizing science: whose values? EMBO Rep 10(6):535–539
Dormolen JV (1991) Metaphors mediating the teaching and understanding of mathematics. In: Bishop AJ, Mellin-Olsen S, Dormolen JV (eds) Mathematical knowledge: its growts through teaching. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 89–106
Dufault B, Klar N (2011) The quality of modern cross-sectional ecologic studies: a bibliometric review. Am J Epidemiol 174(10):1101–1107
Ercan I, Yaz\(\imath \)c\(\imath \) B, Yang Y, Özkaya G, Cangur S, Ediz B, Kan I (2007) Misusage of statistics in medical research. Eur J Gen Med 4(3):128–134
Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A (2012) Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(42):17028–17033
Felson DT, Cupples LA, Meenan RF (1984) Misuse of statistical methods in arthritis and rheumatism. Arthritis Rheum 27(9):1018–1022
Fernandes-Taylor S, Hyun JK, Reeder RN, Harris AHS (2011) Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals. BMC Res Notes 4:304
Fisher R (1955) Statistical methods and scientific induction. J R Stat Soc B 17(1):69–78
Gal I (2002) Adults’ statistical literacy: meanings, components, responsibilities. Int Stat Rev 70(1):1–51
García E, Alcaraz C (2004) Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers. BMC Med Res Methodol 4:13
Gardner MJ, Machin D, Campbell MJ (1986) Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies. Br Med J 292(22):810–812
Gelles RJ (1993) From yellow pads, to typewriters, to wordprocessors: confessions of a. writer?, author?, scholar? Marriage Fam Rev 18(1–2):81–92
Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S (2007) Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol Sci Public Interest 8(2):53–96
Hall HR, Roussel LA (2012) Evidence-based practice: an integrative approach to research, administration and practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington
Health & Medicine Week (2004) Published research contains high level of statistical errors. 21 June, p 887
Herman A, Notzer N, Libman Z, Braunstein R, Steinberg DM (2007) Statistical education for medical students: concepts are what remain when the details are forgotten. Stat Med 26(23):4344–4351
ISI Council (2010) Declaration on professional ethics. International Statistical Institute, Reykjavik
Judson HF (2004) The great betrayal: fraud in science. Harcourt, New York
Lewis JA (1999) Statistical principles for clinical trials (ICH E9): an introductory note on an international guideline. Stat Med 18:1903–1904
Lipworth WL, Kerridge IH, Carter SM, Little M (2011) Journal peer review in context: a qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing. Soc Sci Med 72:1056–1063
Marks RG, Dawson-Saunders EK, Bailar JC, Dan BB, Verran JA (1988) Interactions between statisticians and biomedical journal editors. Stat Med 7(10):1003–1011
Matcham J, Julious S, Pyke S, O’Kelly M, Todd S, Seldrup J, Day S (2011) Proposed best practice for statisticians in the reporting and publication of pharmaceutical industry-sponsored clinical trials. Pharm Stat 10:70–73
Michel MC (2014) How significant are your data? The need for a culture shift. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmakol 387:1015–1016
Micheel CM, Nass SJ, Omenn GS (eds) (2012) Evolution of translational omics: lessons learned and the path forward. The National Acadamies Press, Washington, DC
Monmonier M (1996) How to lie with maps, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, London
Moriguti S, Diggle PJ, Gower JC, Wallman KK, Ren WS (1992) The role of statisticians: report of the Ad Hoc Committee. Int Stat Rev 60(3):227–246
Nicholls D (1999) Statistics into the 21st century (with discussion). Aust N Z J Stat 41(2):127
Ocaña-Riola R (2007) The misuse of count data aggregated over time for disease mapping. Stat Med 26(24):4489–4504
Ocaña-Riola R (2010) Common errors in disease mapping. Geospat Health 4(2):139–154
OECD (2010) PISA 2009 assessment framework: key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. OECD, Paris
Pike MC, Berstein L (1985) Statistical errors invalidate conclusions in “caffeine and unsaturated fat diet significantly promotes DMBA-induced breast cancer in rats”. Cancer 55(8):1855–1857
Russell L (2011) The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. Stat Politics Policy 2(1)
Salsburg DS (1985) The religion of statistics as practiced in medical journals. Am Stat 39(3):220–223
Schafer A (2004) Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy. J Med Ethics 30:8–24
Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Godlee F, Osorio L, Smith R (2008) What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? J R Soc Med 101:507–514
Schurz G (2014) Philosophy of science: a unified approach. Routledge, New York
Shatz D (2004) Peer review: a critical inquiry. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Maryland
Shulman LS (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res 15:4–14
Siegfried T (2010) Odds are, it’s wrong: science fails to face the shortcomings of statistics. Sci News 177(7):1–13
Smith D, Neutra RR (1993) Approaches to disease cluster investigations in a state health department. Stat Med 12:1757–1762
Smith R (2001) Medical editor lambasts journals and editors. Br Med J 323:651
Smith RW (2009) In search of an optimal peer review system. J Particip Med 1(1):e13
Snee R (1990) Statistical thinking and its contribution to quality. Am Stat 44:116–121
Sokal A, Bricmont J (1997) Impostures intellectuelles. Odile Jacob, Paris
Starbuck WH (2005) How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organ Sci 16(2):180–200
Stephen LG (1985) Statistics in medical journals: a survey of current policies and proposals for editors. Med Pediatr Oncol 13(2):109–112
Stuart TE, Ding WW (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Am J Sociol 112(1):97–144
Wang Q, Zhang B (1998) Research design and statistical methods in Chinese medical journals. J Am Med Assoc 280(3):283–285
Ware JH (2005) Statistical review for medical journals. In: Armitage P, Colton T (eds) Encyclopedia of biostatistics. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston
White KL (1967) Improved medical care statistics and the health services system. Public Health Rep 82(10):847–854
White KL (1973) Priorities for health services information. Health Serv Rep 88(2):106–112
White SJ (1979) Statistical errors in papers in the British Journal of Psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 135:336–342
Wild CJ, Pfannkuch M (1999) Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. Int Stat Rev 67(3):223–265
Zeger SL, Diggle PJ, Liang KY (2004) A Cox model for biostatistics of the future [Department of Biostatistics working paper]. Johns Hopkins University, Berkeley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ocaña-Riola, R. The Use of Statistics in Health Sciences: Situation Analysis and Perspective. Stat Biosci 8, 204–219 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-015-9138-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-015-9138-4